In April 1944, two Jewish prisoners miraculously escaped from Auschwitz. When they recounted what they had left behind, their harrowing testimony revealed the true horror of the Holocaust to the outside world for the first time. They described in forensic detail the gas chambers and the full extent of the extermination programme. The news they brought presented the Allies with one of the greatest moral questions of the 20th century: Should we bomb Auschwitz?
Discover the past on History Hit with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly presented by world renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code 'TIMELINE' 👉 https://access.historyhit.com/
You can find more from us on:
/ timelinewh
/ timelineworldhistory
/ timelinewh
This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact [email protected]
In April 1944, with the outcome of World War II hanging in the balance, two Jewish prisoners
lay hidden near the outer fence of Auschwitz concentration camp.
It was almost impossible to escape from Auschwitz.
So many people were caught almost immediately and tortured and killed.
Folks didn't sniff them out because they put tobacco soaked in petrol around the hiding place.
They managed to stay there undetected for three days.
On the 10th of April 1944, they abandoned their hiding place and cut through the fence.
They had to be audacious. They had to be brave.
They escaped in order to warn the world that Auschwitz was a killing mechanism.
Their eyewitness account of the mass extermination of European Jews
would lead to one of the greatest moral questions of the 20th century.
This killing complex can turn several thousands of human beings into ash in just 24 hours.
The failure to bomb Auschwitz, no one gave a damn. They didn't care. They didn't want to do it.
Auschwitz should have had the most outrageous response while it was happening.
And that's a moral failure of the West.
Why was the greatest crime of modern history allowed to proceed unimpeded for almost two years?
A million Jews perished there by gas. It wasn't because of lack of evidence.
Rudolf Werber and Alfred Wetzler fled through Nazi-occupied Poland
to the Slovakian town of Žilina, where they made contact with a Jewish underground.
Slovakia is aligned with Nazi Germany, and it is the first country to voluntarily deport its Jews.
Werber and Wetzler made it to a safe house. They were desperate to complete their mission,
to let the world know what was happening to Jews in Poland.
The extermination of the Jews was carried on in great secrecy. It wasn't advertised.
Therefore, until then, we had no cogent or clear description of what went on at Auschwitz.
Oskar Krasnanski of the Jewish underground was sent to interview Werber and Wetzler.
My name is Krasnanski from Bratislava. How do I know you're not fantasists wasting my time?
44070. I asked him, why have you put this tattoo on your arm? And then he looked at me and he said,
where did you think I have been? In a sanatorium? And that's when he told me
that he has been to Auschwitz. Why are you tattooed on your arm and you on your chest?
Chest tattoos were imprinted with huge brutality. Many people fainted.
Is that why they started tattooing people on their arms?
No. No, they did that because the chest tattoos faded too quickly.
You must tell me everything. Every detail that you know about Auschwitz-Birkenau.
Yes. Auschwitz is a killing center.
Not here, not now. Separately.
If you don't know who these men are, you want to interrogate them to make sure that
they're not telling you a bullshit story.
Auschwitz is not a household name in early 1944.
There's a lot of confusion over what is this place? And so at the beginning,
people just knew that Jews were being taken to Nazi-occupied Poland.
The Polish underground had managed to smuggle some information about the camp outside,
but on the whole, this information is fragmentary and sometimes contradictory.
Werber and Wetzlar's interrogation was meticulously recorded, as in a court of law.
How did you escape?
We kept to the forest, traveling only by night.
How long?
Took us 11 days.
No, no. How long were you in Auschwitz?
I arrived there on the 30th of June, 1942.
We've heard rumors that there is gas,
that Jews are killed there by gas machines and by mass electrocution.
When you look at the way he did it, the professionalism,
it reflects that this was someone who knew the information he was getting
was potentially a game changer.
The interview was done with the idea of we might bring legal charges
and we are going to get nothing but the facts.
The perimeter wire is electrified.
But there are gas installations, gas chambers.
Go on.
Four gas chambers with crematoria for burning.
The first crematorium opened in March 1943,
when prominent guests from Berlin arrived to see the new installation.
That day they were able to witness 8,000 Jews from Krakow gassed and burned.
We were very pleased with that result.
How do you know all this?
I worked as a registrar in the Bergkanau section of the camp.
My daily duties included registering the survivors of each transportation,
meaning those who had survived the train journey
and had not, on arrival at Auschwitz, been selected for the gas.
Clerks can move around the different sectors of the camp
a little bit more freely than most other prisoners
and in this way pick up even more detailed information
about what exactly is happening there.
I also got information about the precise operation of the gas chambers
and crematoria from one of the Sonderkommando.
Sonderkommando?
You really know nothing, do you?
The prisoners in Auschwitz-Birkenau who knew best what happened
at the gas chambers and the crematoria
were the members of the so-called Sonderkommando.
These were prisoners who were forced by the SS
to assist in the killing and cremation at the crematoria itself.
Rudi and Freddy felt that they needed to have facts
that would convince people that this really is happening.
And it was their idea to write a report
that could be distributed and shown as evidence.
Werber and Wetzlar wanted to include as much granular evidence
as they could in their report and that included some drawings.
Auschwitz is a massive place and it builds up over time and in different ways.
So the first camp is Auschwitz I, which opens in 1940.
Later, they add Birkenau, a few miles away,
which is where the gas chambers and the crematorium are located.
This is an approximate sketch of the dark heart
of Auschwitz main camp and Birkenau.
This is one of the gas chambers and crematoria
that the SS constructed in Birkenau.
It's striking how much Werber and Wetzlar got right
about the layout of the camp, the mechanics of mass extermination
and even down to the names of individual prisoners.
By the end of January, a large convoy of French and Dutch Jews arrived at Auschwitz.
But only a small proportion of those reached the camp.
What happened to the rest of them?
They went straight from the trains to the gas chambers.
Did you see these selections yourself?
Yes. I belonged to a work command that took me to a place called the ramp,
which is where the trains came in.
Sometimes one a day, sometimes five, sometimes through the night.
My job was to deal with the personal property of those Jews
who'd been selected for the gas
and to collect any dead bodies from the cattle cars.
He sees how Jews are forced off the trains.
He sees how they have to line up.
He sees how the SS selects them and sends those deemed to be weak and ill
and not fit for work towards the gas chambers.
And this really gives Werber a direct insight.
He becomes an eyewitness of the Holocaust.
Women, children, old people, people they considered unfit,
sent straight to the gas chambers.
The fittest were separated out and kept for labour.
How many?
It varied.
A small percentage, five or ten percent.
All this was done with force?
Sometimes, but usually without.
These people had no idea where they were going.
I want to emphasise this.
A train would pull in and those getting off would have no conception
of what had just happened to those who'd arrived a few hours before.
They were describing the details of genocide.
How was it done?
You are asking people to believe something that was literally beyond belief.
You can't put it into words.
Numbness, fright, anger, fury, rage.
And then a feeling of, oh my God.
And probably a sense of incredulity.
Are these guys out of their mind?
How did the SS deal with these arrivals?
I've told you already they were sent to the gas.
To the gas, Birkenau.
Some of the groups would be frightened and disorientated.
Others would be almost relieved, depending on how they'd been treated by the SS.
Sometimes they could be harsh, using the sticks, dogs, lots of shouting.
Other times it would be, how nice that you have arrived.
We are sorry it was not too comfortable.
Things will change now.
Werber's testimony had a horrifying climax.
The Nazis' new plan for Auschwitz-Birkenau.
They are preparing for the extermination of the Hungarian Jews.
How do you know that?
That is why they have built the new crematoria and extended the ramp.
I said, how do you know the intent to kill the Hungarian Jews?
The SS.
They talk.
To you?
I am dirt.
To each other.
I heard it more than once.
They would always take the best food from the trains for themselves.
They had a cosmopolitan diet.
I overheard one officer saying that he was tired of Dutch cheese
and looked forward to the arrival of Hungarian salami.
Are you certain you heard this?
I have to ask, are you certain?
I heard it more than once.
It is why I knew I had to escape.
To warn people of what is to come.
Auschwitz becomes the center of the Holocaust.
And the catalyst for that is the German invasion of Hungary in March 1944.
Hungary had the largest, mostly intact Jewish community in Europe.
And the persecution starts almost immediately.
On April 27th, 1944, Werber's warning comes true.
The first 4,000 Jews were sent by train from Hungary to Auschwitz.
It was a dress rehearsal for the planned annihilation of all 800,000.
Discover the past with exclusive military history documentaries
and ad-free podcasts presented by world-renowned historians.
All on History Hit.
Watch them on your smart TV or on the go with your mobile device.
Download the app now to watch everything
from the gripping story of the Band of Brothers to Operation Barbarossa and D-Day.
Immerse yourself in the dramatic stories of this remarkable era
by signing up via the link in the description.
I would argue that the Nazis are losing the war
and therefore they're trying to win the genocide.
The crime that was being committed was so horrific, so unique,
so outrageous, so evil, so awful.
The Nazis kept their extermination program a closely guarded secret
to avoid resistance and disruption on the trains.
But it was no longer secret.
Werber and Wetzler's harrowing testimony was turned into a detailed report.
The Auschwitz Protocol.
The Auschwitz Protocol is very scientific.
There isn't a lot of emotion and I think that was a deliberate choice
on the part of the escapees.
They weren't going to express their horror.
The horror is there.
Thanks to the Protocol, Jewish activists in Slovakia
learned of the Nazis' plans for the Hungarian Jews.
So the duty to act was theirs.
Everybody who worked as a courier had to be prepared to lose their own life.
They would have been tortured to reveal where they'd gotten it.
The last thing in the world Germany wanted to happen
was that this information got out.
In the first week of May 1944, the Protocol reached Michael Weismandel,
who worked secretly for the Jewish underground in the Slovakian capital.
Rabbi Weismandel was a very passionate man.
He's in Slovakia to rescue people.
His sole goal is to take care of his community.
And he does it with whatever means he possibly can.
Weismandel was not only among the first to read these documents,
but he was the first to fully believe these documents.
The Protocol had a devastating effect on Weismandel.
He had witnessed deportations.
He now realized the full horror that awaited those who had gone.
Getting the information was one part of the task.
Disseminating the information was the other.
It had to be done with great secrecy.
Weismandel is sending this report everywhere he can think of.
He's trying to get it to the Jewish agency in Jerusalem.
He's trying to get it to London, hopefully to the United States.
He's sending them all in the hopes that one cry in the darkness will be heard.
Our bedroom door is knocked down and two gendarmes are in our bedroom,
yelling and screaming.
You have two minutes to pack a bundle.
We are taking you away.
Give up your jewelry.
Give up anything you have in possession.
My father looked at us as though he wanted to
save this picture in his memory of the family.
He said, get out of the house.
And said only this sentence, just stay calm.
Remember, calmness is strength.
And they hit him, pushed him through the door, and he was out.
The rabbi, who was an elderly gentleman with a white beard,
he was made to walk in the front of the column.
You see, it was symbolic.
The Jews are leaving town.
In spring 1944, the world had little knowledge of what was happening to the Jews of Hungary.
Most were looking elsewhere because the war had reached a critical juncture.
What was going on at that very time in the United States and Britain
was the preparations for D-Day, which the total outcome of the war depended.
Now, this took precedence over everything.
The Pacific War was going on for the Americans, and that was an immense Herculean effort.
They knew that as they moved closer to Japan, the fight was going to get harder and harder
because the Japanese were terrifically fierce fighters.
On the other side of Europe, the Soviet army at the time was working full steam.
Stalin basically destroyed the entire German army
in some of the greatest battles of modern history.
While the Allies were focused on the battlefront, the protocol gained momentum.
Weissmandel's transmission reached Roswell McClelland
at the War Refugee Board in neutral Switzerland.
Is this it?
The War Refugee Board was established by Roosevelt in early 1944,
and it was the only body anywhere in the world which specifically had the task of rescuing Jews.
They were selected for gassing.
It gives the impression of the antechamber of a bathing establishment.
It holds 2,000 people.
From there, a door and a few steps lead down to the very long and narrow gas chamber.
Roswell McClelland had a very personal reaction
because he had gone to southern France working with Jews in internment camps in 1942,
and he knows intimately who these people are.
He had watched them go to Auschwitz, and now he's reading about what happened to them.
When Rabbi Weissmandel sent the protocol, he added a dramatic postscript.
It was an appeal for help, but also a rebuke for those who might refuse.
And you, our brothers in all the free lands,
what are you doing about the extermination which swallows 10,000 every day?
For God's sake, do something now and quickly.
He turned the question of what to do about the death camp
into one of the great moral issues of the 20th century.
He demanded that the Allied air forces bomb Auschwitz.
He was the first to do so.
His call to bomb Auschwitz was essentially a call of desperation and a call of despair.
When people first hear about the request of bombing of Auschwitz,
it's quite remarkable because they're demanding that they bomb a camp
where their own people are being held prisoner.
It seemed very strange.
Let's set the whole goddamn thing aflame.
Let's destroy the entire thing.
Then we have accomplished something and we've done something enormously significant.
The clock was ticking.
McClellan sent a summary of the protocol to Washington.
Switzerland is completely surrounded by Nazi territory.
You can't have a courier go in and out.
So Roswell McClellan sends a cable and said,
as soon as I can, you'll get the whole thing.
Since early summer 1942, at least one and a half million Jews have been killed.
There is evidence that from January 1944,
preparations were being made to receive and exterminate Hungarian Jews in these camps.
For three days and three nights, we were locked into that box.
Every morning we were traveling.
They opened those shutters and they threw out dead bodies.
With a tiny window for air and one pail for bodily needs,
which turned out to be very, very embarrassing and unpleasant.
Something has always been going around in my mind and I can't get rid of it.
I feel so ashamed.
Tell me, how can a 14-year-old child hope people should die,
so he'll have room where to sit down?
It was early in the morning that we arrived.
The door opened and screams.
And through the slits of the car that we were in,
I saw they were at Auschwitz. I didn't have a clue what it was.
Nazi soldiers standing there with rifles pointing at us.
Others holding back, snarling, big dogs that were barking at us.
The first thing was, you breathe in and it's a very strange smell.
It was sort of sweetish and burning.
I thought it's a bakery and they're baking bread.
And as I noticed that to the left went people older and with glasses and children and women.
My mother, my two little brothers and my baby and my mother.
So I'm my grandfather, grandmother and my aunt.
My mother went to the left.
With a flick of his hand to the left, they were walked off.
We didn't even have time to say goodbye.
And that's when I saw my father the last time.
He was 60 years old.
Roswell McClellan's cable containing the summary of the Auschwitz Protocol
and the plea to bomb the camp travel from Switzerland
to the headquarters of the War Refugee Board in Washington.
It is urged by all sources of this information in Slovakia and Hungary
that vital sections of the rail lines be bombed.
They also urge that the camps of Auschwitz and Birkenau,
especially the gas chambers and crematoriums recognizable by their high chimneys,
be bombed from the air.
The director of the War Refugee Board was a lawyer called John Paley.
The decision about what to do with this startling information fell on his shoulders.
John Paley was very measured and he was very diligent and dogged.
He's not cynical.
He really does believe that the United States can try to save people.
Would you please ask Dr. Axin to step through to my office?
Oh, and hold all incoming calls until he leaves.
When people saw the level of detail in this atrocity,
they recognized that this was something different.
This was something horrifying.
Ben, I want you to take a look at this.
From Roswell McClelland.
Auschwitz?
I think he means Auschwitz.
Benjamin Axin is a lawyer.
He grew up in Latvia and was an incredibly intelligent man.
He's Jewish.
He certainly still had family and friends back in Europe.
He sees the War Refugee Board as a place where he can do some good.
This is...
It's inconceivable, incredible, unbelievable.
125,000 a month?
You can go straight to the president with this.
What's so funny?
It doesn't work that way, Ben.
There are procedures.
There are rules.
There are no rules for this, surely.
If it's true, you have to be sure that's all.
It's very easy for us these days to close our eyes and imagine Auschwitz.
We've seen photos.
Many of us may have even visited Auschwitz.
And so it's really hard to reconstruct how chaotic information about Auschwitz was.
There are eyewitnesses, two of them.
It is unusual, I grant.
It's unprecedented, John.
And Roswell McClelland seems to think it's true.
That's quite something, isn't it?
It is.
Take a look at this.
It came in with a cable.
It's a list of suggestions made by Jewish groups from Slovakia and Switzerland,
fielded by Roswell.
There is a logic to it, isn't there?
I mean, if you accept this, then it kind of follows that you must do this.
My first thought is they're right.
We should bomb.
Send them some air mail.
I don't think the response lets bomb this place.
Can we react to this atrocity?
Was it all unusual?
I think all of us would have liked to have fought.
That's exactly the response we would have.
This thing, John, it speaks of industrial slaughter.
For a lot of people, it was the protocol that changed their mind.
That in order to stop this mass killing, you had to take out the instrument of killing.
And the only way to take out the instrument of killing was to bomb the camp.
You see, I don't recall ever reading about or hearing about a proposal like this one.
And I'm talking about in any war.
To bomb friendly civilians?
Civilians we're committed to rescuing?
And that's a moral leap, isn't it?
I don't know what it is.
Paley perceives that there's not much that we can do.
The War Refugee Board is constantly trying to get information about what's going on in Europe.
And I think he sees this as information, but not actionable intelligence.
I'll make the suggestions to the War Department.
But I know what they'll say.
It's a diversion.
On June 24th, 1944, Paley passed the recommendations to bomb,
up the chain of command, to John McCloy, the Assistant Secretary of War.
But McCloy is not inclined to divert resources from the war
because the war was at such a critical moment at that point in time.
Allied forces had landed successfully in France on D-Day.
The supreme effort now was to drive towards Germany,
reach Berlin and force the unconditional surrender of the Nazis.
Round-the-clock bombing missions against German cities,
military and industrial targets were intensifying.
On the Eastern Front, the Soviet army was advancing westwards towards Poland.
The focus is on winning the war.
We can't be diverted by Auschwitz.
No one really grasps that this was part of an effort
to wipe out an entire people from one end of Europe to the other and beyond.
Once you understand the Jews are being killed every day,
you can't go on with business as usual.
You can't imagine not doing something about it.
You can't say, we shall win the war and then we'll worry about the refugees.
This is the period in the whole history of Auschwitz
where the killing reaches its frenzied climax.
Never before have so many Jews been killed so quickly in Auschwitz-Birkenau
as in the period between May and July 1944.
437,402 Jews were shipped primarily to Birkenau on 147 trains.
147 trains during 54 days meant an average of 2.7 trains a day,
an average of 2,975 Jews per train.
I didn't know what a crematorium was.
I didn't know what a gas chamber was.
I didn't have a clue.
But we soon found out.
It didn't take us long to find out.
Somebody asked me, where's your mother, is she with you?
I said, no, she went left, probably with the older women, now in another block.
And we learned finally what happened, all those who went to the left.
He didn't want to believe it.
And he said only this sentence.
That's where she went.
She went through the chimney.
So we all look back at these chimneys
and I keep thinking, how does a person go through a chimney?
What, they gonna burn my mother, my brother?
I didn't believe it.
They were absolutely incredulous.
It's not true, it's not true, it can't be.
We got to know next day that it is true.
They were burning the families.
The protocol may have stalled in America,
but it reached the desk of Foreign Secretary Antony Eden in London.
The Jewish Agency representatives in London, Chaim Weizmann and Moshe Shertok,
fixed an urgent meeting to make their plea directly.
Chaim Weizmann was the president of the World Zionist Organization
and Weizmann understood very well the situation of the Jews.
Moshe Shertok was later the second Prime Minister of Israel.
Then we think some kind of reprisal needs to be conceded,
something that will act as a deterrence to Germany.
If the Auschwitz camp continues to function as a killing center, then...
You're wrong.
The aim being to dislocate the machinery of annihilation
and hope to save the remaining 300,000 Hungarian Jews from extermination.
It's bold, it has imagination, it may even work.
And Mr Churchill?
Also in favour, in principle.
What we should need to do now is examine its feasibility with the Air Ministry.
Yes, yes of course.
In a memo to Eden, Winston Churchill wrote about Auschwitz.
There is no doubt that this is probably the greatest and most horrible crime ever committed
in the whole history of the world.
Churchill's instincts are genuine.
He was one of the first to recognize the full gravity of what had been going on.
He said to Eden, we should do something.
Then he said, get anything out of the Air Force you can and invoke me if necessary.
Eden would have interpreted it as act quickly, act decisively and you have my blessing.
Two of the most powerful men in Britain now supported the bombing of Auschwitz.
Eden summoned the head of the Air Ministry Sir Archibald Sinclair
to discuss the feasibility of the raid.
Well it was quite a surprise receiving this.
I mean it hasn't been raised at Cabinet so far as I know.
Unnecessary according to Winston.
Well there's a feeling in the Ministry that we shouldn't be disrupting
the Normandy campaign right now with an operation of this nature.
There is?
Yes, yes there's quite a strong feeling.
Also isn't this a thing for our Soviet allies anyway?
Being much closer to the intended target than us I mean.
Stalin was as likely to bomb Auschwitz as he was to stand on his head
in the Red Square in the middle of winter for a week.
He wouldn't have done it.
This is all very interesting Archie,
but I asked you to examine the feasibility of a bombing raid on Auschwitz-Birkenau.
That's what I've done Anthony.
Well no you haven't done that you see.
You've merely listed the objections the Air Force might have to such a mission
and come up with a couple of fanciful suggestions of your own.
What we need to discover, you and I,
is whether the bombing raid on Auschwitz is actually feasible.
I think you should coordinate your thinking with the Americans.
Sinclair was very much playing the role that he was in as Secretary of State for Air
which was to protect the resources of the Air Force, focus them on the war itself.
I think he did look at it and said
better hand it off to the Americans.
They're in a better position to do it than we are.
Eden's request for a feasibility study into bombing Auschwitz
reached General Karl Spatz, one of the most powerful men in the Allied Air Force.
Spatz says yes, it sounds like something I would be willing to do.
I can't imagine that anyone like Karl Spatz would not have been outraged.
Would not have wanted some kind of retribution or attempt to get at this
with the instrument that was available to him, which is the long-range bomber.
The moral question of should we bomb Auschwitz became a technical one.
Could we bomb Auschwitz?
Every target that was attacked was attacked after specialised intelligence was applied to it.
Where is it located? What does it look like?
What would be the best routes?
The Allies had been gathering intelligence about the area since spring 1944.
Spy planes flew over Auschwitz-Birkenau
but they were looking for factories, not a death camp.
They had been photographing all around IG Farben in order to
support hitting the industrial areas that were producing synthetic fuel for the Germans
which was a critically important target.
The photos were taken to RAF Medmanen where they were analysed in 3D.
By chance three of them showed Auschwitz-Birkenau.
These were the images General Spatz desperately needed.
The photographs covered a wide area, more than just the IG Farben site itself.
They were picking up Birkenau.
They had the crematoria in photographs, they just didn't know they had them.
By August 1944 the tide of war was turning.
The Allies finally had supremacy in the air.
American bombers were attacking targets deep in Eastern Europe, including Poland.
They were flying to many targets right in the vicinity of Auschwitz.
So these airplanes were in fact within range of attacking the crematoria at Birkenau.
One must remember that the idea of bombing Auschwitz is to destroy the gas chambers without
killing the people.
Now this is extremely difficult.
The gas chambers at Auschwitz were the size of a tennis court.
There was nothing even remotely like precision bombing in the Second World War.
The American B-17s flew over 30,000 feet at 300 miles an hour.
And the bombs they had then were extraordinarily primitive.
If one bomb was going to hit each of the crematoria, you would need to send roughly 220
bombers, each of them dropping 10 bombs each, to have a high chance of one bomb landing
on that building.
It's very hard.
It's very hard to do this.
The word they used is bombs away.
And where they land, nobody knows.
And consequently, there were mistakes.
All the options were bad options in a way, because even a small miss could have killed
a lot of people.
Despite the risks, General Spatz was ready to carry out the raid.
He needed the aerial photographs, but they'd been overlooked.
No one realized they showed the death camp.
Meanwhile, pressure to act came from a new source.
Rumors about Auschwitz were stoking public outrage.
Rabbi Stephen Wise, the head of the World Jewish Congress, organizes a rally in Madison
Square Park in New York City on July 31, 1944.
And about 40,000 Americans attend this rally.
It's a call for the bombing of Auschwitz.
And I think it's a striking commentary on the level of public knowledge and the level
of public concern.
Trains to Auschwitz continued relentlessly.
Thanks to the protocol, Jewish leaders now knew the fate of the deportees.
They demanded a meeting with John Paley at the War Refugee Board.
Leon Kowalewski of the World Jewish Congress and Bezalel Sherman of the Jewish Labour Committee
had very different views on the bombing of Auschwitz.
They were divided and they were fearful.
One fear that they had was they didn't want to turn the war into a Jewish war because
the future of the world was at stake.
We are faced, it seems, with a monstrous determination from Nazi Germany to pursue
this criminal murder of the Jews of Europe to its bitter end.
Hence the call to bomb these installations ourselves.
The War Refugee Board fully appreciates the motives behind the idea.
We know it wasn't suggested lightly.
But the fact is, the War Department still believes that such a bombing mission can be
achieved only with considerable diversion of resources.
Then divert.
I'm sorry, Mr. Sherman.
Divert.
We've read the testimony of these two men who escaped from the Auschwitz camp, the
things they saw.
We've been given corroborative evidence, too.
As have we.
So we all know a picture is forming of something off the human scale.
Isn't that so?
The Germans have created a factory in Poland whose sole purpose is the eradication by gas
of an entire race of people.
I say divert.
All right.
Let's just say for a minute that the United States or Great Britain bombs this place.
Can we know how many...
How many Jews will be killed by our bombs?
That's right, Mr. Sherman.
Hell, if we miss the gas chambers, we destroy 30,000 prisoners instead.
Wouldn't that give the Nazis a great alibi?
I can hear it now.
The Western allies hate the Jews more than we do.
The Germans took anything they could grasp for propaganda purposes.
So there would have been a struggle over the narrative of who was being more brutal.
I believe in Hare Shah.
I believe in saving those actually living.
I don't understand what follows from that.
You cannot kill the innocent in order to prevent a catastrophe.
There was a genuine debate that went on.
There were very good people who were directly affected by the Holocaust,
who had lost members of their family, who weren't sure that the bombing was a good thing.
Thank you.
Mr. Sherman.
All the excuses for not bombing Auschwitz omit the most compelling reason for bombing Auschwitz.
It would have been recognition that what was happening there
was totally evil and unacceptable to the world itself.
We keep repeating the line that bombing Auschwitz would constitute a diversion.
But how do we know that?
Peli might have said to himself, he may be right.
And now the ball's in my court.
And that's an awesome responsibility.
I would bomb this infernal place.
You know I would.
And the railroads too.
That's what my gut was telling me also.
But we know it's not about the gut, is it?
It's about what the War Department wants.
Then bypass them.
Go tell the president.
Acquaint Roosevelt with the facts and he'll act.
There is no evidence that Roosevelt has ever approached
about the question of whether the United States should bomb Auschwitz.
FDR was not well to begin with.
He was fighting polio.
He was very subject to the flu.
He had congestive heart failure.
He didn't stop working.
But he had to kind of come out of the public eye for periods.
At the same time, Churchill's support for the plan was going cold.
Chaim Weizmann of the Jewish Agency was informed by the British Foreign Office that
technical difficulties prevented the bombing.
One official dismissed the idea as fantastic and concluded it should be dropped.
Another complained that a disproportionate amount of time
is wasted dealing with these wailing Jews.
We're not going to believe atrocity stories.
These stories are just being told to get us to let refugees in,
to get us to let children in.
And that level of anti-Semitism that creeps into so many decisions.
Those Jews are carping again.
Despite being written off as a diversion from the war effort,
on the 13th of September 1944, the Allies did bomb Auschwitz-Birkenau.
Some 2,000 or so bombs rained down.
The bombs don't distinguish between prisoners and SS.
Dozens of prisoners are killed.
Hundreds more are injured.
However, it wasn't intentional.
The target was the nearby IG Farben factory.
Auschwitz was never a priority.
Synthetic rubber was a priority.
Synthetic gas and oil was a priority.
IG Farben was a priority.
If the target that they were intended to bomb was four miles away,
and they inadvertently bombed Auschwitz,
it shows how amateurish the bombing was.
All of a sudden, the air is full of noise.
I'm sure that some people were hoping they're going to bomb us,
or at least the gas chambers, but I can't say I did.
We didn't care.
We were hoping that they should bomb the place.
I said, my God, you know, finally they arrived.
And I said, keep the bombing the hell out of this place, no matter what happens.
In April 1944,
Werber and Wetzler had escaped from Auschwitz
to warn the world about the extermination of the European Jews.
By September, still nothing had been done.
The American army reaches the border of Switzerland at the end of September,
freeing for the first time all of the people inside Switzerland
who can now send messages to the wider world.
John Paley at the War Refugee Board
finally received the full protocol in early November.
What he read shocked him to the core.
This version of the protocol is much longer.
It reads more like a testimony.
This is what Auschwitz is.
It is a place where horrific things are happening.
The difference when the full report is released is stunning.
It's undeniable.
You can put them side by side and you see a striking difference.
Gassing took place as follows.
The unfortunate victims were brought into the hall
where they were asked to undress.
Each person receives a towel and a small piece of soap
issued to them by two men clad in white coats.
They are then crowded into the gas chambers
in such numbers that there is only standing room.
When they were all inside, they closed this heavy door
and there was a short pause.
After which, SS men in gas masks climb the roof,
open the traps and shake down a preparation
in powder form from tin cans labelled cyclone
for use against vermin manufactured by a Hamburg concern.
It's this cyanide mixture that turns to gas at certain temperatures.
And after three minutes, everyone in the chamber was dead.
When Paley saw the entire report,
his conscience could no longer allow him to be tentative or to sit quietly.
Mr. McCloy.
Good morning, sir.
John Paley here.
I have something I think you must see.
It's a report from Auschwitz.
His reaction was, it's worse than I thought.
I thought it was extraordinarily evil.
This is, by a magnitude, even more than that.
He goes back to John McCloy.
He sends him a copy of the protocols with a cover note that says,
I am now convinced that we need to use direct bombing action
to destroy the gas chambers and crematorium in Auschwitz-Birkenau.
Paley was told conclusively by Assistant Secretary of War John McCloy
that bombing Auschwitz was not feasible from a military standpoint.
He says there is considerable opinion to the effect that such an action,
even if practicable, might provoke a more vindictive response on the part of the Germans.
What's more vindictive than Auschwitz?
The officials who made the decision that this shouldn't be done,
they weren't concerned about the people in the camp.
From everything we know, the vast majority of them just sloughed it off.
Paley couldn't force the War Department to act,
so instead he leaked the full version of the protocol to newspapers with a covering letter.
So revolting and diabolical are the German atrocities
that the minds of civilized people find it difficult to believe they've actually taken place.
Paley understood his responsibilities, and that was his greatness.
I regarded John Paley as one of the great American heroes,
and he said we did too little and we did too late.
Paley knew what he was doing, and he played the media card very, very well.
It got a great deal of attention. It was all over the newspapers.
This is front page news nationwide.
The Washington Post publishes an editorial entitled Genocide.
It's the first time that word appears in a national newspaper.
The day that this information is released to the American people,
the Nazis destroy the gas chambers.
It was an attempt to destroy the evidence, but it didn't work.
Two months later, on the 27th of January 1945,
Auschwitz was liberated by the Red Army.
The Soviet soldiers who entered Auschwitz were moved and shaken by what they saw.
They understood that they had come across something unique,
that they had seen something horrific beyond the imagination.
I wish the British or the Americans had pushed for this target to have been bombed
as a statement of principle, as a statement to the Nazis that this is atrocious.
And we, as the human species, will not stand for it.
It's one of the most emotive things that's ever happened in modern history.
You could say this is a great failure,
but one has to understand that they're fighting a world war,
and the fate of the surviving Jews of Europe largely depended on
liberating Nazi-occupied Europe and destroying the Nazi regime.
I would advocate bombing as a statement of profound moral outrage.
But do I think it would have solved the problem? No.
And I think the critics who say that it would have, haven't read the history well.
But moral protest in the wake of genocide is much better than nothing.
Much, much better than nothing.
I think it's important when people are being subjected to genocide for the world to say,
we do give a damn, because you don't know where it's going to happen next.
We came to the position that we had to recommend this, and that it should be done,
and not only should the rail lines be bombed, but the crematoria should be bombed too.
It's tragic that we didn't take this position in the first place, but that is the fact.