中國政府稱特斯拉是中國國產車；江西銀行爆雷

Tesla is the largest electric car and solar panel company in the United States. The headquarters is located in Texas, USA. It produces electric cars, solar panels, and storage equipment and system solutions. Recently, a local government in China claimed that Tesla is a Chinese-made car. What is going on? In this program, we are going to watch a strange news. Later, we are going to watch an incident where a Chinese bank went bankrupt. Let's start with Tesla. Today, Tesla selected a province in the east of China, Gansu Province, to purchase a car. According to the recently disclosed Gansu government procurement network, the Gansu Provincial Party Administration, Business Unit and Group Organization announced the purchase of 2024-2025 New Energy Vehicle Framework Agreement. Tesla Model Y, the rear-wheel drive version, entered the procurement list for the new energy vehicle from the government of Gansu Province. This is the first case of Tesla entering the government procurement list in China. On 4th July, the Gansu Provincial Government Procurement Center responsible for the project's contact person told Hongxing News that there is no official document that prohibits Tesla from entering the government procurement list. The contact person explained that as long as the car meets a certain price and configuration requirements, it can be entered. The contact person also said that the announcement is just an entry. It is up to the user to decide whether to purchase the car or not. That night, the Gansu Provincial Government Procurement Center told Hongxing News that the purchase was made by Tesla. The procurement center evaluated the car based on the price and configuration requirements and approved Tesla's entry qualification. A staff member of the procurement center said that the government does not purchase imported goods. Imported goods require special approval. But Tesla is not an imported car. It is a domestic car. The Hongxing News pointed out that 95% of Tesla's parts are produced in China. Therefore, it is a domestic car. According to the government procurement law, it should prioritize the purchase of domestic goods. Although Tesla is an American brand, it established a factory in Shanghai. It also produces and sells in China. And 95% of the parts produced in Shanghai are domestic. On 5th July, the Gansu Provincial Government called a hot topic that Tesla is a domestic car. Netizens said, Is Mazda going to change its nationality? If the land is in China, it is a domestic car. It is not even a joint venture. According to your theory, iPhone is also a domestic car. LV, Adidas, and Nike are also domestic cars. In our opinion, In January 2014, Tesla's founder and CEO, Musk first proposed to build a car factory in China. In June 2017, he decided to build a factory in Shanghai. On 10th July 2018, Musk signed a contract with the Shanghai government and announced that Tesla's factory in China will be built in Lingang. Tesla's entry into China led to the development of Chinese electric vehicles. Without Tesla's factory in Shanghai, there would be no complete supply of Chinese electric vehicles. This made Chinese electric vehicles stand out. But this does not mean that Tesla's career in China has always been successful. Data security has always been a concern of the Chinese government. The data collected by Tesla will be transmitted to the United States. Since 2022, government agencies such as Zhejiang, Beijing, and Wuhan have begun to ban Tesla cars from entering China. When CCTV announced that smart network cars produced by foreign companies such as Tesla would not be allowed to enter Taiwan, local parking lots protested against Tesla. Tesla has already made a compromise in this regard. Prior to this, in October 2021, China's multi-department joint statement stipulated that Tesla, as the first company to participate in the regulatory review, has already established a data center in China to localize data storage. This means that all the data produced by Tesla's long-sale cars in mainland China will be stored in China. But the fate of Tesla's car business really turned around in April this year. At that time, Tesla CEO Musk went to Beijing to meet Chinese Prime Minister Li Keng. On April 28, China's Automotive Industry Association issued a statement Tesla has reached an agreement with Baidu on automatic driving system. Since then, Tesla has been developing unmanned cars in China and wants to enter the actual operating stage. The reason why the CCP opened a green light for Tesla and Musk is that China's automotive industry has encountered technical bottlenecks. If China's huge automotive industry wants to break through, it needs Tesla's technology, including Tesla's unmanned driving technology. However, China's policy towards foreign companies depends on economic and political needs. Today, Tesla's electric car has entered the government's purchase list. If Tesla is restricted again in the future, Tesla's future in the Chinese market is full of uncertainty. It is possible that the government's partial restriction on Tesla's cars in China is just a show of force. Because this policy is not in line with the national security of the whole country I'm afraid it's hard to be true. There are many reasons for China's strong development of the electric car industry. The current Chinese economy is in a serious dilemma and the CCP urgently needs the so-called new industry to support the CCP's plan. However, this kind of transformation is not successful. China's economy is still in a state of rapid decline. The real estate crisis has directly impacted the banking industry and there have been many explosive incidents. There was news the other day that the Bank of Hong Kong was involved in a large-scale extortion case involving more than HK$1 billion in gold. Many residents rushed to the Bank of Hong Kong's main bank to ask for money back. The video online shows that at the gate of the Bank of Hong Kong many people protested for their rights and called for money back. The relevant authorities also dispatched police to arrest them. The public data shows that the Bank of Hong Kong is the only city-level commercial bank It opened in June 2018 and is listed in Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The latest report shows that in 2023, the Bank of Hong Kong had a net income of HK$112.97 billion and was down by 11.15%. Its net net profit was HK$10.36 billion and was down by 33.13%. The above-mentioned incident is related to the Nanchang City's financial registration service center. According to the Chinese media's Economic Observation Department, the investment products recommended by the financial registration center have recently been subject to large-scale violations and many investors have not been able to repay their loans and interest. At present, the center's business has been shut down. As far as I know, the incident involved more than 2,200 investors with a deposit of more than HK$8 billion. Most of the customers are locals in Nanchang City. Among them, there are more than 60-year-old citizens and investors who have invested between HK$1 million and HK$2 million. However, many Chinese official banks say that the Bank of Hong Kong has nothing to do with the financial registration center and is only an open-account bank. On the one hand, Chinese banks often launch various financial products for their customers and it is difficult for them to distinguish the actual relationship between these financial products and the bank. On the other hand, the Hong Kong West Bank has a series of incidents that are related to the bank's bad business. The Hong Kong West Bank's Deputy Head Yu Kim was arrested for committing a serious crime. In addition, many officials in the Hong Kong Bank recently were arrested, including the president of the bank, and the banks have been facing doubts about the financial ability of the Some people also say that the incident in Hong Kong is a big drag on the is the re-enactment of the incident in Chunshin Bank, Hainan Province. According to a Chinese media outlet, the Bank of Hong Kong gradually restored its normal payment function on 29 June. The staff of the bank also emphasized that the bank's current deposits and withdrawals are all normal, but it seems that some people are still unable to make regular payments. On 4 July, the Hong Kong and Western Southwestern Provinces' Local Monetary Authority issued a notice, claiming that some people are gathering at the main gate of the Bank of Hong Kong, posting false news on the Internet, claiming that they are disrupting the work order of financial institutions, and threatening them to be punished by the law. However, the official notice was soon exposed by the mainland netizens. Why didn't they say anything about the gathering? If they didn't say the reason, they said it was a rumor. As soon as there was a problem, they immediately cleared the relationship. What is false news? They didn't say anything about the situation. The most obvious arrangement was that the prison was not strong enough, and the payment was out of order. It is difficult to make payments in Hainan Province. The bank has not been able to pay the money yet.