Project NextGen Rushes New COVID Vaccines | Crossroads

I talked about a few stories. Let's start today. I want to go first into Jason Aldean Because you might remember and I'll show you after this episode the whole story on it and my take on it Jason Aldean country music star comes out and does a story a music video try that in a small town And of course the left attacks him for it because he suggests that if you were to try to burn down cities kill people You know punch old ladies, you know playing the really called the knockout game Try that in a small town people are probably gonna stand up to you. The left freaks out. They claim he's like advocating for Vigilante ISM they paint him as like promoting racism Somehow they say that he wants to like lynch people and all kinds of crazy stuff People are pointing to like literally all the other music out there where you have your average rap song, right? Usually about like rape or you know murder or gang violence. You're like, how is that not controversial? But this is interesting note, by the way People are trying to cancel now country music television because EMT actually canceled this guy's video Jason Aldean responded to this Let me show you I won't play the video because we're not the rights to it I don't think on Twitter, but he said this what I am what I am what I am is proud a proud American I love our country I want to see it restored to what what it once was before all this bull started happening to us It says I love my country I love my faith and I will do anything to protect that I can tell you that and he also by the way stated his opinion That while people should be entitled to state their opinions lo and behold, so he's not folding to the censorship mobs He's not he's not folding to all this nonsense But also James Dyson you correct me every in the chats I'll give you I'll give you my full take on what's happening including I'll show you how actually they'd be going after Jason Aldean for A while. This is not a new development They've been targeting for him for like a couple years now, I'll explain to you why they're going after him I'll do that in the you know, Crossroads tonight episode, which I'll show you in just a little bit that said though Let's jump over next story here. Um, he's coming that do this stuff on YouTube getting a note I want to talk to you about the vaccines. There's a new vaccine program coming out right now And while they're really trying basically, it's replicating operation warp speed operation warp speed is being replicated The new one is called project next-gen. That's the official government name for it So basically the by administration right now is replicating the same thing that well funny enough Donald Trump did when he was rushing out vaccines the issue at the time, right? The issue at the time was that when Trump was president, of course, there was a real scare Hey, kovat 19 is gonna kill a million people. Trump was anticipating it. He launches operation warp speed He wanted there to be like it or not, right? Criticize him or not his idea with it was allow multiple different types of treatment He was even he was pushing for example hydroxychloroquine He was pushing for example other treatments the vaccine mandates and the forced Vaccinations were very much a Democrat and establishment program But Trump pushed operation warp speed which kind of fast-tracked the approval of new vaccines That was supposed to be like a once-in-a-lifetime thing because vaccine companies hardly have any oversight as it is Really there's hard that there's no legal there's there's no way you can sue the companies themselves So those part the government our taxes our tax dollars have to pay people off because of that There's really lack standards pretty much all around. They don't need to go proper safety tests They do to an extent but in terms of like, you know Going back and being able to actually look at efficacy and such anytime they do it they find huge problems In fact Pfizer just pulled out of India because India was saying let us do a safety test or we're kicking you out Pfizer backed out of a market of like 1.6 billion people because they refused to do a safety test with the Indian government You know take that case in point But what they're trying to do now is normalize that fast-tracked process the ability to roll out a new vaccine Like a you know a couple months or something like that the ability to bypass even the very lax Standards that were already in place and that's called project next-gen financed already by the Biden administration with a budget that utterly dwarfs Operation warp speed which was Trump's so get ready for the the medical the medical Misinformation barrage as you get slammed from all directions with all these new treatments You're supposed to get for that though Let's jump over to epoch TV because you know They don't let me talk about vaccine stuff on YouTube by the way, you have to forgive me my throats a bit funny today So I probably sound a little funny. I'll also talk to you about fake abortion Hoax coming out right now Democrats are pushing and why why I'll show you how they're lying about it They'll tell you why I think they're lying about it. We'll go into that on hates the Constitution They just hate it First Amendment who wants that freedom of speech? Why would you let the masses talk amongst themselves? They hate the Constitution so come to a place where we love the Constitution That is epoch TV Epoch.tv.com we have a flash sale going on you get a real you get a real good price on it right now So get your subscription get a trial just try it out come join the Q&A as well And again, I'll see you on epoch TV link of the description epoch.tv.com And now let's talk about the things that YouTube will not allow us to talk about let's talk about the forbidden knowledge Let us share our forbidden knowledge about vaccine efficacy and the lack thereof Hey James Dyson James, I support you. Yeah, she said Josh. I'm gonna chat new speak all day, but I got your back All right. Let's go into the first story here Biden administration allocates five billion dollars for new kovat vaccines with Oh, wait, we're done. I'm in trouble with the junk in one sec Let's see here. Yeah, Anne F., you said exactly chip. You say you're talking to chip. I thought you were talking for a minute about the chips. Have you seen the new biometric payment systems? They released these, maybe I'll show you later this week. They have new payment systems that scan your hand. They scan the print on your hand. Like, you know, people were saying, oh, they're gonna put, you know, they wanna put a chip in your hand. They want to, you know, who knows what. There were like programs, for example, where they were like injecting chips into people's hands. They don't even need it. They can use biometrics for it. New payment system rolled out in China. New payment system, they're actually even seen in, I believe, Texas. There are some already being used in different places where you can scan your hand as a payment system. Talk about CBDCs. Don't need a credit card. You are the product. All right, let's jump over to Epoch TV now. Sorry, we had an issue there. All right, first off, your Project Next Gen. Biden allocates, or Biden had an allocates $5 billion for new COVID vaccination with little manufacturing guidance. It says the Biden administration is issuing grants from a $5 billion program to expedite the next generation of COVID-19 vaccines, but pharmaceutical manufacturers are not receiving guidance about vaccine standards. Maybe there are no standards. As a development process returns to its normally slower pace, the initiative known as Project Next Gen has left manufacturers confused about whether they're even eligible for funding, the New York Times reported. For example, the Pennsylvania-based company Ocugen, which is developing an inhaled vaccine, I can only imagine what they could do with that, said it was unable to receive guidance about whether it was eligible for the funding. Further, it says Project Next Gen dwarfs Operation Warp Speed, its $18 billion 2020 predecessor that hastened COVID vaccine development. The latest project launched with COVID deaths at their lowest level does not have Warp Speed's funding nor authority. It's a little confusing here. They're saying Project Next Gen dwarfs Operation Warp Speed, but they're also saying it doesn't. Maybe it's an error in the article. Regardless, though, what I see them doing right here is they're trying to normalize Operation Warp Speed. Operation Warp Speed, which was the fast tracking of the creation and release of new vaccines for public use, you know, it was supposed to be a once in a lifetime thing done under a serious emergency. They're now declaring essentially that pretty much any disease now is being called a public health emergency, Monkeypox, which was spreading almost exclusively among homosexual men and not in large numbers was being called a public health crisis. And then when it started spreading to like dogs and children they just made the whole thing disappear, you might remember. They have all kinds of weird, like, you know, minor illnesses with like, you know, 10 cases here or 15 cases there. And they're calling the public health crisis. What we're seeing right now is the normalization of the concept that any emerging illness is now a crisis and any emerging illness necessitates a massive government response. Even not even emerging, but even just something that appears in small numbers pretty much anywhere. I think we're gonna see probably the COVID state of things become the normal way of doing things. Now, this is actually problematic already because vaccine companies really had pretty strong legal immunity as it was. As I mentioned briefly, you know, actually, I was curious about RFK Jr. And what he really had to say, because he says, I'm not anti-vaccine. He's totally anti-vaccine. He can say he's not all he wants. Maybe what he means is that he's not against the traditional, you know, the traditional vaccine systems. I think it's fair to say he doesn't oppose all vaccines. But I was watching his interview with Joe Rogan and he's talking about the history of vaccinations and the legal process that has been just loosened to such a massive degree to allow for these vaccines to be made public. He seems to be very much against them. I'd agree with him, actually. I think the vaccine industry is one of the most corrupt industries in the face of the planet that is killing children. He said that, you know, they say, oh, cases of vaccine injury are like one in a million. He said, actually, studies they've done, it's about one in every 36. Not one in a million, it's about one in 36. One of the big things he raised was the problem of mercury. He's, you know, he's an environmentalist. So that's his big thing, right? I'm not endorsing him one bit, don't get me wrong. The way I see RFK Jr. is that he's a Democrat and he's a conventional old school Democrat. One that does not affiliate with the wild, far left, crazy town type narratives that have come out these days. Which is, I think, why the really wild, far out, crazy town ones despise him and fear him. But, you know, I don't typically like those policies. I'm very much against abortion. I'm very much for gun rights. I'm very much for free markets and so on, right? He's very much seemingly against some of those things. Although I think he could argue he's kind of for free markets. At the same time, I do like the idea, for example, going after big pharma. And if Trump's gonna have any issue with him, it's gonna be that point. Because Trump is still, Trump is probably losing some voters for not admitting that things went wrong with Operation Warp Speed. And for not acknowledging that there are some problems with the vaccines. He's kind of stayed on that train. So I think that's one thing he's gonna have trouble with with RFK Jr. And just overall, even with DeSantis, he's gonna be dealing with that. Beside the point, though, one thing RFK Jr. did was he talked about, what do you call it, mercury. And he said if he talked to a lot of these people, they'd be like, oh, well, the stuff we have in vaccines is the safe mercury. The safe mercury? There is no safe mercury. There's two types. One of which is, I guess, the dangerous mercury. And everyone's called, they call it the safe mercury. Why do they call it the safe? It's because they did a huge experiment on children. They managed to inject them all with these, you know, mercury-laced vaccines or whatever. And they found that mercury leaves the bloodstream within a couple weeks to a couple months. Great, it left the bloodstream. Anybody who works in toxicology is gonna say, well, where did it go? Fine, it left the bloodstream. Where did it go? It didn't come out anywhere. It didn't come out anywhere else. Where'd it go? Where's the mercury? Now, they used that study to fast, you know, basically put the stuff in everything. If you get an injection, if you get these shots, yeah, you're getting mercury injected into you. Why is that? It's because the process of approving these vaccines is based on the idea of, you know, eliciting an immune response and how do you get your body to have an immunoreaction while you inject poison into it. You cause your body to respond. And they found that just injecting the viruses was not eliciting enough of a response. So they had to pack these things with toxic chemicals. Toxic chemicals, mercury in this case, elicit the immune response that get them the FDA approval. It's all about the approval process and the technicalities of the approval process. After they started doing it, another group was like, well, let's figure out where the mercury is going. And they got, you know, a bunch of monkeys, poor monkeys, by the way. They did the same thing to them. And then they dissected the monkeys and they found the mercury didn't go away. The mercury didn't disappear. The mercury went into their brains. So, you know, you get those shots, you're getting mercury injected into your brain is all you're doing, which I think is pretty dang problematic, personally. Anyways, the problem you're having now is these vaccine programs are going to be able to operate on a faster track as a normal way of doing business. An industry that already had way too little, way too little requirement and way too much immunity, way too much immunity to be able to function in a way that deserves public trust. These are utterly untrustworthy companies, in my opinion. Not saying I'm against, I'm not saying I'm against like normal vaccines, but I think the industry is utterly corrupt, basically. That said, let me show you one more thing. We'll jump into questions. I want to show you how everybody is being lied to. Again, well, I guess I do that a lot, actually. But let me show you this case. It relates to this abortion case all over the place right now. And Nebraska, this is no lie with Brian Tyler Cohen. This is one of the leftist establishment guys. And this is what he's telling the world just happened. If you were like watching this show, turn on the mainstream news and you read this, and you're like, how dare they? How dare they? We need to go cast our votes to make sure this never happens again. Because no lie with Brian Tyler Cohen says this. A Nebraska teenager has been sentenced to jail and charged as a felon after ending her pregnancy with abortion pills. She faces up to five years in prison. Imagine, they tell you you can get an abortion, they sell you the pills, a teenager takes the pills, she's just a teenager, and she faces five years in prison. Imagine. Now, it was luckily fact-checked by Community Notes. This guy, Brian Tyler Cohen, never watch his show, by the way. Don't really know who he is. But it says it was fact-checked. First off, yeah, she's a teenager. She's 18, an 18-year-old. Normally you'd call that an adult. Second, she was not charged for having an abortion. That's an utter lie. It's a disgusting lie. She was charged for using abortion pills to kill a fully developed infant, a baby that could have survived on its own, a baby that was a living, breathing, fully functional human being, technically, in the third trimester, which violates the law in Nebraska. Not only did she then kill a fully functional infant, she then burned it, and then she buried its remains and didn't report the crime, essentially. Under American law, if you wanna dispose of a human body, well, you gotta report it. Otherwise, it's called concealing a dead body. For killing a fully developed infant, for burning it, for burying it, and then failing to report it, she only got three months in prison at most. Think about that, at most. She's probably gonna get less than that. The left is coming out in her defense. They're putting a teenager in prison for having an abortion? No, they didn't even charge her for having an abortion. They didn't even charge her for that. Well, they didn't prosecute her for that. Representative Ted Lieu comes out, and he says this, he's disgusted. He says, the Twitter community note at the bottom of the tweet is stupid. That's right, how dare, how dare the community and Twitter clarify the truth of what actually took place? How dare they tell the world the truth? He says, putting women in jail for concealing an abortion as compared to having an abortion is not the winning message the Republicans think it is. And then he got fact-checked. He got fact-checked as well. And funny enough, people pointed to a New York Times article which said this, it says, prosecutors did, this is quote from New York Times, prosecutors did not charge Celeste Burgess under Nebraska's abortion law. She pleaded guilty to removing or concealing human skeletal remains, which is a felony. And she only got three months for that felony. Prosecutors agreed to drop two misdemeanor charges, concealing a death and false reporting. Imagine you kill a fully developed, fully functioning infant capable of living. You kill it, you kill a baby, right? And then you burn it and then you bury it. And she also conspired with her mom to do it. They said that her and her mom said, we'll burn it and just get rid of the evidence. They actually said something along those lines in the text messages. Now look, my stance, abortion is a moral debate. We're debating it on politics, but it's actually, it's more of like a religious debate. I understand the law on it. I understand a lot of people have done it. I do not believe in it. I think it's killing. And that's more because I believe in the human soul. I believe, I don't believe in killing humans. I don't believe in killing babies, especially. For me, I believe an infant at any stage of being in the mother's womb has a soul, has a human soul, and ending that life is no different than killing a fully grown human. That's my personal belief. And that's more rooted in my religious belief. I believe, again, that humans have souls and that killing a life is killing a life. I don't support it. That being said, though, again, it's a moral debate. I don't think we're gonna find common ground on moral debates unless we just talk with reason with each other, or if we have kind of shared beliefs. But aside from all of that, just viewed from a normal legal perspective, let me tell you why I think this really matters. Abortion pills basically give a backdoor where you can violate abortion laws. This girl took an abortion pill, right? Abortion pills allow you to violate the law on these things. It means you can have essentially abortions at any point of the birth. You could technically give birth to a baby and then kill it afterwards and say you did it beforehand. If, for example, you have this law or this allowed violation of the law where a person can just destroy the body, what point of growth can the infant be killed, right? And that's the other big question. People originally said first trimester or first few weeks. Then they said first two weeks, and they were saying partial birth abortion where the baby's being born and you can like shove a scalpel in its head or something like that, which people have talked about doing. You know, we're getting pretty far along that line now. We're getting pretty far along that line where it's no longer even abortion. It's a fully functional living person. And if you wanna talk about a third trimester, there's no way you can say otherwise because if it's born, it's capable of living. It's not abortion anymore, no matter how you try to frame it. The question is also, should it be legal to hide the dead bodies of dead infants? Because that's actually what the left is saying right now. This girl didn't get charged or she didn't get put in sentence to prison for having an abortion. She got sentenced for like hiding the body. Now, if you think it should be legal to hide a dead body, what kind of issues do those raise? It means people can basically give birth to infants living human beings and do basically whatever the heck they want with them. You know, I find that deeply concerning personally. And what are the implications if killing and disposing of infants has no consequences? If this girl, she only got sentenced to 90 days in prison, three months, and she's probably not even gonna serve that. I understand people are like, oh, well, you know, we should consider this and whatever. If there's no consequence of killing an infant, burning the body and disposing of the body, what does it mean if you don't punish that? It sets the precedent that you can kill and dispose of an infant in any way you want with no consequence. I think we're heading down a really dangerous road as a civilization if we allow these things to happen. I think it's a very deeply concerning, dangerous road that is like the canonite, you know, baby sacrifice of yesteryear, making a full 180 and coming back to modern civilization if we don't get off this path. Frankly, we're probably killing more infants a year than the Mayans or the Aztecs sacrificed on their temple steps. We're probably past that point already. Let's see here, MS, you're saying Josh, have you, let's jump into some questions. Have you thought about the possibility that you may not receive medical care if you needed an emergency surgery because you're not vaxxed? I'm not vaccinated. I don't think it's as big of a deal now, you know, kind of post pandemic. I did think about it during the pandemic, but I'm not gonna go against my principles just because someone tries to, you know, pressure me. That's just me though. Sandy Sefcik, you said, truly ballsy. How they brainwash the world this particular pandemic, then will create new vaccines for the next one. Pandemics become that frequent, hey? Yeah, well, and that's the thing too, the politics around it, the additional government powers around it, the corporate involvement, the NGO involvement, you know, they got a taste of power and they want that power back is what I see happening. And they're trying to normalize this as just the way that you deal with pretty much anything that comes about. They're talking about using a public health crisis declaration for gun violence. They're talking about using a public health crisis declaration for, you know, global warming. I guess they're calling it global warming again, by the way, I'm just ahead of the times. Anyways, Seymour Buds, he's saying, Josh, what do you think are the implications of Biden refusing to do any presidential debates? He's not campaigning either, last I saw. Biden, has Biden held any campaign events? I don't think he has. Maybe he feels there's nothing to debate. But at the same time, remember we're in the primaries right now. So technically if Biden were campaigning or debating, he'd be doing it to win the Democrat nomination. He, as the incumbent, technically does not have to, you know, RFK Jr. probably is not going to get the nomination. I think there are people anticipating that Biden, either will not run for president in the end, or he's going to drop out. The question is, if he's planning that, then when does he do it? My one thought, maybe I'll talk about this again more in depth. My one thought is that RFK Jr. presents a real fundamental threat to them. If Biden drops out, if he doesn't run for re-election, he's going to lose incumbency. And that means then whoever comes in and tries to run is going to have to run against, you know, RFK Jr. Gavin Newsom, I don't think he stands a chance. I don't think he's going to stand a chance against RFK Jr. Michelle Obama, probably not either, but you would have Barack Obama back. But I think the public dislikes him enough now that I don't think he has the gravitas for it either. So they don't want to get rid of Biden, I don't think either. My one assumption is they're going to try to pull like a last minute, you know, like bait and switch, where they get, my personal assumption, and this is purely based on my own speculation, so take it as you will. I think they're trying to wait until then have Biden step down because of a public, you know, a health problem or something like that, thereby throwing the Democrats into an emergency situation where they themselves within the party choose the new front runner that will bypass the process of having that person elected by Democrat voters. I think they're going to bypass that process by having Biden do it after the time when the elections would have been held. And so I think that's why he's not campaigning or anything like that. I think they want to wait, they want to wait till after the primaries. This is purely my speculation. We'll see if it ends up happening, but I think just kind of reading the tea leaves that's what they're doing right now. Let's see, Tetley Past, she's saying, where is house and poor shopping wasteful spending? Sorry, I think there's an error here. I can't read the question right. Yeah, New Life Forward 2018. They said, killing humans. Does that mean not everyone is human? Well, that's the thing they're doing too, is they're trying to even redefine what is human life. There's a movement, a political movement now, being pushed by Democrats, being pushed by NGOs. They call it personhood status. Personhood. They're trying to say that AI, artificial intelligence, should be given personhood status. They're saying animals like chickens and cows should be given personhood status. That all kinds of anything that's alive should be given personhood status, which would mean what? You can't legally turn off an AI. You can't legally kill a chicken. You can't legally slaughter a cow, and so on and so on. You can't chop down a tree because it has personhood status. It also blurs the line of what is a human, because already you have trans-human things, like the furries and so on, where you have kids being told they can identify as cats or identify as trees. And because of that, it's also skewing the idea of what identifies someone as a human being. And so, yes, the messing with the human language, the messing with the building blocks of civilization, and the messing with the building blocks of what constitutes life is going to bring about some really serious questions on the sanctity of human life and the rights that we have as humans, you know, among all the other things in this world. We're very rapidly heading towards that debate. And actually, I know in some states they've already shot down some of those personhood debates. It's not being done everywhere. I know in Idaho they shot it down, for example. But that's going to be one of the big debates we're going to have as a society soon, is what defines a human being. Deeply concerning, in my opinion. Keep in mind, there were debates with that previously, with the Catholic Church going to Latin America. They had to debate on whether they wanted to classify the natives as humans. The Catholic Church in the end determined, yes, these are human beings, which is why they decided to integrate them into the religion, basically. There's a lot of history to this stuff. It's actually really interesting. Anyways, leave that hill for the future. We'll get there eventually. That said, let me show you the episode I did about this music video called Try That in a Small Town. This is Jason Aldean. And I'll give you my take on why we're really watching what's happening. I kind of dig into the background of all of this. So stick around. I'll show you that. Also, tune in tonight. We have a great episode at 7pm. I'll also see you tomorrow morning, 10am Eastern Time. As I always say, folks, thank you for being here. Appreciate all of you. Take care of yourselves. Stay informed. Stay free. Thank you.