鍾劍華：嚇人！ 邊個話立23條更多人想來香港住葉劉係講比邊個聽？移英港人9成9都唔返！ 小三都要讀國安洗腦教育只需接受不能質疑！ 害人！習大向拜登求救 ？中美吹咩和風？唔似？ #Lucy連線

Let's put it this way, it's very clear that the Legislative Council wants to do it. No one can stop it now, right? The members of the Legislative Council will not oppose it, because they are all slaves. If they want to do it, they will definitely do it. If they don't do it at this time, when will they do it? And to strengthen the suppression of Hong Kong people, to strengthen the political control, of course they will do it. But now you see that you haven't legislated, only the National Security Law has led to a large number of Hong Kong people to emigrate overseas. I don't believe that after Article 23, many people will come down because they feel safe in Hong Kong. Now Hong Kong has a high level of wealth, so if you keep signing out, naturally people will come down. But to be honest, how many people feel more worthy of coming to Hong Kong because of Article 23? I don't think there are many. What you have to worry about now is that after you add up Article 23, more and more people will leave Hong Kong. This is the truth. What Yeh Laiu said is not for us to hear. He made up this story himself, to make up a story. So I don't think what he said needs to be valued. If you value the objective facts, it's easiest to look at the data, and contact Hong Kong people here to know. Let's talk about this investigation first. This investigation was done by an organization. It is said that it interviewed about 2,000 people. As a result, as you just said, there are about 50% of people who do not have a job yet. But some of those who do not have a job are old people. Some are still studying. So this can't be said to be particularly high. Anyone who goes to a new place and wants to re-enter the local society, to build their own life, will need time and preparation. So I believe this is 50%. First, you have to look at the research. The research is not a random survey. So it may not be fully representative. Second, even if there are 50% of people who have nothing to do, you have to look at those who have nothing to do. Are they not going to work? I've seen a lot of people. First, they may have to take care of their families. Because in the UK, this is not the same as in Hong Kong. In Hong Kong, you can have other families. There are Filipino workers. But not here. So they have to take care of themselves. Some people don't work for this reason. Some people don't want to work. Maybe they are learning English now. Participating in vocational training. For this reason, they have nothing to do. So I think you have to look at it clearly. There are 50% of people who have nothing to do. What does this mean? Third, he said more than 90% of people don't want to go back to Hong Kong. Even if the UK is slow, they don't want to go back to Hong Kong. This is not surprising. Among the people I have contacted, of course, I only know one person. After coming to the UK, because of various reasons, he needs to go back to Hong Kong. But most of the people here immigrated to the UK in recent years. At least because they have nothing to do, because they can't get a job, they have to go back to Hong Kong. It's not a small number. Yes, it is. But it's not a small number. Also, two years ago, at the end of 2021, when BNO was just launched, less than a year later, the British Ministry of Home Affairs did a more representative investigation. Because the British Ministry of Home Affairs has all the information. So they did an investigation and interviewed a group of people who used BNO in Hong Kong to immigrate to the UK. That investigation is more representative. That investigation also found that 95% of BNO holders who came to the UK did not consider returning to Hong Kong. I think this is the same as a more representative investigation. It's basically the same. It's also the same as the facts we know on a daily basis. I think the people who have come to Hong Kong in recent years are mainly dissatisfied with the government and the CCP's destruction of Hong Kong. There are quite a lot of children who don't want their children to accept the current brainwashing education. So I think even if there are difficulties, even if some difficulties can't be solved for the time being, people who really want to return to Hong Kong are really few. Many are trying to adapt here, and slowly increase their living conditions through self-equipment. I think this is more common. This has been the case for the past two years. National security education has always been a national security issue. What we are doing now has nothing to do with national security. It has nothing to do with it at all. It is basically to use the name of national security to suppress Hong Kong people's political freedom, freedom of speech, and functional rights. So since it is a national security issue, it has been a fight from the beginning. As for brainwashing education, it can only be accepted without doubt. It is even more absurd for students to cultivate the history of the anti-Japanese War in Changchun Lake. The movie Changchun Lake is fake, and its history is false. How can it be said like this? So what is being said now? Students in the third year of primary school have to study national security, and those in the sixth year of primary school have to deal with extremism. This has become a choice or even a historical fact to encourage a blind nationalist sentiment. This is most beneficial to the CCP's governance. This is exactly why so many people have to bring their children to Hong Kong. So I think that no one can stop them from doing what they are doing now. But I saw a report that some teachers have said that if they are forced to teach such things, they would rather not teach. As you can imagine, these methods are extremely anti-education. But now the Chinese Communist Party and the Hong Kong SAR government's education department are basically using these methods to distort the mind of the Hong Kong young generation. They want to distort the minds of the Hong Kong young people, their personality, and their knowledge. This is not education. This is cruelty. This is no different from murder. So I think everyone should pay attention. I also hope that parents can do some work to cancel such distorted, incomplete, and even biased educational content. On the surface, the government's commitment is to carry out the next phase of the audit. They may have to make changes. But now the government is choosing to apply the facts. Ordinary citizens inside have a reaction, so they are considered to be thugs. Those white-clad people have already been on the streets in the afternoon, and they are not considered to be thugs. Those who have weapons have a reaction, so they are considered to be thugs. This is obviously very outrageous. Everyone knows that justice is in the heart. But now the government is making excuses, and the court is also cooperating. The judge, Chen Guangchi, has a very good reputation. He can sentence Lai Chiying, who has an office in the Apple building, in a corner of the media building, to a company, a company office, to four years in prison. This is the past record of Judge Chen Guangchi. So from his trial, we know the result. He also did his job in the process. He said that if there was a problem, he would have to leave. If he didn't leave, it would have been a provocation. This kind of logic can be used in court. This kind of person can be a judge. But now you are using these people to try this case. So this case will not be fair from the beginning. If you use this judge to try, you know that it will not be a fair trial. He must be helping the government. So I don't think it's too surprising. That is to say, I don't believe it at this stage. I will talk about this later. I don't want to talk about things that I don't believe in, or that I don't have enough evidence. But I don't think this is a provocation of Sino-US relations. Because in fact, after the meeting, there was no joint press conference, no signature of any documents, no joint announcement. What kind of provocation is this? Before the meeting, the main topic was to restart the high-level dialogue, to re-establish regular military phone contact. In the end, they just didn't want to be misjudged, didn't want to cause trouble. Did Biden say that he wanted to re-establish relations with you? He didn't say that. He didn't say that he wanted to strengthen relations, establish relations, establish good relations. He just said that he wanted to increase communication. So I don't think it's a provocation. After Biden met Xi Jinping, he even received a press interview. The reporter asked him, do you still think Xi Jinping is a dictator? He said yes, he said yes. You can imagine, this time, Xi Jinping's appearance on the surface, everyone was very happy. But the CCP, Xi Jinping, went to the United States, went around the circle, what did he gain? In addition to holding a press conference As for the media, I won't talk about this. I don't think some of the so-called agreements reached later, or the understanding reached later, it is said that the Sino-US military will do something to restore the military-to-military military-to-military high-level phone calls. At least someone is listening to the phone. It is said that China will take steps to reduce that kind of toxic substance to send it to the United States. In fact, there is no real progress. So I think, firstly, I may not believe Wen Qilong's statement. Secondly, you said that the relationship has improved, the wind is blowing in harmony. I don't think this is as obvious as imagined. Of course, when you come to be a guest, everyone is happy, but I don't think there is any progress. Besides what you said, the goal of the United States is very low and very clear. Now it has reached the goal of the United States. This is for China's trade sanctions, for restricting Chinese companies to do 5354 things in the United States. In other words, this is what I understand from the Chinese government's statement. As you can see, this statement has been out for two days. The SAR government has not formally responded to this statement, nor has the central government in Beijing made any further statements to this statement. So for the time being, it may only be the Guangdong Provincial People's Government who have the support. If this support is to be implemented, the document is very long, to be honest, the three areas, human resources, funds, and so on. Then there is the issue of co-governance. This is a big or small issue for the one country, two systems. I believe that the central government may not have the intention to promote this. To be honest, does this mean that the Hong Kong people and the Guangdong Provincial People's Government have a say? I don't think this has become a blackboard policy against Hong Kong. From the very beginning, I didn't like the Blue and White Box, because as was said in the press conference on Nov. 18, on Nov. 15, it was blocked by Ma Ying-jeou and Zhu Lianglun. At that time, people like Wang Shanshan were obviously against the Blue and White Box. In fact, the following pro-democracy protests can also be seen. The Nationalist Party's plan was to bring Ma Ying-jeou and Zhu Lianglun out, and then beat them to death in a big way, hoping to make the People's Party's An Wen-jie submissive. An Wen-jie is not a fool. An Wen-jie's幕僚 doesn't like this either. In fact, many supporters of An Wen-jie and the People's Party will not accept this. Because some of the supporters of the People's Party are young, and naturally have opinions about the ruling People's Party. But according to the data, they are actually more conservative than An Wen-jie. If An Wen-jie and the Nationalist Party are ranked second, I believe that the supporters of the People's Party will be dispersed, and the People's Party will also be eliminated. After a few days, I believe An Wen-jie has also heard the opinions and analysis of some of the supporters of the People's Party. If not, the People's Party will not accept it. In fact, on the 19th and 20th, he said that he had never thought about the issue of Hou A-Pui. Until today, there was a press conference at a restaurant. Two so-called unruly guests came. They are Ma Ying-jeou and Zhu Lanlin. They sat there. As a result, it seems that it is 5 o'clock on the 24th in Taiwan. There are still a few hours left before the nomination deadline because it is 4 o'clock in the morning in Taiwan time. There are still about 10 hours left. So I think without a doubt, the Blue and White Boxes should be able to be arrested. They will be elected individually. We don't know whether they will be elected or not. But the People's Party will definitely continue to fight against Aung San Suu Kyi. In fact, Aung San Suu Kyi is already in their hands. So Hou A-Pui will definitely be forced to fight against the People's Party one-on-one. So I believe there is no doubt about the election. The only doubt is whether Aung San Suu Kyi will be elected. If she is elected, there will be four people. If she is not, there will be three people. I think the problem now is that they have not yet announced the candidate for vice president. But it should be announced within a few hours. It is 4 o'clock in the morning. There are still 12 to 13 hours left before the election. But the People's Party has already announced a few days ago that Xiao Meiqin will be the vice president. This is also a very smart combination. Xiao Meiqin's image is very good. Her ability is also very high. So she is paired with Tsingtao. Now, looking at the list, it will strengthen the power of the People's Party to attract voters. Let's see what kind of people Aung San Suu Kyi and Hau Yau Yee will attract to be her vice president. But now, based on the current situation, the Blue and White Boxes should not succeed. Now we have to see how the combination of the other two parties, the People's Party and the KMT, will evolve. Before announcing Xiao Meiqin as the vice president, the support rate of Tsingtao, including the increase in power, was basically stable. It was 30% or more. Sometimes it was close to 40%, but it could not break 40%. The support rate of Aung San Suu Kyi gradually increased to 30% in about 20%. So there is still a month and a half before the election, on January 13th. It depends on who will be the vice president and the election process. You can't rule out the possibility of Aung San Suu Kyi. Hau Yau Yee's support rate has always been around 30% or more. But it is obvious that there is a continuous downward trend. So who will be her vice president? It is very likely that her election will be reversed. But Hau Yau Yee has been in the Blue and White Boxes for a long time. I personally believe that her influence on voters is not very big. Even if you don't say she is a wolf, her performance can be said to be average. She doesn't look like a prince when she wears a dragon robe. It is a pity to have to put a big brother, unless you are very surprised that she has a very strong and attractive partner. Otherwise, I can't see any reason for her to surpass An Wen-jet and Lai Ching-tuk. Of course, she is still relatively close to An Wen-jet. But there is still a distance between her and Lai Ching-tuk. So for the time being, the election will be slightly ahead of the Democratic Party. But will it get more than half of the votes? This is still to be seen. It still depends on the next election. However, after she announced that Siu Mei-Kim was the vice president, I can't see how big the change in the latest poll is. I believe that Siu Mei-Kim's image is better, her ability is higher, and her English is fluent. This will help Lai Ching-tuk.