【精彩】潘焯鴻：憤怒鬧爆家超！個個老闆穿晒窿！你搞咗咩出來盛市經濟食咗S啦！ 捱多2 3月 萬間公司執笠 車公講中 去深山去打獵全部廢柴 去把咩！失業率如高你S啦 #Lucy連線

It's been 3 months, what have you done? Apart from thinking about the urban economy, you've eaten shit. Do you know that you've eaten shit? If you hold on for another 2-3 months, I believe there will be 10,000 companies shut down. You have to compensate for the fired workers. On the other hand, every boss is basically in a hole right now. If it gets to the end of the year, or autumn, you really have to wait until autumn. I don't believe it, but the workers' signs are a bit vague. You have to wait until autumn. You go hunting, you're all useless. You carry all these weapons in, guns, rockets, grenades, whatever. You're all useless. Do you want to go in and shoot? Come out, don't wait until next year. Think about next year's autumn. Think about this year's autumn. There's a good chance that the workers are right again. It's only April now. We still have to wait until October or November. The U.S. election may really be Trump's salvation. There's still half a year left. What can you do now? In this half a year, don't let Hong Kong die so miserably. To be honest, the people I know, basically all of them, no one is born. Some people are born. Some people are really born. I'll give you a hint later. But most of the people who are not born are traditional. They work hard in Hong Kong. They do business very well. They work hard every day and do business hard. And they face a situation where they can't do business. The turnover keeps falling. The rent has never fallen. Because even if you rent a house to this person, he has to pay the rent. The management fee goes up. His turnover and salary can't go down. He has to pay the rent. On the other hand, every boss is basically broke now. He's willing to take out his wealth. If he doesn't want to take it out, he'll close the company first. If he doesn't want to take it out, he'll leave it. Then he'll hire his own workers the next day. He'll hire his own people again. It's all the same now. After another two or three months, I believe there will be tens of thousands of companies closed. Hong Kong is now the fourth largest in the world. It was the third in 2022. It was the fourth in 2023. There is no data yet. I guess it's between the fourth and the third. In terms of the number of companies closed, not in terms of proportion, but in terms of numbers, Hong Kong is the third and fourth largest in the world. I believe that if Li Ka-siu continues to do this, by the end of the autumn, Hong Kong is likely to be the second largest. It's amazing. France, Britain, and the United States have ten times more companies than us. The number of companies closed is not much more than ours. If Li Ka-siu continues to be greedy, continues to ignore everything, and continues to think that the United States will decrease, think that the June reduction will be good, think that after the June reduction, the U.S. dollar will be weak, think that after the June reduction, the U.S. dollar will be weak, and the Hong Kong dollar will be weak, and the RMB will rise, the consumption in the South will rise, and the consumption in the North will decrease, and Hong Kong will be a little cheaper. It's all wrong. It's like after Japan changed the curve of the interest rate policy, the Japanese dollar turned into a weak, not a rise. Because, as expected, its interest rate rise is not as high as expected. That is to say, Li Ka-siu really has to warn you. I have been talking about it for a year now. If you don't engage in economics, just engage in politics, Hong Kong will be in a mess. Okay, now you know you have to engage in economics. I've been talking about it for a few months. Since you went to Beijing on December 20, 2023, before you went there, you were still scolding people, saying that people are far-fetched, noisy politics. Then after you went to Beijing, you shut up and said you wanted to engage in good economics. Okay, I worship you. I support you. I really support you. I'm serious. I don't care. But the problem is, from January, February, March, just three months, what have you done? In addition to thinking about the city economy, you have eaten shit. Do you know you have eaten shit? Okay, then go back. You think this financial center position can be re-established again because Alimutlau or Alimutlau is listed. If it doesn't work, it's a mess again. It's April now. Are you still holding on? I want someone to go to the market. I want Assad, Amir or Alibaba to go to the market. Or do you think the city economy can save you? Now it's October, November. Hong Kong's Hong Kong dollar is still following the US dollar. It has been strong for most of the time. Or the US dollar rate can't be reduced. Or it's reduced very slowly, slower than the US dollar. The RMB will still be weak. Southbound consumption will still be weak. Northbound consumption will still be strong. How do you protect Hong Kong from so many companies closing down? If the company continues to close down, if the unemployment rate rises, it hasn't hit yet. 2.5% is not considered unemployment. It's almost called all-or-nothing. If the unemployment rate rises, Li Ka-shing, you will die. It is impossible to recover the 23rd. Li Ka-shing, you will have a hard time recovering. You can't do it by then. You can't even send money. Now you are using more than RMB 100 million to run the city economy. Take it back. If you want to do it, let me tell you. You give RMB 50 million to the project. You put RMB 50 million in the budget to the government officials. Ask the officials to do it themselves. Use the RMB 45 million to send it, please. To reward consumption. You don't send money to every citizen. You are also to the consumers. Immediately use the Taiwan set. In the vote, the code of conduct. Use the 8-street supermarket, Weihong supermarket set. Then you use its F-market. Ask it to help. Use the 8-street supermarket. Use the money bag F-market. Then use the F-market to draw the lottery. To reward consumption. To stimulate Hong Kong people to stay in Hong Kong. If you do this every week, send RMB 1-2 million, Hong Kong people may be very happy. Very willing to stay here. But if you don't dare to do it, every month, thousands of companies may be shut down. Thousands of people will lose their jobs. Then, Li Ka-shing, until October or November, I don't know how you face the public. To some extent, this action is caused by the situation of Netanyahu. Basically, Netanyahu fell into a muddle in the Gaza war. At first, he stood on a very high moral high ground. With the authority of most of the Israelis, 70-80% of the Israelis, everyone believes that it is necessary to remove the threat of terrorism. This is a very big promise of Israeli citizens. Should Netanyahu be responsible for the terrorist attack on October 7 last year? Or does the government need to be responsible for this? This is also a fact. Israelis are very clear. Why did the attack happen on October 7? Not only the security system, not only the intelligence collection, not only the protection of citizens, not only the isolation, not only these details, but also how the right-wing government stimulates these Palestinians, how it suppresses these Palestinians, and causes such a great resistance among the Palestinians. This is also a factor that Israeli citizens should consider. But the Israeli citizens' consideration is basically only one way, which is a re-election. After the re-election, they can use their own votes to tell the government which type of politicians they are welcoming now, or which type of governance. This is what will happen. But Netanyahu is very clever. He hopes to get rid of the extremist armed groups in Palestine as soon as possible, so that he can restore his reputation. At least this is also a common goal of the Israelis. But from October 7 last year to April 3 now, it has been half a year. In this half a year, can you say that Israel has failed? It is not a failure. Israel's troops face great pressure and face great risks to eliminate the Palestinian armed groups or extremist terrorists. But in the process, they killed more than 20,000 to 30,000 innocent civilians. How do you calculate this? Is this right? It is hard to say who is right and who is wrong. But overall, there is a very obvious trend in Israel's domestic and international society. The trend is that whether it is the international society, Israel's domestic society, American society, or European society, they no longer think that Israel is absolutely right. They used to think that Israel has the right to retaliate. Now they think that Israel has committed war crimes. There are doubts. At this time, U.S. President Biden can no longer allow Netanyahu or his right-wing government to continue to act recklessly. Every incident, every time it is reported as a massacre, or a massacre, or a massacre of innocent people, or a war crime, not only Netanyahu's government faces a certain degree of destruction. This also includes the U.S. government, including U.S. President Biden, will face what his citizens think Biden's handling of the Israel issue is out of control or there is no way to handle the matter. Biden and Trump are very different. Trump will feel that things outside, that is, things outside the world, things outside the United States, are not at all in the interest of the United States. The U.S. is leading, the U.S. is leading. So Trump's policy is quite smart. If Israel is involved, no matter what position it is in, it is not the U.S.'s fault, it is the Israeli problem. If you can do it, I will move you. If you can't do it, I'll do it for you. You are self-destructive. It's your business to go the wrong way. This is Trump's approach. Biden is not. Biden has put himself as a re-enactment of the U.S. as an international leader. The U.S. is a role of the world police. Jews in the U.S. or U.S. citizens to some extent when they support Biden, they will also think or they may not agree, at least they are not totally against Biden's regime, they think that the U.S. government, since you say you are an international police, you say you are leading the world, you have a grasp of world affairs, you have this concept, you have tactics, you have strategy, you should play your role well. On the whole, if Israel needs to eliminate armed groups, you supply weapons to them is not a problem at all. China is very supportive, both parties are supportive. But if you supply weapons, Israel will kill the innocent. Or if you supply weapons, Israel will become a regime that cannot be controlled at all. Its behavior will make another value of the U.S., that is, human rights, will be violated. Biden should have the ability, or strategy, or tactics, to control or adjust the Israeli government's approach. At least the weapons come from the U.S. Part of the weapons come from the U.S. Now Biden is obviously unable to do this function. There is no way to make it very effective, to have a very formal communication with the Israeli government, so that the Israeli government can respect the views of the U.S. and deal with the Gaza issue very well. The U.S. has proposed the two-state solution. The two-state solution is also a UN resolution. Most countries think it should be neutral. The reason why the country should be neutral is because this is a resolution. It was originally passed by a solemn UN resolution. It is the proposal after the resolution. But after the resolution, it has changed. And for decades, it has not been implemented well. Now the result is like this. Should we go back to the two-state solution? We are not saying Beijing should say this, we should say that. I have my own independent international view, not with Beijing. Okay, we can see that Europe is starting to have a force. The force is that some European countries, even if they are in the United Nations, or in Europe, their voices are not very loud. But they have decided to form an organization. For the time being, we know that the countries that have expressed their position, including Spain, including Slovenia, including Luxembourg, including Iran, these four countries have begun to think that they should first admit that Palestine is a country. Since Israel, including Netanyahu, including the Israeli right-wing government, has completely rejected the two-state solution, rejected this peaceful process, and rejected the two-state solution to achieve long-term peace. They think this is not possible. But in the world, other people, more than 700 million people, who may have thought, may have more than half of them, think that this is a way out. At least we have to try. Now there is no attempt. In the end, so many people are innocent and the world is in chaos. No matter who is right, who is wrong, no matter how this matter is resolved, we have to find a way out. The only way out is the two-state solution. If Israel does not agree, the two-state solution is impossible to achieve. Even if Palestine wants, the two-state solution is impossible to achieve. The only way is if there are countries, countries as units, or even international organizations as units, they are willing to admit that Palestine is an independent country. If so, establish diplomatic relations with Palestine, establish a whole international relationship with Palestine, even the taxes received by the Palestinian government do not have to be the same as before. It is to use the third country, the EU country, to help it to collect funds, so that it can form an independent country as a physical power, or an international role, including its own central bank. In this way, Palestine will gradually, gradually, form a relationship with Israel or it can relatively force Israel to negotiate, to negotiate, to negotiate. Now, including Spain, including Slovenia, including Ireland, including Luxembourg, have decided to do so. What should we do? Although we are PAPFU, we are not a national unit, we are just one of the more than 70 billion people, very small, very small. But I think we 7 million Hong Kong people should be smart. Don't be like some KOLs, thinking that I am right-wing, right-wing is right, right-wing is the trend, you are stupid, you are left-wing, you are left-wing. We should not divide like this. It is not that right-wing, left-wing, there are wrong and right places. Right and left also have right and wrong places. Of course, those who are right-wing will definitely win more votes. Does this mean that right-wing thoughts are all right? Now, for the time being, we can see that at least in the world, now in Israel, the extreme right, or the middle right, to the government between the extreme right, among them, their actions or their decisions are more towards the extreme right. In this situation, it turns out that it results in a worse situation. If so, we have to come out and support. We should support Spain, support Slovenia, support Ireland, support Luxembourg, support more European countries, including Poland, which may appear. Poland is a bit difficult because there are a lot of Israelis in Poland, a lot of Jews, of course, there are national thoughts. But should more countries, more European countries, or more countries around the world join this line, including how to support Palestine, how to recognize them, how to make Israel walk a straight path towards the two-state plan. Of course, how can Biden deal with Netanyahu? Netanyahu has a reaction. When Biden oppresses Netanyahu, Netanyahu makes the world more chaotic. Yesterday, he went to bomb Iran at the consulate in Damascus, Syria. He bombed the consulate's main building. The main building was not destroyed. The wing on the left of the main building was bombed. There was a banquet hall inside. At that time, there were banquets for festivals. At that time, some of the military officials of Iran or some of the generals or senior military officials of the Revolutionary Guards attended the banquets. This means that he was very precise. He did not destroy the main building of the consulate. He just bombed the banquet or the festival that was being held. I am not very familiar with religion. I am afraid I am wrong. It was a celebration related to the banquet or the festival. It was a banquet. He was very precise. He mainly killed the generals of the Revolutionary Guards. But did this cause the regional situation to be more tense? Does this mean that the situation in Hong Kong is not affecting Hong Kong? The situation in Hong Kong can immediately be blamed on Li Ka-siu. How many people in the Hong Kong government can see the current situation? How much impact does the global situation have on the Hong Kong government? The Hong Kong government except for the Hong Kong Legislative Council has been writing articles about planes all day long. The content is extremely disgusting. They are not even interested in what they are saying. Is the Hong Kong government so stupid to invite so many people to do such stupid things? Hong Kong is not in such a situation. Hong Kong is actually on fire. The current global situation is causing the U.S. to have several strong economies. At the same time, the strong economies are likely to lead to inflation. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy is based on debt. The U.S. economy