勇者無懼周小龍：23條生效唔覺有乜改變 我依然講真話 大聲撐言論自由！我冇嘢驚！實際美國暗示緊最後通牒！畀多個藉口港人移民外資唔嚟 所謂「潛逃者」係邊個做乜要封殺？任你噏 #Lucy 連線

So Article 23, at this time, when the Hong Kong economy is in such a difficult situation To give an excuse to these international companies Not to choose Hong Kong to be the Asia Financial Center The headquarter of Asia Pacific region The message given may be the last message to the central government That is, if you continue to do this But I have finished my interview with you today It was done after Article 23 was passed, right? If it really wants to come in a circle, it can only arrest us We are still wearing black clothes Arrest you, Lucy, arrest me, right? It didn't change my intention to be a human being It didn't change my insistence on freedom of speech If my intention to be a human being To tell you in common sense To support the insistence on freedom of speech To insist on the friends I know Whether they have the so-called notification order To insist on appreciating their talents If you still want to control it, I can only say one sentence, arrest me Right? Just like those in the black society Hello everyone, welcome to watch Lucy's Channel In this interview, my guest is a businessman, Zhou Xiaolong Hello Mr. Zhou Hello Lucy Article 23 of the Basic Law has already been enacted today It is seen that there are more than 21 countries in the world Nearly 21 cities, I have counted Today is a joint protest Western countries, the United States, the UK, the EU, the United Nations All have a joint protest against Article 23 of the Hong Kong government When we are talking now, Article 23 has already been enacted But I don't think there should be any changes Those who speak the truth must continue to speak the truth Is it because the officials also say You criticize the government for not enforcing Article 23 Of course, there are a lot of very spicy provisions We have noticed, last time I was on Professor Chung's program I have mentioned it Especially from Article 86 to Article 93 I mentioned that those who are infiltrators are very spicy provisions But I think, first of all, let's talk about the specific implementation of Article 23 In principle, should I no longer accept your interview? Because it is a collusion with foreign forces I think this is very ridiculous After the implementation of Article 23 We should rather examine What has happened in the past many years It has led to what you can call the ultimate The last nail in the coffin Hong Kong's human rights And any dissenters I think we should look back at this stage See why it has led to the HK version of the National Security Law On June 30, 2020 And today, March 23, 2024, Article 23 Everyone will be more aware This is actually a white terrorist act on the Korean Peninsula Because basically, their argument and justification Is that because the country is safe This is extremely ridiculous Because Hong Kong has never harmed the security of the country Hong Kong is so small, the country is so big There are planes, cannons, and tens of millions of people in the Air Force I think they use this as an excuse Because there was a demonstration in 2019 There was also violence on both sides Is this called harming the country? In fact, everyone knows what the truth is It is impossible to harm the country You said that Hong Kong was a bit chaotic at that time It can't be denied We will try our best not to be biased Because the regime has never admitted that there was a problem with the police But you have to look back at the beginning, how did it come out? It was indeed the government's dereliction of justice Carrie Lam realized that the government's dereliction of justice was a mistake So you said Article 23, it is now introduced To make Hong Kong a peaceful place Actually, it was only after Carrie Lam's government finished Hong Kong Not when some demonstrators were on the streets To pick up your grenades and resist To throw some bricks, some gas bombs At the anti-riot police with all kinds of weapons If your government didn't make a mistake You wouldn't have withdrawn Article 23 You would have admitted that you had made a mistake So when you introduced Article 23 Who should be blamed for it? Just like what Li Ka-shiu said When MPs asked questions, he said it reminded him of the black cloth of 2019 In fact, the real reason for creating chaos in Hong Kong Is the HK version of the law I think everyone should reflect on these truths at this stage So that we have the courage to continue talking And dare to speak the truth And continue to speak out against some ridiculous things Not because after Article 23 Everyone will be silent and quiet At this stage, you can only show That the regime is ridiculous to the extreme You introduced Article 23 of the National Security Law With all the illogical reasons, such as people have, I have In fact, it basically corrects your own mistake Not the black cloth of 2019 It is the criminal law of 2019, your own mistake Then today, you used all the excuses To take this opportunity In the past 26 years, you have failed to pass the National Security Law Today, you have passed it So I think Hongkongers should continue to speak out And continue to speak out against the wrong things If you are affected by the anti-corruption effect Hong Kong will die very soon We are not Hongkongers We are real Hongkongers, we don't want Hongkongers to die We hope it won't destroy The status of the International Financial Center of Hong Kong But they don't listen to others They continue to push this Article 23 under the blame of the whole world Let's see who will bear the heaviest responsibility in the future So I hope everyone won't have this fear Because of the establishment of Article 23 I think in the first few weeks Some people will be more quiet due to the anti-corruption effect But I don't believe that Hongkongers Especially those who usually criticize the government Will be so timid to shut up I won't shut up, I will definitely not shut up Because the establishment of Article 23 is even more ridiculous We are not against the National Security Law Every country has the National Security Law The US, the UK, Germany, France, everyone has it But we think they use the argument that Everyone has it, I have it, because the West also has it Why can't I have it? My argument is very weak Because others are not you, you are not others They use the National Security Law Not to lock up 47 people who participated in the primary election Not to lock up a person who pretended to be a newspaper Not to lock up a professor who helped prepare for the primary election Not to lock up a person who leads an organization To commemorate the 8.9.6.4 The fate of the Tiananmen Massacre People won't use the National Security Law to criticize these people Because these people really did something to the society They just spoke up for the society Hoping to protect human rights Hoping to keep Hong Kong's freedom Hoping to make the Democrats To lead the Legislative Council for the first time These people have never harmed Hong Kong Not to mention any terrorist activities Or assassinations, or wildfires So today is the best reflection day To see why the National Security Law was introduced A group of people used this as an excuse The central government also used this as an excuse So it was enacted It was finally successfully enacted It was enacted in a very short time, in the form of consultations But it is very complicated, isn't it? There are many flaws The first obvious flaw A netizen also mentioned it to me Has the National Security Law been looking at this issue, to confirm this issue That there are 7.5 million people in Hong Kong If you count the number of migrants to other countries There may be 7.8 million people But in fact, the special regional passport issued Has more than 10 million copies In this process, some of them Are Hongkongers who have migrated And still have dual citizenship So there may be more than a few hundred thousand copies Of the special regional passports But what about the remaining one million copies? Why do we have a population like this? Why do we have more than 10 million copies of the special regional passports? These people came to Hong Kong With this kind of money, or with this kind of channel Or with this kind of relationship To get the special regional passports very quickly Just like the fake ones Now they have been arrested in the U.S. Are these people a threat to national security? Has the National Security Law taken care of this point? Has it taken a closer look at the process of issuing passports? Has it strengthened the background of people? Do they want more fake passports? There is also this Qian Zhimeng He has just been found When he was selling financial products in the mainland He got away with a few hundred million He came to the UK with a fake identity I guess he didn't use a fake identity Chinese People's Republic passport Is it easier for him to get Dominica Republic passports? Or did he apply for a Hong Kong special regional passport? The government needs to investigate these people These are the real criminals The real criminals who are a threat to national security Not those who are involved in election campaigns and newspapers Not those who are involved in the Six-Year Anniversary Party But I can't see these 23 people Including those who are covering up for these people Deng Bingqiang also said I guess we will see his interview on Now TV And Carrie Lam's interview The main topic is the 86 to 93 provisions How to deal with these The so-called infiltrators of the HK government There are other infiltrators Jia Fei is an infiltrator He has been arrested by the US federal government Entered the US with a fake identity Chen Jianmin is an infiltrator Did he get a special regional passport? How many of these people Actually got your HK special regional passport And committed a crime in the international community? Because his information is too limited He can't cover up for these people What impact do you think He will have on HK? Now I see some foreign companies are worried If they continue to operate in Hong Kong The risk and cost will increase In addition, I have just seen an international organization In Hong Kong, they have been carrying out some immigration activities these days The number of people involved is really high Its investigation report also said 70 Hong Kong people will leave within two years And those people I see their annual income is at least 300,000 to 1 million These people say At least they are rich or middle-class people in Hong Kong As for foreign capital, how will it increase the cost? I don't quite understand But this is definitely for them When they operate and operate in Hong Kong It is a political security consideration Because in the past, there was no need to worry about these things in Hong Kong This is indeed in western countries Especially in the countries of the elected government They are worried about the policies of these authoritarian countries This is indisputable They may consider again To reduce the role of Hong Kong You can see that the U.S. Ambassador to Beijing Has come to Hong Kong to understand the situation In fact, that is almost The message given out May be the last message to the central government That is to say, if you continue to do this In fact, the role of Hong Kong's former consulate independence may be gone Because in the past 155 years, the consulate in Hong Kong has been independent No need to report to Beijing The U.S. Consulate in Beijing But it may hint that there is a chance Since Hong Kong is such an unstable place politically It also doesn't need Hong Kong to participate in some political activities Maybe everything will be reported to Beijing in the future Hong Kong will simply become a place to sign the law Business visa, tourist visa, student visa It's not surprising, these changes If it really happens, I hope it won't If it really happens, I don't think it's surprising As for the Dinghai God's needle Will Hong Kong become better? I don't buy these official propaganda I will stick to looking at the numbers Now you are talking about the Asia-Pacific region headquarters Don't talk about family offices I don't know what role they play They are purely for investment But you see if people have confidence in Hong Kong Is it a world financial center? It depends on the Asia-Pacific region headquarters Is it more or less? In fact, Singapore has more data than Hong Kong Because Singapore's operating cost is cheaper than Hong Kong Like the rent and the salary But the gap is not 1,000 to 4,000 Now there are 1,000 in Hong Kong There are more than 4,000 in Singapore For the Asia-Pacific region headquarters Or the entire Asia-Pacific region headquarters This figure won't deceive people I think everyone is focusing on this figure Don't listen to the officials making big propaganda Official words, look at the numbers The numbers don't lie But for Hong Kong people Give a little time After everyone has seen it I believe it will continue to speak up You need to continue to speak up Because this Article 23 clearly states If you criticize the government, you won't commit a crime Right? So everyone really can't let it win Can't let this Hansheng Effect win Right? Because if you look at the beginning The whole thing has made Hong Kong The economy is so bad On the edge Hong Kong's economy is so bad The economy is so bad Hong Kong's economy is so bad Let me tell you A lot of people are in Hong Kong They are really worried The situation is bad A lot of people are worried Hong Kong's economy is so bad Also, it is so bad That's why I have always said You should not say Hong Kong's economy is so bad Because of the black cloth You can see that some of the leaders of the political parties have said Hong Kong is so small, when will it be able to unite your country? Don't joke, you said that Hong Kong When there was a protest, there was a conflict This is an undeniable situation But today, after the HK version of the National Security Law, you have arrested them all There are more than 1,000 political prisoners, 1,900 or 1,300, I can't remember the exact number More than 1,000 political prisoners, you have arrested them all Some of them are so ridiculous that even Zhou Hengtong has to go to jail What you have done is misappropriation of political power, no one is punished Li Ka-shing became the Chief Executive Then when you introduced the National Security Law Dai Yaoting, who helped with the primary election Li Zhiying, who pretended to be a newspaper To go to jail, to be separated from his family, to lose his freedom Where is the truth? Hong Kong people must never forget these truths I don't care if you have the National Security Law or Article 23 The truth is like this, you came out and created a misappropriation of political power No punishment, no interrogation Those who organized the primary election, those who pretended to be a newspaper, went to jail Those who organized the June 4th memorial, went to jail Until now, they are still in jail Where is the justice? So whether you have Article 23 or not Don't forget that there is still a lot of injustice You are now more strict in suppressing Let's talk about the provisions in Article 23 After adding the punishment, compared to the National Security Law What is more evil? Everyone can see, Article 86-93 has scared you to death Basically, to put it simply If Article 86-93 says, the perpetrator First, especially my male friends Don't just look at the word perpetrator Then immediately wear a red eye patch And say these people are bad people What have these perpetrators done? Liu Zhaodi reported that Luo Guancong participated in the primary election So he decided to leave To continue to speak up for HK people abroad What did he do in HK? He set fire to people What did the perpetrator Anna Kok do? He set fire to people It's ridiculous, these people are all very peaceful people Just speak up, right? What did Yuan Guoyi do? He set fire to people He just opened a stage to speak up The perpetrator has to be punished, how is it now? If anyone cooperates with him to do business Or gives him any financial support He will have to collude with him He may have to inform them Then he will be in jail for 10 years, 7 to 10 years How ridiculous, Article 23 You claim that he is a perpetrator Don't let them bring you into a black hole These people are legally detained in their local countries The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the local countries As soon as they heard the notice They immediately came out To show their position That they won't cooperate with the execution of this notice Because they won't do any political monitoring 193 international police offices Have already come out to make it clear Australia, the US, Canada, the UK They won't help the HK government to enforce the law HK people have to wake up Don't go to the government And say, yes, these are bad people These people have ruined HK What have they done? Let's think rationally What have they done? Except for speaking up If they are really so evil Why don't the international police enforce the law? Is the international police evil? Don't do this All of a sudden, after Article 23 Suddenly, all the facts have been distorted Suddenly, these 15 people When there is a 1 million yuan notice After Article 23, they are really bad people After Article 23 Or without Article 23, only the National Security Law These people are not bad people at all They are the same as before Only speak up for HK The HK government said It is a country that has been subverted To endanger national security The local Ministry of Foreign Affairs At the first time, they told you Don't harass our citizens Who have legal residency rights In the UK, the US, Australia, Canada These are the facts You say these countries are wrong? These countries Suddenly cover up for you A Hong Kong migrant Why do they cover up for you? They have their own political risks If they really enforce the law If they really violate the law They cover up for you, they have their own political risks Of course, people think These inspections are ridiculous So, Hong Kong people Don't let them After Article 23, Let them To cover up for these people Now, as Deng Bingqiang said There is a law We have to Arrest them. Arrest what? You come to the UK to arrest them? You go to the US and Canada to arrest them? The Canadian government Doesn't allow you to do it You try to come to the UK To arrest Loi Kwun Tong See if you can So, this method is still ridiculous We are just stating the facts Don't because of Article 23 These unreasonable things Become reasonable Then say, anyone who supports them Will violate the law Give them a place to live The person who rents a house to them Will be punished. Wow, that British guy Anyone, Meng Xiaoda, Loi Kwun Tong In the UK, Liu Zhaodi Rent an apartment The British guy doesn't even know who you are Right? Rent it to them And suddenly violate your Article 23 Right? Do you expect the entire UK To know these people Are in your Hong Kong notification You are not allowed to rent a house to them? These government officials Ridiculous Even the local government Won't help you to violate the law You even say, now there is a law We have to think of a way To arrest them Simply put Once you have the Article 23 These people you call You call them These so-called traitors Can't eat, can't wear a mask Right? Even their passport Can't have their original Nationality Or their original Hong Kong Residence Like Loi Kwun Tong, who was not born in Hong Kong People who were born in Hong Kong Can't have their own passport What kind of behaviour is this? This is the behaviour of an authoritarian country Right? If you have Article 23, you say Now I can go There is clearly a national security law To arrest them Arrest them for what? Do you think after having Article 23 These people will be Reasonablely punished? This is nonsense Now they say They may cancel their nationality Cancel their professional qualifications Forbid the third party to provide funds Now people may ask Should we arrest Hu Zifeng? Deng Bingqiang said, we have to assess Is it possible that The perpetrator in his mouth Is the perpetrator who is now issued a notification The perpetrator in his mouth The scope of the perpetrator in his mouth may be very large Yes, once he is issued a notification He is the perpetrator Cancel your professional qualification That's Guo Wengheng Cancel the qualification of a lawyer It's even more ridiculous Because I I don't agree With the government's Sayings In 2019, the political errors Caused by the government And the people Who spoke up For HK people They have their own sayings If you say yes, then yes If you say no, then no If you say yes, then yes The real perpetrator Under the law of any country Anyone who can stand the test Will be said to be a traitor You are a terrorist Biden is a terrorist Everyone in the world agrees that he is a terrorist Not only you The HK people say yes Now only HK people say yes If you say yes, then yes If you casually say that Zhou Xiaolong Is a traitor If you say yes, then yes God Don't think that after Article 23, you are a God If you have Article 23 Those 15 people Are not the so-called Traitors Because other countries Deny and won't help to punish 193 international police offices Deny and won't help to punish These are the facts Right? So Article 23 At this time, the HK economy is in such a difficult time Give another excuse For these international companies Not to choose HK anymore To be an Asian financial center The headquarter of Asia Pacific region This is your Again, you have shown your political errors As you said I hope the HK government Never Lose the status of the world financial center To remind you These officials You have to know what you are doing The reporters Asked him about the HK economy He cried Did you feel that the HK economy Was in such a difficult situation That he was worried? This is very obvious Who else would deny The current situation of the HK economy Is not a problem Except for these officials Who else would Deny the HK economy Is not a problem There is a problem Now big companies Are planning Whether to leave In the past, people considered Whether to consider HK or not It all depends on the cost Expensive or cheap Where to set up a headquarter How much is the cost of hiring people How many managers, presidents How many middle management How big is the office of the Asia Pacific region headquarter Which countries should be covered These were the discussions in the past Today's discussion is about the National Security Law Article 23 Whether it is safe For my employees to operate in HK National secrets Will they Do research Do consulting Do market research Will they be caught How ridiculous He introduced the law To give people an excuse to leave HK To protect HK with us To protect 1.4 billion Chinese people