Настоящая история России в старинном учебнике 18 века ( запрещено к просмотру официалам )

Share, share, share, share the price by quarters, don't put it off, buy it right away. Share, share, share. With Share from Alfa Bank, pick up the purchase right away for a quarter of the price and pay without overpayment in equal parts. Choose stores on padele.ru Hello everyone! Let's imagine for a moment that you are a historian. What should you do first? Study the most ancient educational tools that are available. The same is said by Viktor Zhivov to Mikhail Zadornov. If you don't know something, you need to take a dictionary and look, and only after that you need to confuse the general public. In the last video, we studied the first foundations of universal history, the shortened chronology in favor of the Russian nobility, part 2. And today we will read the third part. The book was published in 1768. Yes, by the way, in this video we are debunking the so-called Norman theory, a theory taught in educational institutions as the truth in the last instance. As you probably heard, in 862, the Slavs, sitting on the fir-trees, decided to call themselves princes from Norway. They took it, got off, shagged their paws, because it's not good to call a prince barefoot, and said, our land is great and abundant, and there is no dress in it, come and rule us. Well, the Norwegians scratched their heads, thought, at first they did not want, and then decided that it was good to disappear, and agreed. In the last video, we learned that Russia in ancient times was called Scythia, Slavs are Sarmatians, Scythians are a bit. In this textbook, everything is much more interesting. Question. What do you understand through the Scythians? Answer. I understand all the northern peoples, who at different times and under different names filled all other Europe, and at the same time a large part of the Asian peoples. But I think that none of them took this name for themselves, for it is incredible that what people would want to wear a cursing name of a wanderer, as the word Scythia means in the Slavic language. On the contrary, I think that this name was given to them from other peoples, since the name of the barbarians from the Romans was given to the Germans, Gauls and other peoples. Question. What do you know about the Scythians during the time of Emperor Tacitus? Tacitus, the Roman emperor, ruled from 275 to 276 AD. Answer. The Scythians, who during the reign of Tacitus spread to Pontus, Cappadocia, Galatia and Cilicia, were forced by the Romans, either forcibly or for money, to return to their land around 275 AD. Unfortunately, Dupin does not specify the places where they came from and where they returned, why it would be possible to accurately determine their homeland. Comment. That is, the Scythians are fighting with the Roman Empire, and here even they doubt, either they were defeated, or the Roman Empire paid off. According to the official chronology, the Scythians still have a maximum of 100 years left, and they are at war. Moreover, we know at least something about the Roman Empire, and in fact nothing about the Scythians. Question. What do we know about the so-called Russia during this era? Answer. Otin or Vodin, being expelled from Asia by Pompey the Great 60 years before the birth of Christ, entered Scythia, or the land that is now called Russia. He conquered Ona for himself and made there the son of his Boa Tsar. We leave the probability of this historical narrative to the author of Ona, Pufendorf, and send our reader for research to the volume 5 of the comments of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences in the historical class on the affairs of the Scythians. Comment. For 60 years before the birth of Christ, when, according to the official version, separate tribes lived, running after mammoth, Otin or Vodin conquers Russia, though not for long, and puts his son Boa as the head of the state. Otin, in my humble opinion, means Odin. Odin is the supreme god in Scandinavian mythology, the father and forefather of the Assyrians, the son of Bor and Bestla, the grandson of Buri. Further, even more interesting. Question. Who inherited after Boa in Russia? The answer. Gervit is the lawful Russian heir, who, again after the death of Boa, returned the kingdom of his father. Having heard that Otin, who reigned in Sweden, and Inga or Freyr, his heir, died, and that Njord, the priest of Uppsala, entered the throne, went to war against the Swedes, defeated Njord, who went to Denmark, and brought his son of the same name to the Swedish throne, but he was later killed, and Njord was returned to the throne again. This is the ancient claim of the Rosses to Sweden, taken from Pufendorf. Let's read the note. Pufendorf, in his story about Sweden, printed in Amsterdam in 1732, page 16. The conquest of the Swedish kingdom was an award for the victory of Gervitov, who made an arrangement for him in favor of his son of the same name. Comment. Have you heard anything about the legal Russian heir 60 years before the birth of Christ, who was called Gervit? I hear for the first time. After the death of Otin, Gervit goes to war against Sweden and conquers it, now putting his son in charge of Sweden. Share, share, share. Share the price by quarters. Don't put it off, buy it right away. Share, share, share. With Padele from Alfa Bank, pick up the purchase right away for a quarter of the price and pay without overpayment in equal parts. Choose stores on padele.ru And these events take place 800 years before Russia appeared in 862. Then something unimaginable happens. Question. Are the military actions of the Russians not noticed throughout the epoch? Answer. The Russians, Estonians, Finns, or a little bit of the Kurds, and others, were allies of Helvard or Gotebrod, the king of Sweden, against the allies of Proton, the king of Denmark. The Russians then gave the auxiliary army to Halden, the king of Sweden, and Gotsky against Gjarnon, the king of Norway, at the request of Friedlin, the son of Proton, the king of Denmark, who served in the Russian army for a long time and was greatly revered by them. The Russians entrusted him with a large army, which, joining the Swedes, entered Norway and defeated Gjarnon. From these fragments we understand that Russia, two thousand years ago, provided a large number of troops to help the Swedes in the war of the Swedes against the Norwegians. If I understood correctly, there are a lot of names. Question. What do you notice about the Slavs, in fact, the so-called in this epoch? Answer. The Slavs, encouraged by Proton, the king of Denmark, went under the command of Goteskalka to help Gestilo, the king of Goth against Alaric, the king of Sweden and Gauton, the king of Vermeland. They defeated Gauton, killed him and joined the Goths. It is a pity that Mr. Pufendorf does not write what this story is based on. We will find in the synopsis about the beginning of the Slavic people that August himself did not dare to attack them because of their bravery and strength. And as he was advised to fight them, they replied, I do not like to catch fish. Allegedly, he wanted to say, I do not want to ruin more than gain. The same author adds that he wrote to one of his generals named Lentulius, promising that he would not dare to irritate the Slavs with war. Here we understand that the founder of the Roman Empire, Julius Caesar Octavian August, was afraid to fight the Slavs, who, according to the official history, do not yet exist. Question. What note can be made in this case of the history of the Rus and the Slavs? Answer. It can be noted that the Rus, coming from the ancient city called Old Rus, and the Slavs from the ancient city of Slavyansk, where Novgorod now stands, were at that time military peoples and very noble among other peoples. Comment. What I talked about in the last video. These cities were founded 4,410 years ago. Question. What were the Rus called at that time? Answer. Uffendorf already at that time calls them Rus, but other writers, who do not mention them at all, call them Raxolans. Lomonosov does not deny this last opinion, although he does not refute the first. Question. Who were the Sarmatians? Answer. The offspring of the Slavic people, who lived in the land that was then called Sarmatia, now Poland. Question. Does the Roman history not mention the Sarmatians and Raxolans of this era? Answer. Dupin writes in the Life of Adrian, that this king kidnapped the Sarmatians and reconciled with the king of Raxolans on the road to Illyria and drove the Alans, who made raids on the Roman region, to Armenia and Cappadocia. Caracalla also had quarrels with the Sarmatians, and took money from them. During Goliath, they again attacked Illyria, at the same time as the Scythians robbed Greece and the temple of Dionysus in Ephesus. Question. Who were the Alans? Answer. They were also the offspring of the Slavic people. Question. What do you know about the Ghettos? Answer. This was another knee of the Slavic people, which must be distinguished from the Goths. The Ghettos came out of Little Russia, as we find in the Russian Historical Library. During August, the tsar of the Ghettos, the Berobist, Elikoton, was commemorated. Question. What is the common name of all these peoples? Answer. The name of the Slavs, according to the common opinion, which is confirmed by the agreement of all these peoples and their neighbors. Question. What was the faith of these peoples? Answer. Although Christianity was already preached by the Roses and the idol of worship, however, it remained with them. Their main idol was Perun, to whom the priests had to keep continuous fire. Their second idol was Volos, the god of cattle. The third was Vazvist, or Vasvist, the god of air. The fourth was Lado, the god of fun. The fifth was Kupala, the god of earthly fruits. The sixth was Koleda, the god of holidays, and many other idols. In general, what can be said? This textbook gives unique information about what was happening in Scythia, Russia and neighboring countries according to the official chronology 2000 years ago. Moreover, this information is not at all in modern history textbooks. Well, probably historians should read this textbook, study the sources it refers to. After all, in the last part it was indicated that this story is taken from chronicles. You need to find, read, study these chronicles. If, of course, they are interested. In general, in my humble opinion, alternative researchers want to figure out the past in order more than official historians. Alternative historians have curiosity and interest, and interest is the basis for learning new. Official historians defend what is and do not want to change anything. I think that's all. Write what you think about this. Do not forget to subscribe to Telegram. According to rumors, YouTube will block in Russia until the New Year. Look at my one-name site. For example, I can recommend a set of books for self-development. See you soon, bye!