Martin Luther and the Heidelberg Disputation

VerseCrate
2 followers
Feb 19, 2024
After the controversy surrounding the 95 Theses erupted, Luther was invited to defend his views at the University of Heidelberg. This video explains the Heidelberg Disputation and the development of Luther's views of grace and justification.
Ryan M. Reeves (PhD Cambridge) is Assistant Professor of Historical Theology at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. Twitter: https://twitter.com/RyanMReeves Instagram: https://instagram.com/ryreeves4/
Website: http://www.gordonconwell.edu/academics/view-faculty-member.cfm?faculty_id=15906&grp_id=8947
For the entire course on 'Church History: Reformation to Modern', see the playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRgREWf4NFWY1ZaP-falnLFIR9texgvjR
in this lecture we're going to be
looking at Luther and Heidelberg and
we're not just looking at Heidelberg
disputation but rather we're seeing that
the Heidelberg expectation is something
of a pivot for Luther in his development
of his theology in his public expression
of his faith after the 95 theses in
before he's put on trial at the diet of
forms and we can begin by discussing
what happens after the 95 theses that
gives rise to the debate that carried
Luther further and further into
controversy and we ended our last
lecture with Luther posting the 95
theses on October 31st and some scholars
have doubted whether or not there was
actually a posting or nailing of the
theses in Luther's life he rarely talks
about this instead he typically talks
about what happens after the 95 theses
but there are two things that propel
Luther onto the public stage the first
is that in January 1518 the theses are
taken they're translated into German
from Latin thus making them accessible
to any layman who could read or more
likely those who could read aloud would
read it to those who couldn't in the
German translation of the 95 theses were
printed off in past and sent around
throughout a significant portion of
Germany now there's always been some
debate as to the impulse behind this it
doesn't seem necessarily as if Luther
himself is pushing this down into the
level of the populace he wrote the
theses in Latin and if you did post them
on the door which is probably likely in
my view he attended it then to be part
of the academic conversation within the
university and not something for the
everyman to sort of join in with but for
whatever reason they're sent around in
German and they are something of a smash
hit with certain communities within the
German world at the very least they
create something of a buzz the second
thing that happens though is that Luther
is less concerned with raising up sort
of a grassroots popular resistance to
the issue of indulgences but instead he
still playing the role of the defender
of the papacy and the defender of the
church takes the 95 theses writes
something of an apology about them
meaning a defense of them and he sends
them to the R
bishop of mites albert who as we saw in
our last lecture is actually one of the
men behind the sale of indulgences in
germany now Luther does this on good
faith he's not poking the bear you might
say he's not attempting to rouse the
anger of the archbishop you might say
that he's going to Albert with hat in
hand asking him to pay attention to
what's going on with those who are sent
out throughout Germany in other words he
thinks Albert is more or less on his
side and it's that move sending the 95
theses with a letter to the archbishop
that propels Luther more aggressively
onto the stage and draws the gaze of the
Pope because what Albert does is he
doesn't really look at the theses
himself remember Albert is really not
much of a scholar or theologian he got
his office's due to political power and
money but Albert has the theses examined
by someone else someone in his entourage
for theological heresy and when there
are some question marks raised he then
forwards it to the Pope to leave the
tenth
and the response from the papacy the
response from Leo the tenth is actually
rather ho-hum they don't initially an
immediately crack down with warnings and
condom nations and scoring's of Luther
for his attempt to correct some of the
understandings of indulgences sales in
the power of the papacy and as I've said
before in previous lectures that's
actually pretty axiomatic for the
Catholic Church historically speaking
the Catholic Church doesn't tend
historically to swoop in as fast as
possible to shut people up often what
happens in these cases at least in the
Middle Ages and in the early modern
period is the Pope will exert indirect
pressure he himself won't write scornful
letters or publicly condemn anyone but
he will send an entourage of people sort
of surreptitiously around to try to calm
the person down and if there are threats
it's usually the person in charge of the
treblemaker well over the course of
about a year that's exactly what Leo the
tenth does and we're going to go through
this chronologically but we just want to
note it now
Leigha the tense move for most of a year
if not two years is to exert indirect
influence on Luther to let him know that
he's heard in some ways but that he
needs to calm himself down when it comes
to the authority of the Pope even if
Luther has a theological leg to stand on
historically that the Pope has never
claimed certain rights over the issue of
salvation that that always belongs to
Christ and that papal authority extends
over temporal jurisdiction of issues
related to penance etc the Pope will not
suffer long someone who wants to
challenge his authority no matter how
rightly placed that criticism might be
from Luther
but despite the coming firestorm between
Luther and the papacy there were a
number of people who found Luther's
initial ideas compelling and it's this
combination of a number of people both
in the universities and at the wider
popular level within Germany who find
Luther compelling as well as the
eventual firestorm from within the
Magisterium and from the University of
Leipzig as they attack Luther that twin
pronged experience for Luther is the
context that drives him to develop a
more consistent vocabulary and
articulation of his understanding of the
theology of the cross and justification
by faith and so in April of 1518 Luther
is actually invited by the University of
Heidelberg
to come and give a disputation or a live
debate or live back and forth on the
subject of indulgences and the things
that he raised in the 95 theses
now let's not get ahead of ourselves
Luther being invited in at this point is
not as radical as it might seem Luther
has yet to come under serious public
fire for his stance on indulgences at
this point he is somewhat provocative
but in some cases applauded for his
stance on the subject of the
controversial indulgences sales
throughout Germany and so the invitation
by Heidelberg to come in allows Luther a
public setting to really sort of hash
out and debate his ideas now again if
you're a university trained professor
the main place you do this is not in the
quiet and solitude of your study but
very often in the public forum of a
debate where you dialogue back and forth
and pass out more consistent vocabulary
now we don't have the sort of
blow-by-blow transcription the things
Luther says at the Heidelberg
disputation but we do know from
eyewitness accounts that Luther's
convictions in his perspective are
becoming clearer as he is speaking
publicly April 1518 again he goes to
Heidelberg to do his disputation and
this really is a pivot for him and one
of the eyewitness accounts we have
actually is a man who will become one of
the most important reformers in all the
sixteenth century and that man is Martin
boots er boot sir is a man who will see
later when we go through the life of
Calvin but boots ER is a significant
reformer in his own right who resides
frankly somewhere between the Reformed
position and the Lutheran position he is
certainly on the reformed side of things
but later in life as he refuses to
become more reformed in the sense of
becoming anti Lutheran there are some
from within the city of Zurich who began
to treat boots there's a bit of a
traitor boots er is as we often say
irenic
that is to say he doesn't want to choose
sides if he doesn't have to he wants a
more generous perspective on
Protestantism and to the day he died he
was very appreciative of Luther even if
that meant that some of his brothers in
the reformed tradition found him a bit
suspicious well the beginning of his
fascination in his respect for Luther
begins here at the Heidelberg
disputation because in the audience is
Martin Buser
himself still Catholic yet because of
Luther's force of his arguments really
sees the beginning of his change from
Catholic to Protestant as beginning here
at the Heidelberg disputation in Boots
er attends and he actually has a letter
that he sends to a friend afterwards in
which he writes that Luther responds
with magnificent grace and he listens he
says with insurmountable patience he
presents an argument with the insight of
the Apostle pol now this is certainly
sort of effusive language he certainly
loves Luther but it gives at least a
little bit of an inkling as to Luther's
persona up on that stage Luther from
about this point and frankly all the way
until the day he dies simply has this
effect on people whenever they see him
face to face
people are just mesmerized by the way
that he interacts and the sort of
larger-than-life personality that he is
in butcher wasn't the only one there who
found Luther's ideas compelling what's
important about the Heidelberg is
mutation though and the reason why I'm
choosing to call it kind of a pivot
point is that Luther knew deep down that
indulgences were not the only thing he
really cared about in fact in a manner
of speaking indulgences were a proxy war
meaning that they are an attack on an
element of the Catholic understanding of
salvation and penance cetera but they're
not the whole thing and what begins to
happen in Luther's thinking and in his
public expression of things from roughly
Heidelberg on is that Luther transitions
his language from being about
indulgences per se to instead be more
about the fundamental issues of the will
and the ability of the Christian to
perform good works and more
fundamentally the power of the Pope
itself
now we saw all when we looked at the 95
theses that Luther is at least hinting
at a restriction of papal power well
over the course of 1518 he actually
begins to push deeper into this subject
it becomes a little more aggressive as
time wears on about how uncertain he is
frankly about the Pope's position in
relationship to Scripture because the
issue with indulgences and with some of
the other practices that Luther is
attacking with his theology of the Cross
is that they are fundamentally based on
the power of the papacy in the
Magisterium to declare and to rule on
these subjects
and so increasingly as the debate sort
of go on and as he gets some criticism
and he has dialogue with a number of
people Luther again and again and again
realizes that his issue isn't so much
indulgences per se but that he no longer
believes that the Pope should be allowed
to say these things or to enforce these
things and this really is a vital point
to understand when we look at the
Reformation itself often it's said at a
popular level that the Reformation was
about the doctrines of grace that the
Protestant faith is focused you might
say exclusively on the issue of
justification well that certainly is
true in a material sense that is to say
it is the subject of salvation and
justification that causes the
Reformation however from a doctrinal
standpoint and from a historical
standpoint the root cause of the crisis
is not justification alone that is the
problem but rather that Luther's
criticism of the medieval understanding
of salvation meant that he was led
eventually into the conclusion that the
Pope had no right to do these things
that the Scriptures were somehow being
placed under the authority of the Pope
and that if the Pope was saying that he
had the right to interpret Scripture and
that his interpretation of Scripture was
that indulgences and penance was the
order for all Christians to perform well
then what Luther was led to have
believed eventually is that the Pope can
be wrong that he has no right to rule on
these subjects and therefore the
fundamental sort of concrete bedrock
issue amongst Protestants and Catholics
from the very beginning is this issue of
the authority of the papacy to rule on
doctrine or to interpret Scripture and
as the next sort of 12 to 18 months
unfold for Luther the issue becomes less
and less about indulgences and more and
more about the authority of the Pope and
in fact that issue in particular dawns
in Luther's mind not so much because of
his own self-awareness and his ability
to sort of reason down to the foundation
rather the issue of the authority of the
papacy in Luther's eventual rejection of
that authority comes about by Catholics
challenging Luther on this very point
and we can see this immediately
following the Heidelberg disputation
late of the tenth finds himself
relatively unsuccessful at sort of the
indirect method of putting pressure on
Luther through some other means to get
him to calm down and so Leo sends in
sort of a pit bull to take the first
salvo of Luther's doctrinal positions
and that man is Sylvester pre arias pre
arias was a Dominican and he lived in
Rome where he was the master of the
sacred Palace which means that he was on
sort of the inner circle of the papal
court itself in pre arias is brought in
as something of a scholar and he's asked
to offer the first major critique of
Luther theologically in writing and pre
arias does this examines Luther's
ninety-five theses and some of his other
pieces and he draws up a response to it
and this is important because pre arias
is the first to semi-official either not
officially to refer to Luther as a
heretic and pre arias is focus is
specifically on the issue of the
authority of the Pope he challenges
Luther not with misunderstanding
indulgences or with being
curmudgeonly in complaining about abuses
that he has no right to complain about
rather pre arias takes a different
tactic in which he says the Pope has
allowed this the Pope has caused this
and pushed this therefore Luther pre
arias says in a nutshell shut up it's
not your place the Pope has the right
over this and if you challenge that you
are a heretic the authority of the Pope
is supreme again notice in this case and
this is true in
many places throughout history often a
fundamental problem that looks to be a
doctrinal problem becomes one of
authority when dealing with the
Magisterium Pope Leo is not done however
he also enlists the help of another
Cardinal by the name of kg Tom in kg
Thanh is kind of one of these figures
who should have seems to show up
everywhere in the Reformation as sort of
a voice or leader in the Catholic
hierarchy is at Chicago Town for example
who is sent up to England 13 years later
when hinder the 8th is having his issue
with his first wife Catherine of Aragon
and he's asked the Pope to consider an
annulment and it's Khajiit on who sent
up at the Pope's urging to rule on this
subject and cotton is the one who has to
figure out a way of telling Henry no
without telling him now and the story is
sort of legendary he sits and hears the
case and then rather than rule a verdict
which was next to impossible because he
couldn't rule in either case without
angering some major magnate or King in
Europe instead Khajiit on calls a halt
to the meeting for summer break
he then scary's back to Rome and never
comes back and the rest is history for
the formation of the Anglican Church
when Henry the eighth kicks the Pope out
of England but in this case Cayetana is
enlisted to go after Luther in cotton
and Leo do again a bit of an end-around
they go to Frederick the wise the prince
who has authority in jurisdiction over
Luther because he has authority and
jurisdiction over vit and Borg and over
the University and they pressure
Frederick to send Luther down to Rome
and they push pretty hard on this
alleging that Frederick is harboring a
heretic even though Luther has yet to be
officially condemned and they urge him
to pack him up and send him on down to
realm well it's at this point that one
of the more curious realities of the
Reformation sets in which is that
Frederick is a Catholic again we've made
note in previous lectures that the
Vinton burg Castle has a staggering
number of relics and things that could
be part of a pilgrimage to the city of
Wittenberg for the sake of penance and
even for indulgences and Frederick does
not himself ever come under full fire
he's never tossed out of the Catholic
Church for his role in the defending
Luther
but in this case Fredrik doesn't take
the side of the papacy or of Khajiit on
and it's hard to understand his mind
here but one of the elements that seems
to be going on with Fredrik as well as
others is there's a real animosity to
the idea that those in Rome would call
one of their own a german-born man down
to their midst when they knew full well
that Luther would never come back so
rather than say no what Frederick does
is he makes a demand that a meeting
between chitin and Luther happened on
German soil and he makes a suggestion
that it happened at the city of Augsburg
the papacy in kg ton reluctantly agree
and Khajiit on comes up to Germany to
meet with Luther around the same time
though the Pope does put together a
papal bull in which he clarifies a
couple of things related to indulgences
and that bull is known as cumin Post
clump now just a quick note on the
naming of bulls and what these things
are a bull is essentially an official
proclamation by the papacy today these
things often go by the name of
encyclical or by other names whenever
the Pope issues an official proclamation
but a bull is something that has the
full power of the Pope behind it and the
way we name these things is usually we
take the first two or three words in
Latin from the text and we just sort of
call the document after these words so
in this case the document begins with
the lad encompassed qualm and therefore
this is the name of the document
well this bull Kuhn Post qualm does two
things first of all it does put an end
to some of the abuses that Luther
complained about in the 95 theses and
this is sometimes overlooked by
Protestants in particular the Pope does
in sort of a quiet way put it into some
of the things that were so scandalous
about the sale of indulgences things
like playing on the emotions of those in
the audience whenever you're preaching
an indulgence sale for example however
this document is bull stands tall and
does not back down at all on the issue
of the Pope's authority to issue in
indulgences and these things are binding
in that they have an efficacious role in
the Christian life for Luther though
this bull was relatively irrelevant it
doesn't actually come across as
instead Khajiit on comes up to the city
of Alex Burke in 1518 in October roughly
a year since the posting of the 95
theses and Khajiit on and Luther meet
and it does not go well at all in fact
the two eventually descended to a
shouting match and the situation is
focused primarily on the subject of the
Pope's Authority and it's at this point
again Luther pushed and pressed asked
again and again to buckle under because
the Pope's Authority is supreme Luther
again and again begins to say and he
says it here to Khajiit on that he does
not believe that the Pope can rule over
Scripture that he can be the interpreter
of Scripture that scripture is over the
Pope and therefore if Luther finds a
significant deviation from papal
proclamation from what he believes to be
the interpretation of Scripture then
scripture wins in the Pope is not the
interpreter of that text so a year after
the posting of the 95 theses Luther is
confronted again and again and again
with the issue of the Pope's Authority
and from pre arias Takashi tan Luther is
forced and pushed and prodded to make
further and further bold declarations
about his understanding of the authority
of Scripture over the Pope and Luther
very nearly lost his life here in
October of 1518 Khajiit on at some point
notifies the authorities that they're
going to meet again the following day
and that if Luther remains recalcitrant
and will not rescind his heresies that
he is to be handed over and arrested
then put on trial in the civil
government and Luther slips away in the
night and escapes well by and large
15:18 is the big push from the official
response from Rome with pre areas and
Khajiit on and leave the tent behind
them pushing a line of attack against
Luther in which they say that he is
disobedient and that he is challenging
papal Authority after this moment though
after October 1518 the battle sort of
transitions and what happens is is the
main opponent for Luther following 1518
becomes lodged in a university squabble
between the University of Wittenberg and
the University of Leipzig Leipzig is a
bastion of conservative Catholic
thinking at this time and one of the
leading lights one of the major figures
when the major theologians of the
University of Leipzig is a man by the
name of Johann Eck and because Luther
was a university professor and because
Wittenberg and the other professors
their rally behind Luther and become his
biggest supporters what Eck does over in
the University of Leipzig is he takes
Leipzig out into the battlefield and
makes Leipzig the counter-offensive from
the university standpoint over against
Luther and Eck is vitally important
because what Eck will do is become in a
manner of speaking Luther's nemesis Eck
will be the one who will be there at
Luther's trial and he'll be the voice
condemning him as the prosecutor a neck
throughout Luther's life becomes one of
his biggest opponents and Luther later
throughout most of his life we'll have
lots of scathing things to say about
that little dr. Eck as he called him
well again after the pivot of Heidelberg
and after Luther has confronted the
official response from within the
Magisterium from pre arias and Khajiit
on acknow come to the forefront and on
into the following year of 1519 Eck
cooks up an idea that he wants to have a
serious showdown between the leipzig
faculty led by him in this case in the
representatives of vit berg on these
so-called new ideas about papal
authority and indulgences and so in July
1519 you have the major summit over
these issues and this meeting is known
as the Leipzig disputation now in this
case there is sort of a bit of a strange
twist to it that most students don't
quite get right all the gate and that is
that the leipzig disputation when the
University of Leipzig and Eck invite
Vinton Berg in they in a manner of
speaking can't invite Luther himself to
be the primary speaker there were all
kinds of rules to these debates etc and
often you have to invite the senior
person from the order or from the
university to be sort of the lead chair
of the
eight and that's exactly what happens
here one of Luther's colleagues and one
of his closest friends is a man by the
name of Andres Carlstadt in Carlstadt
was a supporter of Luthor's views and so
therefore when Leipzig and Eck invite in
the Vinton burg faculty and they want to
draw a Lutheran to say something about
his views they actually invite Carl
Stott to sort of share the vit and Berg
side and Luther kind of has second chair
you might say or he's the the backup but
there's no escaping the fact that at
Leipzig its Luthor versus akin a manner
of speaking
even though karlstad again has the first
voice on the floor in the leipzig
disputation is four sessions in July of
1519 that lasts for 18 days these are
serious long ranging deep prodding
debates over all kinds of issues but the
three primary issues that they deal with
are the issue of free will biblical
arguments about the basis of indulgences
or penance itself in thirdly papal
authority as the bedrock of all the
Catholic system and what Eck finally
manages to do what others have not been
able to get Luther to be publicly until
this point is that when Luther is
finally on the stage and he's defending
his position over against Eck Eck
primarily doesn't deal with the issue of
indulgences instead when he has Luther
in his sights he goes specifically after
the issue of papal Authority and quite
famously Eck pushes Luther into a corner
you might say or if you don't want to
make Luther sound weak you might say he
pushes Luther to realize from within his
own theological system that what he's
saying is essentially that the Pope can
air that church councils can be wrong
they can err and that if scripture if
Luther's interpretation of Scripture I
should say goes over against either a
council or a pope Luther has to admit
that the church Magisterium can be wrong
now again this is not quite so
controversial in the 21st century but in
Luther's day this is extraordinarily
controversial
because really only a matter of about a
hundred years before in the early 1400s
there was a man the name of yon hood who
had done ministry in the city of Prague
and who had said many of these same
things as well
he denied papal Authority he deny the
infallibility of Pope or Council to rule
on doctrine and in the early 1400s yon
host had been burned at the stake in the
city of Rome
well what act does is really kind of a
masterstroke from the Catholic side
which is that he gets Luther to frankly
admit to being a ha sight as they were
called and there is something of an
apocryphal moment here whether or not
Luther said it and these words are not
were not quite sure but at some point
Luther essentially admits that he is a
ha sight at least on this issue of papal
authority that with HUS Luther admits
the Pope can air a council can air and
scripture alone is the thing that cannot
air its interpretation must reign over
our church well again in a manner
speaking for active force Luther to come
to the realization that his theology is
essentially hussite or essentially
schismatic on the issue of the authority
of the Pope is with running the rest of
being a bit hyperbolic it's the final
nail on the coffin for Luther to avoid
the title of being a heretic and so
their July 15 19 year and a half after
the posting the 95 theses after a lot of
debating both positively at the
University of Heidelberg and then
negatively in private with people like
Khajiit on and now publicly against the
man who would become his nemesis Luther
has now fully bloomed and blossomed you
might say into his understanding of the
theology of the cross and his
understanding of justification that
because the fundamental issue is that
Luther doubts and then eventually
condemns this idea of the authority of
the papacy that it took this sort of
pressure-cooker time after the
controversy of the 95 theses for Luther
to come to the bottom of only actual
believes and what his theology actually
implied in terms of his relationship
with the papacy and so after Luther has
made this proclamation and after he has
not buckled under or caved under when
both the official response team from
Rome with pre arias and kakouton as well
as the Leipzig University in the dispute
ation of July 1519 when Luther does not
cave from this point on Luther is
heading quickly towards being condemned
as a heretic
to eventually being put on trial
okay that's it we've now come to the
point where Luther is Anna matter of
speaking and open heretic and in our
next lecture we're going to be looking
at what happens to Luther as she is
branded a heretic and put on trial at
the diet of forms
you
