【精彩】潘焯鴻：23條寒蟬！批港府我會唔會被拉？陳國基唔覺意篤爆孫玉涵 爆高才通假數係唔係好多人唔會墮入法網！唔小心執到文件要小心 垃圾桶都危！香港將周街都有cctv 一個唔覺意就出事？ #Lucy連線

This is also a warning and a reminder It is also necessary to criticize the Hong Kong government Let's try to see if I will be arrested after the criticism March 19th is also a day that Hong Kong people must remember March 19th has a good relationship with March 23rd Yesterday was March 29th, midnight, not midnight There is no estimate. Yesterday morning, I estimated that it might be played until the early morning But they overcame it, because each person is a piece of shit Directly speaking, it's a piece of shit Even the 1 to 89, 1 to 89, 1 to 89, Dixie County It also said that after the 23rd article of the Tiananmen Massacre, Hong Kong can take off Go to the Great Wall of China Is it like this? I don't know Of course, the prayer is to stay in Hong Kong Of course, I hope Hong Kong can continue to be good But the 23rd article has passed, that is, today, March 20th It has not been officially announced yet, but it is not far away It will come every five minutes on Friday After the announcement, it will be implemented What impact will it have on Hong Kong people after implementation? Some people say that it won't have a big impact on Hong Kong people It is unimaginable Fortunately, Hong Kong people can't touch it In fact, it's not like that, it's really not like that Especially in some of the government's secrets Or the government's secrets You may not even be able to contact it Of course, I think there is still a little gap The gap is in the original secrets, that is, the government's secrets In fact, the government's secrets include the government or the political development of Hong Kong So even the documents of Hong Kong Railway may be secret Maybe it's also included in this 23rd article Okay, let's talk in more detail If it's a secret, there is a management method The mainland's secret law is actually a management agency The management agency will standardize the documents Will print it, that is, know whether it is confidential, confidential, or secret Then there is a relevant circulation document Is its own right There is also a limit on confidentiality, confidentiality, and confidentiality These three things, that is, the original identification That is, you put a pig in it to know whether the document is confidential, confidential, or confidential Secondly, it is the original circulation of these documents Or those who use these documents have the right to Will not go to another person's place at will If you go to another person's place, the whole document will be taken by the person holding the document That is, only A-level officials can look at these documents A-level officials have a total of 10 Can take turns to circulate or use one document at a time After looking at it, it will be terminated Okay, but if one of the A-level officials is missing The official himself has to be responsible This is the law in the mainland In Hong Kong, I see the law It seems that this aspect is written very vaguely Even no, does not exist That is to say, the missing person has no responsibility The official himself has the right To be able to contact secrets, confidentiality, or confidentiality But when he is missing, he has no responsibility There may also be no traceability Can't even find out who is missing But if the citizens are not willing to take it out Then it will violate the law This is worth paying attention to Once the law is passed, we can't say anything Some people ask, Mr. Poon, why didn't you say it before? I really don't dare to say it To be honest, I am quite bold But I really don't dare to say Article 23 I really don't dare to say it I don't know what the reaction will be after I say it Later, if the BBC comes to interview, I will die Or if the BBC comes to report, I will die So I even, to be honest I don't even dare to write this opinion I don't want to be reported later I don't know how to deal with it Okay, but as a Hong Kong citizen We need to have a new way of thinking That is, Article 23 has already been passed From today on, although the law has not been officially issued It has not been officially announced, but it is close Everyone should be prepared That is, in accordance with the National Security Law This is the National Security Law Article 23 The content of the law And the limitations inside Should be handled carefully If you really accidentally Pick up a document There is really a print on the document Written as confidential or secret Or it looks like there may be some national secrets Some are about military, diplomacy About the destruction of the power system The weak points of the power system These are all related How to do it? There is actually a way A way to escape After you really pick up the document First, you can't leave without your fingerprints Don't throw it away If you throw it away, you can't leave without your fingerprints The first method is to immediately take it to the police station Immediately take it to the police station Now Hong Kong will be Will be all over the street CCTV This is definitely the trend of development That is to say In addition to the police in the yellow area The yellow area of ​​Hong Kong In addition to installing 2,000 CCTV This is only the first phase More and more CCTV will be installed It may also be shops Or different shopping malls Some private CCTV I believe the National Security Commission May slowly May have its own way To contact Or when there is a problem Collect these messages Slowly Actually everyone Where did you pick up the document? How long did you wait after picking up the document? From which place A place to B place Then go to the police station In fact, when you go to the police station to hand in the document Maybe it will be found out very quickly That is to say If everyone really inadvertently picks up some in the future You are suspected of being related to this Is related to national confidentiality and secrecy Whether it is a government document Unlisted document Hong Kong Railway Or some semi-official institutions For example, the Bureau of Security Or for example, the Bureau of Urban and Rural Reconstruction When you see the content One inadvertently saw Eight or nine saw After seeing the content Really can't Maybe some will affect national security Of course, ordinary citizens Have not fully grasped The kind of government officials The kind of understanding of national security It's even like This is what He Gunyao said yesterday at the Legislative Council He said he went to teach That is, to teach This teacher There may be about 2,000 under the stage But it seems that there are too many 2,000 I don't know how many teachers There is no way a hall can accommodate 2,000 people Then you look at the hall He can't figure it out There are a lot of teachers in front of him He teaches them He said that the teachers are holding them Don't listen to books Playing with mobile phones In short, don't pay attention Don't respect him He said You are a teacher I know what you know I know more about national security You say this is the best This sentence In fact, we can also use it in the future If there is really something wrong It turns out that our Legislative Council member He Gunyao told everyone The reason is very simple Very simple That is, it turns out Knowledge of national security Is of the same level There is a difference between high and low It turns out that they are better at cross-examination They are more powerful They are better than us We are relatively less sensitive to national security I admit that this is a fact So in the future If you accidentally pick up a document If you accidentally pour it out It's just that I am not sensitive to national security It doesn't mean that I definitely hope To expose this matter But you can't run away So everyone has to immediately Give him a warning As if it were a lost item As if anything Give him a warning Then take a piece of paper When and how many days Hand it over to the police Then you explain I didn't pass it on You can't throw it away Don't even think about throwing it away It's illegal to throw it away Remember In the future Not in the future Now Almost all trash cans Have CCTV cameras Then when you throw it away It will be identified On the other hand Don't just think about documents It turns out that the article in China Is written more clearly It turns out that national secrets Secrets and secrets Not just documents May be software May be a file May be a computer file May also be a invention May be a bottle of liquid May be a piece of tofu A soft jelly Some may be national secrets Secrets or secrets Including military use Including technological use Or invention of technology and military Everyone should pay attention to these Don't just think about information documents Don't just think about hard copy documents Or some messages on the computer Or files Or whatsapp Or what you see on social media Some images In fact, it also includes Some inventions you can't think of So technology Technology is actually a Secret and confidential part Don't talk so much about Article 23 In short From today on Everyone, whether on social media Or in your WhatsApp communication Telegram communication Whatever On Facebook On YouTube Comments All the same Don't think Hey, I didn't log in No traceability Don't think like that Really don't think like that Everyone has to be very careful It's not that we have to make everyone's Sailing effect That's not what it means But in fact We must be careful first Then slowly After seeing the real Article 23 Is it really Not much impact on Hong Kong people One inadvertently Like the HK version Later, arrest some people Then set up some cases Then you don't know who will be arrested Yesterday, Chen Kuo-ke came out To talk about some data One inadvertently Exploded It's Sun Yuk-ha It's related to Gao Caitong It's just a few days ago Before that, everyone heard me talk about Sun Yuk-ha talking about Gao Caitong Sun Yuk-ha is our Don't talk about people Article 23 It's a bit dangerous to talk about an official's name Then I have to talk about the title Sun Yuk-ha, Director of the Labor and Welfare Bureau The Labor and Welfare Bureau is responsible Or the Director of the Labor and Welfare Bureau For Gao Caitong Is the highest Not the highest person in charge Is the highest executive Is the highest chief official That is to say, he has to do it I have criticized it many times For the Hong Kong government For Gao Caitong's input There is no good statistics And there is no regular announcement For Hong Kong citizens And some related Including academic groups To study What is this study? The government can say that Gao Caitong Entered 50,000 people 100,000 people 400,000 people 300,000 people Approved 150,000 people There are a lot of different data For everyone But can Gao Caitong really For Hong Kong How to save Hong Kong? The whole society Bring a benefit Bring an economic benefit Bring vitality Bring development motivation This is actually a question mark Using economic benefits To describe an emigrant Or from the mainland to Hong Kong Gao Caitong's plan Is a bit insulting to them But Sun Yat-sen Indeed, a few days ago Used economic benefits to express He even said There are 3.4 billion economic benefits He said there are 44,000 Gao Caitong Arrived in Hong Kong These 44,000 Gao Caitong Every year Can bring to Hong Kong 3.4 billion yuan of economic benefits In addition Another Gao Caitong He can bring to Hong Kong Economic benefits Very simple But he is in Hong Kong How much money can he make Spend all his money Not to mention But Unlimited loan It's very simple If he makes 50,000 a month This is actually Our Minister of Justice Chen Kuo-ki Exploded yesterday Yesterday he said He turned out to be a bit of a government Survey How did the survey come? He did not explain Why does the government know Now the 44,000 Gao Caitong Or what Chen Kuo-ki said yesterday 40,000 people said Approximately 40,000 people It's not like Like Sun Yat-sen It's so detailed 44,000 people came to Hong Kong Under this number The government turned out to have a The number of new employees has been calculated The number of new employees Is about every person The average monthly income per person 50,000 Hong Kong dollars Okay, let's count 44,000 people Use Sun Yat-sen's number Don't use Chen Kuo-ki's number Use a little bigger Help Sun Yat-sen Don't be so embarrassed It turned out that Chen Kuo-ki said 40,000 people When a few days ago Sun Yat-sen said 44,000 people I think 44,000 44,500 It's still 40,000 Because it's not 45,000 Not 50,000 Okay, 44,000 people Use a bigger number Multiply by 50,000 per month That's about a year There is a monthly income of HK$2.2 billion Multiply by 12 months It turns out that there are 26.4 billion in a year That is to say It's easy to calculate Look at the Pitch That is HK$26.4 billion in income Even if they don't do savings Spend all the money Spend it all Including buying things Buy clothes Eat Travel Travel through Hong Kong All consumption in Hong Kong Renting a house in Hong Kong Buying a car in Hong Kong Buying a house All the money is spent in Hong Kong It's only HK$26.4 billion It's not what Sun Yat-sen said HK$3.4 billion If you subtract from Sun Yat-sen's HK$3.4 billion It's just about 7-7 times That is to say Is it 7-7 times? Yes, 7-7 times HK$26.4 billion For Sun Yat-sen's HK$3.4 billion It's 7-7 times That is to say Sun Yat-sen is embarrassed Yesterday, Chen Kuo-ki's words Although Chen Kuo-ki is not a flexible person His brain is not flexible Even if he reads a script, he can read it without a hitch He can read a script to the point where he is speechless After reading it, he can't remember where he is He is that kind of person I don't know why He can be the Minister of Justice But he came out yesterday and said There are 40,000 senior officials Now the average monthly income per person is HK$50,000 It's easy to remember, it won't be wrong, right? Then we put it back in the book He said 44,000 people came 440,000 people Now our Minister of Justice has given information Their average monthly income is HK$50,000 Multiply by the number of people Multiply by 12 months You will know that there are 2.64 billion yuan every year Some of them came from the high-end They made a profit in Hong Kong I will forget all the income Not used in mainland China Not used abroad All of these 1 cent, 1 cent All used in Hong Kong 1 yuan in non-governmental banks This can only contribute to Hong Kong About 2.64 billion yuan in economic benefits It's not what Sun Yat-sen said HK$3.4 billion If you want to make Sun Yat-sen's HK$3.4 billion Then 44,000 people Multiply by 12 months It turns out that you have to make HK$64,400 every month If you can't make HK$64,400 Don't use all of this HK$64,400 You can't reach Sun Yat-sen's Now very embarrassing HK$3.4 billion Economic benefits Okay, this is also a warning Also a reminder Also need to criticize the Hong Kong government Also try to see if I will be arrested after criticizing Simply put, the Hong Kong government Especially the Li Ka-shing government Has always been very disrespectful to data I heard that it is possible to use data to convince Hong Kong citizens To say that there is more data In fact, there are only two people One is Ling Han-ho The other is He Wing-yan That is, the Director of the Development Bureau And the Director of the Housing and Housing Administration The two are for land supply For the different time of land supply Or the number of houses supplied Different numbers of houses supplied The number of houses to be demolished in turn The duration They also have more data Can be delivered to the public It is a more positive data The reason is that the data can be tested Can be verified Today you said this data Tomorrow you say Or next year you say Or next month you say another data Everyone knows that you were talking nonsense at that time But other officials These two officials For the time being Including the Director of the Development Bureau, Ling Han-ho Including the Director of the Housing and Housing Administration, He Wing-yan When they talk about data For the time being, I am very sensitive to data For the time being, I can see that their data is consistent That is to say, their data is checked Is logical Is consistent That is to say, there is a process There is a track Not just saying The track itself is in line with the policy For example, the number of houses supplied will increase The data comes out and everyone knows Or Ling Han-ho or He Wing-yan also said In the past three years The number of houses supplied has been relatively small But then Whether it is public housing or private housing Relatively more Then He Wing-yan also began to dare not talk about private housing Because he saw the developers Even if Ling Han-ho Launched a land for market trading The developers also adopted a relatively flat method Flat, not negative, flat Okay, including Hengji And Changgang In the Shenzhen area of ​​Hudong North Have given up six lands When Ling Han-ho said Hey, your deadline is here If you don't go to the lands again I will take your land back Then the developers said You take it back, you give me money You give me compensation Because this is a development area You have already signed a contract This is already a new city or a new development area with a big plan It's not just adding land It is necessary to compensate the developers Okay, the developers also deposited the money It's better to deposit hundreds of billions Than to lose another 100 billion in the land price In this case To a certain extent These are all officials With the market and citizens On the data Or on the real estate On the policy Is to Can talk about negation To exchange To communicate Or to force It may be a little hard to hear But in addition to force In fact, to some extent, it is compromise That is, to find a harmonious point Okay, after talking about these two officials Other officials To be honest To be honest, they are very insensitive Take a look at Zhe Jianhuan You can see that he came out to promote This is a garbage collection You can see that he has no way to convince Hong Kong citizens Where Hong Kong citizens are skeptical In addition to some Some regulations on real estate Even the numbers For example, why are the plastic bags so expensive? Or why those four plastic bags factories Why are they allowed to do it? Why don't you find some Cheaper sources These are actually all avoided Because we see that Hong Kong government officials Have a very bad ability That is, the ability there The ability in that area is relatively low Just in his logical thinking Stubbornly remember some rules Regulations Or from top to bottom From top to bottom Some policies He didn't think about it He won't think through it Or participate in a thought And receive this policy He doesn't have these things In the absence of these situations As a result, the policy for him Is not a lively, logical, basic A decision with a background He is just a pile of text He just remembers the text The text says we do this After doing this, it slowly develops The brain has even lost the ability to analyze numbers The ability to analyze text is gone A pile of words came out The ability to analyze numbers is gone The ability to analyze text is gone It's a big deal When you talk about numbers First, you can't remember Because you never use your brain to count the numbers Second, you can't remember There is no way Unwittingly There is no way to make the citizens understand The number you want to deliver Or what message do you want to tell Or what will happen next You said the numbers today Will be overthrown tomorrow We see Shu Yuexian said 3.4 billion yuan It is said that Gao Caitong Now there are 44,000 Gao Caitong Hong Kong people In Hong Kong In one year, they can bring to Hong Kong 3.4 billion yuan contribution This 3.4 billion yuan contribution He didn't count How much income does each person have on average? If it were me Before I said the numbers I would use a calculator to calculate 3.4 billion minus 44,000 people Is 64,400 yuan a month That is to say 3.4 billion minus 4,000 people Minus 12 months Equals 64,400 yuan a month That is to say Even if he uses up all his salary The income of these people Is still at the level of 44,000 yuan If not You can't make 3.4 billion yuan Of economic benefits If I were Shu Yuexian I would ask the officials who are preparing the information To talk Everyone interacts How did you get the information? How did you calculate it? I calculated it once Then naturally it will enter the brain But if the government officials Still think logically For every policy The numbers behind the policy Because of the numbers Because of the data To support the policy To promote these logical thinking Or change it in the brain Consider it in the brain Think about it And then come out A formula Some are logic If not It's a big deal Just like our Shu Yuexian He was kicked by the Secretary of State He was kicked That is to say 3.4 billion is wrong Use up all the sheep Use up all the food If you don't go, you use it If you don't go, you forget about the mainland Only 2.64 billion yuan Economic benefits Now I hope the officials of the Hong Kong government Can have the ability To train yourself In this logical thinking In terms of data In terms of data thinking in your brain In the data See if the matter is not absurd Or build a kind from the data A logic that can help memory Or a logic that helps thinking Or say a word Or say a policy Should understand the logical thinking behind Then use it to communicate with the citizens So that the citizens can understand easily So that the citizens feel that the officials are not talking nonsense So that the citizens are willing to listen to what the officials say