膠片攝影 grainydays試玩lomo新膠捲 lomo ‘92

相機在握
76粉絲
1 次觀看·2026年2月14日
今天這個系列是由 Surfshark VPN 贊助製作的
Yo, what it do?
It do not much with me.
Your favorite purple film company, Lomography, released a brand new color-negative film stock.
Yeah, you heard that right.
And I'm not shitting you or on you.
It's a new color-negative formula that you've never seen before.
And it's finally here. It's called Lomo 92.
I don't know why it's called Lomo 92, so literally, don't ask me.
I swear to God, if I see that shit in the comments even once,
I'll have to chug a flaming hot Mountain Dew or something.
It's entirely possible they're referencing the year 1992,
the year after the worst year of my life.
Lomo was kind enough to reach out with a pre-production role for me to test.
My upstairs neighbors are making a lot of noise,
because they have no spatial awareness.
But like always, my opinions on it are my own,
and I'm going to use whatever nouns, adjectives, or LaCroix flavors that I want to.
No holds barred.
But listen up, motherfuckers.
I should probably level with you.
I have grown very weary of doing film stock reviews,
and I don't much care for it these days.
That's it. There is no but.
So with my usual optimism at an all-time high,
I hit the deep, sketchy underbelly of LA's farmer's markets
for some street photography with Caleb.
OK.
Anyway, I grab my Nikon F2 and shove some of this new, unknown Lomo 92
straight up the heart of darkness.
I'm waiting for the day that I open a bag to load film,
and there's film in there.
It's gonna happen.
You've done it before.
No, I haven't. I'm perfect.
OK.
Lomo 92 is a 400-speed film,
which is a good ISO to chill at for most things.
A lot of the pre-production samples that I saw of Lomo 92
looked like maybe they could have used a little bit more light,
so I preemptively decided to shoot this roll at 320 ISO
just for a little extra sauce.
Color-negative film generally does well with overexposure anyway.
Slam.
Yeah.
Shooting street, or in this case, farmer's market in LA,
is definitely a different experience for sure.
I should be used to it by now,
but it's always gonna be a little uncomfortable
having literally everyone stare at you and your camera constantly,
including pissed-off fruit stand ladies.
In New York, it seems like literally no one gives a s***,
and that's kinda nice.
But before we dive any deeper into Lomo 92,
I'd like to first thank today's sponsor, Surfshark VPN,
for making this all possible.
Uh-oh.
I'm on the floor,
because I was blown away from the computer
by today's amazing opportunity.
Here's the rub.
If you're like me,
and you're constantly moving through different markets
across the globe,
you may start to realize that there are geo-restrictions
on some content,
and that's not super cash money for us.
Enter Surfshark VPN.
VPN stands for Virtual Private Network,
and one of the reasons that Surfshark is so popular
with online consumers these days
is because it can change the playback location of your device,
like cell phone, laptop, refrigerator door,
whatever you use.
Personally, I use Surfshark to access in-market games
that are usually blacked out.
By simply switching my VPN's network
to somewhere out of the area,
it unlocks access to in-market games,
so I can continue to watch my teams lose over and over again.
But wait, there's more.
Because there's always more.
Security. It's important.
Have you ever used Wi-Fi that was open to the public?
Probably.
Public Wi-Fi is the best way for tech-savvy outsiders
to rip into your data and personal information.
But worry not.
You can take preventative action with Surfshark
and secure your data by effectively masking
your IP address.
That way, your personal information
remains private in public settings.
And what I personally love
is that Surfshark offers a 30-day money-back guarantee.
So what are you waiting for?
Get it while it's hot.
You can find the link to Surfshark VPN
in the description below.
And you can use code GRANNYDAYS
to get an extra 3 months of Surfshark for free.
Lomography has been doing some interesting things
over the years.
And personally,
I think they've gained some respect for me.
Sure.
They do make some film stocks
that make you question if reality
is just a trip on toad venom.
But they also put out some stocks
that aren't half bad.
I have been power-slamming the crap
out of some LOMO Redscale lately.
And I know I'm not the only one out there.
LOMO 800 is another film stock
that's just downright filthy as well.
But is LOMO 92
a solid addition to their portfolio?
Upon first impressions,
yeah, I think so.
It's definitely very blue.
And not just like normal blue.
Advanced blue.
Which kind of leaves
a lot of the other colors
of the spectrum
to not really have
so much of a fighting chance.
It feels to me
like a cool summertime film.
The way it renders the color blue
is very interesting.
And I think
it would probably go well
with warmer colors.
Like this shot
with the tablecloth
and the overhead yellow canopy
contrasted against
the turquoise blue
sunlight spillover.
Hold up.
Did the PCP just kick in
or does this film stock
have a slight halation to it?
Blue halation.
I guess halation
can be any color
depending on how
the layers of the emulsion
are stacked.
I mean,
it's pretty well controlled
and it doesn't really appear
in most shots.
It could be a lens artifact.
Edge chroma
or whatever.
The problem is
I've never really seen
that kind of artifact
with the Leica R35-70.
It's a super sharp
and well-corrected lens
even on digital.
Let's see.
Here's some high-contrast
Kodak gold
that I shot with the same lens
and camera setup.
And I'm not really seeing
anything similar.
Which leads me
to believe
that it is coming
from the film.
Weird.
Cool,
but weird.
I would go so far
as to dare
to say
that this film stock
almost kind of seems
like it leans
maybe a little bit more
towards the tungsten
white balance.
The colors do look
a little bit colder
overall
in direct daylight
and then more
normal
under artificial light.
But what does
normal even mean
anyway, right?
My hot male doctor
hasn't seen a
normal heart rate
from me in years.
Grain.
Yes.
It certainly has that too.
I would almost say
that this stock
leans truer
to a 250 ISO film stock.
But that's just
kind of a guess.
I don't know
if Lumography
is going to do
that thing they do
where they give you
an ISO range
to shoot at.
My pre-production roll
said 400 on it
so that's probably that.
I mean,
who cares anyway?
ISO is made up.
It's a construct.
Just like
taking vitamins
and eating vegetables.
Anyway,
after wandering through
the nearly endless
farmer's market maze
like Triwizard competitors
Cedric Diggory
and that other guy
from that one movie
we grabbed some food
for a quick lunch.
Wait,
you're too cool for it?
It's disgusting.
To show you
kind of what we're working with
as sort of a base
on this film stock,
in Negative Lab Pro
I left all the settings
on the default
pre-saturation
and the Noritsu
color model
in the control panel
usually I left the
tone panel to
default lab standard
and the white balance
to auto neutral.
No further adjustments
were made after the fact
except that I cropped
the images to 4.3
but that's just
a personal preference.
And just for
curiosity's sake
here's what it looks like
with the white balance
set on auto warm.
Anyway,
as we clearly wandered
into the red light district
of the farmer's market
I started to ponder
where this film
came from exactly.
Don't get me wrong.
It's cool that
we're seeing a brand new
film stock in 2023.
But one does
have to ask themselves
how is that possible?
Lomography doesn't
actually have a factory
itself to manufacture film.
And it's kind of
a hard process
because it involves
chemicals.
And chemicals
explode sometimes.
It's hard to say
where it's from exactly.
All you can really do
is guess.
Or you just have to ask
Lomography yourself.
But chances are
they won't tell you
a damn thing.
Either way,
here's the little
cheat code
for this film stock.
Shoot warm-colored
things with it.
Like orange,
yellow and red.
This stock leans
bluer than a Smurf taint.
So if complimentary
colors and the whole
Hollywood teal and orange
thing has taught us
anything,
you can't really go wrong
pairing these two
tones together.
Like this.
Not exactly a great
photo,
but the colors
sure do grab
your attention nicely.
Anyway,
that about does it.
Of the 36 exposure roll,
I had about 30 keepers,
but that's kind of
a vague term here.
I was really more
focused on giving you
a sense of how
the film performs
instead of anything
that really flexes
my creative muscle.
Portfolio shots?
I don't know.
This one's
my favorite
because of the colors
and this one is
an honorable mention
as well.
Closing thoughts.
I don't have many
because critical thinking
is dangerous headache
territory.
I would say overall
Lomo 92
has a nice vintage look
and that's kind of
a good thing
because it's
quite different
than other film stocks
that are currently available.
It almost kind of
has the same feel
as like Lomo Metropolis
except if
Lomo Metropolis
had color
and wasn't diagnosed
with depression.
The colors
aside from the color blue
render in a very
pastel way
which is nice
and there seems to be
some magenta
coming in from somewhere.
Maybe the highlights.
I don't know.
At the moment
all I do know
is that this film stock
will be coming to
120 and 110
for all you people
out there who say
that size does matter.
But hey Lomo
where's 4x5 and 8x10?
I would happily extend
my pledge to get
a Lomography tattoo
if you deliver
this emulsion
in large format.
And yeah.
I guess finally
if this film stock
was a LaCroix flavor
it would probably
be a passion fruit
maybe.
Not quite
god tier guava
but not nearly
as shit
as cold medicine
cherry blossom.
And just a casual reminder
because aggressive
reminders are
unnecessary
sometimes.
Today's episode
was sponsored
by Surfshark.
You can find
more information
and some links
in the description
below.
