Hãy hiểu rõ ba sự thật lịch sử này và đừng mù quáng ủng hộ Hamas

After launching a large-scale attack on Israel, Hamas has received significant support from the public, especially from online voting heroes. There are many Hamas supporters who are very enthusiastic. Among them, there are even those who have just begun to be indistinguishable between Palestine and Pakistan, showing complete lack of understanding. They don't even want to use Google to search, showing they don't care about the reality and happiness of the people of Palestine. Their support for Hamas is based on a need to oppose what the United States supports, and to support what the United States opposes. Their extremely limited cognitive abilities make it difficult for them to grasp the complexity of the Gaza issue. In today's video, we would like to share with you the most objective information about the war in Gaza. I hope you will have clear definitions for yourself. Hello everyone, I am very happy to be with you in today's topic of comment. The truth about the acceptance and assistance of the Palestinians by the Thais In 2000, there was a dispute over the application for recognition of the world heritage of the UNESCO World Heritage Site for Jerusalem. Both Israel and the Palestinian state desperately want to be the one to file the application, causing disputes on the negotiating table. After a long and turbulent speech of the Palestinian representative, the Israeli representative asked calmly where the Arabs were when Jerusalem was built. In the end, UNESCO announced that Jordan was the winner. It turned out that Jordan had officially filed a request to UNESCO while Palestine and Israel were at war. Jordan admitted that its application, Jordan's Hashemite royal family, was once the protector of this holy city. Regardless of the truth, UNESCO returned the application to Jordan. The result was that the acceptance script not only confused the Palestinians and the Israelis, but also made the neighboring country like Turkey not satisfied. They said, if it was that simple, I would have filed the application earlier, when I took power, where is the Jordanian king? This narrative has made the stories of history incomprehensible in the Palestinian region. People often see history as their faith and have seen it as a legal basis for modern politics. Ignoring such a debate on the value of faith, at least when it comes to the issue of Palestine, it has never been on the side of the Arabs. That's because the Zionists were the first to establish an independent country in this region and have maintained it for thousands of years. They came early, established a country early, and their presence has existed for a long time. If we talk about the past, it is clear that the Zionists have a stronger sense of sovereignty. After the collapse of the Zionist kingdom, this region has changed hands many times and has been dominated by the Arabic Empire, the Arab Empire, and the Ottoman Empire for a long time. The only time the region was independent was when the European Crusader Army established the Kingdom of Jerusalem. With the rise of the Zionist Republic in the late 19th century, the Zionists migrated to Palestine under the rule of the Ottomans. In the early 20th century, Britain's influence in the Middle East increased significantly and they took control of Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, leading to a large migration wave of the Zionists. In this significant migration wave, the Zionists did not occupy land with arms, but instead bought and ploughed the land and established their homeland. The realistic version of the story of the farmer and the snake, the Palestinians accepting the Zionists. This is the story of the farmer and the snake, helping the snake and being bitten to death, not sure in any sense. Before the establishment of the state of Palestine in 1988, the Arabs in the region had never established a political entity. It was the Ottoman Empire and then the British who accepted the Zionist immigrants. Moreover, many areas of land were considered to be bought by the Zionist immigrants as the royal territory of the Ottoman Empire, later becoming land under British rule. This really led to many land disputes, but it is believed that the Zionist immigrants took the land from the Arabs was misheard and misrepresented. Civil disputes and military invasions have completely different natures. Finally, when it comes to the land issue in Palestine, both the Zionists and the Arabs have no grudge against each other. The truth about the restriction of the partition of Palestine The area under the control of the Ottoman Empire and Britain in Palestine is larger than today, including the eastern part of the Jordan River. And today is the Kingdom of Hashemite Jordan. People often mention the dominance of Jordan over Palestine. However, not only the territory of Palestine today, even the territory of Jordan is also a gift from the British to the Hashemites. The process of giving away this territory is quite complicated. The homeland of the Hashemites in the Hijaz region is in Saudi Arabia today and far from the territory of Palestine. In 1919, there was a reorganization in the Middle East. The influential chief of the Hashemite family arranged for the son of Hussein to inherit the family's inheritance and let the second son, Abdullah, become the king of Iraq, and the third son, Faisal, rule Syria. However, in 1920, Faisal was overthrown by the French. Abdullah, an honest man, gave the throne to the king of Iraq, his brother, and led the army to fight the French. To avoid further conflict and ensure the territory, the British stood outside the reconciliation. Do not fight anymore, I will give you the eastern part of the Jordan River, it belongs to you. In 1921, accepting the British reconciliation, Abdullah established the Kingdom of Hashemite Jordan. Therefore, only later did the international agreement with the Kingdom of Jerusalem and himself become the king of Palestine. Therefore, the British idea of ​​restricting only Palestine is incorrect. It is true that the British gave the land, and that is not a tragic issue. In fact, not only Jordan, the Arabs have succeeded in getting out of the control of the Ottoman Empire for decades with the support of the British. In short, the Arabs are not the earliest settlers in the Palestinian region, but it is the Jews. In history, the Arabs have never established a country in the region, while the Jews have established a kingdom of Judah, the southern kingdom. The fact that the Arabs of Palestine claim sovereignty over this region has no historical basis. Emphasizing a history from the past to the present is largely a slander, which will eventually obstruct the integrity of the Arabs of Palestine. Of course, the best historical debates are just the basis for political statements. But they are not the correct standards for today's politics. In the end, politics must serve the current reality to solve the problem of Palestine today. What is necessary is to start with the UN General Assembly Resolution 181 in 1947. The truth about the UN Resolution 181 In the context of the issuance of the UN Resolution 181 as a racial conflict between Jews and Arabs in the region at the end of the 19th century, the revival of Judaism has been motivated to lead to a large wave of immigrants to the Palestinian people. This led to frequent conflicts between immigrants and local Arabs. One of the most notable conflicts was the Hebron massacre in 1929. In the Hebron area, there are tens of thousands of Arabs living together with a community of about 800 Jews. This Jewish community has been present in this area for centuries. Although not related to the racial conflicts that broke out in Jerusalem, the Jewish community in Hebron has become the target of Arab violence and 67 Jews have lost their lives in the hands of Arab neighbors. The sudden migration of Jewish immigrants was suppressed in Europe before and after World War II, increasing tensions in the region. The UK, which was still recovering from the war and was no longer ready or capable of dealing with the situation, decided to withdraw from Palestine in 1948, leaving the issue of Palestine for the United Nations to solve. The UN Resolution 181 stipulates the establishment of a Thai state of about 11,586 square kilometers and an Arab state of about 15,208 square kilometers after the end of the British colonial rule in 1948, with Jerusalem as 176 square kilometers designated as an international city. The passage of the UN Resolution 181 was heavily influenced by the US, but it was not a unilateral decision. The UN actively participated and supported throughout the process. Representatives of the Thai-Arabs from the Palestinian region also participated in drafting this plan. The United States initially proposed a federal model of governance instead of establishing separate countries. The US believes in the federal system and believes that living together in peace will be more beneficial. However, both the Thai and Arab parties decided to establish their own independent countries. Therefore, in the end, the consensus shifted to separate countries. Since then, they have decided to follow the path of separation, the division of the land into centers. The final land allocation plan allocated 57% of the total land area to the Thai, which accounts for 1.3% of the total population of the region. Some people see this allocation as beneficial to the Thai, but the more complicated issue is only the percentage of the land area. The most important thing is the quality of the land. In Palestine, most of the land is dry and not suitable for planting. As for good, fertile land, it is limited and polluted, only accounting for up to 30% of the total area. Of the 57% of the land allocated to the Thai, only 7% is high-quality land, the rest is dry land. Therefore, the accusation of deliberately dividing the Arab land into three separate areas, not connected, is baseless, because the land allocated to the Thai was also divided into three non-connected areas, making the claim deliberately divided is baseless. The Arabs believe that they are at a disadvantage because the population is more crowded, so the right to own the land also needs to be greater. They propose a plan to divide the land by 80-20, which is beneficial to them. However, they do not provide enough evidence and the right to own the land, because only 6% of the land is officially registered under the right of the Arabs. Arab leaders believe that the lack of evidence has been retained in the Ottoman Empire. Turkey's non-cooperation has led to the state of not being able to provide convincing evidence for its claim. Therefore, the 20-80 proposal has not been approved. In summary, the Arabs may have had some significant shortcomings related to the allocation of land in the 181 resolution. Some shortcomings about the land may have been lost due to lack of evidence. However, it is very likely that the allocation is wrong, as proposed in 80-20. During the Ottoman Empire, more than half of the land in Palestine was part of the royal territory of the Ottoman Empire. The Thai could buy some land, but the Arabs could not sell much land. The main opposition to the 181 resolution came from the surrounding Arab countries. The British leader led this opposition was James Jordan. Jordan today, where he received British land to establish the Kingdom of Hashemite Jordan. They oppose the resolution because the land allocation is not fair, but not intended to find justice for their Palestinian brothers. Jordan's opposition aims to achieve the reunification of the regions on both sides of the Jordan River. The great influence of the Hashemite family has led 11 Arab countries to vote against the resolution, along with Cuba and Greece. A total of 13 votes against, the United States and the United Kingdom led 33 countries to support the resolution. 13 of those countries have the United Kingdom to vote against. From the results of the resolution, it can be seen that the 181 resolution was passed with overwhelming majority. This shows that the statement that the land allocation is not fair has not been widely accepted by the international community. In the 1970s, with the strong efforts of the Arab countries, many countries in the Third World accepted the story that the land allocation is not fair. Most of them were not members of the United Nations when the 181 resolution was passed. It is noteworthy that the government of the People's Party of China represents China has cast a blank vote on the 181 resolution, while the new Communist Party of China, linked to the Soviet Union, expressed strong support for the autonomy of the Thai people. There is no doubt that the 181 resolution is not perfect and it cannot solve all the complex issues of the Palestinian region. However, judging by the legal procedure, its legitimacy is undoubted and it cannot be denied just because of the allegations that this is an initiative supported by the U.S. The truth about the failure of Palestine in establishing a state Although the country soon supported the rejuvenation of the Thai people, but for the benefit of the Union, the UK voted against the 181 resolution. The UK initially supported the state system of the Thai people, but then moved to a more proactive position. Their main goal is to maintain an alliance with Arab countries to maintain their influence in the region. For similar reasons, in 1948, the British government postponed its actions, maintained its military presence, and did not transfer power. Without the help of the UK, the Thai people could still prepare for the establishment of a state, while the Arabs of Palestine lacked a modern national identity. They could not do that. Without the help of the British and without the recognition of the Arab countries, the process of establishing a state in Palestine was delayed. In the end, the Thai settlers were disappointed and there were many conflicts with the British government. One of them was a terrorist act. Amid internal and external problems and pressure, on May 14, 1948, the UK hastily announced the end of the rule of law, while Israel announced the establishment of a state within the framework of the United Nations. However, there was no such statement from Palestine. On May 15, neighboring countries around the Palestinian region, including Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, and Syria, as well as Iraq, although not related in terms of geography, but led by the Hashemite family, have mobilized their forces in a symbolic way. With 50,000 troops advancing into the Palestinian territory, Jordan also occupied East Jerusalem, preventing the internationalization of Jerusalem. The Arab League said they were intervening to support the Palestinians, but did not discuss or plan for the establishment of a Palestinian state. Their main goal is to remove Israel. The UK, as a secret supporter, has provided significant support to the Arab countries. Interestingly, although the Arab League claims to support the Palestinians, their real agenda is not to establish a Palestinian state. If they succeed in removing Israel, their next steps will be related to dividing the Palestinian territory for each other. It should be noted that both before and after Resolution 181 were passed, the main obstacle to the status of the Arab state of Palestine was not Israel, but the Arab brothers around it. Israel, which was just born, was not well prepared for war. They only have 23,000 soldiers, and their equipment is limited. Initially, they fell into a defensive position and had to face serious challenges. However, the United States and the United Nations cannot allow a resolution of the United Nations to become meaningless because their international status is being threatened. Therefore, under the guidance of these superpowers, the United Nations has called for a four-week ceasefire after the conflict began. The US even pressured Britain to withdraw support for Jordan and other Arab countries. After a month of fighting, Israel was quickly armed. Not only did they regain the lost territory, but they also advanced 2,000 square kilometers. The final ceasefire agreement is based on the actual control of both sides. The result is that the territories of the Palestinians have a ratio of 20-80, of which the Arabs have a ratio of 20. Israel has a ratio of 80. Israel rose from the ashes. After these events, there were four more conflicts in the Middle East between the Arab League and Israel, along with a number of one-on-one clashes between Israel and neighboring countries. Israel has experienced many different achievements between victory and defeat, continuously expanding its actual control over the territories. After the end of the 4th Middle East War in 1973, a country as vulnerable as the Arab League has to face the fact that completely destroying Israel is an unattainable goal. Because coexistence is an essential road, reconciliation has become the most feasible choice. Conclusion Who hinders the peace process in Palestine? Throughout the history of the Israel-Palestine conflict, the Middle East has been deeply affected by a series of wars. The plan to divide was put forward in the UN Resolution 181 that could no longer be implemented as originally proposed. The Arab countries are the first countries to violate the agreement, invade Israel and occupy Jerusalem. Not achieving the goal is naturally the next UN resolutions such as Resolution 245 and Resolution 338, which apply more balanced approaches. On the UN Resolution 181 basis, these new agreements recognized realistic control paths and were established after the First Middle East War. The agreement has become the main consensus in the international community and is a platform for improving relations and reconciliation between Israel and many Arab countries, including Palestine, led by Fada. In 1994, Israel and the Palestinian Authority reached an agreement to exchange land for peace, and declared Washington, Israel is a country that controls nearly 90% of the Palestinian territory, especially Gaza, has handed over these areas to the Palestinian Authority, bringing hope to the peace process. That same year, Jordan and Israel signed a peace agreement, formalizing the cooperation that has taken place since the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Egypt, another direct neighbor of Israel, established diplomatic relations in 1978. On September 15, 2020, Israel and the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain signed an agreement at the White House, which is considered peaceful and historic in order to re-form the Middle East, the Abraham Accords. Israel officially established relations with these two Arab countries, and the process of the Middle East reconciliation began from here. Kuwait and Saudi Arabia also quickly entered the reconciliation list and actively cooperated with Israel. Despite the historical ups and downs, the peace process in the Middle East has finally returned to the beginning, which is part of the UN Resolution 181. However, there are always those who turn the tide and go against the historical flow. Hamas from the beginning has resolutely opposed the peace path, the land exchange for the peace of Palestine and Israel, believing that the United States and Israel will certainly break the treaty. Sooner or later, the world will know who is the one who really broke the treaty. In 2006, Hamas took power in Palestine, then abandoned the previous peace agreements. This violation has made the reputation of Hamas worse and led to the isolation of the international community. In 2007, Hamas refused to resolve and accept nationalization, which led to a fierce conflict with Fada. Fada withdrew to the West Bank and established a legitimate Palestinian government widely recognized by the international community. Under the leadership of President Abbas, they contributed to improving relations between Palestine and Israel. After Hamas took control of the Gaza Strip, they continued to launch attacks on Israel. In 2017, Hamas and Fada reached a reconciliation agreement, pledging to hand over the Gaza Strip by the end of the year and establish a united government. However, Hamas did not respect its commitment to continue to control the Gaza Strip. On October 6, 2021, Hamas launched a large-scale attack on Israel, nicknamed the Al-Qasa Trench. The trench did not flood the Al-Qasa Mosque in Jerusalem as planned, but instead landed fiercely on the Gaza Strip for Hamas to control. The final historical turning point will be the era of abandonment. Looking back at the entire conflict between Israel and Palestine, it is clear that Israel is not an innocent side. However, the main responsibility for the wars half a century ago lies in neighboring Arab countries. Despite the United Nations Resolution 181, they launched an invasion war and disrupted the process of establishing a Palestinian state. Their failure has cost the people of Palestine. These countries have learned a painful lesson and finally chose to face reality, seek reconciliation and peace on the negotiating table. However, some key figures in the Hamas region still pursue the noble goal of annihilating Israel. Their reckless actions have harmed the people of Israel and more importantly the people of Palestine in the Gaza Strip. To truly support the people of Palestine, how can they support such extremists who have lost all humanity? Goodbye and see you in the next episodes!