約翰內斯牧師的隱居生活 兼職隱士的另一年生活 - 第 3 集 - 四周都是梯田

但這片雪沒有維持很久 至少不在南邊 很快我可以回到我遺失的花園工作 其中一項是裁縫 我做得有點遲 雖然我不確定結果 但我無法丟棄遺物 裁縫很容易 這是好事 因為我有很大的計劃 在屋頂上的屋頂上 如果我能永遠留在這裡 我會想做蝴蝶保育 但我對野蝴蝶的愛意 是想提供更多的食物 以避免牠們被人群聚集 我又開始在花園的屋頂上工作 這片土地已經有很長的歷史 從去年9月開始 當我來到牆壁上建築時 2024年 儘管我沒有在場 但我還是有很多東西要做 我還回到屋頂屋頂 我正在修復倒塌的屋頂 穩定一些位置 建造新的屋頂 希望會有三層 一個大水庫 一個新的種植空間 大量的石頭 也在下面的花園製造力 但最重要的是 電腦工作太單調 在這集的結束時 我再次帶你回到 《雅緻》的寺院 通過《雅緻》 到目前為止 我們看了宗教 是一個與正義有關的德行 並把它分別為 我認為 或許更好的稱謂 現代的靈性 在一種無形的尋找 尋找更高的東西 在實際層面 這更多是一個 比任何基礎關係 更重要 我們說 這讓宗教 呈現了真相 並表達了 慈悲行為 這是唯一可能的 因為慈悲 必須指向 真實的東西 無論真實或幻想 現代靈性 我建議 通常沒有 慈悲的定義 如果有 它會成為一個宗教 也就是說 我們用這個詞語 它有自己的世界故事 有自己的權利 規則和指令 我們知道 現代靈性的宣傳者 可能會視缺乏真實性 作為獲勝的特點 因為誰可以 以神的知識 作為單純的死亡 然而 在我的回應中 我提出了 一個人可以 以所有的知識 作為宗教 所以 宗教可以 是智慧上誠實 和謙虛 它的最低限度的承諾 是我們知道足夠 瞭解佛教 但也許 對於知識的承諾 起初 有著不同的 基礎 可能是 現代靈性 所提到的 後來的父母 對於任何真實的承諾 也可能是 實際的憂慮 例如 和平的渴望 這些 似乎都被承諾 是靈性 承諾 現代靈性 是避免 經常被認為 是宗教的 不耐煩 我明白 渴望 和平的渴望 不耐煩 互惑 可能 是現代的德 但我想提出 兩件事 第一 理論上的 封閉 並非 真實的 封閉 第二 這種 封閉 並非 真實的 封閉 是不耐煩 是基於 弱弱 並非堅定 我首先 如果你 告訴大家 他們的明顯承諾 是有些錯誤 而他們 寧願 跟隨你的例子 和深入的觀察 你可能 是對的 或可能 錯誤 但你並 不更多 專心 你只是 提出了 不同的信念 其中一種 是人們 與你不同 所以如果您建議佛教、伊斯蘭教和基督教 以及其他任何人 想要不同意您的精神意識 並沒有確定 您就像一個普通的穆斯林 告訴一位基督教徒 他有些錯誤 如果您認爲您在減少所有的宗教 爲您自己的精神 提供了基礎的東西 是沒有區別的 因爲那些非常具體的宗教 都會被您誤解 可能說 佛教、伊斯蘭教和穆罕默德 都是聰明的人 基本上都想要一樣的東西 但是這是一個相反的論調 對於他們的宗教徒 來說 所以您在做的 是在建立一個交換的觀點 因此 這並不是比其他更加公平 請不要誤會我 我一方面認爲 這是完美的公平 我並不反對您 有不同的建議 我反對 這種不同的建議 會更加公平 把不同的觀點混合在一起 不在乎那些建議的 自己的觀點 並不讓您的建議 更加公平 並不讓您的建議更加公平 再說一次 我並沒有不同的觀點 當一個問題是困難的 不同的試圖回答 都會出現 並互相反映 這就帶我來到第二點 這種假裝的 互相包容 並不值得 值得的是 我們儘可能的 去研究 再建立一個真實的證據 但關鍵的是 真實的真實的證據 我比較願意 掙扎和努力回答 而不是假裝沒有問題 我比較願意 有個爭議 而不是假裝 真實的真實的真實 這是我對這些 現代的靈魂的 我無所謂 Quite coherent, and quite wrong I laughed out loud Worth earning a stern look from a librarian If there had been any A perfect joke Set up an expectation And then subvert the expectation in the punchline That is how humor works The book from which this quote is taken is called Heretics Who, as Jessup explains, are those Whose view of things has the hardyhood to differ from his own Let me quote him in some length On the importance of right belief From that very introductory chapter It is foolish, generally speaking, for a philosopher To set fire to another philosopher in Smithfield Market Because they do not agree in their theory of the universe That was done very frequently In the last decadence of the Middle Ages And it failed altogether in its object But as one thing that is infinitely more absurd and unpractical Than burning a man for his philosophy This is the habit of saying that his philosophy does not matter And this is done universally in the 20th century In the decadence of the great revolutionary period General theories are everywhere condemned The doctrine of the rights of man Is dismissed with the doctrine of the fall of man Atheism itself is too theological for us today Revolution itself is too much of a system Liberty itself is too much of a restraint We will have no generalizations Mr. Bernard Shaw has put the view in a perfect epigram The golden rule is that there is no golden rule We are more and more to discuss details in art, politics, literature A man's opinion on tram cars matters His opinion on Botticelli matters His opinion on all things does not matter He may turn over and explore a million objects But he must not find that strange object The universe For if he does, he will have a religion And be lost Everything matters Except everything Examples are scarcely needed Of this total levity on the subject of cosmic philosophy Examples are scarcely needed To show that whatever else we think of As affecting practical affairs We do not think it matters Whether a man is a pessimist or an optimist A Cartesian or a Hegelian A materialist or a spiritualist Let me, however, take a random instance At any innocent tea table We may easily hear a man say Life is not worth living We regard it as we regard the statement That it is a fine day Nobody thinks that it can possibly have any serious effect On the man or on the world And yet, if that utterance were really believed The world would stand on its head Murderers would be given medals For saving man from life Firemen would be denounced For keeping man from death Poisons would be used as medicines Doctors would be called in When people were well The Royal Humane Society Would be rooted out Like a horde of assassins Yet we never speculate As to whether the conversational pessimist Will strengthen or disorganize society For we are convinced That theories do not matter This was certainly not the idea Of those who introduced our freedom When the old liberals removed the gags From all the heresies Their idea was That religion and philosophical discoveries Might thus be made Their view was that cosmic truth Was so important That everyone ought to bear independent testimony The modern idea is That cosmic truth is so unimportant That it cannot matter what anyone says The former freed inquiry As man lose a noble hound The latter frees inquiry As man fling back into the sea A fish unfit for eating Never has there been so little discussion About the nature of man as now When for the first time Anyone can discuss it The old restriction meant That only the orthodox Were allowed to discuss religion Modern liberty means That nobody is allowed to discuss it If modern spirituality Is proposed as an alternative to religion Because it is supposedly more inclusive Then, as we have seen, it fails It is not more inclusive It is just yet another view of the universe A view that may be deliberately nebulous So it can pretend to include other religions While flatly contradicting those religions On their own terms If on the other hand Modern spirituality serves to avoid Hard questions of truth For the sake of avoiding arguments And for the sake of peace I contend that it serves a false peace It devalues the most important questions The quest for the most important answers Let the struggle for those answers be hard And at times frustrating But let it not be called unimportant Or unnecessary