Egyptian Origins of the Ghana Empire, in West Africa (Kemet, Black Egyptians).

Welcome to a new day of truth and awakening and thank you all for tuning in to another edition of the original histories of Africa and migrations of the ancient world. I am your king and royal majesty Pharaoh Mitsraheim, historical researcher, geographer, and the voice of truth. And today I will be teaching on the subject Egyptian origins of the Ghana empire in West Africa. But before we get started be sure to look below, subscribe to this channel, and like and share this video. Thank you. Some of you may be wondering why am I wearing black and reason is because I will be speaking on the land of the darkness which the ancient Egyptians called the Amenti, meaning the land towards the sunset in the west. And in this land to the far west of Egypt there arose a great empire known as the Ghana empire. And when it comes to the ancestors and origins of the Ghana empire, there are many theories put forth by modern authorities. But there's a problem with these theories and problem is they're too late. And those who make these theories provide no ancient written sources to validate them. And then there's the Islamic sources coming from the Mali and Songhai empire that succeeded the Ghana empire. And it speaks on the origins of Ghana after Ghana converted to Islam. But there's a problem with these sources and problem is these sources corrupt the origins of Ghana with Islamic propaganda. But what if I told you the truth is actually in one source. And that source is the earliest source to ever mention the Ghana empire before Islam came into Ghana. And being that Ghana was an early medieval empire that lasted from the 8th century to 12th century AD, it is only right to seek the truth in an early medieval source that's contemporary with the Ghana empire. So without further ado let's show this source, examine it, connect it with historical events, and find out the truth for the origins of the Ghana empire. No more waiting for the truth. Let us now begin our lesson and show the earliest source to ever mention the origins for the Ghana empire and also the most ancient source to ever give a description for the Ghana empire. And that source is none other than Al-Yakubi, a Muslim historian who lived in the 9th century AD and was born in the region of Arak but later lived in Egypt and died in Egypt. And while in Egypt Al-Yakubi wrote a book titled the Tariq meaning the histories. And in this book he mentions the origins for the people of Egypt and for the people south of Egypt and west of Egypt. And in the book titled works of Ibn Wadi Al-Yakubi volume 2 edited by Chase F. Robertson the Tariq 872 AD the kingdoms of Sudan page 494 Al-Yakubi in his own words says in quotes when the descendants of Noah dispersed from the land of Babylonia the descendants of Ham son of Noah set out for the Magrib or the west and traveled from the banks of Euphrates towards the land of the setting sun. And when they crossed to Nile the descendants of Cush son of Ham they were the Ethiopians and the Sudanese split into two groups one group of them the Nubians the Buja the Ethiopians and the Zons travel south and one group the Zagawa the Kalku the Mararyan the Maranda the Kalkau and the Ghana went west. Based on what we just read let us first identify the Sudanese and Ethiopian or Habesha tribes mentioned by Al-Yakubi starting with the Nubians who were the ancestors of the modern-day Nubians of southern Egypt and Sudan along the Nile River. In the Buja who were the ancestors of the modern day Beja of eastern Sudan. In the Ethiopians which was translated from the original word Habash or Habesha and these were the ancestors of the modern-day Ethiopians of Ethiopia. In the Zons who were the ancestors of the modern-day people of Eritrea and Somalia. In concerning the other group that went west starting with the Zagawa who were the ancestors of the people of Chad. In the Kalku the Mararyan and the Maranda who were the ancestors of the people of modern-day Niger and Nigeria. In the Kalkau who were the ancestors of the people of modern-day Gao in the regions of Mali. In the Ghana who were the ancestors of the people of modern-day Mauritania, Senegal, and Guinea which derives from Ghana. Let us now focus on the first part of Al-Yakubi's account when it says, When the descendants of Noah dispersed from the land of Babylonia, the descendants of Ham, son of Noah, set out for the Migrel and traveled from the banks of the Euphrates towards the land of the setting sun. Now, this passage from Al-Yakubi clearly derives from the story found in the book of Genesis chapter 11 written in the Old Testament Bible. But let us compare Al-Yakubi's account to the Bible and see what the Bible actually says in Genesis chapter 11 verse 8 and 9. So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth, and they left off to build the city. Therefore is the name of it called Babel, because the Lord did there confound the language of all the earth, and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth. Based on what we read in the Bible, a unnamed and unknown people known as them scattered and dispersed from the city of Babel upon the face of all the earth. But the Bible's account says nothing about the descendants of Noah dispersing from the land of Babylon, and also says nothing about the descendants of Ham setting out for the West and migrating from the banks of the Euphrates River to the land of the setting sun that is mentioned in the writings of Al-Yakubi. But we can clearly see the words descendants of Noah, descendants of Ham, and Babylon was interpolated into the story by Al-Yakubi himself, and it's not identical to the original Bible story. So, being that Al-Yakubi's account is not supported by the Bible, how are we to make sense of this? First of all, we must remove the words descendants of Noah, descendants of Ham, and Babylon because it's not validated by the Bible. But let's focus only on the migration that took place from the Euphrates River towards the land of the setting sun in the West, and tie it to the earliest historical event. Now, when we focus on the migration only, and remove the biblical words from Al-Yakubi's account, we get this in quote, When they dispersed and set out for the Magrib, or the West, and traveled from the banks of the Euphrates towards the land of the setting sun. So, now we see the text is speaking of a migration that started from the Euphrates River and reached the land towards the setting sun in the West. So, question is, when did this movement and migration from the Euphrates River to the West took place historically? And the answer is in the ancient records of Assyria, and this source mentions the earliest historical movement and migration from the Euphrates River to the West. And here in the ancient records of Assyria in Babylon, volume 1, page 98, lines 300 and 301, translated by Daniel D. Luckenville, Reign of Tiglath-Pilesar, 1100 BCE, says in quote, Tiglath-Pilesar, the mighty king, king of the universe, king of Assyria, at the command of Ashur, my lord, from the other side of the lower Zab to the upper sea of the setting sun, my hand conquered, against Amuru I return, Amuru in its entirety I conquer. And here in the ancient records of Assyria, volume 1, page 251, lines 703, 859 to 824 BCE, says in quote, Shalmaneser, king of the universe, king of Assyria, son of Ashur-Nasirpah, king of Assyria, booty of the great sea of Amuru, of the setting sun, in the sea of Chaldea, which they called the bitter sea, I got into my possession. Based on the primary source we just read, the kings of Assyria from the Euphrates River moved and conquered the sea of Amuru towards the sunset in the West, which is known today as the Levant region and the land of Canaan. But this migration from Assyria never reached Egypt, Cush, or West Africa and never went beyond Canaan. And this is the earliest written historical account to ever mention a movement and migration from the Euphrates River to the land of the West. And it took place in the year 1100 BCE during the reign of the Assyrian king Tiglath-Pilesar. And this is the first and only historical event that the passage from Al-Yakubi can be tied to, but anything else is nothing more than just theory and conjecture. Let us now focus once again on the second part of Al-Yakubi's account when he says in quote, when they crossed the Nile, the descendants of Cush, son of Ham, they were the Ethiopians and the Sudanese, split into two groups, one group of them, the Nubians, the Buja, the Ethiopians, and the Zanj, traveled south, and one group, the Zagawa, the Kalku, the Mararyan, the Maranda, the Kalkau, and the Ghana, went west. According to the text we just read, a migration of a group of people called the descendants of Cush, crossed the Nile of Egypt, migrated south into Nubia, in the extreme south to the Sea of Zanj, and the other group went west to Zagawa, in the extreme west to Ghana. But to better understand who these people were, let's focus on the words, descendants of Cush and son of Ham. Now, Cush, the son of Ham, clearly derives from the book of Genesis in the Old Testament Bible. But let's go into the Bible and see what it says about Cush, the son of Ham. And according to the book of Genesis chapter 10, verse 6, it says, and quote, And the sons of Ham were Cush, Misrahim, Futh, and Canaan. And the sons of Cush, Seba, and Havala, and Sabta, and Rahama, and Sabtaka, and the sons of Rahama, Sheba, and Dedan. Genesis chapter 10, verse 20, and it says, and quote, These are the sons of Ham after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations. Based on the Bible verses we just read, the Bible story about Cush, son of Ham, clearly differs from Al-Yakubi's account about Cush, son of Ham. And according to the Bible, Cush, son of Ham, did not migrate or cross the Nile, but were indigenous sons of the land of Ham, who settled in their country and in their nations. And this is the truth of this matter. But let us now turn our focus on an earlier, more ancient historical source known as the ancient records of Egypt that mentions the term Cush. And being that the Bible makes no mention of a migration for the descendants of Cush or sons of Cush, how are we to interpret the passage from Al-Yakubi when he says, when they crossed the Nile, the descendants of Cush split into two groups. And truth is, the reason why these people were called descendants of Cush, because they were a group of people migrating into the indigenous land of Cush. And Cush was actually the name of the land. And the indigenous inhabitants were known as Cushites. And this is the real reason why these group of people were called descendants of Cush or sons of Cush. So the question is, who were these people called the sons of Cush migrating into the land of Cush? And the answer is in the ancient records of Egypt, volume two, 18th dynasty reign of Tutankhamun, page 423, lines 1029 and 1030. And it says in quotes, the king son of Cush, governor of the south countries, fan bearer at the right of the king, Huey triumphant, bringing all the tributes to the Lord of the two lands, the presence of retinue, the wretched, by the king's messenger to every country, the king son of Cush, governor of the southern countries, Amenhotep triumphant. According to the passage from the ancient records of Egypt, these people known as the sons of Cush were actually a colony of southern Egyptians from the region of Waset or better known as Thebes, the city of the God Amun in southern Egypt. And they live during the 18th dynasty period of Egypt. And on the orders of Pharaoh, these group of southern Egyptians were sent south to the land of Cush and west of Cush and became known as the king sons of Cush. And we must also keep in mind the word Cush itself derives from the written records of Egypt and all land called Cush was reached, conquered and settled by Egyptians because Cush is an Egyptian word referring to a non-Egyptian people known as Cushites whom the Egyptians settled amongst and mingled with. And their descendants later became known as Ethiopians mentioned in the ancient writings of the Greeks. But let us now focus on the movement and migration of these southern Egyptians coming into the land of Cush and find out when did these Egyptians came into the land of Cush historically. And when we go into the ancient records of Egypt, Volume 2, Biography of Amos, son of Ibana, reign of Amenhotep I, 1524-1504 BCE, page 17, line 39, it says, I sailed the king Zedjikare, Amenhotep I, triumphant, when he ascended the river of Cush in order to extend the borders of Egypt. Meanwhile, I was at the head of our army. Based on the inscription of Amos, son of Ibana, during the reign of Pharaoh Amenhotep I, an army of Egyptians moved and advanced south to the land of Cush to extend the borders of Egypt and establish an Egyptian colony in the land of Cush. And it was during this time, the 18th Dynasty, that a colony of Egyptians known as the Sons of Cush migrated, reached, and settled amongst the native Cushites in the land of Cush. And later on, according to Al-Yakubi, these Egyptians sent more colonies westward towards Chad, Niger, Mali, Mauritania, Senegal, and Guinea in the land of Uganda. But let's now focus on the question, how far did these borders or boundaries of Egypt extend? In what direction did they go? And the answer is in the ancient records of Egypt, Volume 2, 18th Dynasty, reign of Thutmose I, 1506-1493 BCE, page 30-31, line 73, and it says, He brought the ends of the earth into his domain. The entire earth is under his two feet, bodily son of Ra, his beloved, Thutmose I, living forever and ever. Ancient records of Egypt, Volume 2, 18th Dynasty, reign of Hatshepsut, page 134, line 321, and it says, He, Amun, has made my kingdom. The black land and the red land are united under my feet. My southern boundary is as far as the land of Punt. My eastern boundary is as far as the Asia. My western boundary is as far as the mountains of Manu. According to the ancient records of Egypt and the inscriptions we just read, the true boundaries for ancient Egypt was at the ends of the entire earth, towards the east, west, north, and south of the Nile River. And the ends of the earth is actually referring to coastal lands that is bounded by sea or ocean. In the north and eastern boundaries of Egypt was indeed the Euphrates River in the Persian Gulf. The southern boundary of Egypt was the land of Punt, located in the Horn of Africa, or the Horn of the Earth to the Egyptians. The western boundary of Egypt was indeed modern-day Senegal, Mauritania, and Guinea, located in the westernmost parts of Africa, or the western horn of the earth. And this is the truth according to the Egyptians themselves. So there you have it. When the source is revealed, the truth comes out. And when the source is present, the truth cannot be denied. And truth is, according to Al-Yakubi, the earliest, most ancient source to ever mention the term Ghana. The ancestors and founders of the Ghana Empire were a race of southern Egyptians that migrated from southern Egypt to the land of Kush, and from the land of Kush to the extreme west of Africa. And the only historical event this migration can be connected to is the Egyptian dynasty conquest of the land of Kush and Punt to the south and all of Africa to the west, that took place during the reigns of King Thutmose I to Amenhotep III. And these Egyptian colonies sent out on the orders of Pharaoh reached, conquered, and settled all of Africa to the west of Kush. And their descendants were later known as the Ethiopians, mentioned in the ancient classical writings of the Greeks. And this is the closest ever to the truth because the truth is in the earliest original source. And this truth is final and irrefutable. I arrest my case. So there you have it. What did we learn today? We learned that according to the one and only original primary contemporary source for the origins of the Ghana Empire, the ancestors and founders of the Ghana Empire were a race of ancient Egyptians who migrated from Egypt in the south and from Nubia in the east to Ghana in the west. And with that said, I say no more. The sources have been shown, the ancients have spoken, and the truth has been revealed. This is your brother, Pharaoh Mitzrahim signing out saying until next time, Egypt stays in Africa. Peace, ma'at, amen, hotep, and may you all have a wonderful day.