Naukowcy przypuszczają, że nasz wszechświat mógł powstać w czarnej dziurze!

The Big Bang was not the beginning. More and more scientists currently believe that our universe may be inside the black hole. It's hard to believe, isn't it? However, the more data the James Webb Telescope delivers, the more it becomes clear that the well-known concept of the young universe does not match the current observations. New, even crazy structures appear all the time and radically undermine our current theories. The Big Bang was considered an undeniable fact, but the truth is that the theories, which a few years ago sounded like pure science fiction, are now gaining popularity. The James Webb Space Telescope is turning science upside down, and now it was even announced that we live in a black hole. The proof of this is the direction of the galaxies discovered by JWST in the early Universe. The latest studies conducted by the scientist Lior Shamir from Kansas State University show that the directions of the galaxies are not randomly placed. It seems that the era we observe with the James Webb Telescope has a very specific direction of rotation. This does not match the assumption of an isotropic universe, in which the galaxies would have to rotate left and right. However, it is not true that almost all galaxies analyzed by Shamir rotate in the same direction. This indicates that our universe actually has a hidden direction, and this fact leads to another exciting assumption. If the universe has a direction, there must be a clock for this direction. If we follow the rules of physics, this clock must be huge. What makes all the galaxies observed by the Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey rotate in the same direction? As part of the JADES project, hundreds of spiral galaxies were studied, which were created just a few hundred million years after the Big Bang. Thanks to computer-aided analysis, Shamir was able to clearly determine that about 50% more galaxies rotate in the opposite direction to the Milky Way than in the same direction. In a truly isotropic universe, this ratio should be about 50 to 50. Each direction of rotation is equally likely. However, JWST shows a clear deviation. This asymmetry is so strong that it can be seen not only by algorithms, but even with the naked eye in JWST photos. This discovery indicates something that we did not know before. If the universe had built-in feeling of rotation at that time, it can tell us more about the liberating factor. The theory of the black hole of the mother. Ironically, it is believed that the gigantic black hole is a factor that liberates the built-in feeling of rotation. This black hole is very likely to be the birthplace of our universe. In his studies, Shamir proves that the spin in the early universe confirms the so-called cosmology of black holes. This theory assumes that our universe could have been created inside a black hole in a higher-level mother universe. If this black hole rotates, like almost all known black holes, it could transmit its momentum to the emerging universe. The observed symmetry of the rotating galaxies would then be nothing more than a fingerprint of this mother black hole and the cosmic heritage that is visible to this day. Shamir's studies do not give a final answer, but provide strong evidence. The direction in which galaxies rotate may be the key to a much better understanding. More and more evidence indicates that our universe is just a bubble in a much larger cosmic structure. If our universe is a child of a black hole, everything changes. All our cosmology must be rewritten. The cosmology of black holes does not describe our universe as an isolated, one-time event, but rather as a product of the mother universe. According to this concept, what we perceive as a great explosion is not an absolute beginning, but rather a passage, a portal through a black hole that exists in a higher dimension. In their event horizon, matter falls under the influence of unimaginable gravitational forces. However, instead of becoming a real entity, as the classical theory of relativity assumes, some researchers suspect that in the extreme range, quantum and gravitational forces cause a reflection, i.e. a reflection of matter. This reflection could give rise to a new time-space, According to this view, our universe would still be the interior of a black hole. The mother black hole existed in a larger cosmos, and its collapse led to the birth of our universe. This theory answers several puzzles at the same time. For example, why do the galaxies rotate? As you can see in Shamir's research, they show a directional tendency. The moment of the mother black hole could have a significant impact on a new time-space, at least at the beginning. This concept fits perfectly into the cyclical cosmology of Roger Penrose. His idea of conformal cyclical cosmology states that the universes are constantly reborn when the old universe reaches its final stage and disappears through the black hole and radiation. The transition from one cycle to the next does not occur through complete destruction, but through transformation. Black holes play a key role in this process. They are engines that transfer matter and information to the next cosmic era. Our already vast universe would then probably be only one of many and only one stage in an endless chain of universes, each of them arising as a result of the collapse of the black hole in the previous cycle. What we have so far perceived as a beginning and an end can be a mistake, and the cosmos shows us an eternal cycle of collapse, transformation and rebirth. The image that emerges is radical. Black holes are not blind spots of physics, but channels of the birth of new worlds. Three models of the origin of the cosmos. If the beginnings are also the ends, and the principles of physics are elastic, we are in a completely new cosmos. New studies and their groundbreaking results show how little we know about the origin and end of the cosmos. Scientists have presented us with three main cosmological narratives. They are not necessarily contradictory, but they shed light on the same origin, although from different perspectives. The classical Big Bang, the theory of reflection and the cosmology of black holes are similar, but they are fundamentally different in detail. The classical Big Bang describes in standard cosmology the universe, which was created about 13.8 billion years ago from an extremely hot, dense point of individuality. Space, time, matter and energy were created as a result of one event. Thanks to the rapid expansion, i.e. inflation, the universe expanded in a fraction of a second. This theory explains many observations such as the radiation of the cosmic background and the placement of galaxies on a large scale. However, it has its limitations. Where did the individuality come from? What was before and why does the universe exist at all? To overcome these problems, some physicists propose models whose Big Bang is not the absolute beginning, but the transition. In the so-called scenarios of the Big Bang, the former universe falls into an extreme density state, in which quantum and gravitational forces prevent the complete individuality. Instead, the universe reflects and starts all over again. This means that there is no first beginning, but rather an eternal cycle of expansion and shrinking. This is consistent with concepts such as conformal cyclical cosmology of Penrose, in which the universes are created as another era of infinite space. Reflection models can also explain phenomena such as the surprisingly early development of galaxies. The theory that universes are created inside black holes goes even further. When a star or even the whole universe collapses, its matter does not disappear in an unsolvable individuality, but creates a new area of time and space inside. A small universe. According to this view, our universe is a product of a black hole in a larger material cosmos. What is interesting, the momentum of the black hole could explain why the early galaxies, studied by JWST, prefer to rotate in one direction. Black holes would therefore be not only the final points of matter, but also the channels of the birth of new worlds. In a time when the classic Big Bang tells a single story of creation, the models of reflection and cosmology of black holes place the beginning in the framework of the cyclical, and even the hierarchy of many universes. Both avoid individuality as a beginning, which has always remained an unsolved problem in classical physics. These ideas resemble the cosmology of the multiverse of ancient Germanic peoples, who lived 2000 years ago and more, and perceived their gods and opponents located in nine worlds. Reflection theories emphasize the eternity of the cyclical cosmos, and the cosmology of black holes is a generational model, in which each of them gives birth to new universes through portals. This is identical to the model of creation and the hierarchy of the gods of the Vedas, which later gave rise to Hinduism and the idea of eternal cycles in our lives. Of course, all the new theories in which the universe was not created by chance, but is part of even greater orders, are particularly exciting. If we transfer these physical discoveries to other areas of science, such as philosophy, and even religion, we come to the idea of ​​infinity, rebirth and higher meaning. Higher cosmic order. The meaning of everything? If we think about the new origin and nature of the universe, the question of the great conductor of the orchestra changes. The directions of the rotation of galaxies can be explained by the theory of black holes, but not by the chain of events and the possible diversity of universes and the enormous dimensions of this infinite chain of creation. The classic theory of the Big Bang speaks of a radical beginning. Space, time and matter arise from nothing. This model corresponds to the linear concept of history, like a book that starts on the first page and ends with the last chapter at some point. This logic also shapes our Western thinking. Birth, life, death, beginning and end. However, it leaves one key question unanswered. Why does this first chapter even exist? Theories of reflection solve this riddle in a different way. Here, the Big Bang is not the beginning, but the transition. The universes, in a sense, breathe, expand, collapse and reappear. This eternal cycle resembles the ideas that have existed in ancient cultures for thousands of years. The Indian concept of Kalp, the Greek idea of eternal return. This is not about a one-time act of creation, but about a larger pattern that encompasses everything. Finally, the cosmology of black holes poses perhaps the most radical thesis. Our universe is a child of a black hole in the mother cosmos. What looks to us like the end of matter, in a broader perspective, is a family channel. Each collapse creates a gate, and behind this gate a new space-time can be created. This idea connects physics with symbolism. The end and the beginning are not opposites, but two sides of the same process. First of all, cyclical ideas, which in a broader context make more sense than the idea of beginning and end, raise new questions. Who or what directs this cycle or causes it? Can the process of life, death and rebirth on the cosmic level be a pure coincidence? Does some kind of intelligence work here? Or maybe even God? Subscribe to the channel now and be up to date with every new video.