Michael Cremo is coauthor, with Richard Thompson, of Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race. He is also author of Human Devolution: A Vedic Alternative to Darwin's Theory.
Here he explains how Alfred Russel Wallace came to be acknowledged as the co-discover, along with Charles Darwin, of the theory of evolution by natural selection. Wallace's scientific interest eventually turned toward spiritualism -- where he reported witnessing many unusual phenomena under controlled conditions. His colleagues included Sir William Crookes, President of the Royal Society, and William James, the founder of American psychology. Cremo explains his understanding of Wallace's work as it pertains to human evolution.
New Thinking Allowed host, Jeffrey Mishlove, PhD, hosted and co-produced the original Thinking Allowed public television series. He is a past vice-president of the Association for Humanistic Psychology; and is the recipient of the Pathfinder Award from that Association for his contributions to the field of human consciousness exploration.
Thinking Allowed
Conversations on the leading edge of knowledge and discovery, with psychologist Jeffrey Mishlove.
Hello and welcome. I'm Jeffrey Mishlove.
Today, we're going to explore the life and work of Alfred Russell Wallace,
the co-founder with Charles Darwin of the theory of evolution.
Wallace was a spiritualist and deeply involved in scientific investigations of
19th century
spiritualism. With me is Michael Cremo, who is the co-author of Forbidden Archaeology,
the Hidden History of the Human Race, and
also author of Human Devolution, an
alternative to Darwin's theory, a Vedic alternative to Darwin's theory. Welcome, Michael. Good to be here.
It's good to be with you once again as well, and I'm so delighted that you took an interest in
your book Human Devolution and the work of Alfred Russell Wallace, because he's a very important
person in the history of science and particularly important in the history of
psychical research in parapsychology. It's an important chapter in that history that's usually overlooked.
Yes, the history of Wallace, his actual history, is generally overlooked in
biology textbooks as well.
It's sometimes
mentioned that he was, along with
Darwin, the co-founder of the theory of evolution by
natural selection.
Darwin had gone on the voyage of the Beagle.
He was a naturalist on this ship that journeyed around the world, and it was many of his
observations, such as those he made of the tortoises and the finches on the Galapagos Island,
that originally
suggested to him
his theory of evolution, the idea that species are not immutable types, but
merge one into the other.
So he had,
after that voyage,
gone to reside in the countryside in
England, and
he began to formulate his theory and write a book about it, the book that was later published as
The Origin of Species, but it was taking him a long time to do it,
actually a couple of decades at least. And then one day he received in the mail a
letter from
Alfred Russell Wallace, who was a younger, at that time,
English
biologist or naturalist, who had gone out to Southeast Asia, and
in his
communication to Darwin,
Wallace revealed he had come up with the exact same theory that
Darwin was working on, a theory of evolution by
natural
selection. And he enclosed in his letter a paper that he said
was going to be read at a meeting of the Linnaean Society of
Biological Scientific Society in London. So this was somewhat
shocking for
Darwin,
because the etiquette in the scientific world is the first person who presents a
theory gets
their name on it. Gets the credit, yeah. Gets the credit, so
Darwin consulted with his scientific friends and
asked them what he could do about this, and he said the only thing they advised him, the
proper thing for you to do would be to ask
Wallace if he would agree that a paper by you, Charles Darwin,
would be read at the same time at the Linnaean Society in London, and that way
you will both get credit for the theory. So that was agreed upon,
and
for a long time,
the theory was called the Wallace-Darwin theory. You don't hear that very much anymore.
Well, you know a couple of years ago,
I was in London at the London Museum of Natural History, and they had a special exhibit just on the work of
Wallace. So, I think there's some effort amongst mainstream biologists to revive his memory.
I think he probably
tarnished his reputation because he became an advocate of spiritualism.
But, it's important to note, as you write, that he didn't start out as a spiritualist.
He was like Darwin, a materialistic,
19th century Victorian, who had no particular interest in spiritualism at all.
Absolutely. When
Wallace was out in Southeast Asia,
you know, he'd gotten sick and he was laid up in a hospital for some time, and
he was recuperating, and reports began to come from Europe
about
mesmerism,
hypnotism,
paranormal research, and things like that. And he was initially very
skeptical about these things, but when he returned to England,
he began to look into the matter himself, and he became convinced that there was
something to it, you know, from the
scientific point of
view. And he actually published a report
directed towards his scientific colleagues about what he regarded as the scientific evidence for
the supernatural.
He attended many seances. Yes, he attended seances, for example,
seances of
Mrs. Marshall,
Mrs. Nichols. These were
mediums, people with reputed paranormal powers that were
providing
demonstrations of them in private circles in
England, and he went to spend some time in these circles, and his
result of that was he concluded that there was something real going on here.
He witnessed what he regarded as true examples of
psychokinetic effects and
levitations among other things, and he became personally involved in this research, and this
prompted Darwin to write him a
letter,
a very critical letter,
saying,
by getting into these things,
you're murdering our child,
which only made sense to Darwin in terms of a strictly materialist
ontology. Well, I think it's fair to say that the phenomenon that most intrigued Wallace were some of the most bizarre,
inexplicable things, what we would call today macro
psychokinesis, which is still extremely controversial, even amongst
parapsychologists now, because the sorts of things,
materialization of spirit beings in ectoplasmic form, for example, levitation of mediums themselves,
these things today are
extremely rare, not reported very often. So, modern researchers think, well,
there must be something wrong with the accounts from the 19th century.
Yes, there can be.
That's a common reaction. There can be reactions
like that. But, I found it significant that
Wallace didn't work alone. He worked in
cooperation with other
prominent scientists, such as
Sir William Crookes, who was later a president of the Royal Society,
England's topmost
scientific organization. He was a physicist. He was involved in
some of the work related to the discovery of the cathode ray tube, things like that.
So, he was a prominent physicist, later a president of the Royal Society, and
he and Wallace were conducting
experiments into
the phenomenon connected with mediums.
One of the mediums they investigated was Daniel Dunglass Hume,
who had
some interesting
abilities.
So, one thing Hume could do is he could take an accordion, a
musical instrument, and hold it with one hand opposite the keys and
cause it to
play
elaborate tunes in that condition.
So, Crookes... Yeah, Crookes placed the accordion in a cage to make it impossible
for any sort of fraud to go on. Right, and under those conditions, he was still able to
cause the accordion to play. And even more interestingly,
he would withdraw his hand from the cage and,
according to
Wallace and Crookes,
the accordion would float in the cage,
playing a tune.
It sounds quite
astonishing.
Another thing that was witnessed by both
Wallace and Crookes were levitations by Hume, and
yeah, we know that it's possible to
manufacture the illusion of
a levitation. Magicians do this.
But,
these
events took place under
circumstances that
really completely ruled out those kinds of
explanations. Magicians, stage magicians, can do it when they're in control of the stage.
Yes. But, to do it under scientific conditions with multiple observers who have
strip-searched the magician and searched the room thoroughly is another matter altogether.
Yeah, so you have to wonder, well, why did Wallace, you know, the co-founder of the theory of evolution by
Natural Selection and Crookes, a president of the Royal Society,
publicize these things to their scientific colleagues?
You know, did they have some kind of psychological death wish that they wanted all their colleagues to think they've gone
completely off the deep end, or
did they publish these things because
that is what, as scientists, they actually observed and
they thought other scientists deserve to have this
information
available to them? I choose the latter
among those possibilities. And, you know, it's also important to point out that it wasn't just the two of them either. There was a
coterie, a clique, of many
prominent scientists from that era who were actively involved in the Society for Psychical Research.
Another one you mention in your book, who was a
colleague of
Wallace, was William James, the founder of American psychology.
Yeah, William James was a very interesting
person,
because he was
open to a whole variety of facts that would be looked upon quite negatively today.
One case he investigated was
what he regarded as a genuine case of
spirit possession. You know, the case is called the Watseka Wonder.
Oh, yes, indeed. And Watseka is a little town in, I believe, Illinois, and
it also happens to be the name of the street I live on in Los Angeles, which is Watseka Avenue, which is
named after one of the most famous cases in the history of psychical research.
So, that was an interesting case involving
a young girl named Laurency Venom, who was a member of the Venom family. She lived a quite ordinary life until,
at a certain point in time,
she went into trance states, what she called trance states. And in these trance states,
she claimed to be encountering the spirits of departed
personalities, and one of the spirits she encountered was that of a girl named Mary Roth,
who had died
previously in that same
geographical
locality.
So, she reported that to her family members, to her parents, and they went and searched out this Roth
family, and
they brought her family to
the Venom house.
Now, Laurency had reported that, in her encounter with the spirit of Mary Roth,
this spirit being had told her, I would like to visit my parents.
So, more or less, I'd like to take possession of your body for a little while.
And,
when that happened,
Laurency Venom began manifesting the personality of
this girl, Mary Roth. And
when the family
approached, they were brought to her house,
she looked and was able to identify
immediately, without ever having seen them before, her mother, other relatives, and
she,
by the agreement of both family members, went to live with
the Roth family and perfectly manifested the personality of their daughter,
manifested all kinds of detailed knowledge about the family affairs that would have only been known
to Mary Roth. And
this went on for some time, for some days, until, at a certain point... As I recall, it was a few months.
Actually, yeah, for some time. And then, at a certain point, she went back into the trance states and
the spirit
departed, and she resumed her normal personality, felt like a stranger, and the Roth house was returned to her
family, where she lived out the rest of her
life in a fairly normal way, as far as I can remember from the reports. But, I did find it extremely
interesting that
William James included this case in his textbook,
Principles of Psychology, as what he regarded as a genuine case of
spirit possession. I think it was removed from a later edition, probably, but you're absolutely correct. The case was
investigated by James' colleague, Richard Hodgson, who traveled to Watsika, Illinois and interviewed the
families some years later.
It stands as
one of the most well-attested and dramatic cases of possession,
and not in the negative sense, either, because, as I recall,
Laurency Venom
was ill at the time, and when Mary Roth came, she said, this will help heal her, which apparently it did.
But, the interesting point, I think, Michael, is that in this case, it says a lot about
your notion of human devolution, that
humans from within what we could call the spirit world, or I could call it hyperspace, or some other
dimension of reality, not
conventionally what we think of as three-dimensional physical reality, are able to influence events in this world.
Yes, and that
depends upon
understanding the
actual structure of what a human being is,
ontologically. I think there are three things involved. There's a gross
physical body made of the chemical elements.
There is a subtle mental and intellectual
body, and then beyond that, there is the actual
conscious
self.
So, I think what happens in the
cases of
possession is
that you have a
person, a conscious self, who has separated from their gross
physical body,
but retains the subtle mental and intellectual
body on
some level of
existence.
They are able to
use their
mental and intellectual form to
take
possession of the mental and intellectual
body of a terrestrial human who is still embodied in a gross
physical form, and this may be done
coercively or by consent.
It would appear that, in this case, the possession was
by
consent, and that the person,
personality doing the possessing, was
benign.
Yeah, and that said, there could be other cases. They're not always benign.
But the
Alfred Russell Wallace
documented many, many dozens of different kinds of
manifestations. For example, ectoplasmic
materialization, where a spirit being seems to
create a temporary body out of some mysterious
substance called ectoplasm that it seems to be exuded from the body of the medium.
I think that is,
he did observe things like that, and
I think that
ultimately, he considered that if there are
beings, if there are mediums
that can do that, that can
manifest those
ectoplasmic forms,
then there might be higher beings in the cosmos that originally
manifested what we call species,
you know, the various forms that organize,
that organisms take.
He, I think it was part of his
ultimate conclusion about evolution that things like that might also be involved,
which I think is why Darwin became very upset with him. Yeah. Well, I gather that
Wallace
didn't really try to make that connection explicitly to modify the theory of evolution to incorporate the
observations he had made working with spiritualists. But you seem to be, in your own thinking, pointing in that direction.
Yeah.
Well, I think if we look carefully at
Wallace's
writings in the last part of, you know, my chapter
about
Wallace, you know, I
look at how his
parapsychological research influenced his
thinking about
evolution, especially the evolution of the human form.
You know, he began to think there was something special about it that
really couldn't be
explained by
the mechanisms that were involved in the production of other
species. So, I think at least in that particular case, he was
somewhat willing to modify the mechanisms of
the theory. Mm-hmm. But I gather, if I push you on
your notion of human devolution, the idea might well be something like that
at one time, maybe billions of years ago,
spiritual beings in a
spiritual realm,
highly evolved spiritual beings were capable of manifesting
physical bodies that suited their needs. And that may be how the human, first modern humans, came into existence.
Well, I
ultimately, I do think something like that.
When I speak of
devolution, I
use the word in a few different ways. But the primary way that I use it is
that
what we really are, in
essence, is
conscious
personalities. And that conscious
personal self is
not reducible
to
chemistry or physics. It has its own
independent
existence. And
I would say we all originally exist on
a platform where we manifest a form of pure consciousness or
spirit, if you want to put it in a
religious terminology. But I prefer the term pure consciousness. I
prefer that
terminology. So, in that sense,
none of us are from the world of matter. We're from some higher realm. And
if we remained in that realm, there wouldn't be any
necessity for
gross physical
forms. It's only when we come to the world of matter
that we require a vehicle that will allow us to function in this
alien element.
You know, just,
am I making any sense here? You're making perfect sense to me. And I guess our viewers will have to decide for themselves.
But I can't say whether I agree or disagree with you,
but I think I understand clearly what you're saying.
Yeah, it's like, as humans, we're normally meant to
live on the land.
Mm-hmm. But if we want to exist under the water
for more than a few seconds, we're going to need some kind of
vehicle that will allow us to function in that alien element.
We'll need a diving suit or a submarine. And then we have to ask, well, where do those
diving suits or submarines come from? Well, I would say they come from
engineers who understand that if a human being is going to exist under the water,
they need
some type of vehicle that will allow them to do that. So the engineers design and build those things.
So, but I would say on the level of consciousness, there are beings that have the intelligence
to
manifest from their forms in a
kind of
biological process, but not the one that we're familiar with.
It's more like
what Wallace observed,
mediums
manifesting
ectoplasmic forms
that
take on their own
identities.
So those forms are, I would say, are manifested by these higher beings in
the cosmos and
conscious selves
that want to exist on the level of matter are placed in those forms, which then go on to reproduce
themselves. Now, I know you point out in your book that Wallace himself
didn't really explore the phenomenon of reincarnation, but subsequent researchers such as Ian Stevenson have
accumulated massive
documentation about
cases where young children
remember past lives, and very often there are
biological concomitants to that, birthmarks, and
for example, that seem to be
reflecting, for example, the death wounds of a previous
personality show up as a birthmark, and the present personality also
suggesting this ability of pure consciousness to influence a biological vehicle.
Yes, yeah, there are some very interesting cases that Ian Stevenson and his colleagues
investigated
where they have shown that a personality may have died by a gunshot wound, for example, and it's known
where the entry and exit wounds are, and
the person who
manifests the
personality, the reincarnated
personality of that person, their
body will have a birthmark in the appropriate place of the wound and the
exit wound, you know, kind of indicating that the
mental body that's
accompanied that
unconscious self from one form to the next has
retained that impression, and then that subtle mental body will
influence the gross physical body, configure it in such a way that
it
manifests those,
it will manifest birthmarks
reminiscent of those
wounds suffered in a
previous life.
So, as
you were saying, I would take that as
evidence that
conscious self, through its
mental body, can
influence the form of the gross physical body, and
if that's true,
conscious selves could also possibly
manifest
these gross physical forms on the first instance of their appearance
on this level of reality.
I should think that if Alfred Russell Wallace had lived long enough to be aware of that research, he would have found it very interesting.
Well, Michael Cremo, once again, a fascinating
discussion. I'm so glad that we were able to both explore
the history of Alfred Russell Wallace and also your own thinking about the devolution of the human species.
Thank you for being with me, and thank you for being with us.