Real estate insiders reveal the industry's deceptive tactics | Four Corners

Real Estate Channel
5 followers
5 Video Views·Oct 2, 2024
"Australia’s real estate insiders are spilling the secrets of their industry.
Some are risking their careers to speak out about the tactics used to deceive buyers and sellers as they make the biggest financial decisions of their lives.
Four Corners has spoken to more than a hundred agents and property professionals, and scores of buyers and sellers, who responded to a crowdsourced investigation launched last year.
What they reveal is a damning assessment of the industry: rife with potential conflicts of interest, misconduct, and regulators struggling to clean things up in this nine trillion-dollar industry."
I stick to one thing that I'm good at,
and that's called selling properties and listing properties.
And if you don't close a deal, someone else will.
Can you guys give me some more confidence?
Serious face if we can, please.
Australia has one of the most hyped residential real estate markets
in the world, worth $9 trillion.
There's so much money.
There's so much money to be made.
For those of us fortunate enough to buy or sell a home,
agents are the gatekeepers to the market.
This is an area where consumer protection is absolutely essential.
It's people's life savings that are going into this.
Now the insiders who know the system best are speaking out.
Some are risking their careers to lift the veil on the tricks of the trade.
How would you characterise the real estate industry?
Disingenuous.
Extremely insincere.
It's lies on top of lies.
Real estate agents are frustrated at the conduct of a select few
who give the industry a poor name and a bad reputation.
We're about to show you the secrets of Australia's real estate industry.
We'll examine the tactics used on buyers and sellers
to get them across the line.
Real estate in Australia is rife with potential conflicts of interest
and hidden commissions,
and there's little confidence that regulators are doing enough
to rein in rogue agents.
The Gold Coast is a very untapped market,
especially in the luxury space.
We're going to innovate.
We're going to bring in our Z touch and a Z sparkle
to get the whole Gold Coast market sharing and shaking.
Melbourne real estate agent Z Nishit isn't a rule-breaker,
but he is a risk-taker.
He's expanding his high-volume Melbourne agency
to what he believes will be a lucrative market here in Queensland.
Maybe everyone just look at me, and then when I say 3, 2, 1,
just, like, laugh, smile, just talk to each other.
3, 2, 1.
Friendly people.
I'm all about personal branding,
and I'm all about expansion after expansion,
and the only way we can expand is to be in front of more people
and create as much content as we can
so people can get captivated by what we're doing.
Because in real estate, image is everything.
You have to make your passion your paycheck.
I live and breathe real estate.
Real estate's in my DNA. Sold by Z Real Estate.
In today's marketplace, every single phone call matters,
every single meeting matters and every single appraisal matters.
And if you don't close a deal, someone else will.
How's that for an angle? Better?
Z offers a window into the promotion-driven world
of the luxury high-end agent.
Confidence, all of us looking the same.
All right, guys, serious first.
All right.
You're a legend.
Hey, Zed. How you going?
Welcome to Z Real Estate Gold Coast, mate.
Good to see you, mate. Yeah.
This is the team.
Zed Nasheed's the kind of agent you expect to see on a reality TV show.
And I'm a loud person.
No, no, I'm not.
Zed's always honing what he calls his killer sales pitch.
A good, sharp salesman should be able to read
every single personality out there.
Like, your body language right now is telling me
that you're very straightforward, you're a very honest person,
but you're also a little bit indecisive person,
so you need that push for Z Real Estate.
Sometimes, when it comes to real estate, you're like,
oh, I don't know if I should buy now or if I should buy later.
Right, OK.
I'm not actually in the market for property,
but there is a potential buyer on the phone.
Obviously, with the interest rate rise that's just gone up,
you know, with everything that's slowed down,
I'm happy to take an offer of $2.4 million in writing, if you like.
You can't do that? That's OK.
Would you go $2.3 million?
Zed is pushing hard for an offer.
Alright, why don't we do this?
Let's put $2.2 million in writing with 30-day settlement.
Could you do that?
And nudges the buyer closer to the line.
Pleasure talking to you. Thank you so much.
Bye-bye. Bye.
Everybody's an opportuner in real estate, isn't it?
Regardless of who they are, what they are.
And I never knock back offers.
Reason being is because we're only state agents
and we just can't knock back offers.
So the minute you put money in front of people,
we can't be decision makers.
It's all about the numbers game, isn't it?
Everything's for sale for the right price.
You like that?
I love that shit!
Zed's unapologetic about his relentless focus on sales.
That's how he makes money.
This has to be the money shot right here.
The back of the house is a lot more modern than the front of the house.
Would you guys agree?
Absolutely.
But he fires up when it comes to one industry practice
that many consumers complain about.
Underquoting.
That's when agents lowball price guides to lure in more buyers.
There are so many agencies out there that underquote
and I'm totally against it.
I am 100% against underquoting.
The amount of buyers that show up to auctions in today's environment
where agents have underquoted,
they market a house between 2.4 and 2.6
when the reserve price is $3 million,
the buyers get pissed off.
This is why real estate agents have a bad name.
Because of those underquoters.
Because of those agencies and it comes from the top.
The top of those leaders out there,
the old way of selling real estate is gone.
They need to change their ways.
How would you characterise the public's perception
of real estate agents?
Well, sadly, we know that consumer perceptions
about real estate professionals are not particularly good.
We know this from annual surveys that are conducted
and it's certainly something that I think, as a peak body,
for real estate professionals disappoints us
and equally, I would say,
it disappoints those who are in the profession.
My name is Mark Jones.
I'm an independent real estate agent
in the eastern suburbs of Sydney.
I worked in finance in London during the GFC
and saw how badly the industry needed to change.
That's what I think needs to happen in Australian real estate.
It needs cleaning up.
Mark Jones knows he runs a risk
in speaking out about his own industry.
Yeah, I could be shunned by the industry, for sure.
Yeah, it could mean the end of my business.
I might have to go back to finance.
How are you? Hey, Paul, how are you doing?
Yeah, good. Beautiful morning. Lovely.
So, Mark, what do you think is the biggest problem
in real estate in Australia?
Underquoting.
It's everywhere and it's obvious, it's really blatant.
Anyone who's in the industry
or anyone who's trying to buy a property
can see it on most listings.
How do you know it's everywhere?
Well, I'm in the market.
I'm watching what goes on, talking to buyers' agents,
talking to buyers.
You know, I know what price properties should or will sell for,
certainly within 10%, maybe 15% at worst.
So I'm often seeing properties come on and just thinking,
what a joke.
There's no way that that's going to sell anywhere near that guy.
He's been closely following price guides set by agents
in his local area and comparing them with sales prices.
He's found a significant difference.
So from the first guide to the sole price,
I just kept track of properties that were comparable
to the properties I was selling or appraising at the time.
And so it's just a handful, and they were underquoted by...
31%, 28%, 28%, 38%,
and the winner from the year before, 43%.
So with underquoting, we have recognised
that this is quite a significant issue
which is causing quite significant consumer harm.
So in 2021, we set up a specialist underquoting team of inspectors
who went out and really did a blitz across the state
to look at how this practice was playing out.
What that underquoting team saw
was around quite prevalent...quite prevalent underquoting.
The data we've got from Fair Trading
shows that the largest fine they've ever awarded for underquoting
is $2,200.
Serious?
That's a joke, isn't it?
Is that any kind of deterrent?
No. No.
The usual suspects are earning, you know, millions of dollars a year.
It's... Yeah, it's an absolute joke.
I mean, surely some agents are just baking this
into the cost of doing business.
So that is an issue,
and that is something that we are working with them on.
If they are baking it into the cost of doing business,
they need to look more broadly
about what is it doing to their reputation,
both as an agent but also as the sector.
What are consumers thinking
and what sort of level of consumer confidence is
if people are just doing the wrong thing
and baking it into business?
If people are forming that view,
if there are people telling you that,
then I'd have to accept that that's their opinion
as to that particular issue.
Again, you know, it's a big state and...
But, look, you know, let me say this.
I'm aware it does take place.
But having said that,
I don't think it is anywhere near
as big a problem
as what the community would believe it to be.
We're in South Australia's Clare Valley
to meet homebuyer John O'Brien.
Hey, John. Hey.
Paul. Is it? Yeah.
Great to meet you.
So we're pretty much just surrounded
by vineyards everywhere here, aren't we?
Yeah, it's an idyllic place.
But you know there's always a bit of trouble in paradise.
John O'Brien's story shows
how consumers can be misled by an agent.
This is some marketing from around the time
when we purchased the property.
Stone cottage, modern extension,
eight acres in bold.
Wide French doors that open out onto a balcony.
Then we come back down here towards the bottom.
The grounds are superbly simplistic,
spacious lawn, box hedges
and eight acres set amongst huge gums and vineyard.
And it just isn't true?
It's not true.
We're missing three acres.
The agent who sold John the property was also the owner.
He also sent us an email about the size of it
justifying the price on the basis of the size of the land as well.
So that was it.
We were misrepresented the size of the land.
John says he conducted the usual checks for the purchase.
Two years after he bought the property,
John started planning renovations
and realised it was 5.2 acres in size, not eight.
He's devoted years of his life trying to untangle the mess.
We decided to pursue through the regulator a complaint
and we lodged that and they came out and investigated
and ultimately they did find
that the agent had misrepresented the size of the property.
Under scrutiny from the regulator,
the agent undertook not to make false or misleading representations.
He agreed to what's known as an enforceable undertaking,
which says that because he owned the land and was selling it,
he should have known that the land was not eight acres.
Every state and territory keeps an online register
so that consumers can check a real estate agent's licence.
South Australian law requires disciplinary findings
to be recorded on the register.
We looked up the licence of John's agent and there was nothing there.
So this is a copy of the agent's licence
and it doesn't actually reference anything
about the findings against him in relation to your property.
There's nothing on here at all.
Unbelievable. Just unbelievable.
So he misled you and there's not even a reference to that on his licence?
Yes. Yes.
Doesn't surprise me, though.
Consumer and Business Services South Australia
said that undertakings are available on its website
but not on an individual's licence.
This practice is now being reviewed.
The regulator said it took appropriate action
in relation to John's complaint
and that the agent's licence was cancelled this year
for an administrative reason.
They should be held to a higher standard.
They're a property professional. That's their career.
If you read their blogs and their real estate website and all that,
they boast about how skilled they are and how much they know and all that
and yet they know all the tricks.
People just feel so completely bamboozled
by what they're seeing in the property industry
that they really just want someone who's in their corner
and backing in their interests.
And that's where buyers' agents come in.
And people really just want someone
who's willing to give them frank and fearless advice.
Two hours north of Sydney, Newcastle is a thriving property market
and competition is fierce among buyers.
I'm Chad Dunn, a buyer's agent from Newcastle, New South Wales.
I've been in the real estate industry for over 22 years.
I'll ask you this question.
Does your buyer's agent have your best interest at mind?
It's really important so there's no conflict of interest.
This one hasn't even hit the market yet
so it hasn't been listed with an agent
and it hasn't gone onto the open market.
So these clients that I'm sending this through to,
they're getting a showing before the general market does.
A buyer's agent helps, I guess, assist you through the whole process,
hold your hand,
but make sure that what you're buying isn't a dud.
Buyer's agents rely on their relationships with selling agents.
We spend a lot of time making sure that we're talking
and communicating with lots of different agents in different areas
to be one of the first to find out about the new listings coming up.
But it is crucial that we don't be seen as having too much of a bias
to one particular office or one chain
because at the end of the day,
we're being paid by the buyer to have a bias to them
to find them the right property,
not necessarily with who we're, you know,
got a better relationship with as agents.
Ready?
And it will look all right.
So I'm standing at the front of a property we purchased for a client.
We're just about to do the pre-settlement inspection.
One of Chad's competitors in the Newcastle market is Jack Henderson.
Henderson Advocacy,
so they're one of probably 20 different competitors
we've got in my area, in the Hunter.
I think they also operate on the Central Coast in Sydney.
I was a young guy in the construction industry,
got expelled from school,
and I leveraged all that to build my story,
to get onto people's podcasts and to get articles and all that shit.
And then I just went hard
because I believe in life it's not about what you know,
it's who you know.
There's plenty happening out there, Will.
I can feel it.
When everyone's contracting, mate,
we're f***ing expanding on my biceps, all right?
The 26-year-old is a prolific content creator,
churning out colourful videos on YouTube, Instagram and TikTok.
How many square metres is that?
Yeah.
OK.
It's nice, man. It's private too.
Big week this week for the Henderson team, mate.
Three deals last week,
couple happening this week.
Greg Sheridan and his partner
bought their Newcastle home through Henderson Advocacy.
We wanted to leave Sydney, we wanted to head a little bit north,
and we found ourselves in Newcastle.
We found that real estate agents were suggesting that we call Hendersons,
so when you've got the vendors' agents suggesting Hendersons,
we perhaps naively went straight to them.
Right from the start,
Greg and his partner Glenn saw a red flag
in the contract that Hendersons provided.
It says that we're not allowed to say or do anything
that might bring the buyer's agent into disrepute
or to in any way discourage people from giving them business.
So this is basically a gag clause...
Absolutely.
..that your buyer's agent has asked you to sign.
Wow.
So you couldn't really say anything negative about Henderson at all?
So we couldn't leave anything less than a glowing five-star Google review.
Wow.
Or contact the regulator if we'd had any problems with this transaction.
I responded to Jack straightaway saying,
no, we're disengaging, we're not going to proceed.
And when he asked why, I said, that gag clause.
He was very quick to drop the gag clause.
He wanted the business, very keen for the business
and was prepared to drop the gag clause.
I don't think these clauses should appear
in buyer's agent's agreements,
but a non-disparagement clause is likely to be unenforceable anyway.
The ACCC has taken action against businesses
with non-disparagement clauses
and deemed them to breach unfair contract terms laws.
Henderson Advocacy helped Greg buy his home
through one of Newcastle's biggest selling agencies,
PRD Presence, which also trades as PRD Newcastle.
PRD Newcastle is co-founded and directed by Mark Kentwell.
It's no wonder that people from all around Australia
and locals alike are trying to get their piece
of coastal real estate action
that's close to the city of Newcastle.
Mark Kentwell and Jack Henderson
appear in real estate videos together.
But the selling agent and the buyer's agent
also have a business relationship.
And I'm sitting with the other co-founder, Mark Kentwell.
Yeah, Mark Kentwell, MK, Kenny K.
And I organise the scaling and the vision side of the business.
Look, I think we were surprised.
I know, talking to different sales agents,
they were surprised as well,
because I think on face value they weren't informed
that there was what could be perceived
as a conflict of interest.
And I think as long as clients are informed
that there is that conflict of interest to a degree,
I think then problem solved.
Mark Kentwell is a co-founder of Henderson Advocacy.
He isn't a director or shareholder
and told Four Corners he receives no dividend
or profit distributions from the company.
The two men have publicly spoken
about how they work together at Henderson Advocacy.
And even though I still do real estate sales and advisory myself,
I don't buy properties for Henderson Advocacy.
I'm purely involved in scaling and the business side.
So what would you say if I told you
that one of PRD Newcastle's directors
is also one of the founders of Henderson Advocacy?
That would come as a shock.
That just seems totally inappropriate.
Did you know that? Were you ever told?
No. No, definitely not.
So the whole point of engaging a buyer's agent
is to be our representative,
to be able to talk all of the real estate guff
and know and work through all of the strategies
that the vendor's agent would be using against us.
So we definitely want somebody
who's independent of the vendor's agent to be working for us.
Whilst we're paying them a very, very large amount of money,
we certainly want them to be on our side.
Jack Henderson declined an interview request with Four Corners
and did not respond to written questions.
He told us he wasn't interested in being a part of the story
and referred us to his positive customer reviews.
There's another layer to the relationship
between PRD Newcastle and Henderson Advocacy.
Behind these tinted windows is a call centre.
And in this call centre, a handful of agents
are making hundreds of phone calls a day,
drumming up new business with a very sophisticated strategy.
The so-called growth centre is supervised by Mark Kentwell.
It's a separate corporate entity to PRD Newcastle.
What might sound like a spontaneous call from an agent
is sometimes a calculated, scripted pitch.
I was actually just checking in.
You inquired about a property with us a while ago.
I was just wondering, did you manage to secure something,
or are you still looking?
We've obtained a copy of a training manual
to help new staff pitch for sales to people on PRD Newcastle's database.
A detailed script directs trainees to gather intelligence
and then choose the appropriate sales spiel.
I just had a thought.
One suggestion I can make based on this chat,
have you ever heard of a buyers agent before?
We use the guys at Henderson Advocacy
and they have a really good relationship with a lot of agents.
They've helped a lot of buyers so far.
Throughout the conversation, the script coaches staff
to recommend Henderson Advocacy.
We work closely with Henderson Advocacy,
who are the best in the business.
Well, what I can do is pass on your information
to one of the team at Henderson and get them to touch base
and I'll tell them to really look after you.
We showed the Growth Centre script
to Henderson's competitor, Chad Dunn.
Yeah, I mean, look, speechless.
That's really surprising.
It's very staged and obviously routine
and I think that's the bit that is a little bit disturbing.
So it's the way this is done is probably not sitting that well with me.
There's nothing wrong with referrals in our industry.
I do get recommendations from other agents,
but this is very staged
and I think that's where it's really blurring the lines.
I just hope there are clients that sign up with Henderson's
are aware that this is where they're coming from.
There's no mention that PRD Newcastle's director
is a co-founder of Henderson Advocacy.
If there's no disclosure,
how is a purchaser supposed to know about the relationship?
How are those players, those businesses,
going to act in the best interest of the purchaser
in those circumstances?
Mark Kentwell declined an interview request with Four Corners.
He said in a statement his business interests and relationships
are disclosed to stakeholders in writing and verbally where required
and that he continues to work with lawyers
to ensure compliance with consumer laws.
PRD Presence, which trades as PRD Newcastle,
also said it complies with its disclosure obligations.
My name's Steve Vonderbough.
I've been a real estate agent since 1984.
Along the way, I've seen laws being bent, breached and broken.
This is not serving the community well.
Consumers are suffering
and good real estate agents are being dragged down.
Steve Vonderbough runs a suburban real estate agency
in Adelaide's north-west.
Hello and welcome to beautiful Henley Beach South.
We're right here on the beach here
and, of course, it's a fabulous location.
By speaking out, Steve risks making enemies in the industry.
He wants to tell us the tricks agents use on sellers,
like conditioning.
My name's Steve Vonderbough. Thanks for watching.
So just walk us through that. What's conditioning?
There's a lot of competition amongst agents to win the listing.
A lot of people think that real estate is about selling property.
It's actually about winning the listing.
And the temptation is that agents
who will tell an owner what they want to hear
are more likely to get the listing
and then it's the source of poor advice.
Once the agent has won the listing with an inflated selling price,
the conditioning strategy
is to talk the seller down to where the market actually is.
That agent has a competitive advantage.
When they go to list their property,
their modus operandi is a price high without accountability
and, quote, low to make dough.
You sound pretty angry about it. I am angry about it.
Because good agents are lost to this industry
by this sort of practice
because they get dutted all the time.
And there's no real empowerment of the authorities
to go out and find this stuff out
and deal with it because it's nuanced and it's whispered.
There is this practice that we've been told of conditioning
where agents condition sellers to get a listing.
Does that practice concern you
if agents aren't being honest
about their expectations for a price they can get?
A real estate professional shouldn't be inflating the price
in order to secure the listing
and then subsequently trying to condition the vendor
to accept a lower price.
So what I would say is that a good real estate agent
should be able to substantiate
the amount that they think the property will achieve.
And that's usually done
through pointing to comparable sales data.
We accept that in some areas of agency practice
that there are people who do the wrong thing.
Like every other trade calling and profession,
there are people, unfortunately,
that bring the industry into disrepute.
We have ours.
We have to deal with ours.
We do.
But we are constantly trying
to improve the standard of the services
that we provide to our clients.
Steve von der Bock wants to reveal something else
about his industry, the hidden kickbacks.
An agent who sends a client to another agent
could get a commission.
Well, a good example would be referring business.
So you're standing at an open inspection,
you meet someone who's got a property in a remote location
you can't work, who needs to sell.
They mention this to you, you get their details,
you call another agent in that location,
let them know that that's about to happen,
they give the client a call, go and see their property,
and in return, at settlement,
the referring agent picks up 20% of the fee.
So that could amount to a couple of thousand dollars
for a $500,000 home.
Do you think consumers actually know that this is happening?
I'm sure they don't.
Referrals are a bigger part of the market
than I had realised when I first started the business.
Yeah, there's...
It's very standard for a 20% referral fee to be paid
from anyone who might bring the business to you
or to bring you a lead or bring you a listing.
So there's a whole kind of hidden economy of commissions
beneath the industry.
Yeah, absolutely, yeah.
It's all considered very normal,
which I don't have a problem with as long as it's disclosed, right?
With more than half a million residential properties
sold around the nation each year,
regulators can't police every transaction.
We're here for the general compliance briefing
for Operation 3 2023 South Western Sydney.
But New South Wales Fair Trading inspectors are doing their best
to keep real estate agents honest.
We're joining them in the middle of a week-long blitz.
We're still seeing quite prominent issues with under-quoting,
not being able to substantiate changes
to the estimated selling price.
We'll be looking at taking a consistent approach
with under-quoting.
Fairly, fairly educative in respect of the requirements,
but strong compliance action to indicate our zero tolerance
for that particular matter.
Operations like this are part of the New South Wales regulators'
efforts to oversee an industry with a reputation
for flouting the rules.
As the regulator, we can never be in every agency
every day of the week,
so ultimately what we need agents to do is to actually step up
and do the right thing and comply with the laws
that they are required to comply with.
So we can only do so much as a regulator,
and ultimately it needs to be the agents who step up
and make sure that there is consumer confidence in their industry.
After the blitz, the compliance team updates the commissioner,
and it's not good news.
We visited 41 agencies during the week,
and 37 were non-compliant.
37 of the 41 were non-compliant.
It's about 90% non-compliance, right?
It's pretty disappointing.
So we had 88 separate breaches that were identified.
The most common breaches were agents not having policies
and procedures in accordance with the supervision guidelines
and not ensuring that estimated selling price on sales agreements
were considered to be reasonable and remain reasonable.
So the under-quoting offence. That's correct.
I think $25,000 worth of penalty notices were issued.
We've done education and warnings,
and the team will be out in the next couple of months again
to see that that compliance has lifted in those areas.
The New South Wales Fair Trading Commissioner
would welcome greater powers to be tougher on agents.
A lot of it's enshrined in law
in terms of what the maximum value of the fine can be.
So it really is a matter for the politicians
to change the law in that respect.
Personally, I think I'd be very happy
to have higher fines and higher enforcements.
Do we take the approach that we want to fine the industry?
We're simply going to be looking to catch people doing the wrong thing?
Or do we take a better response
and say that we want to work with industry
to bring the level of compliance up to where there is...
..to where the standard of what the regulator wants?
Now, I frankly don't think there is a lot of benefit
in having these programs where we go into the market
and fine a heap of agents
and then publish the results in the newspaper the following day.
We've learnt the Real Estate Institute gave agents a heads-up
about the operation in south-west Sydney.
This information actually came from Fair Trading,
and it's not the first time.
The regulator has alerted the industry body
about a number of raids in the past.
We take two approaches.
One is announced visits and one is unannounced visits.
So, with the announced visits,
we would work with the industry associations
and we would tell them, this is what we're looking at.
It might be underquoting, it might be rent bidding.
We would tell them, because ultimately,
we want real estate agents to get their business in order
to do the right thing.
I mean, aren't you giving a tip-off to the industry
about compliance issues in advance
if you're forewarning them about a visit?
As I said, we do both announced visits and unannounced visits.
So, with our announced ones, we are informing them.
We are saying, it is our regulatory focus this month
to look at underquoting, and we put you on notice
that you need to be doing the right thing
because we are sending inspectors out to monitor you
and we will come after you if you're not.
When did this practice of getting updates from Fair Trading
on compliance operations in advance, when did that begin?
Be 12 months ago, maybe?
Why did that start 12 months ago?
Look, that's probably a better question for Fair Trading.
I don't know. We have...
Did you request that?
We could have said that we would like to be working
with Fair Trading in these issues.
Where I see with penalties...
Sorry, did you ask the regulators?
I possibly did, yes.
I mean, we're asking constantly
if we can have a more productive relationship
so that we can improve our sector.
I mean, some might say that indicates
that that's a far too friendly relationship,
getting tip-offs like that.
What would you say to that?
Well, I see the argument, but at the end of the day,
what we've said to people
when we know that Fair Trading is going to be in the area,
we've said to them,
these are the things that they will be looking for.
So have your office in a position
to provide the maximum assistance they can with Fair Trading,
because at the end of the day,
people from Fair Trading that go in there,
they've got their job to do.
We can cooperate with each other.
We can provide the documents that they are looking for.
Christine Shaw, real estate agent from Canberra.
Our industry is all about trust.
I believe the legislation should be improved
so that consumers have greater protection.
I want to thank our owners in handing over the property
they've had constructed for themselves to live in.
Christine Shaw is breaking ranks with her own industry.
Who'd like to kick us along?
It's not where we start, but where we finish.
Oh, this is going to be a long day.
Agents like Christine are seeing a real slowdown at auctions
as interest rate rises take hold.
So we have a slight increase here, folks, to $2.2 million.
Just give us a moment.
We're going to seek some final instructions from our sellers.
The final bid today isn't enough to reach the reserve.
Third and final call. We're all done and finished.
No further bids.
Pass the property to you. Thanks for your bids today.
We might be able to help you immediately after the auction.
Thanks, folks, for coming along.
I have a very good group of agents around me.
There will be some and many of us
who follow the spirit and the intent of the law
and the legislation and our framework of how we operate.
There are others, however.
If there's a loophole in the legislation, they'll find it
and they could drive a truck through it.
Christine Shaw wants to see better regulation
and wants the industry itself to help pay for compliance.
That's perhaps not going to be liked by many, I understand,
but perhaps that is an avenue
and that can help improve consumer confidence
that the industry themselves are contributing
to those compliance and investigative units
that are in their various jurisdictions.
It's hard enough as it is for many Australians
to break into the property market.
Surely there's a better way to help consumers
with what may be the most important financial decision of a lifetime.
So you've got, in every state and territory,
different rules around licensing,
you've got different rules around penalties,
different rules around what needs to be disclosed.
Wouldn't it make more sense for all of this
to just be regulated nationally,
given how important property is to Australians?
Yeah, that's right.
Look, I think that's the utopian vision, potentially.
Even though that sounds like a simple solution,
the reality of achieving that is, I think, quite complicated.
So I'll hand it over to Zed.
Welcome, Zed.
Back with Zed and Ashit at his Melbourne headquarters,
it's the weekly sales meeting.
In today's marketplace, you need relationships, you need connections.
Today is a celebration of his team's fortunes.
So far this month, they've hit $42 million worth of listings.
Congratulations to every single one of you guys,
because if you notice in here, every one of you guys have performed.
So another agent told us that when we asked him
how would you characterise the real estate industry in Australia,
he said disingenuous, extremely sincere,
from the very first appraisal meeting, it's lies on top of lies.
What do you think about that?
Everyone has their own opinions and I respect that.
If that's the experience and the journey that they've had,
I feel bad.
At the end of the day, nobody's perfect in life, correct?
And that's why you've got to do your due diligence, your homework.
There shouldn't be any lies.
Why would you have the need to lie?
In this real estate industry, if you want to survive,
you've got to go out there and become a hunter
and be willing to be able to take punches on a daily basis.
It's the world's easiest industry to get into.
It's also the world's hardest industry to survive into.
And in real estate, if you don't sell, you don't get paid.
