陳茂波曾俊華 隔空「隻揪」；香港優於新加坡？；「我很幸福，我很幸福」時代降臨；洪門宴故事之「法律面前，錢錢錢錢」 #香江頭條 #香港財爺

Hong Kong, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore and Hong Kong I am so happy, I am so happy. Times are changing. Chen Maobo, Tsang Chunhua, Get-Hong-Chek-Chau Hong Kong is better than Singapore. The stunts are getting better. The story of Hongmen Banquet. Money in front of the law. Hi everyone. This is Hong Kong Time. I am Wing-En on 3rd May, Tuesday. Reporting the truth, the world needs courage. and your strong support. If you like our show, Remember to like, share, leave a comment, and click on the superfans to support us together. On 28th of last month, Mr. Chan just released a new financial budget. In the face of the annual fiscal budget, the budget proposes a loan adjustment. The former Finance Minister, Mr. Tsang Chun-hwa, said that the annual loan is likely to trigger structural fiscal budget and the next generation. Mr. Chan refuted, saying there is no need to worry. Mr. Tsang Chun-hwa said in a post that Mr. Tsang Chun-hwa is an optimistic person. But when it comes to his own family, he said he is not worried about the financial situation. He is not worried about the next generation, but the younger generation who will continue to live in Hong Kong. He said that the people who used to help Hong Kong to pay the bills were criticized for being greedy. He was criticized for keeping so much money in his wallet all the time. It is easy to make money. The financial budget proposes to issue a government loan of 1.2 trillion yuan in the coming year. The government plans to issue a loan of 6 trillion yuan in the next five years. Mr. Tsang Chun-hwa is worried that Hong Kong will be in debt for too long. He said it is indisputable that Hong Kong has officially entered the age of structural fiscal policy. The government naturally needs to seek a way out. The most ideal is an economic boom. But this situation may not be repeated for a while. He said that in order to increase the income of the rich and the poor, he had thought about it. Although many governments around the world have the intention to issue a government loan to support the government's regular operation, some people think that it is not a big problem if the debt accounts for more than 10% of the GDP. But Hong Kong is just a special region, and it can't print a lot of money, so it is not suitable to compare Hong Kong with other countries. Tsang Chun-hwa emphasized that we should know that we can never use the money we borrow to deal with daily expenses. If the government loan is used as a large-scale infrastructure investment project, and there is a long-term economic return after completion, this is not a problem. But if the government loan is issued every year, and then used to pay daily expenses, and even use the debt to cover the debt, Hong Kong's pocket will dry up soon. It will also bring serious consequences. First, it will inevitably affect Hong Kong's credit rating. In order to pay the debt interest, additional taxes and fees will come one after another. Then the public services will be greatly reduced. These will be borne by the children and the elderly. She further pointed out that now we are still in the high-rise era, and the bonds issued without interest may not attract buyers. But when the government wants to pay such a high interest rate, the money you borrowed is used for investment outside. Is it so easy to get at least a 10% return to support? It's really hard to think about it. For this reason, Chen Mo-bo refuted that the International Bank and the Hong Kong Fiscal Commission are planning to restore balance of revenue in two years and three years from now. Citizens don't have to worry about the government's structural budget. The government has about 7 trillion yuan in reserves, and is not in a hurry to pay debt. Exports will eventually decline. The two financial experts pointed out to netizens. Some netizens believe that what Uncle Potato said is very reasonable, and it is also true. In the past, financial experts had to live in seclusion, so as not to be swallowed up by the financial crisis in Hong Kong. Therefore, they have to guard the financial sector. Today, Uncle Potato is a loser. For the security of the CCP, he does not know how to rob Hong Kong people. If I hadn't seen the audience speak Cantonese, I would have thought this was a Beijing street interview. It is said that the British Broadcasting Company, that is, the BBC, raised Article 23 of the Basic Law on Friday, March 1, in a report on whether Hong Kong's discussion of legislation has become a public ban. When many citizens hear that it is related to Article 23, they immediately raise their hands and bow their heads, not to mention violating the National Security Law. Sorry, I don't know. I'm going to work. I won't say it. I don't understand. Then everyone seems to have seen a ghost, and left so quickly. Is this similar to the scene where mainland reporters interviewed on the street? I am very happy, I am very happy. It has become a standard answer for mainland citizens to face CCTV reporters in the street. However, there are still very few brave citizens in Hong Kong who dare to speak the truth and express their disdain. They often use foreign examples but do not explain the details. They won't arrest you just because you say a few words. I think since the implementation of the National Security Law, no one dares to mention Article 23 again. There is a feeling of white terror. I don't know which word will offend the regime, so I won't say it. Yes, now Hong Kong people don't know which word will offend the regime. I can only be forced, I am very happy. Therefore, the 23rd Legislative Consultation of the Basic Law for a month ended last Wednesday. Not many Hong Kong citizens dared to publicly raise objections. The authorities said they had received more than 130,000 letters of opinion, 98.64% of which said they supported it. Former Hong Kong Democratic Party Chairman Lau Wei-hsing said this consultation is completely different from the one in 2003. Lau Wei-hsing said the atmosphere in 2003 was very relaxed. The government allowed demonstrations and various forums to allow people to discuss and discuss in a lively atmosphere. But this time it is completely different, it is two different worlds. As for Lau Wei-hsing, she fully played the role of a CCP Party member and a pioneer. She reflected deeply and had a self-reflection spirit. She said she was not smart enough and did too much when promoting Article 23, and did not manage the consultation well. Lau Wei-hsing is really a sister. She is very smart this time. On Sunday, the Ministry of National Security of China issued a statement on the official WeChat account stating that Article 23 is a must-answer question for children and the elderly in Hong Kong. It also stated that the anti-Middle Eastern and Hong Kong forces who have been living together for a long time are evil and difficult to deal with. Therefore, Article 23 must be passed and cut off all ties. Okay, let's pass it quickly. After passing it, I believe Hong Kong can become a beautiful fishing village at the earliest. At that time, everyone has fish eggs and ice cream every day. Hong Kong people will live a happy life from now on. Hong Kong and Singapore are Asian financial cities that have been in contact with the world for two months. They are often used as a comparison. Recently, some mainland netizens asked on the social platform Alipay where Hong Kong is better than Singapore. They got a lot of responses. One of the responses also made Hong Kong netizens praise it and called it very good. In early February, Alipay posted the previous question where Hong Kong is better than Singapore. Up to April this month, we have received 90 replies. The responses mainly come from mainland China. In many comments, a netizen called 犬與狗不同的網友語出驚人 留言獲得很多港人讚好 該網友說 香港好 就好在是社會主義體制下的 亞洲金融中心為止 英國人用100年打造了香港 成為了亞洲金融中心 我們只用了5年 就將新加坡打造成了 新亞洲金融中心 香港變成為止帶來很多好處 香港人紛紛離開香港 富豪紛紛跑去新加坡 這一點上 說明香港未來應該不會永濟 香港的房價也應該很快被打下來 與此同時 香港政府棄暗投明 放棄金融行業 開始研究燒烤 夜市 如此一來 香港未來一定會有一款 打動人心的美食 例如 灣仔臭豆腐 銅鑼灣螺絲粉 烏蘭街肥腸粉 蘭桂坊烤麵筋 等等具有開創性的美食 等著你去發現 值得注意的是 上述美食 並非香港本地特有 該網友或想映射香港 不僅在政治上被殖民 飲食文化也被中國大陸取代 該網友表示 相信不久的將來 香港會成為大陸新一線城市中 亮眼的一座旅遊城市 坐在太平山頂上 翻著三個代表偉大思想 看著山下密密麻麻的紅旗 映著海風飄揚 中環村鎮信用社人山人海 隔離花旗銀行大門緊閉 門口貼著王浦招租四個大字 這些都是新加坡不能給的 不賠 最後該網友總結說 人可以一直活在自己的世界裏面 無疑是幸福的 世界上最幸福的國民是北韓 你還要加把勁 暫居大義 還有上升空間 大家還記得疫情期間 那種曾轟動一時的洪門宴嗎 當時永遠茶行太子女王思雅 有份出席並染疫 但就涉嫌向衛生主任張竹君等 虛報行蹤 王思雅否認四項提供虛假資料罪 早前被裁定全部罪成 3月4日 她在九龍城裁判法院 被判160小時社會服務令 暫委裁判官葉青青指 判刑須具阻嚇性 否則會削弱政府進行防疫工作的效力 以及危害社會大眾在防疫上的努力 王敏判後表現平靜 哇 判160小時社會服務令這麼重啊 會不會嚇死人啊 王思雅作供時曾表示 自己染疫後記憶力變差 現在你判她160小時服務令這麼重 小心她反告你嚇到她心臟病啊 不如改判160小時睡覺令啦 之前有一單 一個從迪拜底港的印度裔男子 和其在本港的女友 涉嫌向衛生防護中心提供虛假資料 隱瞞曾參與聚會 其後兩人被拘捕檢控 被判囚3個月及20日 另外兩名前國泰基倉服務員 於前年底由美國飛抵本港面檢疫 涉嫌在居家醫學監測期間違規外出用膳 兩人經審訊後 早前被裁定共三項 沒有遵照衛生主任所指明的條件罪成 各被判入獄8週 唉,有人要坐監 有人就只是社會服務令 以前的香港就說法律面前人人平等 現在 法律面前錢錢錢錢 最黑暗的是 慰問發聲的香港市民 未判先判 甚至不斷要延遲公審 這樣的司法制度 香港還怎麼會沒有前途? 好喇,今日嘅香港就到呢度 多謝大家嘅收睇,明天見