SpaceX’s Genius Plan to Send Dragon to the Moon—Better Than NASA’s 93B SLS

"SpaceX’s Genius Plan to Send Dragon to the Moon—Better Than NASA’s $93B SLS
===
#techmap #techmaps #elonmusk #starshipspacex
===
Intro 0:00
A Dragon-based mission 1:04
Other architectures 10:24
===
1) SOURCES OF THUMBNAIL:
2) SOURCES OF VIDEO AND IMAGES:
proxidesuwa
https://x.com/pr0ximacentaura
PROXI Ch.2426 △
https://www.youtube.com/@Proxima_Channel.2426/videos
TijnM : https://twitter.com/m_tijn
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDA8yz_nQY-0Uxd96-qxYjA
Evan Karen: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDN1X8Fz1oAXX-rBcOWjzmg
Dale Rutherford: https://twitter.com/Dtrford
iamVisual:
https://twitter.com/visual_iam
https://www.youtube.com/@iamVisualVFX/videos
Stanley Creative: https://www.youtube.com/@StanleyCreative/
===
SpaceX’s Genius Plan to Send Dragon to the Moon—Better Than NASA’s $93B SLS
For the first time in half a century, America stands on the edge of a new lunar era. The race to return to the Moon isn’t just about exploration—it’s about leadership, innovation, and the country’s determination to remain the world’s leading space power. Under the renewed vision for American space superiority, Nasa and SpaceX now find themselves at a pivotal crossroads: a choice between the slow, costly traditions of government hardware or the fast, lean efficiency of private enterprise.
As President Donald Trump’s directive calls for planting the Stars and Stripes on the Moon before the end of his second term, all eyes turn to Nasa's new leadership and its partnership with billionaire astronaut Jared Isaacman. The question is no longer whether America will go back—but how. Will it rely on the massive, decades-old SLS rocket and Orion capsule, or embrace SpaceX’s Dragon and Starship systems to carry astronauts to the lunar surface faster and at a fraction of the cost?
SpaceX’s Genius Plan to Send Dragon to the Moon—Better Than NASA’s $93B SLS
On December 18, President Donald Trump issued a pre-holiday directive calling for “American space superiority,” which includes returning to the Moon and placing the American flag there before the end of his second term.
This new mandate increases pressure on Nasa’s leadership, now guided by billionaire astronaut Jared Isaacman. His task is clear: to reform Nasa’s long-standing inefficiencies and steer it toward faster, more effective progress.
For more than a decade, Nasa has remained committed to its own approach: the Orion crewed spacecraft paired with the heavy-lift Space Launch System rocket. The SLS, derived from Space Shuttle technology, has been in slow development since 2011. Some of its core hardware, including the RS-25 engines and solid rocket boosters, dates back even further to earlier projects such as Ares 1 and Ares 5 in the mid-2000s.
SpaceX’s Genius Plan to Send Dragon to the Moon—Better Than NASA’s $93B SLS
By 2025, the SLS rocket alone—excluding the Orion capsule and supporting infrastructure—will have cost roughly $31.6 billion. When combined with the broader Artemis program, total spending from 2012 to 2025 is expected to exceed $93 billion.
These delays and rising costs pose a serious challenge to both Artemis’s long-term viability and the President’s objective. As a result, a move toward commercial alternatives is becoming increasingly likely.
That discussion inevitably centers on SpaceX, whose spacecraft and launch systems—especially Starship and Dragon—have drawn wide attention. The successful Crew Dragon mission to the International Space Station in May 2020 proved that a privately developed spacecraft could carry astronauts safely and at a fraction of the cost.
===
Subcribe TechMap: http://tinyurl.com/3z5ysrtf"