4/4 Northern Renaissance : The Birth of the Artist (Ep2)

Classic Art
36 followers
23 Video Views·Jun 23, 2025
In the 19th century, when these two busts were carved,
the two represented the twin poles of artistic experience,
northern manliness against southern grace.
In fact, the two great painters never met,
but they did exchange works.
It's known that Durer sent Raphael a transparent self-portrait,
which had to be held up to the light in order to be seen.
Alas, that work is now lost.
In 1520, Durer decided to journey northward,
to the Netherlands.
Carrying crates of his prints for sale,
he clearly wanted to turn a profit.
When Durer arrived here,
Antwerp was a thriving metropolis,
northern Europe's trade hub
and the centre of art production in the Netherlands.
Through this port passed goods from the Old World and the New.
Never before had Europe seen commerce on such a global scale.
Tellingly, Durer's sketch of Antwerp's harbour
is his most modern-looking work.
This city welcomed Durer as a celebrity.
During his year-long voyage, he was feted by royalty,
but Durer relished the most the honour paid him
by his fellow painters.
As I was being led to the table,
everyone on both sides stood up
as if they were leading some great lord.
There were among them men of high position
who all showed me the greatest respect
and bowed low to me
and said they would do everything in their power
to serve and please me.
Yet his diaries reflect less practical purposes.
With travel came novelty,
and Durer passionately loved the New.
Durer's wonder is greatest
when he sees Incan objects in Antwerp
brought back by Spanish conquistadors.
To him, these New World artifacts
are more beautiful to behold
than miracles or marvels.
In them, Durer recognizes, in his words,
the subtle genius of people in strange lands.
In the Middle Ages,
curiosity was considered a vice
and the reason for Adam and Eve's fall.
In the Renaissance, curiosity became a virtue.
Durer embodies modern curiosity.
Nature fascinated him as much as art.
His celebrated print of a rhinoceros,
based on secondhand reports,
was part fact, part fancy,
yet the result is an artwork
as fascinating as the beast itself.
Durer's curiosity transcends
mere fascination with the exotic.
Through his penetrating gaze,
even the tiniest example of mundane nature
becomes a new continent to explore.
Why would someone choose to paint
what most people consider
to be deeply insignificant things
like these little meadow grasses
or little tiny one-leaves of yarrows?
Why would you choose to paint those things
when perhaps you had things
that are much more conventionally beautiful?
It's very unconventional, this painting,
and I think that's why it appeals to botanists
because we rather like these things
which have little tiny flowers
and everyone else thinks they're a bit dull.
We think they're quite nice.
Artists before him had made detailed studies
of plants and animals,
but Durer was the first to sign
and date his nature studies
as finished works of art.
I think Durer's picture of the hare is amazing.
It's in complete repose.
The hare is not tense, ready to spring and rush away.
It's in complete repose.
And he must have either observed
lots of hares and their behavior
and then done the painting from skins
or I don't know what because it is so accurate.
I mean, the color gradations of individual hares,
as in hares on your head as opposed to hares the animal,
is absolutely incredible.
Durer was such a good observer
that he actually created something
that's almost more than art.
It's verging on being scientific as well.
For Durer, art and science were one.
Sketching from nature,
artists acquired knowledge,
and to be beautiful,
art also required knowledge.
Durer tried to uncover the secret of beauty,
at first assuming that the secret was mathematical,
in some measure applicable to all things.
His books on proportion and perspective
remain milestones in the literature on art.
Ultimately, though,
Durer confessed that the secret eluded him
and that, in his words,
what beauty is, no one can know.
While Durer pursued the elusive secrets of beauty,
there were others working in his shadow
who took a very different path.
Hans Baldung-Green, Durer's most brilliant disciple,
explored the aesthetics of the ugly
by deforming Durer's compositions.
While working in Durer's shop,
he signaled his independence
by turning his master's figure of Adam
into a macabre corpse.
Demonstrating perfect proportion,
Durer's Adam had shown
how paradise might be regained through artistry.
Baldung reversed this
by submitting Adam to a death
brought about by his own sin.
Baldung achieved originality
by travestying his master's
more original achievements.
In his work, Adam and Eve, evidently corrupt,
exude a fallen sexuality
which implicates the viewer.
Thus Baldung, by playing this trick,
sins against his artistic father, Durer,
who now had an almost godlike status
among German artists.
One of Baldung's last pictures
was a self-portrait in woodcut form
in which the evils he depicted
strike back at him.
The artist lies unconscious on the ground
but with his monogram
and the Baldung coat of arms displayed.
He has been overcome by a witch
and a devilish horse
who now also threatens us.
Nothing could be further from Durer's dream
of a Christ-like artistic self.
Baldung's person collapses
through outer and inner corruption.
And where Durer in his self-portraits
trumpets the birth of the Renaissance artist,
Baldung performs the artist's
catastrophic demise.
Even Baldung's pessimistic visions
are not original
but amplify a depressive strain
already present in his master's art.
Durer's personal emblem for this
was melancholia,
where curiosity and the pursuit of beauty
collapses into lethargic gloom.
Durer's engraving in melancholia
is perhaps his most enigmatic print.
Probably more has been written about this print
than any other work of art.
The picture is filled with puzzles,
magical squares,
complicated geometries,
all sorts of objects
which are cryptic in character.
And you can see one of the figures,
the little putto in the middle,
is scribbling away
as if trying to solve another problem.
Probably the most puzzling thing
about the work of art, though,
is what the work of art itself means.
Durer styled himself as a melancholic
since that's what genius should be.
He sketched himself pointing to his spleen,
the supposed seat of melancholy.
The inscription complains,
There where the yellow spot is
and the finger points,
there it hurts me.
And in his early drawing of himself
drawing himself,
he strikes the typical melancholy pose.
Whether manic or depressive,
melancholy turns a person inward.
Durer's print pairs
frenzied intellectual activity
with inactive introversion.
Whether these are sides of Durer's
true character, we can't know.
The print is, after all,
our insoluble puzzle.
Evidence of the troubled contents
of Durer's mind is kept
in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna.
Locked away is a rare document
of Durer's personal nightmares.
Here is Kunstbuch,
the art book of Albrecht Durer of Nuremberg.
We do have a lot of woodcut
and prints.
Ah, there it is.
So here is the spring motion.
Ah, Durer's dream.
Durer painted his dream vision
of an apocalyptic flood in watercolors
soon after he woke.
The very first water that hit the earth
so suddenly, it fell with such speed
and wind and roaring
that I was terrified and woke up.
And my entire body was shaking
and I wasn't able to collect myself
for a long time.
Durer's nightmare and his decision
to paint it may have reflected
his anxiety about the troubled times.
Martin Luther's reformation
of the Christian church was underway
while an increasingly violent peasantry
threatened the entire social order.
It's also possible that Durer's
medical condition had a role to play
in this fevered dream.
He had previously contracted malaria
in the Netherlands,
which may eventually have led to his death.
Durer is buried here
in the churchyard of St. Johannes
outside the city walls.
The words on his gravestone,
penned by his friend Pierkeimer,
still ring true.
Whatever was mortal of Albersch Durer
lies covered by this tomb,
departed April 6, 1528.
As they gathered round his grave,
Durer's admirers recognized
that his legacy would surpass
any they could imagine.
In every era since his death,
this artist has been born anew
as people make their own living image
of Albersch Durer to suit their needs.
On occasion, Durer's imagery
has been appropriated for disturbing ends.
German nationalists made him
into an embodiment of Germanic purity.
Durer as Führer became a slogan
and his iconic images were used
to project Nazi symbols
into a make-believe past.
There's a paradox
at the heart of Durer's legacy.
On the one hand,
this artist was ferociously protective
of his productions.
He added to one of his woodcut series
a label warning copyists
to keep their thieving hands
off his productions.
On the other hand,
he labored to make his influence massive
and to ensure that his art
would be endlessly utilized.
Today, Durer's legacy
is so large and complex
that artists evoke it
simply to provoke.
Durer continues to be copied,
plagiarized, and travestied.
Here at Germany's
biannual garden festival in Munich
to celebrate the country's hosting
of the World Cup,
a small football pitch
echoing one of Durer's
most famous watercolors
has been created.
Here in the penalty box,
the soil's been seeded
with the same mix of plants
as Durer depicted
in his famous watercolor
The Great Turf.
You can actually buy the seeds
and plant your own Durer turf
at home.
This may seem far removed
from the lofty realm
of Renaissance art,
yet Durer understood
that art and commerce
are complexly intertwined.
He was, after all,
a master of self-promotion,
so it's fitting
that he can still be the face
of an advertising campaign.
Durer wrote that great artists
are similar to God.
A great painter, he said,
is, quote,
full of figures,
and were it possible for him
to live forever,
he would always have
something new
flowing through his work.
Artists, Durer believes,
are filled with figures
or images,
and through that boundless
imagination,
they create godlike,
endlessly novel visual forms.
Considering the range
of Durer's masterpieces,
I think that no artist
was ever more filled
with images,
and therefore,
in his own terms,
more divine than Albrecht Durer.
Throughout his career,
and ever since,
Durer's person remains
the center of his legacy.
True, his creativity
knew no bounds,
and his interests
and his creations
were marvelously
various and new.
Yet precisely because
he was so original,
he circled back inevitably
to the origin,
to the puzzle
of his own creativity.
To Durer,
the ultimate marvel
was himself.
Next time,
one eccentric artist,
Hieronymus Bosch,
struggles with demons,
radical Protestants
smash images,
and another painter,
Peter Bruegel,
breaks through to modern art.
The bizarre images
of Hieronymus Bosch tomorrow.
More Northern Renaissance
a bit earlier here on BBC4
at 1.20.
