뉴턴부터 인공지능까지 등장하는 철학과 대학원 수업⭐️ feat.칸트

Tiger's graduate school experience. Today, I came to the philosophy graduate school of Koryo University. What kind of class are you doing at the philosophy graduate school? Listen to it with me. It's a professor. All the students look relaxed. Let's go. Then we have the basic function of the human soul at the base of the human consciousness I don't know what you're talking about. This is a book I wrote to see if it was possible to be a brother as a school. What can we do? It can also be said that it is a book that answers. We learn through the experience of understanding the world, but on the other hand, we learn through the concepts in our heads. The problem is that if you choose one of the two and explain our knowledge, you will be an outsider. Kant is a new plan from existing theories It unfolds a theory that will remain in philosophy, and that is the pure rationality. I will omit the details. In this semester, it is an intelligence concept that works ahead of experience. I read the part of the pure intelligence concept that proves to be objective. Today, we will focus on the problem of imagination, which is set between the intelligence that takes experience and the intelligence that is in charge of the concept in the head. I'm going to finish the area. Here, imagination is not the ability to imagine what is not in the world. It is the ability to play the table and combine functions. So it is also translated as imagination. Be careful. Now, don't go anywhere and use it as a version of the pursuit of the pursuit of the pursuit. Oh, that's what it is. Is this really a medium? If it's a medium, it's not a separate intuition and intelligence. Then, the composition of pure rationality is a transcendental aesthetic that deals with this intuition. Then, there is an analytical analysis function in the logic of transcendental logic. But there are people who are dealing with this right now. Then, shouldn't imagination be called the ability of intelligence? Yes, it's closer to intelligence. But why do you say it's a medium? Earlier, Kant said that without imagination, one cannot have a pure fundamental expression such as spatial time. Isn't that what you needed? I'm dizzy. This space, time, light. Should we only use the form of intuition? One expression and one time. One is enough. That's right. We already have the concept of intelligence, so we have no choice but to express one time or one space. How about the enemy that imitates our intelligence? You can't command this. You can't command this and this. How about this? I understood that the medium of the process of going from intuition to conceptual structure is called imagination. From the perspective of the machine, it is necessary to receive the medium itself, and it is necessary to receive and send it, and it is necessary to receive it. I think it's all about this. I don't know if this is a one-on-one mapping with human imagination. Are you talking to Kant right now? No, no. Mosquito? I failed to catch a mosquito. Isn't the mosquito in this classroom actually me? Why? Why? AI, which is imitating our perception, has thought about it again. Rather, the process of our perception through AI is more like a mirror. There was a dot here. But there are also sensory contents that are given to the primary intuition. This is what we reproduced. And then we imagine again. And then we make this into an accident. Purely an accident. This can be distinguished for us now. Right? It can be distinguished for us. For example, for AI, it is a digital electrical signal. If you distinguish No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, and No. 4, then you can become an AI without lying. But that doesn't work. It's too hard. Anyway, there are a lot of problems with Kant's imagination, but when you look at it in detail, it is not without persuasion when you understand the process of perception as a purely formal structure of the world. Wow, Kant is great. AI translation came out here. But AI translation can't translate philosophy at all. Can't you do this someday? Please make it. I tried to make it easy. German? Newton's law of physics is actually a law that humans made up to explain nature. It's not completely imaginary, but it's made up. But that law actually has a knowledge gap in our minds. That law is not the law of nature itself. I saw an accident happen, and when I got home and thought about it, the accident happened. Aori apple is in season. I want to eat Aori apple. So if we didn't have to make that law, we wouldn't be able to recognize nature regularly. The reason for guaranteeing the objectivity of natural law is the logic of perception. Does it match nature? How do you know if it matches or not? If you imagine it like that? Nature itself is like an object. We can't recognize it, and we don't need to recognize it. But if we don't have the knowledge of natural law that we imagine, can we just live without inconvenience? Yes, you can live without inconvenience. But if so, the meaning of our knowledge is that we don't know anything about the natural world. For example, Einstein's law of physics If we continue to develop our physics with Einstein's law of physics, the gap between the natural world and nature will gradually decrease. Will we see nature itself as a process of recognition? But if there are aliens who have a completely different way of recognizing us, and if they have a completely different form of physics, the nature that the aliens have discovered will be different. The phenomenon will be different, and the knowledge will be different. Wouldn't that X be left as something that can never be reached completely? In the movie, aliens also ride spaceships. May the force be with you? Yes, so you can see it like this. Yes, it's fixed. Or you can see it like this. Or it looks like it's going like this, but it's going like this. It's because of the limitations of our sensory organs. So in the end, it's only about the level we know. Of course, if you're lucky, there may be some crossroads with nature as it is. What does it mean to develop science and knowledge? The fundamental problem with science and knowledge is that Kant's position is something that we can never know. It seems to be reaching truth, but it will never be. What do you mean by number two? Me? Yes, I'm number two. I believe in it. I think it's a process in which the development of knowledge recognizes the world. I didn't know how to talk about science in philosophy and class. If we change the order and regularity, we will not be able to discover the natural nature in nature. Because the unification of nature requires a connection of phenomena, that is, it must be a constant unification linearly. I still don't know. What do you learn in learning classes? I read books. I keep debating. It's like a lecture. It's not a lecture. I keep throwing questions. Is this right? I keep following it. Philosophy is the only way to explore the characteristics of knowledge, the essence of knowledge, and how we acquire knowledge. In a transcendental sense, I'm not talking about transcendence. I'm talking about the most productive way to look at all the academic disciplines in a meta-way. It's a process that doesn't matter who knows or doesn't know. Thank you. I didn't understand everything in the first part, but the last part was touching. Did you enjoy the first graduate class? Today's one-day experience is over.