吳文昕：習逼元老交出財產備戰 為什麼這兩家不交？ #信燕訪談

Hello everyone, I am Lily, Zhang Shunyin. Today's guest is Mr. Wu Wenyin, an international human rights lawyer and expert on Chinese issues. Hello, Mr. Wu. Hello, hello. Hello, everyone. Yes, Xi Jinping's corruption property has actually been confiscated, which is one-twentieth of China's total national production in the past 10 years. The Zeng Qinghong family has handed over the property. The Wu family has handed over the property, and the other families have also handed it over. Now there are only two large families who haven't handed it over. One is the Hu family, and the other is the Gang family. Why haven't these two families handed it over? Ha ha, the Communist Party is all about political taxation, right? The reason why these two families haven't handed it over to the Communist Party is to make it sound worse. First of all, I have to make it clear that I don't think the other families have handed it all over. They have only handed over a large portion of their property. Some of them have already been transferred overseas, secretly. So, why is it that the Gang family and the Hu family have handed it over? It's very simple. Because when Xi Jinping was elected as Hu's successor, there was a fierce argument. A fierce argument. Hu wanted to have Li Keqiang as his successor, but the Gang family opposed it. In the end, the two families had a fierce argument. I am a so-called professor in the mainland. I know all these people. I know all the members of the Gang family, including Hu Jintao, Liu Yuan, and Liu Xiaoqi's son. At that time, there were many rumors that Xi Jinping was going to kill Jiang Zemin. But he told me that he wouldn't do it. Because he and Jiang Zemin's wife were very close. Jiang Zemin accepted to be the first-in-command of Xi Jinping. At that time, Jiang Zemin made some conditions. One of the conditions was that he had to treat the members of the Gang family well. His family members, such as Jiang Mianheng and his two sons. So, Hu Jintao was the same. Actually, Hu Jintao was not elected by Xi Jinping at that time. It should be Li Keqiang. Jiang Zemin was also not elected by Xi Jinping. Jiang Zemin wanted to get rid of Hu Jintao. Both of them didn't want Xi Jinping. In the end, Xi Jinping took it as a way to appease them. At that time, both of them wanted Xi Jinping to agree. That is to say, Xi Jinping couldn't move Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao's family members. Of course, Xi Jinping agreed. But the promise of the Communist Party will never be fulfilled. Even if Xi Jinping had agreed not to move his family members, he wouldn't have allowed it. But the current situation is very bad for Xi Jinping. Because the Red Second Generation is now gathering under the leadership of Liu Yuan. Under the so-called leadership or secret leadership, they are going to deal with Xi Jinping. So, it is very difficult for Xi Jinping. Jiang Zemin's family members and Hu Jintao's family members all knew that Xi Jinping was going to be elected at that time. So, if he moved their property, it would be even worse. So, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao's family members would be even more angry. The current situation is very bad for Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping's position in the inner circle is much worse. Yes, so they dare not move. These two families, Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin, dare not move. It is very complicated to move. Because Xi Jinping is very afraid of death. He doesn't know what will happen. So, they dare not move now. The second problem is that Xi Jinping is currently in cahoots with the party. He doesn't trust anyone. If he is suspected of having a problem, he will be monitored, killed, or disappeared. But Xi Jinping can't kill everyone. On the contrary, when Xi Jinping feels unsafe, he may need to fight. That is to say, he may need to fight a battle, and then pull up another battle. So, the situation is very complicated. It is very possible. Think about it. The people of Xi Jinping's faction, for example, the people who have been in trouble recently, such as Chun Gong, Li Shangfuk, etc. In fact, they are all people of Xi Jinping's faction. When he was in office, he was the opponent of the Qing Dynasty. He tried his best. The highest-ranking members of the Politburo, and members of the Politburo, are basically all people of Xi Jinping's faction. He thought the world was peaceful for him. At that time, I and other experts on the Chinese issue said, what did we say? Because the Communist Party, my personal opinion, I can't blame others. Some people agree. My opinion is that the people of the Communist Party have always been nurtured with a strong sense of struggle. They are the opposite of our traditional Chinese education. Traditional Chinese education requires people to be compassionate, to help others. But the Communist Party is not like that. Everyone has a strong sense of struggle. Everything has to be fought for. If you don't act, you have to act. So what did we analyze at the time? The people of Xi Jinping's faction have suppressed many other factions. They don't allow them to enter the Politburo. That's it. This is the so-called main contradiction. The Jiang faction, the Xi faction, the Jiang faction, the Xi faction, the Hu faction, have all been suppressed. They don't allow them to enter the highest power. So in the end, the entire Politburo, everyone knows that the Politburo is the top 25 people of the Communist Party. The Politburo is all their own people. But because everyone is a Communist, everyone has a sense of struggle, everyone is fighting for fame, for power, for love, for a better life. So there will definitely be internal struggles. That's how I saw it at the time. Because you have to fight all the time. If you take your main opponent, for example, Bosnel, Li Keqiang, all of them have been suppressed. After that, this contradiction disappeared. The original contradiction still exists. When the first big contradiction disappears, the second big contradiction becomes the first big contradiction. So the second big contradiction is the internal contradiction within the Xi faction. Their struggle has no end. This is a feature of the Communist Party. Everyone must understand. They think that the struggle is correct. I remember someone counted Xi Jinping's speech in the 20th National Congress. He said for two hours, he mentioned 57 times, struggle, struggle, what kind of struggle, what kind of struggle. Recently, he even said in the financial sector, we have to hold our head high. Hold our head high. Not only do you have to work hard, but you also have to be very fierce, very cruel. You have to hold your head high to be good. You have such a human heart. It's strange that you don't fight every day. Yes, you have to fight until you die. You have to fight until you die. Yes, that's right. You have to fight until you die. Xi Jinping is afraid that people will assassinate him. At that time, Jiang Zemin had already developed an unpatriotic bureaucratic system. At the same time, he kept harassing their wealth. The wealth that these officials have is unrivaled. It's a lot. It's as much as the whole country. The CCP's internal media once claimed that after more than 10 years of restructuring, Xi Jinping's corruption of property is one-tenth of China's 10-year national production total. It's half of China's national production total. It's very huge, isn't it? Yes. China's corruption is absolutely shocking. It's absolutely reliable. I remember many years ago, when Xi Jinping began his so-called anti-corruption campaign, he arrested Zhou Yingkang and sentenced him to death. He was sentenced to death. He was said to have been arrested many times in his home. Those numbers are shocking. Some of them were in cash. It's said that the whole basement was filled with cash. From the floor to the ceiling, it's not enough for me. You had to buy a house to put the cash in. Yes. It's true that the so-called corruption of property is a very weak description. It's not just the corruption of property. It's everywhere. In addition to the corruption of property, it's the corruption of houses. It's the corruption of thousands of households. Thousands of households. Let me tell you a little story. It's about China's corruption and corruption. It's a fact. Many years ago, when I was in China, I was still alive. I was still there. At that time, I was the director of a multinational company. At that time, I often flew between Beijing and Falun Gong. One day, I was sitting next to the director of the World Bank. His mission was to travel around the world and often live in different countries to monitor the money that the World Bank borrowed or the money that the World Bank gave away. He was very upright. He said that the money would not go into his own pocket. It's true. He is a corrupt official. He can be said to be a corrupt official of the World Bank. He told me that he had been to Africa. Let's not talk about other countries. Let's talk about a certain country in Africa. He said that he was in charge of high-speed roads. He was in charge of high-speed road loans. He said that he had been in that African country for five years. He said that it was too scary. He said that corruption was terrible. Maybe half of the money that the World Bank gave went into his own pocket. Half of it went into his own pocket. He said that the high-speed roads had not been built yet. They said that they ran out of money. They said that the money had been used up. They said that it was too expensive. I asked him. He said that as a corrupt official of the World Bank, why didn't you take action? He said that in some countries, the power of officials comes from the opportunity of corruption. He said that if he took action, he would sue all the corrupt officials. He said that they would not build a single high-speed road. He said that half of it was built. He said that the original road was 400km long. Now that it is 200km long, there is no money left. He said that if there is a 200km high-speed road, it is better than nothing. This is funny. The reason why I sat next to him on the way to Frankfurt, Beijing, was because he had just changed his job. He was not going to France. He was in charge of China. He was in charge of China's banks. I asked him what he was doing. He said that he was the director of the World Bank in Washington. But he often flew to China. I asked him what his experience was in China. He said that it was like heaven compared to the countries in Africa. Like a paradise. I asked him if he was mistaken. He said that there was no corruption in China. I asked him what the difference was. He spoke to me in English. I can speak English now. He said that in Africa, it was a chaotic corruption. He said that in China, it is a well-managed corruption. What did he mean by that? He said that as anti-corruption officials, he would sometimes take his subordinates to check their accounts. He said that in Africa, you check your accounts to see where your money is spent. You have to write everything down. He said that their method was chaotic corruption. He said that the money was so chaotic that it was hard to track. You have to write everything down. If you want to know the details, you have to look at page 364. He went to page 364. He said that everything was chaotic. In the end, he gave up. He said that in China, it was not like that. He said that the accounts were very well-managed. He could find out where his money was spent. The problem was that he had to find out how much his subordinates were paid. He was exaggerating. How did I find out? I asked his subordinates. They didn't dare to tell me. I asked them how much they were paid. I asked them what machines they bought. They told me that they bought a machine. It was originally worth HK$20,000. But the account was worth HK$30,000. How did I find out? He bought expensive equipment. You can say that you shouldn't buy expensive equipment. But the real reason was that the HK$30,000 was spent. One more thing. He said that the Chinese were very smart. At least compared to the people in Africa. He said that the spies knew how the World Bank was managed. We didn't have an unwritten rule. What was it? It was about 15 years ago. At that time, the Chinese loaned a lot of money. He said that they knew that the World Bank was tracking a certain country. If this country had done more than 10 projects, each project was completed on time. And the money was enough. It was like the African countries. They didn't have enough money. The money was used up. They had to borrow more money. But the Chinese didn't do that. He said that they were very smart. What else were they good at? When they started to borrow money from the World Bank, almost every project was completed on time. Sometimes, they even did it in advance. They even had a psychological warfare. When they started to borrow money, they said that the World Bank had completed all the projects. They had completed all the projects in advance. They also asked how much money they had borrowed. They still had 3 million dollars left. How could they use it? It was a psychological warfare. The people in the World Bank thought it was terrible. The people in the World Bank thought that if a country had completed all the projects on time and didn't spend a lot of money, they wouldn't have to monitor the country. They would monitor the country. Because the salary was very expensive. That's what they did. So the people in the World Bank thought that China didn't have a big problem. It wasn't that bad. They weren't stupid. What did they know? They knew that the Chinese workers were very poor. They got a very low salary. Yes, that's right. Maybe they only got 3 dollars. But they reported it as 13 dollars. The people in the World Bank thought that 13 dollars per hour was a small amount of money. That's right. They did this kind of thing. They were corrupted by corrupt officials. I will never forget it. Managing corruption. Well-managed corruption. Yes. This is a Chinese-style socialism. Yes. They didn't know. That's right. The Chinese workers were very poor. Yes. They got a very low salary. Yes. You can't believe every word the Chinese Communist Party said. You can't believe every word they said. You can't believe every word the Chinese Communist Party said. Yes, that's right. Xi Jinping used this property in three ways. He took away the property. Part of it was used to fight against Taiwan's military expenses. Secret military expenses. The other part was used to maintain stability. He used a lot of money to maintain stability. He built a huge business system. The third one was to alleviate the financial difficulties of China. This proves that the financial situation in the South China Sea is very difficult. Yes, Mr. Wu. I think that's why so many rich people in mainland China have to run away. In English, they have to run away. They definitely have to run away. Now, the Chinese Communist Party has been saying since a few years ago that the country will advance and the people will retreat. Even the smart rich people understand this. This is a saying that the country will advance and the people will retreat. The country will take your money. The country will take the money from the private enterprises. This is for sure. But I think that they can't save the country. Because these people are rich. In mainland China, apart from corrupt officials, many private enterprises have made a lot of money. But it's definitely not voluntary. They have to save the Communist Party. For example, you said there are three reasons. One of them is to maintain stability. The first one is the country's financial situation. The first one is to avoid the war against Taiwan. That's right. All the rich people I'm not discriminating against the poor. That's not what I mean. The rich people are not stupid. If they are very stupid, they won't be able to do business. If they are successful, they will understand. First, to avoid the war against Taiwan. To be honest, I know a lot of rich mainlanders. They don't have a single reason to spend money to liberate Taiwan. They don't have a single reason. But their problem is they dare not speak out. Do you dare to say no? Then you will have no future. The Communist Party... I just realized when I was young, the anti-communist newspapers in Hong Kong in the 1950s and 1960s always called the Communist Party a communist bandit. When I was young, I thought they were exaggerating. They are a political party. What about the Nationalist Party? The Nationalist Party was very anti-communist in the 1950s and 1960s. For example, the Chinese Times, the Taiwan United News, and the Central Daily all used the term communist bandit. At that time, I thought they were exaggerating because they were opponents and they said bad things about others. Now I realize they are right. They are really bandits. Even worse than bandits. Because they are the Communist Party, a communist bandit. This is absolutely right. They kill people, set fire, rob people, rape women, they can do anything. These people are absolutely right. They are communist bandits. So the future of Hong Kong is for most Hong Kong people to understand these people are communist bandits. When you understand they are bandits, then you will know how to deal with the bandits. We don't use violence. As long as we understand what a bandit is, what a communist bandit is, then we will naturally know how to use non-violent means to deal with these people to protect Hong Kong, to restore Hong Kong. So, how many Hong Kong people are interested in Taiwan? Hong Kong people who have been to Mainland China and Taiwan, they don't just travel for a few days, they do business, or go to work. They really understand the real situation of this society. Hong Kong people who have a conscience will think that Taiwan is much better than Mainland China. Taiwan's democracy, freedom, law, and human rights are really different from Mainland China. Mainland China has no human rights, no freedom. In addition, life is very good. Taiwan's life is much better than Mainland China. So, who among Hong Kong people would be willing to pay to go to Mainland China to fight against Taiwan? Everyone should understand that many rich people in Mainland China think the same way. Many of you have been to Taiwan. You know that Taiwan is not as bad as it used to be. Also, there are no foreign forces that want to divide China. In fact, the so-called division is a trap. Many people in Taiwan think that we are in charge of ourselves. We are in charge very well. We are a place that is independent from the power of the Chinese Communist Party. Originally, it was called the Republic of China. Now, it is called the Republic of China-Taiwan. You, the Communist Party, have never ruled us, so we are so good. Why should I accept your unification? It is very simple. In fact, it is very simple. Most Taiwanese in Mainland China believe that blood is thicker than water, that we are one family on both sides. These are all nonsense. If you try to convince me, I will say that we are one family. If you try to convince me, I will say that we are a family. Think about it. The Chinese Communist Party has always been like this. The Chinese Communist Party has always been like this. In the 1950s, the Chinese businessmen said that they wanted to cooperate and form a company. They wanted to form a company. Half belonged to the country, and the other half belonged to them. They wanted to form a company. They said it very well. Then came the Communists. That's right. The Chinese Communist Party gave them the opportunity to form a company. The Chinese Communist Party has always been like this. There is no difference. As I said, sooner or later, the Chinese Communist Party will destroy Hong Kong. The Hong Kong government manages a lot of money. They steal this money every day. Yes. They steal this money every day. If there is an opportunity, they will take it away. This is the Chinese Communist Party. So many Chinese rich people are very angry with Xi Jinping. They think that he forced them to donate money to avoid the CCP. What does it mean to avoid the CCP? Taiwan is doing better than us. Why do we have to fight them? So they think that they can't win. This money is like burning in a fire. Moreover, if they fight, they will be beaten by the US. Many rich people I know understand this. Secondly, they donate money to maintain stability. To maintain stability. Especially after three years of blockade, many rich people are afraid. When they hear the word, they think of the blockade. The blockade is actually a sign of stability. Of course, the so-called stability mainly means that we need money to deal with the anti-communist forces. This is what they think. This is like the speech of David Davos. He said that he came here to give a speech because you are the elite of the world economy. You have been poisoned by socialism too deeply. So I am here to help you disinfect. This president is very powerful. He immediately canceled the one-to-one contract. Some people asked him when he was going to negotiate with the CCP about his new policy about the one-to-one contract. He said I don't like to negotiate with assassins. What do you mean by assassins? He said that in mainland China, if you have the same opinion as the CCP, they will behead you. You will die. So what is an assassin? He is a professional assassin. That's right. He is very powerful. He can see very clearly. So the CCP is really like this. What is the so-called stability? Anyone or any group is disobedient. You don't need to oppose them. As long as you are disobedient, they will kill you. This policy is the same for the CCP. It was like this from the beginning. It's just that in the era of Jiang Zemin, he came up with a more powerful and more advanced method. What did he say? He made it very specific. He said that we need to absorb the teaching. At that time, he summed up the experience of June 4th, the June 4th massacre. This is a fact. I know the senior officials who retired. They said to commemorate Tiananmen success and stability. He said stability, not killing. At that time, in 1999, ten years after the massacre, Jiang Zemin spoke to senior officials in the party. What did he say? You can't see it on the news. At that time, he said Comrades, ten years of experience proves that our party's decision ten years ago What decision? The decision to kill. Our party's decision ten years ago was very wise and correct. How did he deduce why it was correct? He didn't say it casually. There was a reason. Why was it wise and correct? Very simple. Where did our comrades in Eastern Europe go? Connecticut, Romania, Czechoslovakia, etc. Where did they go? They were all gone. What about us? We are still here. Not only are we still here, we are even stronger and more stable. So, I want to tell everyone that the only thing the Communist Party has in its mind is power. This is very honest. For them, power is the most important thing. The Communists in Eastern Europe are too soft-handed. Their actions are too slow. Connecticut, East Germany, wanted to use tanks to suppress the demonstrators. At that time, East Germany and the Soviet Union had an agreement to use heavy weapons. Tanks belonged to the Soviet Union. They had to get the Soviet Union's consent before they could do it. The Soviet Union was afraid they would rebel. At that time, the Soviet Union had changed. Gorbachev did not agree with Connecticut's decision to use tanks. So, Jiang Zemin said, our comrades in East Germany were too slow and too soft-handed. As a result, they were all killed. We are not like that. We are not soft-handed. Our actions are not slow. So, many people are afraid. What else did he say? I understand his thoughts. He said, we have to take some lessons. What lessons? He gave two lessons. First, many people should not be seen at the scene. They should not be allowed to take pictures. We should not allow them to do that. CNN reporters and Hong Kong news reporters took a lot of pictures all over the world. This is a big mistake. I ask you not to allow this to happen in the future. You can continue to kill people, as long as you do not let others see it. This is the first lesson. This is his new policy. You can kill people by any means, as long as you do not let others see it. The second lesson, he said, we have to get rid of the interference in the future. We have to get rid of the interference in the future. We should not wait for the government to take action. At their home, they have some thoughts, in the post-Munga period, some friends were talking about how to disagree with the Communist Party. At this time, we have to do something. He said, in the post-Munga period we need to get rid of It was around June 4th, 1999. It was the 10th anniversary. He didn't say it was a massacre. He said it was the 10th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square incident. Later, as we all know, on June 4th, he said this. On July 20th, Jiang Zemin launched an all-out crackdown on Falun Gong. Why did he do that? It was because, as Jiang Zemin said, in the Ming Dynasty, even if you killed 100 people, you couldn't leave one alive. As far as I know, Falun Gong wasn't anti-communist. They just wanted to cultivate good people. To be true, kind, and patient. If you want to be a true person, an honest person, a kind and compassionate person, you wouldn't listen to the Communist Party. If the Communist Party wanted to kill people, you wouldn't participate. That would be a crime. That would be a violation of the law. So, the Communist Party, you can't underestimate them. Their thinking is very different from that of normal people. So, why is it so strange? Falun Gong has never used violence. Even the Communist Party didn't dare to say they were violent. All of a sudden, all over the country, overnight, they arrested tens of thousands of people. Even now, they even put people in gas chambers. This is what he said at the time. In the Ming Dynasty, you had to take action. You couldn't wait. So, he spent a lot of money on the country. According to statistics, 20% of the country's spending is for maintaining stability. Directly and indirectly. Everyone should know what maintaining stability means. Maintaining stability is a very big issue. It's not just about the police, the police, the National Security Agency, the 610 Office, which specializes in dealing with Falun Gong and other so-called anti-party religious groups. Falun Gong is not something you are interested in. You are just interested in training people and being a good person. That's already a crime. They spent a lot of money. It's not just the police, the special forces that need money. For example, the police, the cameras everywhere. On the surface, it's for the sake of security. But in reality, it's not. It's all about maintaining stability. So, they spent a lot of money. Everyone should know that there are about 600 million cameras in mainland China. 600 million cameras. What do you call them? Sky-watching cameras. They watch everyone. Their goal is to be able to identify anyone in mainland China within the longest two minutes. Anyone from any corner of the country. Within two minutes. These people spend a lot of money. There are countless examples. And the propaganda that is done for the sake of stability is all about maintaining stability. So, spending 20% of the total spending on maintaining stability is not strange at all. I think it's even more than 20%. Because for the CCP, as I said, the most important thing is power. What is maintaining stability? It's about maintaining their power. Anyone who disobeys, any group that disobeys, in the end, they will have to give up their power. So, within two minutes, in any corner of China, in any place, if you want to find this person, within two minutes, you will find him. So, they spend a lot of money. This is based on artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence. The development of artificial intelligence requires a lot of money. It requires a lot of people to do it. They have to do it regardless of the consequences. There is no problem even if there is no bloodshed. They have to do it. So, I heard that the level of artificial intelligence that the CCP has has surpassed the level of the US. But not all of them. I think the US is still leading. Because the US system is different. The US is very free. Political opinions, etc. You know, you have to develop artificial intelligence. What is artificial intelligence? Artificial intelligence is like a human being. But a human being, your thinking, your decision, your analysis, your reasoning, you have to make a decision. There are a lot of things, not all decisions, but there are a lot of decisions that are related to politics. You have to consider the political factors. If I am a computer with artificial intelligence, for example, I have to ask it if we can do something in Tiananmen Square. You have to consider the political factors. There are a lot of things. For example, I remember I tried once, it was very simple. You know, the US GPT. You ask it, can you tell me how the June 4th massacre was? He said it very well. It was very fair. He talked about how the Communist Party mobilized the People's Liberation Army and used the Tanker machine gun to kill a lot of people in Tiananmen Square. All of them. I have the same question. I can compare it to the White House. They have a talk show about artificial intelligence. I asked, can you tell me how the Tiananmen Square massacre was? He said it was completely wrong. Why? Because it was for political service. So they are very stupid. The Communist Party is very stupid. You have no freedom, no human rights, no rule of law. In the end, you have to develop artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence. I just gave an example. I asked two people about the same question. One of them answered correctly. The other one was like a fool. What kind of intelligence do you have? So I said, in a dictatorship country, it will never be in the lead in artificial intelligence development. Because there are too many places to control. You can't say this, you can't say that. There is no such problem in the West. Basically no. You have to teach people how to make bombs. There will be problems. In short, there are very few restricted areas. In mainland China, there are a lot of restricted areas. They are very afraid. Think about it. How much money did China spend to prevent people from freedom of speech? That is, to prevent you from talking nonsense, to prevent you from saying things about artificial intelligence, it has to be like this. Otherwise, it won't allow you to exist. It's like turning your own artificial intelligence system into a fool. The Communist fishing policy is not just fishing. The fishing is the fishing of the people. It must be inevitable to create computers. Because the fishing policy has already expanded the scope of artificial intelligence. It must be like a fool. Otherwise, it won't work. So I am not worried. But what I am worried about is that in other areas, or I should say that it is precisely because of the dictatorship of the Communist Party that the artificial intelligence and the computers are in danger. They think that killing people is the right thing to do. Because their thinking has to be in line with the thinking of the Communist Party. So they turn their artificial intelligence into the Communist Party-style artificial intelligence. The Communist Party always dreams that if one day artificial intelligence is very successful, it will destroy a lot of machines. Each machine will be the real People's Liberation Army of China. So in the future, when we send troops, a large number of machines will kill countless people. Everyone will be a cold-blooded animal. That's how it is. Because that's how they think. They don't care about people's lives. They think that as long as they have power, they can do whatever they want. If in the future, there will be very smart machines, like humans, but the machines created by the Communist Party will be their exemplary People's Liberation Army. That is to say, they will shoot and kill people and so on. It's right, it's correct. The world is in danger. But we can't say that their artificial intelligence is superior to Western artificial intelligence. In fact, the artificial intelligence they create is a kind of mental artificial intelligence. Because as I said earlier, in many areas of knowledge, if you don't allow people to think or speak in a political way, the result will be a murderous act. The number of viewers on-site is now more than 480. Mr. Ng, do you have anything to add? First of all, I would like to thank everyone for their continuous support. Watching my video is a form of support. As you all know, to be honest, I am not doing this to make money. I can use my money. I just hope that I can accumulate some experiences and see some facts in my life. Not everyone knows or I can see it myself. I am very happy to share it with everyone. Because I feel that when everyone knows the truth, not the fakes of the Communist Party, but the truth, I believe that everyone with a conscience knows what they should do. I won't ask you to hit anyone. As long as you know the truth and have a conscience, you will definitely do a good thing. Yes, Xi Jinping has repeatedly forced the Yuen Long family to hand over their property. He will definitely stimulate the interests of the CCP. The red generation will definitely not agree. To deal with Xi Jinping, to publicly challenge Xi Jinping is the red family. How will Xi Jinping and the red family fight against each other? We will continue to pay attention to it. That's all for today's program. Thank you everyone. Thank you, Mr. Wu. See you next time. Thank you. Thank you for your support. Bye-bye.