The Dark Side Of Chinese Table Tennis At The Paris Olympics

China Truths
61 followers
CCP's Chaos at the Paris Olympics: Women's Table Tennis Infighting, Banner Snatching
Bangladesh Government Collapses, Stock Market Soars: Chinese Investors Say ‘Found a Way to Save the Market’
Media and Hackers Simultaneously Expose Corruption in Red Family, Striking at Heart of CCP
The Collapse of CCP's Legal System: Insiders Take to the Internet as a Last Resort for Justice
Huawei Smart TV Can Monitor Everything in People's Homes, Terrifying Netizens
#china #chinatruths #chinanews
CCP's chaos at the Paris Olympics. Women's table tennis infighting. Banner snatching.
Bangladesh government collapses. Stock market soars. Chinese investors say found a way to
save the market. Media and hackers simultaneously expose corruption and red family, striking at
heart of CCP. The collapse of CCP's legal system. Insiders take to the internet as a last resort
Huawei's smart TV can monitor everything in people's homes,
terrifying netizens. It's all covered in today's China Truths.
CCP's chaos at the Paris Olympics. Women's table tennis infighting. Banner snatching.
At the Paris Olympics, the women's table tennis singles final saw an all-Chinese match between
Chen Meng and world number one Sun Yingsha. Chen Meng emerged victorious, retaining her
gold medal. However, what should have been a celebratory moment turned strange as a large
number of Chinese spectators booed and jeered loudly, with some even allegedly making indecent
gestures at Chen Meng. Netizens also posted derogatory comments about the athletes and
coaches on Weibo. Why do so many support Sun Yingsha over Chen Meng, even though both are
from the Chinese team? Public opinion suggests that this is due to the fan circle culture within
the Chinese table tennis community. In recent years, the Chinese sports community has seen the
rise of fan-circlization, a passionate display of supporter emotions. This time, however,
Beijing authorities have taken significant actions to curb this so-called fan-circle culture,
including arrests and criminal detentions. Tang Jingyuan, a U.S.-based commentator, said,
The media focuses on criticizing this fan-circle culture, but I think it's
actually diverting attention from the real issue. The core problem of the entire incident
is the internal distribution of interests within CCP sports, completely disregarding
any sportsmanship and turning the competition into a venue for distributing interests.
This time, it likely disrupted some unwritten rules within the CCP table tennis team.
Tang also stated that this incident not only involves the deep-seated scandals of the CCP's
flagship national table tennis project but has now escalated to the judicial level,
with people being criminally detained and facing imprisonment. What kind of dirty deals under the
glamorous exterior of the CCP's national table tennis project does this event uncover?
He also pointed out that winning an Olympic medal involves not just commercial benefits
but also political ones. He explained that the Chinese table tennis team,
plagued by internal divisions, sees a competitive field so overcrowded that the process of
selecting participants often mirrors a division of spoils rather than a selection based on merit.
Meanwhile, U.S.-based commentator Lan Xu said that China is called a gold-medal powerhouse
but is actually a minor player in sports, with these so-called gold medals being
accumulated through national effort. Lan noted the large discrepancy between the
number of athletes and media personnel at the Olympics, over 400 athletes versus 3,000 media
team members. According to him, the reason is that the CCP views the competitions as minor
and regards winning gold medals similarly. The key is that after winning the gold medals,
they use them for propaganda to brainwash the Chinese people and stir up nationalistic emotions.
That is the real purpose of the CCP. Furthermore, Lian Xiaohua, a staff member
at the Qinchuangchuang law firm in California, believes that it makes no difference to the CCP
which athlete wins the championship in the sports delegation. The outside world should
pay more attention to the CCP authorities' actions in snatching Taiwanese banners.
Lian said, the core issue is not the Olympics or merely snatching banners.
It actually centers on the CCP's ongoing oppression of Taiwan. That's the first point.
The second, very important, is transnational suppression and intervention.
Even in a Western democratic country like France, a major power, during an occasion like the
Olympics, which is supposed to be about peaceful and friendly sports, they can still direct staff
to snatch banners related to Taiwanese support, which shows China's severe infiltration into
Europe. At the Paris Olympics, an incident recently occurred where items printed with
Taiwanese characters and map shapes were suspected of being ambushed and snatched by
a mysterious Chinese group, causing a stir in society. A netizen discovered a Chinese woman
directing Olympic staff to confiscate Taiwanese people's banners or flags. Commentators believe
that the CCP treats the Olympics as a form of diplomatic warfare. Additionally, as previously
reported, CCP Olympic official Yuan Haoran commented on the issue of the US swim team
turning purple after the race, stating that the real situation was not as seen on TV,
but that the Chinese broadcasting organization had color-adjusted the American athletes.
This statement led to an unforgiving investigation by the CCP officials.
Currently, Yuan Haoran's Weibo content has been deleted, and he plans to apply for political
asylum in France, not returning to China. Although unconfirmed, Chinese netizens have
already regarded Yuan Haoran as having defected during the Paris Olympics.
Bangladesh government collapses, stock market soars, Chinese investors say found a way to
save the market. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh, often referred to as the old
friend of the Chinese Communist Party, fled Bangladesh on August 5 amidst widespread
national protests, leading to significant political upheaval. The very next day,
the DSE Composite Index of Bangladesh soared, marking a 4.8% increase at one point,
the largest since March 2020. This financial reaction mirrored the political unrest,
as many Chinese netizens celebrated the protesters' victory, engaging with news of the stock market
surge through likes and comments on social media. Their comments hinted at their desire for a
similar scenario to occur in China's stock market, with phrases such as found the way to make the
stock market surge, so this is why it's always 3,000 points, and found the source of the constant
decline. Support for the Bangladeshi protesters was also evident on China's Weibo platform where,
on the day Hasina fled, numerous users expressed their backing. One blogger noted,
In moments of continuous and severe regression in democracy and fairness,
the brave people of Bangladesh reversed the downward trend with their lives and blood.
Civilization is diverse, but there is only one direction.
Bless the people of Bangladesh. Some netizens reflected on the
courage of the Bangladeshi people, noting they were much braver than the people of a
big eastern country. The primary cause of Hasina's departure is reported to be the
military's neutrality and its refusal to violently suppress the protests.
This stance by the Bangladeshi military garnered significant admirationation on Weibo,
encapsulated in sentiments such as, salute to the brave people of Bangladesh,
salute to the military that stands with the people. Before her escape, nearly a hundred
protesters were killed, with hundreds more injured and many detained. Sheikh Hasina,
the longest-serving female head of government in Bangladesh, was elected for the fourth consecutive
time this January. However, the election was marred by significant controversies,
including the arrest of thousands of opposition members, leading the United
States and the United Kingdom to question the credibility of the election results.
At present, another old friend of the CCP, Venezuelan President Maduro, is also facing
widespread national protests over allegations of election fraud. Media and hackers simultaneously
expose corruption and red family, striking at heart of CCP. At the start of this month,
the international hacking group Anonymous made headlines by infiltrating Hong Kong and Macau
media outlets, releasing reports that exposed the corruption among elite families of the Chinese
Communist Party. These revelations have intensified global focus on the unchecked
wealth accumulation by the CCP's princelings. According to The Sound of Hope, senior investigative
journalist Fu Cade recently discussed the intricate details behind these reports on
He delved into his investigative process concerning the hidden overseas assets of
senior CCP officials and the implications of these findings. Fu Cade's reporting journey
began in 2012 with a publication in Bloomberg, where he unveiled the extensive wealth of Xi
Jinping's family. His investigative efforts continued, capturing widespread attention
last month with a New York Times article that disclosed the covert relationships between
Xiao Jianhua, a Chinese-Canadian businessman recently sentenced to 13 years in prison for
fraud and corruption, Jack Ma, and Xi Jinping's sister, Qi Chaoqiao. During his appearance on
the Bumming By podcast, Fu shared a 2012 incident at Bloomberg's Beijing office.
He received crucial information from a Shanghai colleague about Qi Chaoqiao and her husband
Deng Jiagui's business undertakings in Shenzhen, Beijing, and a rare earth company in Jiangxi.
This probe extended to Qianan, another sister of Xi Jinping, and her husband Wu Long,
who also possessed considerable assets. Following his revelations, Fu faced threats
and was subsequently relocated to Hong Kong by Bloomberg. This exposé preceded a New York Times
report on the wealth of Wen Jiabao's family during a period marked by fierce internal
power struggles within the CCP. Post these revelations, Xi Jinping initiated a rigorous
anti-corruption campaign targeting political adversaries, a move Fu Qaid believes has only
made the Red families more skilled at concealing their wealth, with corruption and accumulation
of riches persisting unabated. Fu also recounted an episode involving Wu Zheng,
husband of prominent Chinese media proprietor Yang Wan. Before his Bloomberg article was published,
Wu allegedly told some high-level Bloomberg executives that Fu Qaid was bad, had received
a lot of information from an anti-Xi Jinping source, and that many Beijing-based journalists
had rejected the material, thinking it was fake, but Fu Qaid accepted it and wrote the report.
Fu Qaid questioned how Wu Zheng knew about the report, which was not public knowledge
even to competitors. Last month, Fu broadened his investigative scope with a New York Times
report that first revealed secret financial transactions between Xiao Jianhua and Jack Ma.
He also mentioned that Xiao Jianhua had his own proxies who secretly controlled many overseas
companies, especially small companies in Hong Kong, with the help of Swiss banks
and the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. These entities turned a blind
eye to these proxies, leading to many public investors making investment decisions based
on false information. Fu said that the CCP targeted its own proxies because Xiao Jianhua
knew many things and could threaten both Xi Jinping's opponents and Xi Jinping himself.
After being captured, Xiao Jianhua was controlled by Xi Jinping and could be used as a weapon,
deterring opponents from acting rashly. Fu and others have continuously exposed the immense
wealth of the Red Families, revealing the truth about CCP elite corruption to the Chinese public.
The outside world believes this has significant destructive power against the CCP regime.
Even international hacker groups have started to take action against the CCP.
Earlier this month, a hacker group called Anonymous infiltrated the websites of Lotus
Times, China Integrity Network, and the China Enterprise Confederation, publishing two reports.
One, titled Xi Jinping's Anti-Corruption Reform, an elite purge game, was signed by
Xinhua Reporter and claimed that Xi Jinping owned over $700 million in hidden assets,
mostly laundered overseas by his family. Another article, Who Told You Not to Be
Born a Party Member?, sarcastically depicts ordinary Chinese citizens struggling to get ahead,
while Xi Jinping's daughter Xi Mingzhe was in the U.S., Li Chang's daughter Li Ying was in Australia,
Li Zhanshu's daughter was in Switzerland, and Wang Yang's daughter Wang Xixiao was in the U.S.
The article stated that while Chinese people endure tough times,
CCP officials enjoy a life of luxury and wealth. The collapse of CCP's legal system,
insiders take to the Internet as a last resort for justice.
In China, under the governance of the CCP, the public security, prosecution, and judicial bodies
have failed to act. As a result, Chinese citizens are turning to the Internet as their last channel
to voice grievances. Recently, a surge of real-name reports has exploded online,
marking a new trend in public outcry. According to a report by CCTV on August 6,
a netizen posted a video with a real-name report, accusing Jia Yu, the vice chairman of the
Federation of Industry and Commerce in Xizhou County, Yulin City, Shaanxi Province, of
falsification and impersonation to attend Suida Normal School and has been working under false
pretenses ever since. On August 6, a joint investigation team from Xizhou County issued
a situation report stating that a team composed of the county's Discipline Inspection and
Supervision Committee and the county's Organization Department has been formed and is currently
investigating. This whistleblower, Jia Yiding, posted the video report on August 5 and received
a response from the local authorities the next day. This speed contrasts sharply with the
conventional judicial process and even received coverage by CCTV, making it seem that the CCP
authorities attach great importance to public opinion. Recently, Chinese netizens have been
continuously posting video reports. Even employees within the CCP's public security,
prosecution, and judicial systems have bypassed the judicial process to make real-name reports
online. For example, a man in Beijing made a real-name report against Nia Yue, the deputy
secretary of the party committee of the Beijing Mingtong Special District Sub-District Office,
for pasting tiles on the Great Wall within the Jiangwen Cultural Relics Protection Zone.
Tiles costing 100 yuan each are labeled as patriotic public welfare,
national engineering, with fees reaching as high as 80,000 yuan. On August 6,
former judge of Panshan County, Guo Dawei, made a real-name report online accusing Wang Hong,
director of the Enforcement Bureau of the Liaoning Provincial High Court, of accepting bribes,
perverting the law, covering up crimes, and misusing public funds for food,
drink, and travel, as well as purchasing official positions and embezzlement.
On August 7, Lu Li, a police officer from the Public Security Bureau of Zhoko City,
Hunan Province, and a CCP member, made a real-name report online for her husband,
a former county mayor, against Zhou Qingsong, a judge of the Juvenile Court of the Hunan
The video poster stated,
My husband was once a county mayor. He chose to post the report online when faced with injustice.
Shouldn't the formal channels be to approach the Discipline Inspection Committee and the
Procuratorate? Why have there been so many cases of real-name reports by insiders recently?
Not only police officers, but judges are also making real-name reports online.
On August 5, Wu Chang, a judge of the Hanjiang District Court in Putian City,
Fujian Province, posted a video, publicly reporting Yi Wenjun,
former president of the Hanjiang District Court, and Huang Jichang,
director of the Political Department of the Putian Intermediate Court,
for buying and selling official positions. A netizen commented,
Even judges do not trust the CCP's legal system and go online to post video reports,
indicating that the CCP system is even dirtier than a cesspit. China's rule of law is a joke.
A former Chinese judge stated,
These cases of reporting indicate that even CCP enforcers do not believe in CCP laws.
However, not all problems can be solved after online reports.
Huawei's smart TV can monitor everything in people's homes, terrifying netizens.
Recently, a startling prompt appeared on a television screen, circulating widely on the
Chinese internet. The message warned that if more than two people were watching TV,
the number of viewers would be restricted. This has alarmed netizens, with many calling it scary.
Information online reveals that TVs equipped with cameras are now common in China,
particularly Huawei smart TVs, which can monitor everything in people's homes.
Images shared online show a TV, possibly playing a drama, with a blue prompt box on the screen
stating, There are currently two people in front of the screen. The number of viewers will be
restricted. Please purchase a family package. Netizens have reacted with fear, saying things
like, So scary, and it seems chatting while watching TV will be a high-risk activity in
the future. The screen has finally entered our homes. Questions about which TV brand this is.
And the answer was clear, Huawei. On the Chinese platform Douyin, many
Huawei TV advertisements promote the most advanced feature of Huawei smart TVs, the built-in AIHD
camera. One video tutorial shows how to use Huawei's remote home monitoring function.
First, open Network & Connection on the Huawei TV, find Remote Home Monitoring.
The video says if you don't have a Huawei phone, download the Huawei Smart Life app,
which also has the remote home monitoring function. Using the same account, you can
control the smart screen with your phone. The second step is to turn on the remote home
monitoring function on the phone. The TV camera then activates, showing the living room's image
on the phone. On December 21, 2020, Huawei held a whole-house intelligence and smart screen new
product press conference in Dingguan, Guangdong. At the conference, Huawei announced, the Huawei
Smart Screen S-Series is equipped with a magnetic AI camera, providing very clear images, and the
Huawei Smart Screen S-Series has added a remote home monitoring function. Whether the screen is
off or on, the smart screen camera can be remotely accessed by the phone to check the home situation.
On July 29, Ms. Liu, a former employee of a Chinese tech company, told NTD that Chinese
citizens are not only monitored by cameras in public places but that every household TV
also becomes a monitor. The authorities can watch everything people say and do at home.
Ms. Liu stated, the CCP's Skynet project means every household TV monitors the people,
leaving them with no privacy. She concluded, China is like a big prison, whatever you say,
whatever happens in your home, they can monitor it all.
Don't forget to leave a comment in the section below to share your opinions on today's topic
with us. Make sure to like and subscribe to see more interesting topics from China Truths.
