ExclusiveStudy: mRNA Vaccines Killed More Than Saved

In a newly published paper, scientists of the Moderna company warned that the technology used in mRNA vaccines carries toxicity risks. Based on the paper that was published by Nature Review's Drug Discovery on January 23rd, the biggest concern now is how the toxicity of mRNA technology can be de-risked effectively. Moderna and Pfizer's COVID-19 shots are based on the mRNA technology. mRNA vaccines have multiple side effects including heart inflammation and severe allergic shock, which is caused by some specific components of the COVID-19 vaccine. The paper also mentions that mRNA and the spike protein that is delivered by Moderna's shot can be found in various parts of the human body weeks or months after vaccination. However, this is contrary to what health officials had claimed. According to health officials, when vaccines were rolled out, such materials would exit the body within days. In addition, according to the paper, scientists believe that reducing toxicity risks with mRNA-based vaccines and drugs is necessary but complicated. And even so, not surprisingly, they still recommend these vaccines. However, Dr. Robert Malone, who helped invent the mRNA technology, said that the paper downplayed the range of risks that have been linked to mRNA-based vaccines. Dr. Malone believes that this may be a part of a propaganda technique. This technique, which is a form of misdirection, involves offering some information to obscure or prevent the discovery of other information. Dr. Malone, who wasn't involved in the paper, asserted by saying, My most generous interpretation of the overall intent of the article is that this article summarizes and represents information concerning risks and toxicities of this platform technology, which Moderna wishes to have disclosed in a manner which puts the firm, its activities and the underlying platform technology in the best possible light. And other shocking news regarding mRNA vaccines shows that mRNA vaccines cause more death than save lives. Another research study published in the Curious Journal on January 24th analyzed reports from some trials of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. These trials were the ones that led to the shots being approved under emergency use authorization in the United States. The study also looked at several other trials and research studies. It found that the vaccines had dramatically lower efficacy rates than the vaccine companies claimed. Moreover, the study concluded that the harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweighed the rewards. In other words, for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections. Previously following the first trials of Pfizer and Moderna, it was claimed that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines had a 95% reduction in symptomatic COVID-19. However, this new study found that this efficacy assumption was false. Researchers also criticized the Pfizer and Moderna trial reports for exclusively focusing on relative risk measures, without mentioning absolute risk reduction. Researchers believe that absolute risk reduction provides a more accurate indication of drug clinical effects, and the omission of absolute risk statistics overestimates vaccine benefits. Based on the study, compared to 95% efficacy using the relative risk measure, absolute risk reductions for Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were 0.7% and 1.1% respectively. So what does this mean? An absolute risk reduction of approximately 1% for mRNA vaccinations meant that many people would have to be vaccinated in order to prevent one mild to moderate case. In other words, to prevent one COVID-19 infection, 143 people would need to be vaccinated with Pfizer shot, and when it comes to Moderna, 88 people had to be injected. So based on these numbers and COVID-19 infection fatality rates, roughly 52,000 people would need to be vaccinated in order to prevent one COVID-19 related death. This would mean two saved lives for roughly 100,000 injections of the Pfizer vaccine. However, based on the calculations, there is a risk of 27 deaths per 100,000 doses of the Pfizer shot. Therefore, for every life saved by the jab, almost 14 lives would be lost due to the mRNA vaccine. The authors of the study also noted that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's, the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee also did not include absolute risk reduction measures when reviewing vaccine data. However, this action is different from the FDA guidelines, which state that both approaches are crucial in order to avoid misguided use of pharmaceuticals. Consequently, the study asked for a halt to the mRNA vaccines. The research says, given the well-documented serious adverse events and unacceptable harm to reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse and enforce a global moratorium on these modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered. The authors also asked for the immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule.