Was in aller Welt ist passiert? - Teil 3/13 - DeeTube

But this whole thing, it's just a symptom of a larger problem. There's a growing anti-intellectual strain in this country. It may be the beginning of the end of our informed democracy. Of course, in a free society, you can and should think whatever you want. And if you want to think the world is flat, go right ahead. The Earth isn't f***ing flat. This is called gravity. It's an interesting experiment to tell someone you know that you don't believe in the universe anymore or that our Earth is a rotating ball of space. Try it yourself. I guarantee that you'll be called crazy or at least looked at as if you had lost your mind. The most interesting thing is that the ball believers, when you address them, are not able to make a solid empirical evidence that the Earth is actually a big, rotating ball. Can any of us prove the Earth's curvature or the movement of the Earth through the solar system on a daily basis? No, we can't. And can any of us claim that he has seen the planets in their orbit and the expansion of the universe with his own eyes? No, we can't either. Usually, the reaction to a crazy person who claims that the Earth is flat is as follows. First of all, they show pictures of the Earth as if they were presented by NASA. Second, they say, come on, everyone knows that space exists and that countless professors have dedicated their lives to the research of this matter. At some point, the existence of gravity may flow into the conversation. But look, what really happens when someone reacts so stubbornly to an alternative view of the Earth is not the result of the person's mental abilities. If the person had sat down with their highly pregnant sister and said, you are not a woman and you are not pregnant, then that would be a statement that deserves such a reaction. Because there is obvious empirical evidence for their pregnancy. What happens when you challenge someone with the topic of the Earth is an internal struggle against his programming. This programming is a deeply rooted and established matrix that was consciously constructed when we were still little children. Before we left elementary school, our personal experiences with our flat and immobile world were slowly extinguished and were constantly blown up to the inflated and spherical idea that the Earth is a globe. The sad thing about it is that many of us grow up and never question this idea again. Only on photos and videos of NASA and other official reliable sources does the horizon appear curved. All raw, unprocessed amateur recordings of the Earth show a completely flat horizon. And that is what we see with our own eyes when we are standing on a beach or a lookout point. Regardless of the height, the horizon always appears 360 degrees around, flat, because it is. And that always increases and decreases according to the eye level of the viewer. You never have to look down or up to see the horizon, because it comes towards you. No matter how big the Earth is, if it were a curved sphere, then you would have to look up or down to hit the horizon. And I know, we all know these disguised photos and videos, but NASA and many other official sources distort the horizon of their recordings with a fisheye lens to create the impression of a curved Earth. Such a fisheye lens is also installed in the GoPro. And I know what you are going to say now. You have already seen how the horizon curves when you flew with the plane. But that is unfortunately only a deception. Airplane windows are usually curved outward and thus create the illusion of a curvature. An article in the Telegraph turns to our slightly blurry nature and explains that the flight windows were changed because square windows statistically caused more crashes. Yes, of course. They use our body size to cover up our own inescapable perception of a flat and motionless Earth, by claiming that we are not big enough to see the curvature. But this balloon managed to climb 36,880 meters and left its fisheye lens behind. And look, a flat horizon. The balloon wobbles and turns. But the horizon remains straight and does not curve in any way or form. And this is exactly the problem. For centuries, our ancestors judged according to their own estimates and relied on their natural senses to recognize that the Earth is flat. And although some people dealt with theories about a possible curvature of the Earth, it was only in the early Neolithic with sailors like Christopher Columbus that the heliocentric model of the world was implemented. For centuries, people sacrificed the knowledge of their own senses. And the heliocentric model is so disgustingly wrong and nonsensical that it is amazing that it could be implemented at all. Let's take, for example, water, which limits the horizon. It is a natural physical property of water to find and hold a plane and coincidentally this plane is flat. If the Earth were a ball-shaped ball, then water would not remain so consistently flat. We are used to the fact that water does this and that. But we have never seen in our entire life on Earth with our own eyes how water does this. Water does not bend. It is not called a sea mirror for nothing, you know? And if water would not always find a flat plane, why would we use tools like this to achieve accuracy? Once again, water does not bend. Rivers, for example, always flow down to the sea mirror. If the Earth were a rotating ball, then many rivers on Earth would have to flow up at some point on their journey. Eric Dubé knows that the Mississippi is 4800 km long, which means that it would have to flow up 17.7 km on a ball-shaped Earth. He also points out that a part of the Nile flows over a distance of 1600 km with a gradient of only 30.5 cm. This would also be impossible if the Earth were a ball. The scientific magicians of our world claim that the Earth has a circumference of 40,000 km. The spherical trigonometry dictates that the surface of all standing water has to bend down by 8 cm per kilometer, multiplied by the square of the distance. This means that with a distance of 80 km, the water on both sides of the central point of the triangle drops by 125 m. Every time scientists tried to find these depressions and bends, the water always turned out to be completely flat. There is a growing anti-intellectual strain in this country. When building railway lines, roads and bridges, architects and engineers never consider a curvature. In the Earth Review, the engineer W. Winkler published an article about the alleged curvature of the Earth, in which he found, As a long-time engineer, I have seen that this absurd consideration is only allowed in school books. No engineer would ever think of doing something like this. I have calculated many miles of railways and much more of canals, and this deviation was not even considered. This playground for the curvature means that it is 8 inches for the first mile of a canal and rises in relation to the square of the distance in miles. A small shipable canal for boats, let's say 30 miles long, will usually have a curvature of 600 feet. Think about it and trust the engineers that they are not that stupid. None of the above is permissible. We think just as little about calculating 600 feet for a 30-mile railway or canal line as we waste our time calculating the square of the circle. Calculating anti-intellectual strain If the Earth were actually a ball that rotates at a breathtaking 1,000 miles per hour, how come we do not feel its movement? There is not a single person on Earth who can prove that he feels the alleged rotation of the Earth. We feel the movement on trips by car, train, boat or when we are on the plane and can get the travel sickness. The scientific magicians will tell you that we do not feel the Earth's rotation because it rotates at a constant speed. They often use the comparison with a train ride. We only feel that we are moving when the train changes its speed. However, this analogy is different if you consider that the Earth in the heliocentric model is not a closed system. It is much more an open environment with its own drastically changing weather. If you sat outside on the roof of the same train that is still moving at a constant speed, then you would certainly feel the movement. In addition, they also contradict themselves. In an article from 2016 with the title The NASA study solves two puzzles about the Earth's rotation, it means that the Earth does not always rotate around an axis. Instead, it wobbles irregularly over time and the direction has changed drastically on Earth due to changes in the water mass. It is strange that no one has noticed this yet. What is it now, NASA? The secret unnoticed rotation? Or the irregular movement patterns and wobblers? The whole idea of ​​a rotating earth ball becomes absurd if you consider the following. If the Earth would actually rotate, then helicopters and balloons would only have to hover over the surface and wait for their target to come to them. If the Earth were a curved space ball, the aircraft pilots would have to constantly correct their flight altitude downwards so that they do not fly straight into space. They would have to descend every minute by 2,777 feet or over half a mile. This is of course not the case and the pilots are never taught or taught about this mechanism of flying. And what does a real pilot have to say about it? Yeah. Really? Yeah. No. Really? This one? Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. True, true. It's true? Yeah. Okay, cool. God bless, brother. All right. Back on. I just got one question to ask. Flat or a ball? Well, I never feel as breaking around. If we live on a ball, surely we'd have to fly around it? Yeah, it feels like... Flat or a ball? Flat. I think it's flat. Yeah, me too. It's certainly does, doesn't it? And you've got that flight instrument down there to keep you flat. Gravity exists. Gravity? This is an unproven theory. No, it's not. Let's rock and roll. Cheers, fellas. Thank you very much. Hello, mate. How are you? Yeah, good. I'm a fellow... In case you're Josh, I'm a fellow just PPL. Hello. Pilot, yeah. Yeah, nice. I've got a couple of serious questions to ask you. Okay, here we go. Yeah, there's a big time. Curvature. Curvature? Yeah. We don't allow for curvature, do we? Yeah, for anything. Not really, usually. No. We're round. We're a disc, aren't we? Round and flat. Yeah. Sorry. But honestly, quite seriously, we are, aren't we? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Thank you, mate. Thank you for being... If the Earth actually rotates, the flight routes would be very confusing. A flight from New York to California in the western direction is 3,928 kilometers long, which takes about five hours on a commercial flight. If the Earth rotates 1,600 kilometers per hour to the east, this flight would not only take up much less time, but it would also be almost impossible to fly back in the other direction, because the Earth is constantly rotating. As if you were trying to run up a very long and fast escalator leading down. And what about the weather? If the Earth and the atmosphere rotate 1,600 kilometers per hour, wouldn't it be impossible to see such motionless clouds and weather formations as we see them? Not to mention the fact that the clouds often cross their paths. That would be impossible if the Earth's rotation were a reality. Thomas Winship notes, let's imagine what force the air would have, which would be set in motion by a spherical body with a diameter of 8,000 miles, which rotates 1,000 miles per hour, with 65,000 miles per hour racing through space and circling the sky. Then let's make assumptions to find out whether the inhabitants could keep their hair on such a globe. If the Earth's sphere rotates at an incredible speed of 1,000 miles per hour around its axis, such an immense mass would inevitably cause a huge gust of wind in the space it occupies. The wind would only blow in one direction and everything that moves like clouds in the area of influence of the rotating sphere would have to move in the same direction. The fact that the Earth stands still is proven by dragons. And honestly, if the Earth were a rotating sphere, wouldn't the oceans and other water masses be pushed away from the Earth? Just like a wet tennis ball, when it is turned quickly, the water splashes out? The science magicians have an answer to this question. Gravity. The science magicians are back at work and speak their magic spells and fairy tales about a powerful force that holds us on Earth. If gravity were such a force, then birds could not fly. Insects would not be able to use the wind for navigation. Monkeys would not easily climb trees and jump. Airplanes would not be able to lift off the ground. Trees would not be able to overcome gravity if they grew against the sunlight, because they would bend more and more in the direction of the ground, the bigger they get. And if gravity exists and has the power to bend the oceans and to wrap a gigantic rotating ball, then people would certainly have difficulties lifting their arms and legs. According to legend, Newton dropped an apple on his head when he sat under a tree. And this was the trigger for his great discovery of gravity, which states that objects are attracted by large masses and move towards their center. But when they speak of gravity, they basically refer to the force of attraction, or the Archimedean law. Today I'm going to show you a simple science experiment that you can try at home to learn about density. Start by taking an empty glass and tip in some water and food coloring. Then add some syrup, or treacle. And I'm going to add a little bit more water to make the layer a bit thicker. Then finally, fill the glass up with some oil and leave it to settle for about 15 minutes. These liquids separate out into different layers because they're different densities and they don't mix. The syrup has the highest density, so it sits on the bottom, and the oil, which has the lowest density, rises to the top. Try dropping different objects in to see what happens. If we drop this metal nut in, which is really dense, you can see it sinks right to the bottom. But if I take this grape and drop it in, it sinks through the oil and water, but sits on the syrup. This is because the syrup is denser than the grape. Pretty cool, huh? Now if I take this plastic bottle top and drop it in, it slowly sinks through the oil and sits on the water. And finally, if I take this piece of sponge and drop it in, it sits on top. U-boats float in the sea when their ballast tanks are empty and contain air. And they sink when their ballast tanks are filled with water. In this way, they change their diving depth in the ocean, by varying the ratio of air and water in the tanks. This can be proven by filling a balloon with 50% air and 50% helium. Since helium is lighter than air and the ratios are balanced, the balloon stays in the air without rising or falling. Here, too, it is similar to the earth's curvature and stretching. We can't observe anywhere on earth that smaller objects are attracted by larger circles or their gravity. It seems very convenient that the tendency of gravity to attract smaller objects only applies to the globe itself and all the supposedly surrounding planets and stars. We can't actually see any of this in motion or in the orbit. Even if you investigate the claims of the scientists and their so-called planets and moons, their calculations begin to work against them. As Eric Dubey emphasizes, Newton's theory of gravity, is especially studied in space and this plays a role in rocket physics. Nowadays, it is commonly calculated that the tidal clocks of the oceans on Earth are caused by the gravity of the moon. But if the moon has only a diameter of 2,160 miles and the earth 8,000 miles, the earth is 87 times more massive, and therefore the larger object should attract the smaller one and not the other way around. If it is the greater gravity of the Earth that holds the Moon in the orbit, it is impossible that the lower gravity of the Moon surpasses the gravity of the Earth, especially at sea level, where the attraction force of the Earth would still outweigh that of the Moon. And if the gravity of the Moon really surpasses that of the Earth and attracts the geysers to it, then there should be nothing that prevents it from moving higher and higher to its greater attraction point. In the end, Newton's gravity has extinguished the common sense of healthy people from top to bottom and instead normalized an absurd idea that this is possible here. And that? And meanwhile in Australia? This is nonsense, pseudo-scientific nonsense and nothing more than an invention to justify the whirlpool with the rotating spherical Earth. Without the theory of gravity, no sane person would believe that the Earth is a sphere. A part of the population lives upside down on the underside of the planet. It's all very simple if you get rid of the matrix programming from the childhood years. The laws of perspective and attraction force perfectly explain the natural processes of our world. They invent complex concepts like gravity and ridiculous, rotating spherical networks with incomprehensible numbers and speeds to confuse us. And we will discuss why they do that in a moment. But wait a moment. I know you're not really on the case yet. And I know you have an important question. If the Earth does not rotate, what about the sun and the moon? We can see the sun rise and set every day. Ah, I'm glad you asked. Follow me to part 4 where we take a closer look at our wonderful sun.