Il Cdc ammette: nessuna prova di efficacia del vaccino su chi ha immunità naturale

NTD Italia
259 iscritti
Truth Over News con Jeff Carlson & Hans Mahncke
Il Cdc ammette – costretto da una richiesta di accesso agli atti ai sensi della legge sulla libertà di informazione – di aver consigliato il vaccino anche a chi è guarito dal Covid senza avere mai avuto in mano la minima evidenza scientifica di efficacia, se non il parere personale di alcuni individui sponsorizzati dalle Case farmaceutiche.
link originale:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/new-foia-document-reveals-cdc-did-not-have-data-prior-to-vaccine-recommendation-for-the-naturally-immune-truth-over-news-5530242
Visita il sito di NTD Italia:
https://www.ntditalia.tv/
#ImmunitàNaturale #vacciniCOVID #CenterDiseaseControl
Hi everyone, and welcome to Truth Over News. Today we are able to exclusively give you
a news obtained with access to the CDC's reports that we have obtained regarding
the so-called COVID vaccines, in particular on the effectiveness and usefulness of the so-called
vaccines for people who have already had COVID. There are thousands of millennial knowledges
on the effects of natural immunity, that is, the human body's natural ability to produce
antibodies for diseases from which it has been cured. But despite this being known at least
since 430 B.C., during COVID, the CDC has insisted that everyone should take these
so-called vaccines, including those who were naturally immune. On what basis did the CDC support
this? Incredibly, as it now admits, it had no basis, except the opinion of some people
sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. It is a scandal of epic proportions, yet once again
the mass media are silent. Scholars of ancient Greece will know Thucydides, who was a historian
and a general. But Thucydides, in addition to telling the Peloponnesian War, for example,
is also the first to adopt a strictly objective scientific standard when documenting events,
and is often referred to as the father of scientific history. But there is something else that
Thucydides did, less known, but much more impressive. He discovered natural immunity,
the fact that the body has a memory of the diseases it encounters, and it can use that memory
to fight off these diseases again. This is also known as immune memory. 2,500 years ago,
long before anyone knew about viruses or other pathogens, Thucydides noticed that those who
had been infected previously never got sick again. He noted that in his world, the same virus
was never attacked twice. This was an incredibly important observation, and one which guided
medicine for 2,500 years, that is, until the arrival of COVID, when the principle of immune
memory was out of the window. When he understood the text of the medicine, there were no longer
any diseases, and they were all obliged. They were all forced to undergo the so-called vaccine.
In a subsequent statement, the CDC had even proclaimed that studies had shown that
the vaccine provided a strong boost for care in people who were cured from COVID-19.
This exact same phrase was parroted by health agencies all over the country, and by other
institutions, such as universities, in their unbridled zeal to force everyone to take the
so-called COVID vaccines. The Washington Post was also promptly joined by the brawl of the
liars, using the same phrase. And so it came that the CDC was, under U.S. laws,
under the information laws, to provide evidence that everyone, it started with that everyone
needed to be vaccinated, including those who had already had COVID. Two and a half thousand years
of medical history should not be erased just because of the CDC who says so.
In particular, the CDC was asked to reveal which studies they were talking about when they
referred to studies that showed that studies had shown that vaccination provided a strong boost
for immune and natural defense. And this process of getting access to vaccines has been going on
for nearly three years now. In a first response to the initial request for access to vaccines in 2021,
the CDC responded that it was not sure which studies had been used to justify
the pressure on naturally immune people to get vaccinated. And it's not a joke. The CDC
literally claimed that it was not sure what the exact studies were which it referenced on its
own website. The CDC then added that these studies, in a certain way, reflect what the CDC was
claiming, so much more than the rigorous scientific standards. Now, one of those studies
came in after the CDC's announcement that vaccines may be naturally immune. So,
perhaps there's two studies. Of those, one study, one would recognize that there were no clinical
trials to test the issue. And the other study admitted that having a second vaccine was not
naturally immune and that, in any case, additional quantitative and qualitative data was needed.
So, aside from the fact that the CDC had made it clear that they didn't even know whether
these were correct studies, these same studies were not very convincing, not even at first.
Now, that's not a good basis for running a experimental drug on millions of people. But
it gets worse. Because even the studies cited by the CDC admitted that a second injection
was useless for naturally immune people. Another request for access to drugs was sent
to the CDC asking for data to support its claim that everyone should be vaccinated
completely, irrespective of their own condition. To be clear, the CDC was claiming that people
should be fully vaccinated, regardless of their symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.
That formulation was repeated by health agencies across the country, as well as other organizations.
But the FOIA requests for access to drugs did not change anything, nor was it properly
respected. Instead, the CDC continued its obstructionism. And then it did something even
worse. After their naturally immune decisions had been stolen by the FDA, the CDC doubled
down on that, when they put out an endless news statement stating that people who were not
vaccinated with a previous infection were five times more likely to contract COVID than
those who were vaccinated. By the way, the CDC's tweet is still online. So, while the CDC was
obstructing the requests for access to drugs, it came out with a new story,
according to which naturally immune people were five times more likely to contract COVID
than those who were vaccinated. And what was this statement based on? Well, the CDC's
tweet came out a few days ago, and it just came through a few good guys. It is a little
shocking even for skeptics like us. The CDC never saw or cared to look at the data.
It's right there in its response. The CDC has also organized a colossal media campaign,
according to which naturally immune people had to vaccinate because they had a five-fold
chance of contracting COVID, but they never cared to look at the data for this claim.
In fact, to this day, they haven't looked at the data. How many people have been
vaccinated or have been pressured to get vaccinated for no reason based on a totally
fundamental statement made by the CDC? But it gets even worse. The so-called study
that the CDC used without ever worrying to check if it was correct was written by a
group of people sponsored by the same pharmaceutical companies that made the so-called vaccines
that the study promoted. How can the government's medical advice be based exclusively on the
personal opinion of people in conflict of interest? No one has made the slightest effort
to try and at least confirm these opinions. Congressman Thomas Massey pointed out
at the time the problems related to the CDC's affirmation, but now we have confirmation
from the CDC itself. It was a gigantic scam to get people to get these so-called vaccines
even if they didn't need them and there was no proof of their usefulness. It is a scandal
of enormous proportions, despite the silence of the mass media. But it gets even worse.
The only reason why these so-called vaccines could be administered is because the FDA
has granted an authorization for emergency use by requiring them to perform appropriate tests.
Well, as it turns out, Pfizer's emergency use authorization specifically states that it is
not known whether people who are naturally immune can benefit or not from these so-called
vaccines. What about Moderna? Same thing. Authorization granted without knowing anything
about the effects of the new drug on naturally immune people. The study was not designed to
assess the benefits in individuals with a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. And then there's Johnson
and Johnson. Sure, the CDC wouldn't have granted this authorization. Now, in fact, Johnson
and Johnson's emergency use authorization also didn't design it. The study was not designed
to assess the benefits of SARS-CoV-2. Let's call it a statement. Tens of millions of people,
these are the worst, were pressured, or persuaded to take experimental drugs despite the fact
that the FDA's emergency use authorization for those drugs did not make any reference to
any of the benefits. And in fact, it admitted that it was not known what effect the drug could have
on these deaths, on these tens of millions of people. And while we say tens of millions of
people, it's hundreds of millions, because over time, nearly everyone got COVID.
All the evidence for persuading the naturally immune people to take this drug was actually
concocted and launched a long time after by people who were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies
and without the CDC having made any effort of any kind to do a study to look at the benefits of
that drug. We'll sit up here and keep repeating. This is a scandal that never happened. The
sheer numbers of people who took a drug with no evidence of its usefulness or necessity
is staggering. Those people, millions of kids, pregnant women, and all kinds of vulnerable groups.
While this scam was being laid off, the CDC was pushing the efforts to get to the truth.
Meanwhile, CDC's little helpers at social media companies were also being supressed to truth.
When Foyer found out that emergency use authorizations were not accountable to our
naturally immune people, an unquestionable fact that anyone could have found themselves,
that tweet was known as disinformation. It is impossible to overstate how bad this is
and how badly the public has been deceived by it. It's unimaginable. So why, after years of
lies and deception, does the CDC admit only now that it never saw the data? The truth is,
we don't know. We were surprised, like anyone, when a few days ago the new response came to the
request for access to the data. This is not the kind of thing you'd expect a government to admit.
But it's right there. Black on white. These are the CDC's exact words. They never had the data.
Perhaps an honest bureaucrat has managed to get this one under the rug. Or perhaps this is the
start of a strategy to draw the truth out a little bit at a time, hoping that everyone will
forget and move on. It is well known that the spread of the so-called vaccines has fallen
on its head. So perhaps the CDC just doesn't care anymore about pushing this stuff. We don't
know the exact reason. But this does not make the last declaration of the CDC any less important.
And it should go back to being that this is a fully accounting of what happened.
You don't have a government pushing experimental drugs to people without even worrying
about examining the data. It's just unacceptable.
Thank you for joining us on this episode of Truthover News.
