世衛組織前副主席_佩羅內（Christian Perronne）重磅反擊歐洲疫苗政策！

Mr. and Mrs. Giorgio, you have the floor. Thank you very much, Madam President, Madam Minister, ladies and gentlemen, I am very honoured to be here today. First of all, I would like to remind you of my professional experience as President of the Commission of Transmissible Diseases of the High Council of Public Health. I advised different French governments for 15 years on the management of health crises and epidemics. I was President for years of the Technical Committee of Vaccinations. So I presided over the French vaccine policy. So I'm not an anti-vax at all, as some media have said. I am fully convinced of the interest of vaccination. And I was even Vice President of the WHO for years of the expert group for vaccines for the whole Euro-region of the WHO, which is much wider than the European Union, because the Euro-region of the WHO includes Russia, all the republics of Central Asia, Turkey, Israel. It is the great Europe of the WHO. So, it is still my experience of both epidemics and vaccination. I would have two main messages to tell you in this crisis. It is that we have buffered science and we have buffered the law. So we buffered science because all the decisions of our policies, based on experts, who unfortunately, we know now, are public, have conflicts of major interest with the pharmaceutical industry. When they make decisions in a catimini, they provide zero scientific reference. Myself, I knew very well Jean-François Delfraissy, the President of the Scientific Council at the Elysee, because I met him when he was intern in 1978. I called him a few weeks ago, I said, listen, Jean-François, we do not agree, but I would like a contradictory debate, because you come up with a lot of opinions like that, we do not know your sources, and then he refused the debate. And that's why I'm very comfortable, because you know, I've been fighting in the French media for two years, I wrote two books, they have never been contested from a scientific point of view. In my books, there are dozens of pages of evidence, everything I say is sourced, I have never changed my mind for two years, and no one has put me in default on one of my words, even if the media every day say that I am a conspiracy theorist, because that's the only word they have, because they can't find an argument. So, the lack of scientific evidence. Then, when there was so-called scientific evidence, we saw the frauds accumulate. Publications in the largest newspapers in the world that were fraudulent. You all remember the Lancet Gate, when we wanted to discredit chloroquine, lobbies paid a team and a newspaper to publish a fraudulent study that blocked everything in the whole world. More recently, you saw it in the British Medical Journal, there was the Pfizer Gate, which showed that part of Pfizer's studies to obtain the authorization of their so-called vaccine were fraudulent. In France, the media never talked about it, except for a small case in the Figaro. That's pretty scandalous, when the Lancet was released, all the media talked about it. The conflicts of interest are major, whether with experts or with the media. That's public, it's not fake news, I'm not the one saying it. The French government, in addition to the tens of millions of euros that it gives to the main media every year, for two years, has given three billion euros to the media. Three billion euros. So, supposedly, the coffers of France are empty, we give three billion euros to the media, that would be a lot of hospitals that could be built. Then, these products that are called vaccines, I was considered for years as a specialist in vaccines in France, in Europe, in the world. And I think the biggest scandal of this epidemic is that we were made to believe that they were vaccines. They are not vaccines at all. We have proof now, we know that they don't work, that they don't prevent contamination, that they don't prevent serious injuries. Now, the countries that have the most vaccinated, we see that more than 90% of people in intensive care are double, triple vaccinated, that it doesn't prevent transmission. So, I've never seen, this is the formal proof that they are not vaccines. So, we have to stop this delirium of wanting to vaccinate for a disease that almost no longer kills. Where are the dead? So, there are a lot of figures that have been inflated. Sorry. A lot of figures have been inflated because with these PCRs, which amplify beyond what is usually scientifically allowed, we have inflated the numbers of epidemics, we have inflated the numbers of deaths because people who arrive at the hospital for something else, if they had a positive test, they were told that they had died of COVID, when they had died of something completely different. Then, what shocked me enormously, as a specialist in vaccines, is that a normal vaccine takes 10 years to be authorized. In addition, when I see the scandal of pregnant women, usually it takes 10 years after the definitive authorization of commercialization for it to be authorized in a pregnant woman by having enough recourse. There, in a few months, it was authorized. What shocks me is the absence of scientific studies on the decisions. When the government says that three doses are needed, soon four doses, five doses, six doses, seven doses, we don't know, there is zero scientific data to support these decisions. What shocks me a lot is that the EMA, the European Medicines Agency, admitted last summer that they did not know the total composition of these vaccines, and yet they authorize it. How? You will have to come to the end. You have one minute left. What we now officially know, according to the databases, is that the vaccine causes 36,000 deaths in Europe, 25,000 in the United States, including hundreds of athletes. An increase in oncologists in the United States showed that there was an increase in cancer deaths after vaccination. I think the best example is that the countries that did not vaccinate or stopped vaccination are the countries where the epidemic is over. This is very strong. We can see the example of India. And the last word is on the law. I would say that everything is illegal, since, as was said earlier, an authorization on the conditional market can only be obtained if we have shown that there was no effective treatment. There are hundreds of scientific publications, and the example of India and other countries that show that there is effective treatment. And above all, the most important thing is that we are still in phase 3 experimental, and that in international treaties, including the Nuremberg Code, it is totally forbidden to make an obligation on an experimental product. So any state, any parliamentarian who votes for an obligation on an experimental product, can be personally attacked in court by an international tribunal for an extremely serious offense, putting the lives of human beings at risk. And since we are talking about children, I will finish on this. There are children who die from the vaccine. And now we know that those who die from the vaccine are more than those who die from COVID, because there are almost zero deaths from COVID. I know a 17-year-old girl and a 20-year-old girl who died eight days after the vaccine from a myocardial infarction. I have never seen a myocardial infarction at the age of 20 in my career, and another one from a pulmonary embolism. So I ask you for a moratorium on these products that are not vaccines, that have not been properly evaluated, when we will have the definitive evaluations in several years. Thank you.