Democrat GOES VIRAL For Doing THIS During Biden Impeachment Inquiry

This woman has gotten viral for quote unquote owning Republicans, but my take is a tad bit different. How's everybody doing? My name is Anthony Brian Logan and today we got to talk about us house rep Jasmine Crockett going viral for her video in which she quote unquote roasted Republicans over the potential impeachment of Joe Biden. Now, before we get into the video, which I do have, I got to back up and explain what's going on here. Now Jasmine Crockett is 41 years old if I'm not mistaken and she's a U S house rep. Her district is in the Dallas, Texas area. She spoke during an impeachment inquiry about Joe Biden. Now main dollar question, Hey ABL, what is an impeachment inquiry? Great question. Glad you asked. This hearing is to see if there's enough evidence to go forward with an impeachment on president Joe Biden. So of course, Ms. Crockett, a Democrat is going to say there's nothing here. It's a nothing burger. Worry about your guy, Trump, artisan net in the third. Now the video of her doing a whole lot of ghetto talking, loud talking, net twirling has gone viral. A lot of your black folks and liberals of all colors say she did a great job. She really showed those Republicans. I thought it was pretty embarrassing and quite frankly it lacked in substance. And again, she's a Democrat, so she'll do whatever it takes to defend her side. Now before I go any further into it, let's go ahead and get into the clip. This is her again, right here. Ms. Crockett from Dallas, Texas. And if you want to see the full clip without my commentary link, as always will be in the description. If you're on IG, visit a link in the bio, go to the corresponding article on the website. But without further ado, let's go ahead and roll it. Mr. Crockett from Texas. Yes. Thank you so much, Mr. Chair. Before I began my questioning, I want to remind everyone that the information recorded in the FBI form 10 23 that my Republican colleagues keep citing is not evidence of anything. And let's pause right here. 10 23. I'm going to show you this. I'm going to show you guys this right quick. And of course this will be in the box. This refers to the whole Burisma holdings and Victor Shoken and all that kind of stuff. And we're going to actually see some video evidence of what's in this form after we get done with miss Crockett's remarks. So keep that in mind. Let's keep on rocking and rolling here. This form reflects the years old secondhand unverified information from a Ukrainian oligarch as relayed to the FBI by a confidential human source. These unverified secondhand allegations have been repeatedly debunked and undermined, including by the confidential human source who relayed this information to the FBI. The tip recorded in the form 10 23 was thoroughly explored by the U S attorney handpicked by Donald Trump, which was attorney attorney general William Barr. And the assessment was closed. Finally, Devin Archer Hunter Biden's former business partner who worked with the Ukrainian oligarch in question told this committee in a transcribed transcribed interview in July that he had no knowledge of any such payments allegedly described in this form. Again, we have evidence, so she'll talk and get through it, but we have evidence from none other than Joe Biden himself bragging about what happened. Okay. And again, I will link to the 10 23. I will link to that in the box and I will also link to these comments right here and also to the video of Joe Biden speaking before the council on foreign relations with a microphone in front of him. So you know it was being recorded audio and video. So it was not a rumor or a secondhand account of information. Let's keep on going. Repeating the same lies will not somehow turn them into truths. Kind of like the election that Trump lost. Say it with me. He lost it. Repeating the same lie that he won. Wasn't going to turn the election around. Now again, this is the impeachment inquiry for Joe Biden. So bringing up Donald Trump's election, uh, rigging allegations is not even relevant, but let's keep on rolling. The lost in this chamber keep pushing lies and lunacy on behalf of a multi-time loser. So if we're going to talk about China, let's go ahead and talk about China and let's talk about the dealings. And let me point out the fact. Is this a Louis Vuitton pin on your jacket in Congress? I mean, can we get a little bit more decorum? I mean, John Fetterman bad enough with the hoodies and basketball shorts, but this right here is not anywhere near as bad. We have business casual, but it's a little bit, it's giving what they say is giving ghetto. Right now, each of you has admitted that none of you are fact witnesses. We walked in without facts and unfortunately, because what we say isn't necessarily evidence. We have wasted the American people's time and we are going to walk out of this chamber and we still have no facts that are leading to anything. But let me give y'all a little bit of tea while we're here. Okay. So now we're just using words that like we're in Congress. Why are you using slang tea? That's like rumor, rumor, or information. Why are we using words like this in Congress? I don't understand. But then again, Hey, if, if the purpose Ms. Crockett was to go viral, then mission accomplished, right? Mission accomplished. So I have a document that I will ask for unanimous consent to enter into the record. It's a fact sheet on president Trump's shady business dealings with the Chinese government. What's that got to do with president Joe Biden? Tell me what's like, how is that linked to Joe Biden? What are we talking about? There's plenty of avenues to present that kind of information. This ain't the appropriate place, is it? What do you enter in a record from who? This is from the congressional integrity, congressional integrity project, the dark money pack. I object to that too. Of course y'all going to object, but we don't talk about it. So, uh, it says, Trump has extensive financial ties to the Chinese government. President Trump collected millions from Chinese government owned entities while in office. I have the best tenants in the world. President Trump was well aware of the multimillion dollar lease to Chinese interests. President Trump promised to donate foreign government government profits while in office, but he donated less than a third of his proceeds from the Chinese government. President Trump maintained three foreign bank accounts while in office, including one in China. President is that illegal? I'm not sure that's illegal, but you know what is illegal or what could be legal is the whole quid pro quo that Joe Biden is being alleged of and involving himself in. There are some things that Joe Biden has done that he has actually talked about doing that are much worse than anything. You're going to read on that paper right in front of you. And Trump's business with China raised legal and ethical concerns. President Trump, President Xi loves the people of China. He loves his country and he's doing a very good job. Let me tell you something. I don't want to talk about what y'all want to act like is some big mystery because we keep sitting here and professor Gerhardt, just just to be clear, as my colleagues have even tried to provide evidence, which they're not the ones to provide evidence. Have you ever heard them say if since we've been sitting here for, I don't know how long? Yes. I, I, um, I've been taking a tally. Oh, okay. Can you show us, can you tell us what the tally is? More than 35 times, the Republican witnesses and Republican members of the committee have used the word if. Thank you so much for that because honestly, if they would continue to say if or Hunter and we were playing a drinking game, I would be drunk by now because I promise you, they have not talked about the subject of this, which would be the president. Now, if you got to say if, because at a certain point, you can't just say a thing that you're trying to prove. The impeachment inquiry is to see if there's enough evidence to go forward with a trial, which is the impeachment. And then in the impeachment, you're going to figure out if these things are true or false. If he's guilty or innocent and to how that works, maybe I'm wrong. You guys let me know about that more in the comments. But let me tell you something that was so disturbing. As I walked in to this chamber today, as I prepared, I said, what is the crime? Because when you're talking about impeachment, you're talking about high crimes or misdemeanors. And I can't seem to find the crime. And honestly, no one has testified of what crime they believe the president of the United States has committed. But when we started talking about things that look like evidence, they want to act like they blind. They don't know what this is. These are our national secrets looks like in the shitter to me. This looks like more evidence of our national secrets say. So what she's doing right now is holding up pictures of documents in Mar-a-Lago. Again, this is the Joe Biden impeachment inquiry. Why are we talking about president Donald Trump and documents? Like, isn't there a separate case for that? Why are we talking about that right now? I don't understand. On a stage at Mar-a-Lago. When we're talking about somebody that's committed high crimes, it's at least indictments. Let's say 32 counts related to unauthorized retention of national security secrets, seven counts related to obstructing the investigation, three false statements, one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States falsifying business records, conspiracy to defraud the United States, two counts related to efforts to obstruct the vote certification proceedings, one count of conspiracy to violate civil rights, 23 counts related to forgery or false document statements, eight counts related to soliciting. And I could go on because he's got 91 counts pending right now, but I will tell you what the president has been guilty of. He has unfortunately been guilty of loving his child unconditionally. And that is the only evidence that they have brought forward. And honestly, I hope and pray that my parents love me half as much as he loves his child until they find some evidence. We need to get back to the people's work, which means keeping this government open so that people don't go hungry in the streets of the United States. And I will yield. Okie dokie. There you have it. So that was, um, Jasmine Crockett from Dallas, Texas, us house rep. Uh, this video went viral all over the place. They love what she said there, but ain't nothing. You're talking about, uh, Donald Trump a lot because you know, your guy has some issues. This is why they want to put Gavin Newsom out there. They want to bring him to the RNC debate because they want him to be the runner rather than your old, decrepit criminality lay in guy that you got. Now, uh, this is again, the 10 23. Now here is Joe Biden. Some years ago, I'm not quite sure when, Oh, it's 2016. This is him speaking right there front center before the council on foreign relations about the Ukrainian investigator, Victor Shoken, but a bit of background in the forum, the 10 23 from the FBI. The allegation is that he basically bribed Ukraine and to firing the prosecutor, Victor Shoken, Victor Shoken was looking into Burisma holdings for corruption. Joe Biden's son Hunter was on the board of Burisma getting paid upwards of $50,000 a month, upwards of $50,000 per month to be on the board. Now this is after Hunter was discharged from the military because of the crack cocaine use. He had no experience in energy. This is a gas company in Ukraine. So he had no experience with gas, electric, wind, coal, nothing, but he's on the board getting paid. And then Joe made the Ukrainians fired a prosecutor who was trying to look into Burisma. Let's hear him with his own voice say exactly what I said. Remember going convincing our team or others to convincing us that we should be providing for loan guarantees. And I went over right, I guess the 12th, 13th time to Kiev. And, uh, and I was going supposed to announce that there was another billion dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from, uh, Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor and they didn't. So they said they had, they were walking out to press conference said, no, I said, I'm not going to, we're not going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You're not the president. The president said, I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting a billion dollars. I said, you're not getting a billion. I'm going to be leaving here. And I think it was what, six hours. I look, I said, I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid. So not only did they fire the guy, they put somebody in there that was more favorable to the U S so he was able to like literally do like a regime change. Okay. With, with the, with the, with the money as a bribe. Well, I mean, I guess that's okay. I mean, it could have been a drone strike like Obama used to do, but anyway, I digress. The point is that there's your evidence right there. He said it with his own voice right in front of an audience of people in front of a microphone council on four. He said it right there, 2016. So what are we talking about? As I close, I want to say this, there's obviously evidence of Joe Biden doing some underhand sneaky things, getting money in ways you shouldn't be getting it. His son is a bag man. Basically a lot of the criminality was handled through his son. What may end up happening is they may throw Hunter Biden away, throw him in a penitentiary, bit rocks, little rocks, and then let Joe Biden get off. Potentially that could happen. We're going to see if the impeachment inquiry goes anywhere. It might not because of how corrupt the federal government is, but I hope it does because it's not just nothing. As Ms. Crockett says, there is a whole lot here, but I think I'll leave that right there for now. And what say you, do you think that Ms. Crockett had a point? There is nothing here. There's nothing burger and that Trump is a guy that we should be focusing on. Although this was not about Trump at all. It was about Joe Biden's impeachment inquiry. Whatever your thoughts are, let me know in the comments below. You guys know where I'm at. People are entertained a little bit too easily. People liked Ms. Crockett, and her energy. But when you're talking about substance, there wasn't much there obviously, but whatever your thoughts are, please let me know in the comments below. And that is all I got to say for this video. If you like what you heard, please comment, rate, share and subscribe. Peace.