Tulsi Gabbard makes Mark Kelly look like a CLOWN when she refuses to play his silly games

Hey y'all and welcome to PolitiBrawl. My name is Brian and Tulsi Gabbard exposes Mark Kelly as a fraud and a hypocrite in this congressional hearing. The way his rhetoric no longer matches his words is telling. Let's dive in. Can you explain to me then why you doubted the intelligence community's conclusions in these two cases, Duma and Khan Sheikhun, but not the others? And please be specific. These two cases were being looked at as a, to be used as a pretext for a major military movement and another, my fear was, a repeat of the deployment of another half a million soldiers like we saw in Iraq towards what was the Obama administration's goal, which was regime change in Syria. The question specifically that I raised around these two came about because there were two reasons. One, that assessment was made with high confidence and low information. The information that they had came from those on the ground in an al-Qaeda controlled area and therefore were al-Qaeda linked sources. And there was conflicting information that came from the UN's office on the prohibition of chemical weapons inspectors, as well as an MIT professor, Ted Postel, who looked at these extensively. So when Russia was denying Assad's use of chemical weapons, they accused the U.S. of supporting terrorists. This is a line that Putin used frequently during the Syrian civil war as he supported Assad. Syrian officials made similar comments. They did it repeatedly. They did it in public. They did it at the United Nations. In 2016, you gave an interview in which you said, and this is a quote, the U.S. is providing direct and indirect support to terrorist groups in order to overthrow the Syrian government. And in 2019, on the democratic presidential debate stage, you said of President Trump, this is a quote, this current president is continuing to betray us. We were supposed to be going after al-Qaeda. But over years now, not only have we not gone after al-Qaeda, our president is supporting al-Qaeda. So I'm interested to hear what was your goal in saying these things. And did you consider before saying them the motives of Iran and Russia, what their motives might have been before making these claims? Senator, as as someone who enlisted in the military specifically because of al-Qaeda's terrorist attack on 9-11 and committing myself and my life to doing what I could to defeat these terrorists, it was shocking and a betrayal to me and every person who was killed on 9-11, their families and my brothers and sisters in uniform. When as a member of Congress, I learned about President Obama's dual programs that he had begun really to overthrow the regime of Syria and being willing to through the CIA's Timber Sycamore program that has now been made public of working with and arming and equipping al-Qaeda in an effort to overthrow that regime, starting yet another regime change war in the Middle East. DoD train and equip program, again begun under President Obama, is widely been known, looked at and studied that ultimately resulted in over half a billion dollars being used to train who they called moderate rebels, but were actually fighters working with and aligned with al-Qaeda's affiliate on the ground in Syria, all to move forward with their regime change and not acknowledging what was obvious at the time and what has unfortunately born true, which was that a regime change war in Syria, much like the regime change wars in Iraq, the toppling of Gaddafi and Mubarak, while these are all dictators, would likely result in the rise of Islamist extremists like al-Qaeda taking power. I shed no tears for the fall of the Assad regime, but today we have an Islamist extremist who is now in charge of Syria, as I said, who danced on the streets to celebrate the 9-11 attack, who ruled over Idlib with an Islamist extremist governance, and who has already begun to persecute and kill and arrest religious minorities like Christians in Syria. I understand. Why that should be acceptable to anyone is beyond me. It shouldn't be. It is certainly not in our interests. I appreciate your answer and thank you. My concern has to do with the tendency to repeat Russian and Syrian, and even in some cases, I think we'll get into in the closed session, Iranian information, and to discount what comes from our intelligence community. Senator, every American deserves to know that people in our own government were providing support to our sworn enemy, al-Qaeda. That should not be acceptable by anyone. Man, oh man, what a difference a few months make. Mark Kelly's line of questioning is actually pretty solid here, ensuring that Tulsi Gabbard is making sure that, hey, we're not taking too much Russian information, we're not taking too much Iranian information, because those regimes will try to flood the zone with propaganda, okay? That's what they do. That's what they love to do because they hate the United States just that much. Yeah, Putin, as much as he's trying to save Russia, is doing it a disservice personally. Russian history is weird, by the way. You can always expect a Russian to be paranoid, and so they're going to do paranoid things. It's why Europe never trusts Russia with anything. And so they're going to try to flip the script wherever they can. They're going to try to take a piece off the chessboard wherever they can. They tried to do that in Syria, and it technically worked. But of course, what Tulsi Gabbard was talking about is that we did regime change in Iraq. It failed miserably. What was it, a million casualties? Then Libya has become a completely failed state ever since we removed Gaddafi. Then Syria? Syria ain't looking too good right now. Okay, it is a nightmare over there. And Mark Kelly's asking smart questions. That is until his ridiculous video saying that you can refuse illegal orders. Hey, y'all, about half this country has high blood pressure. And with Thanksgiving and Christmas coming up, that means you are going to be sitting across from people that you love that are likely affected by it. Some might not know it. Some might not talk about it. But that's why this is the perfect moment to take charge of your health or help someone else with theirs. So go to 120life.com. That's 120life.com and use my code BRAWL for 20% off. Try it risk-free for two weeks. And if your blood pressure doesn't come down, you're going to get a full refund. So there's nothing to lose except your high blood pressure numbers. So use code BRAWL for 20% off of your order today. This is what happened. Last week, the six veteran Democrat lawmakers cut a controversial video to service members, warning them about the importance of adhering to the Constitution and rejecting illegal orders. Participants in the video included Senators Kelly and Slotkin, as well as Representatives Jason Crowe, Maggie Goodlander, Chris DiLuzio, and Chrissy Houlihan. Those folks are now known as the Seditious Six because what was in that video was by definition sedition. That's where we're at, folks. The natural endpoint of Democrat rhetoric is here. And it took one of the normal ones in Mark Kelly. I repeat, the Democrat rhetoric scheme has finally reached its near endpoint. And the rhetoric is telling, saying that servicemen and women, people who quite literally are in the military, can refuse alleged illegal orders. That, by definition, flies in the face of not just basic military doctrine. That is an incitement. That is a direct, hey, wink, wink, you don't have to listen to certain orders. There is a legal code that quite literally says in federal law that if you're inciting U.S. forces to disobey orders, you are guilty of sedition. Now, the question is, what do you do with this information? There has been a lack of people who need to be properly indicted. As now, we've seen federal judges randomly saying, oh, Letitia James didn't technically do anything wrong because of a procedural issue, so we got to throw out the case. Oh, James Comey had the exact same problem. Procedural issue, throw out the case. Procedural issues matter in an era where, guess what? We used to abuse our legal system. That used to happen. That's why we have our laws to begin with. That's why we have the Magna Carta. That's why we have the Constitution. That's why we have our Bill of Rights. The legal codes that we write in place were literally written to correct bad behavior from a former legal system. We are watching bad behavior now in a completely different light. It's no longer these weird judges going around and then saying things aren't laws. Oh, wait a minute. That is what's happening. Mark Kelly's comments don't happen in a vacuum. Mark Kelly's comments require a long laundry list and a long set of time. I phrased that weirdly. I apologize. It requires so much of this weird extra buildup to get to where we are, to where basically you had six sitting members of Congress that had been in the military or the CIA. Basically, you have them out there saying, yeah, you can refuse orders. I'm sorry. That's not how the military works. Our legal code has this morally gray area where if you're not being direct about what you're saying, you can skirt around any potential consequences. That era is coming to an end. Now in this internet age where we can pretty much say whatever we want and get away with it, we've now reached a chaotic tipping point where eventually the dam's going to burst. We're going to have to make examples. It's not the right way to phrase this. We're going to have to up the ante on libel and slander laws at this point. We're going to have to change the way we do things on social media because an incitement to sedition is the destruction of a nation. We have six Democrats who participated in it. In the video you just saw, Tulsi Gabbard is trying to talk about something that's obvious and true. Back then, you at least had Mark Kelly asking an honest question, but I don't trust him to do that anymore. The sheer hypocrisy of the situation is absolutely staggering. I'm beyond confused. He calls her a traitor and a Russian asset and now he's talking about sedition. I don't like the potential end point of this. I really don't. But this is the bed that he's now made for himself. Let him lie in it. But let me know what you think down in the comments below. My name is Brian. Hope you enjoyed that segment here on Politobrawl. Don't forget to like and subscribe. Catch you on the next one. Until then, all the good.