【謝田時間】1.核武上外太空對地球有多危險? 2.美俄曾簽署協議-禁止核武上外太空? 3. 美國俄羅斯對抗加劇? 4. 美國太空技術領先多少? 5.美國應該把重心轉向對抗中共?

看中國TV
9304粉絲
257 次觀看·2024年2月21日
🔥歡迎訪問「中國內幕」新頻道<br>https://www.youtube.com/@china-inside-stories/featured<br>🔥請加入乾净世界https://www.ganjing.com/zh-CN/channel/1eiqjdnq7goOxWkCG46DBd41d1gt0c<br>🔥請加入我們的Patreon,http://www.patreon.com/visiontimesHK<br>🔥請首選Stripe捐款:https://www.secretchina.com/kzgd/donate.html<br>🔥請加入榮譽會員: https://www.secretchina.com/kzgd/subscribe.html
Hello, Professor Xie.
Hello, Shouyue. Hello to all listeners and viewers.
Recently, there was a report that the US House of Representatives asked the Biden administration
to decrypt major intelligence related to national security threats.
The intelligence is related to Russia's desire to send nuclear weapons into space.
What do you think?
I think it's a kind of propaganda.
I think it's a kind of Western mainstream media
or some mainstream media and some pro-government groups
who are anti-Russia.
They hope to stir up a kind of
anti-Russian sentiment at this time.
Because the matter of sending nuclear weapons into space
Russia has been doing it for decades.
The US is also considering it.
In fact, when the US lost the Cold War
and the development of nuclear weapons
they all considered sending nuclear weapons into space.
But later, they also realized that it was too dangerous.
So later, between the US and the Soviet Union
there was a regulation banning the deployment of such weapons in outer space.
But now this regulation should be
non-weaponization in outer space.
This regulation still exists.
Because if nuclear weapons are sent into space
it's easy to have problems.
For example, a nuclear warhead is placed on top
with nuclear paint and materials.
If this is in space
it will collide with another satellite.
After the collision
a large amount of nuclear material
will be transported in space.
While it is being transported, it will be on Earth.
When it comes back to Earth
it will be in a large area
and there will be nuclear material and fuel radiation.
It will hit the ground.
After these parts are burned to the ground
when there is an explosion or an accident
and the nuclear material starts to spread
you don't know where it will end up.
You can't control it.
For example, a Russian nuclear weapon
may end up in the United States.
It may end up in itself.
A US nuclear weapon is the same.
It may end up in the Soviet Union.
A Russian nuclear weapon may end up in the United States.
The key is to cause nuclear pollution all over the world.
So I think that
sending nuclear weapons into space
is a bit of a nonsense.
Like you said, in this situation
is it actually impossible
or should it not be considered this way?
First of all, many countries have signed
a non-weaponization regulation
in the United States.
We don't have any evidence
to prove that it will actually send nuclear weapons.
But as I said in my analysis
sending nuclear weapons
has already been realized
and there is no benefit.
Because it may cause harm to itself.
Especially between big countries.
If you are in a big country
and you spread nuclear fuel and fuel in space
and when there is pollution
in such a big country
you will definitely be harmed.
So in fact, the United States and Russia
are no longer developing
sending nuclear weapons into space.
But the United States is indeed developing
sending conventional weapons
and other weapons into space.
Let me give you an example.
A weapon developed in the United States
is called
I remember it was called
the God's Palm
Palm is the palm of the palm
God's Palm
What is this weapon?
It is a metal stick
made of aluminum alloy
a very heavy metal stick made of aluminum alloy
and then it is sent into space
and then it is placed in space
and as a blow
the metal stick is directly thrown down
This is not a nuclear weapon
but a metal stick
But when the metal stick falls
it will go down from space
at a very, very fast speed
it will pass through the atmosphere
it will kill
but it will fly at a great speed
and hit the earth
The impact and blow it causes
is actually greater than a nuclear weapon
It is no less than the range of a nuclear weapon
but there is no nuclear pollution
Let me give you an example.
This is a weapon developed by the United States
called
the God's Palm
This is the palm of the palm
That's what it means
But there are others
I think there are others
There must be other weapons
But this conventional weapon
All countries are doing it
The CCP is also doing it
including satellite weapons
anti-satellite weapons
How to quickly hit the other party's
GPS satellite
communication satellite
military reconnaissance satellite
At least these
These big countries are doing it
You just said
This report is actually a
kind of publicity
Does this mean
that the competition between the United States and Russia
or confrontation
is getting worse
Yes
Obviously
Now that the Russian-U.S. war has come to this point
Russia obviously knows
that the United States has a great advantage over it
At least the Biden administration
The left-wing government has a strong advantage over Russia
So it must be competing
It must compete with the United States
In fact, Russia is already ahead
We know that the United States
already has a very advanced missile defense system
The missile defense system
can be at the beginning, middle and end of the missile
There are patriots
There is this
That is, a set of three stages
There is such a defense system
After all, this defense system
is now quite effective
Not 100%
But it can also intercept
quite a lot of missiles
And Russia
It doesn't have this
It doesn't have this technology
But it doesn't have
It doesn't have this shielding technology
Shielding
No shielding technology
The shielding technology is not developed enough
It develops the technology of hair
Is an offensive weapon
And it has already been developed
That is, we now know
Hypersonic
