Joseph Trevisani, economic and currency analyst at the financial information portal FXStreet, joins NTD to discuss the economic outlook for the United States going into 2026. He shares with NTD his assessments of job creation and hiring rates, and President Donald Trump’s announcement about mortgage bonds. -- 📺 Watch NTD News 24/7 on cable, broadcast, and streaming: https://www.ntd.com/watch
The new jobs report today shows the US
economy seeing modest gains in in the
number of jobs. Meanwhile, President
Trump announced a purchase of $200
billion dollars in mortgage bonds to
lower loan rates. Joining us to discuss
is Joseph Travisani, economic and
currency analyst at FX Street. Joseph,
good afternoon. Uh hope you're doing
well so far in the new year. Uh so jobs
increased by 50,000 uh and this was
below forecasts. Is the labor market
stalling?
I think the labor market is reasonably
solid. By the way, good afternoon, Don.
Nice to see you in the new year. I think
it's reasonably solid. It's not
producing a great a great number of jobs
as in the numbers out of the labor
department. But do you remember what we
have here? They have revamped their way
of calculating jobs. And so it's a
different it's a different ballgame now
without the input of what used to be
called the birth death model. So it
looks to be still a pretty reasonably
solid job market.
What do you think is contributing to uh
perhaps uh constrained job creation?
Because during the Biden administration,
you remember this, we were often getting
monthly numbers of over a 100,000,
>> right? And a lot of those numbers in the
Biden administration were later advised
revised away which was the problem with
using the birth death model that the b
that the labor department uses or used
to use to classify and to calculate
estimate jobs that are created in the
month. So it it's hard to say exactly
what is behind you're not getting the
type of 100,000 150,000 jobs that you
were getting. As I said, part of that is
a revision of the way they're
calculating jobs. Part of it, I think,
is probably also uncertainty about where
the economy is going to go.
>> What about tariffs? How do tariffs play
into this equation? Is it having an
impact that's leading to lower hiring?
>> Well, that's interesting. I don't think
it really is yet, and I don't I don't
anticipate that it's going to. there
when the tariffs were first started and
as an economic policy back last year in
April and May, there was a great deal of
speculation uh in the economic community
and the forecasting community that this
would be a huge hit to jobs and it would
be a huge boost to inflation. Neither
has happened. I thought at the time, and
I still do, that the threat to
inflation, which could eventually turn
into a threat to jobs, was overstated
because manufacturers and retailers will
absorb and did absorb much of the
increases to maintain their market
share. So, that particular problem
hasn't occurred. Will the the tariffs um
achieve their stated goal of
revitalizing US uh manufacturing which
would of course mean more jobs has yet
to be seen.
>> So Joseph I don't think you would
classify this as extraordinarily strong
job growth. So if that is the case I
want to ask you can the economy grow
without such growth?
Uh yes, I think it can because what
you're looking at, remember behind these
job numbers that we've seen and if you
look at the fourth uh the last three job
numbers, they're actually flat because
the the third prior 31,
I'm sorry, the prior three months ago
was down 105,000. So the last three jobs
numbers are flat. But if you look behind
that, you look at job at a GDP that in
the last three quarters is growing. If
you take the uh Atlanta Fed's GDP
estimate for the fourth quarter of 5.1%
their latest one at a 4.4% rate in the
last three quarters, that's the second,
third, and the fourth quarters of last
year. With that kind of GDP growth, it
is very difficult not to expect a much
stronger job market in this year. I
would say 100, 150,000, 200, many more
jobs once the
economy gets sorted out as to what is
actually happening and where the growth
is occurring.
>> Okay, we'll keep a close watch on that,
but I want to move on to President Trump
announcing a purchase of $200 billion in
mortgage bonds. And of course, you know,
the goal is to reduce mortgage rates,
lower monthly payments, uh make it more
affordable to buy a home. How how much
of a difference do you think that's
going to make in actually lowering
mortgage mortgage rates?
>> Well, it will. I mean, the market I mean
the 30-year mortgage 30-year average or
the 30-year mortgage dropped 22 points
today. Um, that's a pretty substantial
amount for a one-day move. It's now
below 6%. I think mortgage rates, the
two things that go into, of course, um,
housing purchases are jobs, which are
stable and steady, and interest rates.
mortgage rates specifically. If you look
at the numbers over the past five years,
the
uh the number of home purchase, existing
home sales has dropped almost 40% from
the fourth quarter of 2020.
And the large portion of that is the
rise in interest rates that attended the
inflation that we saw throughout the
middle and later part of the Biden
administration. So I think yes, two
things are true here. One, the market
now senses what the direction is. I
don't think the Fed is going to
intervene in the markets to the same
degree that it did in CO where it bought
like 500 million 500 billion and more
and over a trillion in total of MBS
paper. I don't think that's going to
happen, but it certainly is the
direction
markets are going. And if the Fed
[clears throat] moves a little bit more
on lowering the Fed funds rate, I think
market rates and interest rates will
follow.
>> Okay. So, what are the core reasons uh
that mortgage rates are higher now than
before? And uh do you think that
President Trump will have to you know
continually purchasing these bonds in
order to keep the rates uh sustained at
a lower lower rate?
>> Well, it's an interesting question. Uh
will President Trump continue to berate
the federal authorities and the Fed
about what he wants for his policy? Yes,
I think he probably will. That is Mr.
Trump's way of doing business. the
greatest I think the greatest impact on
the decline in home sales particularly
existing home sales um has been the rise
in interest rates and they attended the
inflation of the Biden administration
from the when we went up to 9% in total
for the CPI. So I think that is the
greatest impact. On top of that you have
a falling off of about 20% in the number
of new homes started. New homes tend to
be the the homes that first-time buyers
um buy that they contract for in a
mortgage. That is the most sensitive I
think sector for
interest rates. In other words, new home
buyers who have of course less money,
less established credit need lower
interest rates more than established
buyers. So the more you get interest
rates down the more that particular
sector of the market of the housing
market I think will expand. Once there
are buyers on line then you get builders
online then you get new home starts. So
I do think that interest rates going
down headed lower both by the Fed's
pressure and if you want by job owning
from President Trump will impact and
will improve the housing market.
>> Okay. Just finally uh two things here.
One is do you think if President Trump
stop stops buying these uh these bonds
that rates will go back up? And um the
second thing is what is the impact on
affordability if large investors are
barred from purchasing more single
family homes which President Trump said
he's taking steps to do this?
>> Yes. I don't think it's ne I don't think
if the if the Fed stops no one in the
market is expecting the Fed to start a
massive MBS buying program or or loan
buying program to drive rates lower. I
don't think that's the case. I don't
think that's in the cards. I don't think
anybody expects it. So, if the Fed buys
200 billion of MBS and then doesn't buy
any more, I don't think it's going to
make a lot of difference in the overall
interest rates and the 30-year mortgage.
That will go up and down with what rates
are doing in general. If the federal
authorities ban, as you say, investment
in houses by corporations, then yes,
that will free up, it will take some of
the pressure from the housing market
because after all, why is a large
corporation or a private equity company
buying homes? Well, they're buying it
because they expect prices to go up.
They're not going to live in the homes.
So if that is limited, yes, it will
leave more homes available for the
retail buyer and take some pressure from
prices because if you look at the median
home price, it's almost almost 50%
in the past, I think since co that is a
very high increase and makes it
difficult for retail buyers, especially
new buyers, firsttime buyers to get into
the housing market.
>> Okay, Joseph, it's always good to speak
with you. Thank you so much for coming
on today.
>> Thanks for having me on. Have a good
afternoon.
>> You as well.