Why King James I Was Obsessed With Burning Witches

Museum Mysteries
14 followers
1 Video View·Jan 2, 2026
James, the only son of Mary, Queen of Scots, and Henry Stuart, was born in 1566 during an
ongoing conflict between Scotland and England. When he was one year old, he ascended the Scottish
throne as King James VI after his mother abdicated her position, and was crowned King James I of
England some years later. Some of his accomplishments as king were achieving an eventual peace between
and burning a whole lot of people alive. Modest goals, really.
So, today we're taking a look at James I, the witch-burning son of Mary, Queen of Scots.
But before we get started, be sure to subscribe to the Weird History channel.
After that, leave a comment and let us know what other infamous royals you'd like to hear about.
Okay, time to crack this kingly nut.
The religious violence of the Protestant Reformation and the history of bad blood
between Queen Elizabeth I and Mary, Queen of Scots loomed over the reign of King James I.
Both issues influenced him to keep a firm hold on the political, but fear the supernatural,
despite the fact that ghosts are not real. Um, hopefully.
After inheriting the throne of Scotland as an infant, the dual-threat king was crowned King
James I of England after the passing of his cousin, Queen Elizabeth I in 1603.
During James' reign, witch hunts, trials, and executions swept through the British Isles,
and he remained fixated on their religious and spiritual consequences.
Whether it was by commissioning a new English-language translation of the Bible in 1604,
or obsessing over alleged cases of witchcraft,
James believed himself to be an instrument of divine authority and justice.
Ultimately, he unified the warring kingdoms of Scotland and England,
but it was a long and difficult path to peace.
All that witch-burning probably didn't help. Or maybe it did?
James was born a king in a world heavily divided between Catholics and Protestants.
His mother was an avowed Catholic, and when James was an infant, she wanted him to become one too.
She gave baby James a Catholic baptism, proclaiming her intention to continue a
tradition of Catholic monarchs ruling over Protestant Scotland.
But when Mary abdicated in 1567, she gave up her right to raise her son.
Which is a weird rule.
James was subsequently raised by his tutor George Buchanan as a Protestant,
and he was encouraged to despise his mother and her religion.
James' interest in witchcraft was well known throughout his two kingdoms,
to the point that it likely inspired William Shakespeare's Macbeth.
And if you've ever read Shakespeare's Macbeth,
you know that nobody should feel good about inspiring Shakespeare's Macbeth.
The representations of witches in the play conforms to James' descriptions from demonology.
His obsession was a bit like being afraid of ghosts, because you saw one in a movie one time.
James' supposition that supernatural storms delayed his wife's arrival in Scotland
and nearly cost him his life correlate to Shakespeare's portrayal of witches brewing up storms.
Additionally, Shakespeare probably wrote Macbeth as a short play,
because he knew James didn't have the patience to sit through a long performance.
Maybe he should get on TikTok.
The North Berwick Trials of 1590 marks one of the first and largest witch hunts in Scottish history,
and James played a significant role in them.
After he married Princess Anne of Denmark, they set sail for Scotland,
but were met with a series of storms that nearly put an end to the young couple
and delayed their arrival.
Think the parents in Frozen, if they'd squeaked through.
The ordeal was so traumatic that James suspected foul play.
In other words, he wanted to blame someone for the weather.
He felt the only reasonable explanation was someone,
or a group of people, had tried to sabotage his marriage and target his life.
In response, James initiated a witch hunt that rapidly expanded
as the accused made confessions and further allegations under torture.
Turns out, torture is nothing like Jack Bauer makes it look.
Mostly, people just tell you what you want to hear.
In total, at least 70 people were accused of witchcraft, and most were sentenced to death.
Europe's witch hysteria predominantly victimized women,
which you probably knew if you ever saw Hocus Pocus.
Historian Susanna Lipscomb estimates around 70-80% of accusations in this period
were directed at women.
James believed women were naturally more likely to be witches,
since they were frailer than men,
making them, quote,
easier to be entrapped in those gross snares of the devil.
Apparently, the devil sets traps.
Like the Predator.
Though both men and women stood trial for witchcraft in North Berwick,
far more of the accused were women.
Scholar Deborah Willis even theorized James primarily targeted women
in the North Berwick witch trials to rid himself of an overbearing,
malevolent female gaze left by Queen Elizabeth and his mother,
thus reasserting his own power.
Talk about mommy issues.
James considered witchcraft a serious crime,
so he tailored the punishments to match what he believed to be the severity of the offense.
In 1604, only a year into his reign in England,
he passed a new Witchcraft Act.
Though other witchcraft laws had already been enacted by Henry VIII and Elizabeth I,
James' act took a hardline approach.
For instance,
convicted witches were hanged,
regardless of whether the accused had allegedly caused bodily harm to others.
During the North Berwick trials of 1590,
James believed he had been a target of magical mischief.
Accused witches testified the devil hated James because
the king is the greatest enemy he hath in the world.
Testimonies like this were political gifts for James.
According to author Donald Tyson,
he used them to position himself as
an avenging knight of the Christian faith.
Oh, so kind of like the Doom guy.
James claimed divine authority in his crusade against the dark magic
Satan had allegedly unleashed throughout his kingdom.
James wanted to get the word out about the dangers of witchcraft
in the wake of the North Berwick trials.
In 1591, he sponsored the publication of News from Scotland,
a pamphlet that further sensationalized reports about the trials,
stoking fear and paranoia about witches.
This helped James position himself as a defender
of demon-destroying law and order within his realms.
Like the Doom guy, if he also sold Bibles.
The North Berwick witch trial stirred James' imagination
and convinced him witches were a clear and present danger.
The events influenced him to write a text about witchcraft
and how to deal with those who practice it.
Demonology was first published in Scotland in 1597,
then in England six years later.
The text thoroughly identified different kinds
of supernatural activities and occurrences.
James involved himself in witchcraft trials
because of his fascination with the supernatural
and his self-affirmed role as guardian against the occult.
In this position, he was said to be able to uncover,
by his own skill, notorious impostures.
One of the highest profile cases involved Anne Gunter,
a woman who claimed to be possessed by demons in the early 1600s.
James became interested in the case after Gunter
made allegations against people she claimed had bewitched her,
and he met with her to get the full story.
During their conversation, James compelled the woman
to confess it was a hoax.
It was a ruse hatched between Anne and her father
to exact revenge on people they believed had wronged them.
There was no shortage of darkness in the life
of young King James, and it might have also helped
inspire his fascination with witchcraft.
When James ascended to the throne at just 13 months,
his mother had been ousted.
Not long after, his father died in an explosion.
By the time of the North Berwick witch trials,
Mary Queen of Scots had been executed
by Queen Elizabeth I of England.
In fairness, we might start believing in curses too,
after all that.
Religion and politics were inseparable
in early modern Europe.
In England, the crown was the head of the Anglican church.
Moreover, ministers and rebels sometimes used biblical passages
to question the authority of kings and queens.
Since there were many unofficial English translations
of the Bible, they weren't all the same.
The Geneva Bible, for example, was politically subversive
since it included annotations and marginalia
that criticized royalty.
That's the fun Bible!
By commissioning a new Bible, James hoped
that he could justify his monarchical authority
in the religious text by standardizing the language
and making it free from subversive commentary.
Furthermore, James hoped the newly translated text
would become the single Bible to unify different schools
of Protestantism in England and Scotland
and strengthen his political legitimacy.
And thus, the King James Bible was created,
one of the most widely known versions
of the text to this day.
Contrary to what the name may suggest,
the King James Bible was not created solely by King James.
Rather, James brought together a diverse group
of language scholars to create the new translation.
The translators, however, did not have the final word.
That's what happens when you work for a king.
After they created a suitable version,
committees made up of religious and royal officials
had to approve it,
and final approval was granted by the monarch himself.
All in all, the new translation took seven years to complete.
Rewriting religion to suit your kingly needs
is a long and storied tradition.
Just look at Hank.
James's reign may have divided subjects by labels
like Catholic, Protestant, witch, and sorcerer,
but his greatest legacy was unity.
He brought together the Scottish and English monarchies
by ascending to both thrones in relatively quick succession.
Even prior to the Scottish Wars of Independence
in the 13th and 14th centuries,
England and Scotland were completely separate countries
with their own monarchies, churches,
and systems of law and education.
Moreover, the two kingdoms shared a history marked by warfare.
Though he became King James VI of Scotland in 1567,
James also had a strong claim to the English throne
through the royal ancestry of his mother and father.
When Queen Elizabeth I of England passed on in 1603,
she named her cousin James as her heir.
The union of crowns was a major step
towards political unification.
Sure, he may have only achieved peace
by ruling both countries simultaneously,
and he may have executed a whole lot of people
based on his own superstition,
but you can't argue with the results.
So, what do you think?
Was King James a great unifier,
or just another royal wacko?
Let us know in the comments below,
and while you're at it,
check out some of these other videos
from our Weird History.
