Hello everyone, welcome to New Vision. I am Xin Xin
The Republican Party's Third Person in the House of Representatives
Lizzie Cheney faces criminal investigation for tampering with evidence
Tuesday, December 17
House Management Committee Oversight Sub-committee
Published interim investigation report on the 16-nation Congress incident
Request the Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate the criminal activities of Leeds Cheney
Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Member of the Georgia Republican Party
Barry Goldmilk said
Their investigation is
One of the six events can be prevented.
There have been serious failures in intelligence and security
In addition, the Deputy Chairman of the 16th Special Committee of the House of Representatives
Lizzie Cheney may have violated multiple federal laws
Including tampering with witness testimony
These violations should be investigated by the FBI.
Ludmilk said that during the investigation period of the first six special groups
Cheney violated the law by attacking witnesses.
The evidence was revealed to the star witness of the 16th Committee.
Former White House assistant Cassidy Harrison's lawyer
without knowing the circumstances
Cheney and Harrison secretly communicate to dry up Harrison
Secret Correspondence between Members of Congress and Witnesses
May involve instructing witnesses to testify, hiding evidence
or otherwise interfere with investigations or judicial proceedings
May be seen as a violation of the law or a violation of the moral standards of the Congress
Because this kind of behavior goes beyond the proper function of the legislative process.
Therefore, the protection of the terms is not subject to speech and debate.
Federal law allows for varying degrees of tampering with witnesses.
convicted of a criminal offence
The accused will face up to 20 years in prison.
This report of the Administrative Supervision Group is particularly suspicious.
Cheney directly works for Harrison to hire Harrison
Friendly lawyers to the responsible group to represent themselves
Instead of retaining his original legal representation
Cheney is also responsible for Harrison's testimony.
The report said the FBI had to investigate Cheney.
Is there a violation of Section 18, Section 1622 of the United States Code
That provision prohibits any person from instigating another person to testify
The evidence obtained by the Supervisory Board shows that
After taking the oath to the 1.6 investigation team
Sara committed the crime of incrimination.
Everyone may have an impression of Harrison.
He was a White House assistant.
It's the assistant to the White House chief, Marc Meadows.
June 2022 Harrison as star witness
National Television Hearing Certification Conference held at the 1.6 Committee of the House of Representatives
What he heard about Trump.
What you can hear on January 6
He said January 6, 2021.
He was told that Trump had become furious
Trying to go to the Guild Hill to join the supporters
In the presidential luxury car wild sitting inside
Trump tries to wind up
And scuffled with the agents, claiming to be going to the Congress building.
Harrison's statement was directly countered by Antony Onato.
Honato worked for the Secret Service for ten years.
He was then deputy director of Trump's White House office.
Responsible agent protection work
Trump also contradicted that claim.
Harrison's story is sick and deceptive.
Like the non-elected special committee itself.
I couldn't have done such a ridiculous thing.
The report of the Executive Supervision Committee of the House of Representatives also found
After Harrison fired his original lawyer
The lawyer who hired Cheney pushed in was less than two weeks later.
Harrison participated in the fourth interview of the 1.6 responsible group.
But this time it's very different.
Every interview conducted by the investigation team before that
There are about a dozen people participating.
Including the staff of the group, legal advisers
As well as the members of the group, the interviewees and their legal representatives
Most interviews are held in large conference rooms.
At the same time, they will talk about the scene image.
However, the difference is that
Harrison's Fourth Session
Only four people participated in the entire interview.
They are Cheney himself and a lawyer in the 1.6 group.
Harrison and Harrison's New Lawyers
Harrison, with the help of Cheney, in a publication sheet
Major changes were made to his original testimony.
introduced a new statement
Some of them clashed with Secret Service credentials.
The testimony provided by the star witness Harrison is crucial.
The report of the Administrative Supervision Committee of the House of Representatives believes that
If not for Harrison's comment.
1.6 The task force is unlikely to respond to President Trump's emotions,
and the alleged crimes in the 1.6 incident.
In the final report of the 1.6 group
Harrison's name has been mentioned at least 185 times
But it is puzzling that many legal witnesses have been discredited again.
They repeatedly retorted Hasson's testimony after taking the oath.
These legal witnesses include senior government officials and federal agents.
Not only that, but Demilk's report.
They brought a second bomb.
His team found Special Inspector Jack Smith.
Evidence of collusion with this 1.6 responsible group
1.6 Small group by Democratic Congressman Benny Thompson
and republican Liza Cheney
October 2023
Smith released a batch of documents he used in the Trump case
These include the House of Representatives 1.6 Special Task Force.
An interview with a witness.
It is an unwritten record.
However, in the article transferred from the 1.6 group to the administrative supervision group
There is no record of this text.
This suggests that the 1.6 team may have destroyed this transcript.
The White House refused to provide the unedited version to the supervisory team.
So the only remaining explanation is
Special Inspector Smith
How to get the unedited version from the 1.6 team
What to get from Biden's White House
More than 130 pages of the report were released on Tuesday.
It has been proven in the past two years.
Many of the stories that conservative media keep reporting
For example, 1.6 The blame team failed to save important evidence in its investigation.
More than 1TB of data
These include lost witness interviews.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
In an HBO documentary made by her daughter
There is a segment not broadcast
When Pelosi said herself
She is responsible for failing to ensure adequate security for the Congress.
Before the 1.6 event
Trump, the former chief executive, asked to send a Chinese civilian police force.
Ensure the safety of her speech and the Congress building
But the Ministry of Defense officials postponed the deployment.
Nor was it approved by Pelosi and the mayor of Washington DC.
After the release of the House report
Cheney in a statement Tuesday
The report of Zandermilke.
Deliberate disregard for the truth and the bulk of the Special Council's evidence
1.6 Benny Thompson, former chairman of the panel's Democratic Party
Also hit hard at the Fox News report about Zedmilk
There is no basis for the report of Zandermilk.
He maintained that Trump was responsible for the fatal incident.
In an interview with NBC earlier this month, Trump
Repudiation of Cheney, Thompson and other members of the G6 Committee
Evidence relating to the investigation should be removed and destroyed.
Trump says Cheney is behind the scenes
Benny Thompson and everyone on the committee
It's also the black hand behind the curtain.
They should go to prison for what they did.
A report released earlier this year by Jedmilk
It corroborates Trump's statement.
Investigation by the Administrative Supervision Committee
The G6 accountability team removed records during the investigation period.
And hired good filmmakers to promote political affairs.
On Tuesday, Ludmilk also addressed his colleagues in the House of Representatives.
I wrote a personal email.
Says he provided evidence for the Democratic G6 panel's review
Proof that the Congress risked misleading Americans for political gain
and ask them to help turn it around.
Yudmilk wrote
As our founding fathers hoped.
Americans expect and deserve to have a small,
A government that is limited in scope and fully accountable to the people
After January 6, 2021
Evidence of the conduct of some elected officials and certain government officials
How we are far from the basic principles of our constitutional republic
He writes about transparency, accountability and equal application of the law
is to bring our country back to freedom,
The only solution for safe and full opportunity countries
There are still many undisclosed incidents about the 1.6 incident.
Last week, Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Ray
The day after the announcement.
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz
Just published a report.
Answer a question that people have been asking for a long time.
But it brought more problems.
According to the report of Horowitz
On the day of the 1.6 incident
There were 26 secret informants from the Federal Bureau of Investigation who appeared at the scene of the incident.
Three of them were requested by the FBI.
One of them entered the Congress.
The other 23 people are on the scene.
Contact the respective FBI responsible person for the transfer.
They all joined the protest.
Some are willing to go.
Three of them also entered the Congress building.
Others entered the National Mountain Area.
The report said that all 26 FBI informants
They are not authorized to enter the Congress building or prohibited areas.
or otherwise violate the law
The FBI did not instruct any of them.
By force, others committed illegal acts on that day.
All 26 were not charged.
Horowitz's report answers the long-term
A question people ask.
Are there FBI agents and informants?
FBI Director Ray testified in the Senate.
Ceng Xiang Fang's method of prevarication
It has been suspected that there are FBI agents in the field.
Some conservatives say
They raised another question.
These 26 FBI agents
Is it an FBI agent?
Just like in the Gal Boys.
It's like an FBI agent.
Just changed the name.
Just a word game.
Stephen Shand, then head of the Congress Police
In an interview with Tucker Carlson, he said
There are field investigators.
Vice President-elect J, D. Vance wrote on X.
If anyone dares to say that day at the Congress
There is a Federal Bureau of Investigation.
They will be called dangerous pundits.
Vance is obviously right.
The second new problem is
What do these FBI informants do when they go to Congress?
They will use possible informants such as Xiao Hong Mao Lei and Epps.
To stir up the crowd?
The third scene is in the Congress building and on the ground.
Are there more FBI agents?
After Horowitz published the report
Renowned Jurist, Fox News Writer
Nathan Turley asked a question.
Suppose Ray and Horowitz's report is correct.
That is, on January 6, there were indeed 26 coalition informants.
On the ground and within the Congress
So Turley has a few problems worth millions of dollars.
I very much hope to get the answer
He said in an interview with Fox News.
Rumors that the Federal Bureau of Investigation instigated violence in the Congress building
The report raises more questions than answers.
This information is important for the defendant in the 1.6 protest.
They become the victims of Biden's Justice Department's aggressive prosecution.
Terry said to some degree
This report raises more questions than answers.
Report confirms support for FBI Director
The testimony of Christopher Ray.
There were no agents in the crowd.
But for others there will be a lot of people worried
What are those confidential people doing there?
What role did they play that day?
One of Jonathan Turley's biggest questions is
Why the FBI's informants were arrested
More than 1,500 ordinary American citizens have been charged.
Some of them are just like curious tourists.
At the Congress.
And the Justice Department in suing these ordinary citizens
without telling them.
On that day, there were still FBI insiders appearing at the Congress building.
For the three FBI people who arranged to go there.
What might they have done and said in the crowd?
Consider the Justice Department's harsh prosecution of many of the people involved.
These questions may be useful.
On December 8, Trump was interviewed by NBC News
For the first time in detail on his first day in office
Pardons for first-class defendants without violence
Of the 1,500 defendants charged
More than 1,251 people have been convicted or pleaded guilty
645 people were sentenced to prison
Penalties range from a few days to 22 years.
Their charges include unlawfully entering a restricted venue,
incitement to crime and violent attacks, etc
When asked when he plans to pardon first-class defendants
He replied that I would soon move on the first day
Trump suspects that the Justice Department has filed a lawsuit against his supporters.
is a corrupt act
I think these complaints are politically motivated.
The back involves an improper purpose.
As a result, Trump did not rule out amnesty for more than 900 people.
Defendants who have pleaded guilty.
However, Trump also said that if the 1.6 Congress turmoil
Some people's actions appear particularly aggressive or insane.
Then he will set up some conditions or exceptions when considering the pardon.
Will not treat all defendants equally
His team will examine individual cases.
He will base his decision on the specific circumstances of each case.
Each case is examined individually.
At the same time, Trump's
He'll take into account the severity of the attack.
More than 140 police officers were injured and several died in the incident.
Trump is elected president.
It became the hope of most 1.6 defendants to regain their freedom.
1.6 The incident left many troupes unsolved.
What really happened that day?
This could be the new FBI director.
Cash Patel will dig deeper into the issue
Unveiling the Truth About the Congress Trouble
Give an answer to everyone who has been searching for the truth.
Okay, that's all for today.
If you like our program, please subscribe, praise and transfer it.
Thank you for watching our next issue.