許銳宇：鍾翰林事件 國安故意給他走？真正目的是什麼？黎智英案 美國要制裁的是「港共」 #港心•情

Hello everyone, I am Lily. Tomorrow is the New Year. First of all, I wish you all a Happy New Year and may everything go as you wish. Today's guest is Mr. Khoi Rui-yi, a former Hong Kong district councillor. Hello, Mr. Khoi. Hello everyone, I am Khoi Rui-yi. Lily just introduced me as a former district councillor. Actually, today is a very special day. Supposedly, this is the last day of my term, but unfortunately, I was forced out by the government. If there are any residents of my district who are watching, I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you for your support over the years. I wish you all a Happy New Year. Tomorrow is the New Year. I wish you all a Happy New Year. I hope that next year, we can all find the life that we want. Yes, that's good. A few days ago, John Conlon fled to the UK to seek shelter. Did the National Security Service let him go on purpose? What is the real purpose? I don't think the National Security Service did it on purpose. This is the National Security Service's deliberate design to let John Conlon go. Because the situation you see this time is that John Conlon applied to go on a business trip. Then he didn't follow the plan and returned to Hong Kong. But the National Security Service didn't know that after John Conlon left Hong Kong, In fact, the National Security Service couldn't control him. Another possibility is that he would not return to Hong Kong. The National Security Service had foreseen that John Conlon would not return to Hong Kong. But they let him go even though they foresaw that he would not return. Why? This is what we are going to talk about today. Because you know, many famous political prisoners in Hong Kong, In fact, they didn't go on a business trip. Even their freedom of movement in Hong Kong was restricted. You see, John Conlon's case, First, he applied and was allowed to go on a business trip. Second, his freedom of movement in Hong Kong was restricted to a certain extent. But not to the extent of strict monitoring. What I want to say is that now there are some outlawed Hong Kong politicians in Hong Kong. Even his freedom of movement in Hong Kong was severely restricted. He couldn't go out. There are such people, such cases are happening. I won't say who it is because I don't want to affect him. So I see it this way. In fact, in the National Security Service's prison list, There is a grade. Some political figures in Hong Kong, even if they are released, They can't leave Hong Kong. They can't even leave their house. But John Conlon may be a level-one monitor. He has a certain freedom of life in Hong Kong. Even in some cases, he won't deliberately ask you to leave. But in the case of their request, After thinking about it, In fact, he can let you go. And it is expected that you won't come back. What happened is that It shows that John Conlon is not the most strict monitoring list. He also hopes to build some precedent through such cases. What precedent? He also knows that John Conlon and Zhou Ting, Such well-known political figures have gone abroad. It will definitely cause a certain degree of response. He even expected such figures to be abroad. May continue to engage in some Maybe they don't like the so-called hostile force Some protests or actions He also wants to give it to some people who are not the focus Those people who are outside the monitoring list To see if these people have gone abroad. After that, what will the international response be? And what will they do? Let's make a preparation Because look at the future political prisoners They will come out one by one. Some people will let them go. Some will continue to focus on monitoring. Let's see if I let these people go What will happen when they go abroad? What will happen to Zhou Ting? What will happen to John Conlon? This is one of the purposes. Let them have a preparation If more political prisoners are released in the future What will happen when they go abroad? He has prepared a case This is one of his purposes. The second purpose is very important. He hopes to establish such precedent Zhou Ting went to Canada to study Won't come back John Conlon went on a trip Won't come back After that, you can see the Hong Kong Public Security Bureau Even the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Stand up to condemn Simply put, he established such precedent The so-called political prisoners in their eyes After going abroad, there is a possibility that they will not come back. So in the future, if he has some key monitoring He does not allow those political prisoners in Hong Kong If he doesn't let these people go in the future He has a very good reason I gave some well-known political prisoners to go abroad before But they won't come back He will use this as an excuse Will prevent some people from leaving Some people must not be allowed to leave I won't say the name In many cases, he will use the case of Zhong Hanlin and Zhou Ting To justify his decision Because the Hong Kong Public Security Bureau, you can see After he opened this department Even if the world is at peace He has to find something to do Think about it, for example, Li Zhiying Zhou Xintong Even Liang Tianqi was released These famous political figures He won't let them all go He will definitely stay, whether it's useful or not He will definitely leave some people to come to Hong Kong Then make this Hong Kong Public Security Bureau Continue to have a reason to exist You control Zhong Hanlin, you control Liang Tianqi These need a lot of resources To justify the existence of the Hong Kong Public Security Bureau Continue to need such resources So I think from this Zhong Hanlin case I can see that the famous political figures The first group that needs to be monitored In the future, I think they won't have many opportunities To leave Hong Kong This Zhong Hanlin incident Gave us the biggest inspiration Yes, do you feel that the passports are getting tighter and tighter recently? Really getting tighter and tighter For example, Zhou Ting is also Now it's Zhong Hanlin They will know when they are exposed There are still many Many are not exposed Even those who have no chance to expose Are there a lot? Because this passport For example, Zhou Ting The passport she is holding is illegal What else is there to say? After she was sent to China She was allowed to speak This is a condition that the whole world is laughing at And now Zhong Hanlin has also been exposed They are also preparing to send her to China Give her a passport Do you think For those who are more famous The passports are getting tighter and tighter Will the common people be their turn in the future? Will HK people's passports be like those in the mainland All of them are getting tighter and tighter Not allowing them to go out? Because the trend is like this Do you see the Hong Kong people's passports Now exposed to the HK government What is the situation for the common people? Because I can't see the related news There is this trend For example, now Hong Kong, the HK Communist Party All follow the so-called rule of law in the mainland The so-called passport This is what the mainland does The dissidents in the mainland Those political figures Basically have no passport to speak of All have been confiscated Even the common people are not so easy to go out If they follow this set of rules to go to Hong Kong Will it have a great impact on the people of Hong Kong in the future? Because it's hard to say about the HK Communist Party Its policies are constantly changing Yes, Jason Because to be honest Everything in the world has a chance to happen If you look at some of the common people in China Not allowing them to go out One of the main reasons is that They don't want too much foreign exchange to be lost Because if they go out, they have to spend money abroad So they have to use foreign exchange This is the so-called common people in China One of the main reasons why they can't go out Do you think the Hong Kong people will care about you? Go to Japan to spend a little money After spending a little foreign exchange Because of this, they don't allow you to go out I don't think I can see such a trend in Hong Kong for the time being Will the CCP blockade Hong Kong one day? Not allowing anyone to go out This opportunity will definitely happen But before we see this happen We have some foreshadowing If you see some foreshadowing That is, the Hong Kong government will not allow some common people Even buckle up their passports Like China You have to give a reason Has the foreshadowing appeared yet? Where is the reason for the Hong Kong government to do this? Do you see it? I see it first of all Zhou Ting, Zhong Hanlin They are like this They have no law Is there a reason to buckle up their passports? There is a reason Because of these political figures If you let them go abroad Under the circumstances that they cannot be controlled by you They have to continue to fight abroad He will avoid this The second thing is that I continue to keep some political figures in Hong Kong It can be reasonable for the Hong Kong government to continue to exist Because he wants to control Zhong Hanlin controls Zhou Ting Controls Liang Tianqi These things need resources Then the Hong Kong government can use resources to do these things The Hong Kong government has a reason Buckle up these people's passports Continue to control them in Hong Kong He has a reason We can find a reason But if you say I hope this program teaches everyone to think For example, as an ordinary civilian Now the Hong Kong government has buckled up your passport Don't let your money out What are the benefits to him? Do you see the benefits? For example Passport is a person's natural right God-given God-given natural right It's a person's identity If that person has no crime Did nothing wrong What reason is there to buckle up someone else's passport? Of course there is no reason Zhong Hanlin doesn't let him go Don't let him come to the police Of course there is no reason But the Hong Kong government does these things for a purpose What we have to discuss is Will that happen? What is the reason for it? The Hong Kong government is Buckling up Zhou Ting's passport Or Zhong Hanlin's passport Or don't let them go There is a purpose to control them But for the time being For ordinary Hong Kong civilians Don't let them go Buckle up their passports Does this have a lot of benefits for the Hong Kong government? Is there no harm? For the time being If he doesn't do this This is not good for them Or it will bring a lot of harm He won't do it You don't say Does the Hong Kong government respect human rights? Not this He sees after doing this Does it hinder his control? So this moment You say Will he ban Hong Kong people from coming to the police? Buckle up their passports Don't let their funds in These things are always possible Can always be imagined But before we talk about these points to the audience We need to have a reasonable reason Don't say, oh, it's always like this We don't need to create some We can't find a reason ourselves I don't think we should do this Mr. Hui, do you think There are still a lot of people Who are in this situation Like Zhou Ting Of course there are Yes, there is only one person He exposed it Everyone knows If he doesn't have a chance to say it Will everyone not know? Do you think Zhou Ting and Zhong Hanlin Are they the ordinary people in your mouth? You are talking about Don't we have to bring a fear to the audience? Or for some political reasons For the time being, there is no factual basis When some people are political figures After Liang Tianqi came out Now there is no news of him He must be under control He must have restricted his freedom to go to the police But can you say From these cases Push forward Say you are in Hong Kong As a person In theory, this person can't go to the police No, can't see these things When some people are restricted In Hong Kong Restricted freedom of life Does it mean that all Hong Kong people At this moment are thinking the same thing Or thinking the same thing No, our theory can't go that far But still have to be careful Because after all The mainland does this After all, he will Follow the mainland Go to Hong Kong So Hong Kong people have to be careful Of course, there must be a chance When will it happen And is there any precedent before it happens For the time being, I don't think it has reached this stage Even an ordinary person Rent a house on the street It turns out that he is already restricted from going to the police His funds are restricted Not as much as in Hong Kong for the time being Slowly, I think it will slowly Expose more Yes, he is now temporarily Expose two people Not just one I think The next question Li Zhiying Was judged illegally Worldwide attention At this time, let Zhong Hanlin go Is it to separate this line of sight? Because Bill Kong himself has freedom You see, the Hong Kong Communist Party Let Zhong Hanlin travel to Japan Still say there is no freedom Right? You see Zhong Hanlin He applied to travel That is Is this related to the Li Zhiying case? The relationship is not too big He let Zhong Hanlin go There is a reason As I said He is not the most First of all, the list of important inspections The second thing is that he hopes Let these people go To make a reason In the future, he will not let other politicians leave He can renew this precedent There is a possibility of escape So we won't let you go But you said He wants to use this case to show The Hong Kong government has given Hong Kong people A sufficient human rights I don't think this can be done Any politician who leaves Will definitely Cause another wave of International criticism Or these international fans Because from Zhong Hanlin's incident Zhou Ting's incident See some If they don't come out to talk We won't know It's not like what you just said The Hong Kong government wants to use this case To show the world I let these politicians go They are free After these cases went abroad It clearly shows How the Hong Kong government How to treat Some famous politicians in Hong Kong For example, he won't let you Go to this industry He will You are a good person Even give you money to be a good person To destroy you and your friends This is a very scary Policy If he doesn't say it, we really don't know After some politicians came out He deliberately made your economic situation Not good Don't let you go to work Disturb your daily life Don't let you open a bank account Let you have no normal life Normal Find more money to support your life Under the circumstances Even force you to accept Some of his money He didn't mean to make you develop He didn't mean to give you a sum of money Take care of you so that you won't speak He didn't do this He hopes to give some Give you some money To make these people That trust Or their trust Lost This is a very scary policy Because to be honest Zhong Hanlin said he collected money To help the police Be a good person After this news came out, do you know Some colleagues who have left Hong Kong Will discuss Will Zhong Hanlin Still Be a good person for the Hong Kong National Security Do you understand Simply put The damage has already happened Even if Zhong Hanlin came out and said We have collected police money before To be their good person, I was forced But the harm to him Has already happened I believe there are some Now overseas Some people Will have a warning for Zhong Hanlin Because he has collected The money of the Hong Kong police to be their good person To be their good person So the damage has already happened He hopes to give you money To induce you to be a good person Can destroy The trust between Hong Kong people and Hong Kong people The second thing is He hopes to give you money To grind your personal trust Simply put You can live You can collect their money You can be a good person You can betray yourself Some principles of morality Some values He hopes First, to destroy your trust To destroy your personality Second, in your circle To create an atmosphere of distrust between Hong Kong people This is very scary These things Only when Zhong Hanlin goes abroad We will know For me Even for Hong Kong people This is a huge shock In fact This thing has actually Caused damage Even after Zhong Hanlin left Caused damage Because he is now in the UK Applying for political asylum To be honest, he told these problems To the Ministry of the Interior The Ministry of the Interior knew During the Hong Kong period He cooperated with the police Even collected their money To give them some information What will the Ministry of the Interior think? Will he say Hong Kong police Forced you to What you did to Zhong Hanlin Even after going abroad Continued to hurt Zhong Hanlin In fact, this thing These cases One after another, appeared More inside information was revealed Can show In fact, Hong Kong is now a big prison The Hong Kong government can't declare What kind of freedom Allowing them to leave is a kind of freedom It can't be shown at all It can only show that Hong Kong is now a concentration camp That is, people can monitor each other In an unstable society This is a scary thing Yes, Zhong Hanlin He said this fact In fact, it's a good thing I think Really Western countries also know This CCP is a bandit He actually did a lot Similar to this kind of thing He did a lot of similar things To Zhong Hanlin Hurt Zhong Hanlin Hurt Hong Kong people That is to say Make everyone Disagree with each other The CCP is already Burning It has already done a lot This kind of thing So I think western countries He will understand Understand this I think Zhong Hanlin He said it Yes, it's very Have this Really believe him If he didn't say it It may cause so much harm That's right Western countries may not believe it Yes, he said it On the contrary, it is a good thing Because the whole world knows Western countries know He is a very A bandit He did a lot Similar to this This kind of thing And more than this More powerful For example What is the so-called anti-spy Can't do anything Do everything Of course Zhong Hanlin said this It must be said And this is also a good Advice Because I think Zhong Hanlin is not the only case I believe that many people in Hong Kong The released people May be forced to receive money to be a saint Such people Must be very careful How to deal with the money you receive Remember when you received the money If you are really forced, you can't choose Remember when you received the money And don't use the money Find a way to be safe in the future Then deal with it Don't turn it into your money This is very important If you are really forced to take the money There is no way Don't use it And your money Must be handled very carefully This is very important If he gives you money, he will open a receipt Or write something for you I believe there may be If there is Keep this evidence If not Still have to find a way To collect this evidence Handle it well This is for your personal trust In the future, if you say this It's better to protect yourself Yes, it's a good thing to say It's exposed Let the whole world know It turned out to be so terrible In fact, what the CCP does Is 100 times worse than this There are still many It's just slowly exposing There will be more in the future So many incidents Will be exposed The next question I just want to ask The United States Treats Hong Kong as an enemy I think the United States Treats the CCP As an enemy Wait a minute Put it in the back door The back door Because I'm not aware of it Back door Open the door and put it in the cell Back door is behind the house OK, thank you Sorry, everyone Someone sent something Can you ask the question again? Yes The United States treats Hong Kong As an enemy I think this is The Hong Kong Communist Party Treats Hong Kong as an enemy Not Hong Kong people Hong Kong Communist Party must be clearly distinguished For example, China and the CCP Must be clearly distinguished This Hong Kong Communist Party Does not represent Hong Kong people The United States treats Hong Kong Hong Kong Communist Party Treats it as an enemy Yes Of course, they are now starting to distinguish The CCP and Hong Kong people The CCP and Hong Kong people can be distinguished But Hong Kong people can't You live in Hong Kong Even if it does something to hit the Hong Kong government Even if it hits the Chinese government As a citizen of that place You must be hurt So of course Hong Kong people go to other countries For example, if you are persecuted For example, they will also approve of you But those who live in Hong Kong Because they want to enter the trade war Even enter the Cold War They must Hit your economy Destroy your power Destroy your economic power Living in such a place Cannot avoid being affected This is not allowed And Hong Kong people are also divided into many types Hong Kong people also have some For example, people who work for the Hong Kong government People who do security monitoring In fact, those In theory, they have already Known to be A part of the Hong Kong government To be honest The hostile force There is a part that needs to be investigated Whether there are any Hong Kong officials Even Hong Kong businessmen Those who have power and influence Will they also engage in some Anti-human crimes? What is anti-human crime? If you Monitor people Large-scale To sue people, this is already Right? This so-called equality If you do it in a law firm You say I am also doing an order To monitor who is who I am also a Obey orders, this is already anti-human crime So You say Hong Kong people There is a part Working in the Hong Kong government He thinks he is a Hong Kong citizen He thinks he is also working under orders In fact, he has already seen it as a hostile force I wish them all the best Yes, there is a saying The window is one inch higher Yes If you are forced to do it You must make it clear In fact, the United States Is for the HK Communist Party Not for the Hong Kong people The network will be wider and wider Whether you can be a senior official Be appointed as a senior official Then you are regarded as a hostile force Now slowly The circle is getting wider and wider Because the definition of anti-human crime Can be very broad So if you really Be a prosecutor Even if you are in a national security office The lowest level of staff is responsible for watching Zhong Hanlin You will be involved In the future political situation If it gets worse In the future political situation These people Have to be responsible For their previous actions I think Yes, that's right So So I think Is there really Such a big benefit here? You are a prosecutor Or you are a police officer Is the benefit really so big That you use your whole life's future I don't think so Although Life is quite safe As a prosecutor As a frontline police officer Life is very safe But is it worth it? We don't involve any moral judgment Or any value judgment Is this worth it? I don't think so Yes, in the future The future will be clear Just like Yes, it will Just like World War I, World War II There are many East and West It will be clear Until now I think justice Will come Maybe later But it will come So those who do bad things Don't think it doesn't matter If you do bad things now Life is good In the future, it will be clear It will As always We are waiting for this day I am also very confident I will return to Hong Kong in the future Yes, let's see if there is any supplement Okay, that's the end of the program I wish you all I wish you all a new year I hope next year will be better We can be in Hong Kong earlier Have a chance to rebuild this place To be honest, the situation in Hong Kong is getting worse In the future, if we have the heart and the strength I plan to return to Hong Kong to continue doing something It's also a hard process We have to prepare ourselves Wait for this day and then work hard Yes, I wish you all again I wish you all a new year Happy New Year Today's program ends here Thank you everyone See you next time Bye