🌺 UNIFICATION of FIELD TYPES. Electricity, Scalar & EMR 🌺

Hey, how you doing? Oh man, I had to make a dose of vitamin C. Oh, goodness, I feel great. Well, as good as a fat, bald guy that looks like Uncle Fester can feel anyway. Man, I hate these iPads, they suck. Apple, what a company, huh? There are ways to simplify things. And of course, and I can gloat about this, that I mentioned the unification of matter and light years ago, and it was proven about six months ago. I talked about it where current day science has proven that ultra-high energy light to coherent emissions of light, and of course light is not an emission, they were able to actually create fundamental matter. What if we could actually, and no one's ever done this before in any video or in any book, including Eric Dollard, is unify things very, very simply. As I've said specifically in my definitions, which is in the link below in the descriptions, where I actually define things like ether, dielectric. Of course, dielectric is ether under stress or strain. And that's all a field is, is an ether perturbation modality. Together they, of course, form the conjugate geometry of the universe, respectively the torus and the hyperbole. But what if we could combine three different things very simply? And for certain, no one has done this. I mean, not Tesla or Steinmetz or Heaviside or Dollard or anybody else for that matter. Because Mother Nature is divinely simple, and if you can't explain it simply, then you truly don't understand it. By the way, that's a quote from Einstein. Because even a broken clock is right twice a day. Specifically, we need to unify three different types of ether perturbation modalities. Specifically, light or EMR, electromagnetic radiation. And then we need to talk about, and I hate the word, what we call it. Tesla called it as a death ray, but specifically we're referring to scalar waves. And scalar waves have no wave components, so it's a completely illegitimate name. They're not measured in cycles per second or wavelength, rather in volts per second. And it's a longitudinal energy release. And release, of course, once again is an emission. None of these things are emission. Specifically, they're ether perturbation modalities. And a perturbation is not an emission, ever. Because we all suffer from the same delusion as we do from sound, speed of sound. Well, sound travels. Sound doesn't travel at all. Sound is not an emission. It's a perturbation of nitrogen and oxygen. Nikola Tesla, of course, accurately said that light is nothing other than a sound wave in the ether. Which is perfectly apropos, since light nor sound are an emission. They're a perturbation of the medium. So we have to combine light and we have to combine scalar waves, which is a horrible word. And we need to combine electricity. Now, Charles Proteus Steinmetz referred to AC generators as, quote unquote, churning up the ether. The AC generators of his day did a lot of churning up of the ether. Trying to come up with three simple mental visualizations of these three things is one. And we think of a medium, that being the ether, which of course has no Cartesian reality. In other words, it's not phenomena. If it were phenomena, it would, of course, have measure and magnitude. And it would have a Cartesian coordinate, x, y, z coordinate in a space and time. And that, of course, is certainly not applicable to the ether. So how can we think of these three different things? Kind of like ice, water, and steam, which are, of course, all one thing, right? All field modalities are one thing. I have over many hundreds of videos combined, logically and sensibly, magnetism, dielectricity. Electricity and so-called gravity, which is nothing other than non-point source mutual mass acceleration, into one thing. So how do we explain light or EMR, electromagnetic radiation? Scalar waves and electricity. So I'm going to use, in no particular order, electricity in reference to an ether perturbation modality. I don't have a piece of fabric here. Well, actually, I do. Here's a piece of fabric, a little cloth. Conventional electricity, of course, electricity is a hybrid. It's five times psi equals q, a plank of electrification. Specifically, also, too, explaining electricity is extremely simple if you understand it as a hybrid. Also, too, it makes explaining what an electromagnet is and how it works extremely simple. Charles Proteus Steinmetz, in his book, Electrical Discharges, Waves, and Impulses, stated specifically, and this book was written a little over 100 years ago, 1914, I believe. I believe 1914, that even the electrical theorists of his day completely complicated the idea of electricity. Electricity is a hybrid of dielectricity and magnetism, or five times psi equals q, a plank of electrification. That's one of Dallard's famous sayings, which, of course, is accurate. And that's not belonging to Dallard. Specifically, he got that from Electrical Discharges, Waves, and Impulses, written by Charles Proteus Steinmetz. So let's simplify things, since we're talking about the medium that is the ether. And I'm trying to go for a very, very simple image visualization, such that we're able to combine light, electricity, and scalar waves. So in the case of the ether perturbation modality that is electricity, we're actually talking about churning up the ether, like someone in a pond that's actually flapping their arms, for example. So we're actually talking about generating a rippling, which, of course, has a cycle, in the case of electricity. It has a dual component. There is no longitudinal pulse perturbation, as in the case of light. So imagine the only best analogy I could think of is actually rippling a piece of fabric, like any AC generator, because that's all an AC generator is. And by the way, and I've said this in many videos, and no one else had ever said this about explaining what an AC generator is. And it's really true, just like in the case of a magnet, which is Mother Nature's phenomenon. Mother Nature does have natural magnets, in the case of lodestones, of course. Also to pulsars and quasars. The dielectric, i.e. the plane of inertia, is at the middle, and yet the magnetic field around a magnet, obviously, is around the magnet. An AC generator is inverse to that, where we actually have the plane of inertia on the outside, i.e. the dielectric reflector, and the magnetic core on the inside. We actually set this in motion with a temporal variable. What you're doing is you're just creating, just like this, the ether. And of course, the ether, and it's hard for people to visualize this. We're talking about and trying to visualize something that is being flapped. In the case of the medium, that is the ether that has no Cartesian reality. It has no x, y, z coordinate. It can't be phenomenon, yet we still have to understand the ether. In counter space, which is not a place, or a locus, nor has it any phenomena, we have to imagine this medium, which is everywhere and nowhere. And there's, by the way, a huge distinction between nothing and no thing. That's a huge point in metaphysics that everybody really doesn't grasp. There's a huge difference between nothing, meaning nihil x nihilo, and not a thing. Not a thing is not the same as nothing. Not a thing means it is not phenomenal, i.e. it is noumena. So we actually have to imagine electricity, just as in the case of an AC generator, and the ether being flapped like a piece of fabric being flapped. And of course, the transmission lines and the guidelines of electricity are nothing other than a field guide for electricity. So, now let's get on to the scalar waves, because we're all talking about three different things, which are just one thing. Obviously, scalar waves, electricity, and light are all just ether perturbation modalities. Now, I talk about electricity, magnetism, dielectricity, and gravity in countless other videos, but I've never made a video like this combining light, scalar waves, and electricity. In the case of scalar waves, we're talking about a different type of ether modality in which it is extremely, of the utmost, absolute efficiency if most energy emissions are not that efficient. And they are not point-sourced. And not only is scalar waves, and I hate to say scalar waves, incredibly efficient, but it is also too point-sourced. In the case of electricity, where we're talking about the ether being a piece of fabric that is being flapped, we need to think of scalar waves, which has no transverse component, of course, since it is measured in volts per second, it has no transverse wave component, and therefore does not partake of time. C, or the so-called speed of light, which is not a speed at all, but rather a rate of induction, or the hysteresis of the ether, is exactly like this. And this is not a stick, it's a laser. But you know, this could easily be conceived of as a stick, and I'll put a stick against a table here. It'd just be like creating an energy pulse, which has no transverse component, and it travels instantaneously. Now imagine, if you will, and this is easy to do as a thought experiment, a stick, say the stick is propped up, because nobody can hold a stick, you know, that's like a thousand feet long, right? So it's being propped up, say, by a bunch of U-sticks. You're actually pounding on the end of the stick, you have instantaneous manifestation of that energy at the other end of the stick. There's no transverse or wave component. Of course, the stick, in a thought experiment, would have to be perfectly rigid. You know, most sticks are flexible to some point, so when you hit it, you know, the stick, just like an arrow, and you see actually an arrow in high-speed filming, will bend drastically, and it'll bend again, and it'll eventually straighten out. You have to imagine an unflexible stick. So in the case of scalar wave, we're talking about ultra-high efficiency, but also two-point source energy emission. And when we say emission, we only mean this as a colloquialism, because no ether perturbation modality is actually an emission. It is a perturbation of the medium, just the same as a person in the middle of a pond flapping their arms is not an emission. They're creating a disturbance in the medium. In that case, the water. So in the case of EMR or light, the closest accurate analogies would be one of several types, like a punch or an explosion or resistance energy bunching. In the case of a light bulb, we're talking about the filament where a resistance is set up, or in the case of something like an induction melter. I don't know if a lot of people are not very familiar with an induction melter. It actually starts to heat up, and the more energy that's in it, it changes. It goes from red, which is hot, but that's relatively low energy. And then it starts making its way to orange and yellow and white, and then it'll eventually turn white, white, white, hot. And then eventually, before it starts to melt, it will start to turn blue, ultra-high energy. This energy bunching. So when you think in terms of light, and of course everybody knows what a punch is like. Have you ever seen a slow-mo video where you're punched or punching something? You actually see not only a transverse component, where there are outward ripples created, which are the transverse electrical magnetic. In the case of EMR, all EMR is a coaxial circuit. And when I say coaxial circuit, I assume, and most people may not be aware of this, what the cross-section of a coax cable looks like. A coax cable comes from your satellite dish, your TV, or from TV to various other devices in your house. It has a center conductor. It has a dielectric plastic core. It doesn't have to be plastic. Actually, the most efficient coax cables, or air coax, are incredibly expensive. They're just one hollow copper tube with a helix of plastic that's holding another large copper tube. And these are used, actually, in ultra-high transmission lines at TV stations. In the case of EMR light, we're looking at the analogy of a punch or explosion, or resistance energy bunching. You know, resistance energy bunching is a piling up or a funneling of an enormous amount of energy. And it's actually bunching up. Ever seen a train? It'll actually hit something. It'll slip its tracks. And then the front of the train will hit the dirt or the gravel. And all these millions of tons of trains, of cars behind the train, they start to accordion. The actual cars will start accordion. It's going accordion style. And that, of course, is what light is like. And this train piling up accordion style is no different than resistance energy bunching. But the other analogies that you think of will be an explosion or a punch. And this is a compound. Yet the most simple, because the most simple natural ether perturbation modality in the universe is light. And it doesn't necessarily mean visible light, because radio, visible light, ultraviolet, X-ray, gamma radiation, they are all exactly one and the same thing. They are only differentiated out by their capacitances, because the smaller the spatial, i.e. the higher the frequency, these are all one and the same thing. Infrared being the weakest, the visible light, X-ray, then gamma, and many, many magnitudes above gamma radiation is that of a fundamental particle, which is what we see being emitted by galactic jets and also, too, what they're called astrophysical jets, one and the same thing, i.e. being emitted at the geomagnetic processional axes of rotation, not only of pulsars and quasars, however, pure matter is being emitted by the trillions of tons from the centers of galaxies. There are many, many countless genuine photographs of galactic jets. I can't believe people want to deny them like that's fake or something. It's completely ludicrous. These images are being captured all over the world by countless different telescopes. Since Mother Nature is divinely simple, it's just as ridiculous to assume that infrared light and visible light and gamma radiation are different things. No, they're all electromagnetic radiation. They're all light, fundamentally. They may not be visible light, obviously, human beings see a super, super narrow spectrum of visible light, but they're all light. They're all EMR. Well, scalar waves are what Nikola Tesla called death rays and electricity and light are all the same thing. You should be understood in your mental analogy of how these perturbations occur depending on the source of the transference, not emission. Transference is more accurate. Transference of energy. Like I said, in the case of electricity, we're talking about the ether being fabric and ripples being generated in the ether. This is exactly what Charles Preudy Steinmetz meant when he said generators were churning up the ether. They are, they're flapping the ether. And of course, the transmission lines are guidelines of fields, field guidelines. That's all any transmission line is, is a field guideline. And of course, scalar waves is no different than, as I said specifically, it's ultra, ultra extreme high efficiency because it has no transverse component. If it were inefficient, it would be gamma radiation or some form of light. But when the transference of energy is insanely efficient or ultra efficient transference of energy, then it's just exactly like this. It's like pounding on a stick. It has no transverse component. This is what Nikola Tesla called his death ray. This is what scalar wave energy is. And explaining light, I just got done explaining light. So the reconciliation of these three things is one, is incredibly simple. I hope I made it simple. I mean, it's easy to understand electricity as a flapping fabric. Because that's all really electricity is. And electricity is, once again, a hybrid. It's not in an autonomous ether modality. Well, none of them are because they're all one and the same thing. But they're only individuated by and as such of their transferences of energy by the type of transferences that they are. They're either point source and ultra efficient or they're actually flapping the ether in the case of electrical generation. And a generator, by the way, doesn't actually generate electricity. What it does is it manifests electricity. There's a huge distinction there as I've pointed out many, many times. It's the most common ether perturbation modality in the universe, which is light. Whether that be infrared or visible light or X-ray or gamma. No simple one. So they're only individuated by their transference modalities of the point of origin of the transference modalities where energy is lost. Whether that be the sun, whether that be from an AC generator, whether it be from Nikola Tesla's death ray machine, which, by the way, the government does have. It's also a directed energy weapon. Anyway, I hope I clarified that. I meant to clarify it and make it really, really simple by using simple analogies like hitting the end of a stick or flapping a piece of fabric in the case of electricity or a punch or resistance to energy bunching in the case of light. I simplified this and I love doing videos that no one else has done before because no one else in any videos is one thing. And they are ultimately one thing. They cannot be different. Here we have electricity and over here we have light. No, they're all the same thing. Only distinguished by what I had already said. Thank you so much for watching and have a lovely day.