Does Alternative Medicine ACTUALLY Work?

Dr. Alex Heyne - Acupuncture and Chinese Medicine
1.1K followers
13 Video Views·Jan 10, 2022
My guide, "4 Daily Rituals That Can Add Years to Your Life with Chinese Medicine" is completely free, which you can download right here:
➔ http://alexheyne.com/free/
Become a patient of mine ➔ http://alexheyne.com/clinic/
/// R E S O U R C E S /// B O O K S
My book on tiny, daily health habits "MASTER THE DAY" ➔ http://amzn.to/28HIbsL
Get my book on Audible here: MY AUDIOBOOK ➔ http://bit.ly/masterthedayaudio
__
/// F O L L O W
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/afheyne/
__
/// M O R E
If you want to get even more strategies and tips on living longer with natural medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, you can subscribe right here on my website:
http://alexheyne.com
.
.
.
.
.
Hey guys, Dr. Hein. I thought I would do something a little bit different today.
Do a little bit of a holiday vlog. It's Christmas Eve and I'm just going for a
little walk to get some quiet time. Something that
comes up a lot when people ask me, that they ask me, is if
alternative medicine or if Chinese medicine can work so well
why is it not more popular? And I hear this from a lot of my patients that get
really good results and they're wondering why their physician
never sought to recommend what I do for example
and why they just put them on very strong drugs for a very long time.
And I think there are three very good reasons for that and I think we would
talk about them here today and that'd be very useful.
So reason number one. I don't actually think most alternative medicine is that
clinically effective. Sorry. I mean my own journey of this kid
with lifelong digestive problems going all around the world to try to
find healers and alternative doctors and herbalists,
acupuncturists, naturopathic doctors, everyone. I did not find it that easy to
find people who were clinically skilled enough
that they could get me, someone with very basic digestive problems,
better. And I think the general state of alternative
medicine, I think people should be skeptical
because I don't think most of it is really that clinically effective.
And I hate to be Mr. Poo Pooing everyone else
but I also don't think the actual state or the skill of most people in my field
is that high. That's also discouraging because it
means that I can't recommend 95% of people in my own field
because I don't think most of them, I don't think most of us get the training
inherently in school. We need to be good clinically.
I mean I had to go outside of school. I had to find three great doctors on my
own and put in a lot of extra time to try to
find people who are really successfully treating illnesses
of all kinds successfully. So one, I don't think
really most alternative medicine is actually that clinically effective.
You know when I hear people and they're just talking about
going to like a healer or a Reiki master or
massage therapist, I'm not trying to throw anyone under the bus,
but I do think most alternative medicine falls into the category of
emotional and psychological healing. So the therapeutic relationship being very
important for the patient to get results. If you
track objectively, were their symptoms really improving a
whole lot, I'm not really sure most people would be able to say that
they are. So that's my opinion for number one. The
people who are so clinically good that they have the
results, they have physicians as their patients.
And I know practitioners who do and you know I'm starting to have
some as my own as well. Reason number two
that alternative medicine is not more popular is because
there are powerful economic reasons that most people don't see studies
done on alternative medicine. I mean first of all you have to run a randomized
trial which costs money. I don't remember the
last time I checked but somebody suggested I believe a couple
hundred thousand to potentially a million dollars
for a properly randomized placebo-controlled trial
with a sample size big enough. Most people in our field don't have that
much money because well one you have to be popular
enough and make enough money to do that but
two if you're pretty damn confident something you're doing is working
where's the incentive financially for you to run a trial?
Right so that's a problem and a lot of the people who do have the money to run
the trials are like pharmaceutical companies and are
you going to fund a trial to see that something you do is
ineffective? Or are you going to run a trial that
finds that like an herbal compound works just as well as
most of your antidepressants, most of your SSRIs?
Why would you ever run a trial to put yourself out of business?
So this is often called publication bias
where for example the studies that are are really
do not show a favorable outcome are discarded or
or not included from what's presented and the ones that are only showing
favorable results are then presented and
and publicized. Now this is very tricky and I think it's the FDA maybe that has
recently created laws that those documents have to be accessible.
The other trials that were not shown to have benefit
for example in antidepressant studies. So one of the big problems is that
we have to have enough money to be able to run those trials and two a lot of the
people that do are pharmaceutical companies who of
course they're not evil by themselves but of course they want to see
favorable results on their own products. Otherwise why publish data that says
like I run John's Bagel Shop. We did a study
that found that we have the worst bagels in New York.
Like that's basically what would happen. We found that
we have some of the the least favored bagels in New York City.
Come on over. Just no one's going to do that because no one wants to be put out
of business. So reason number two is you need to have
the money to really study a lot of these compounds
whether it's something pharmacological like a plant or a
mushroom whatever it is you take or if it's an intervention like
acupuncture or a massage or a walk in the woods versus
an anxiety drug. You need to have the money to put in
to doing a study. The third reason is because there are a lot of different
organizations working together to lobby against even alternative
medicine. I mean it really is just old school business practices.
You know physicians if physicians are losing patients to chiropractors and
naturopathic doctors and acupuncturists then there are bodies lobbying bodies
that try to put all of us out of business. Just like
there are lobbying interests that got chiropractors the ability to
do acupuncture and call it dry needling. Just like PTs can do acupuncture and
call it dry needling. Or MDs can do a very very short course
on acupuncture and then do acupuncture. These are all
usually lobbying efforts basically to get a piece of the pie.
And that's just standard business stuff you know everyone is trying to make a
living that's okay. But there are widespread reasons for
that. You know for example one of the interesting things I found was that
in Japan a high percentage of physicians that are OBGYNs
use classical Chinese herbal formulas because they are so clinically effective
for women's health issues and gynecological issues that they have
the clinical efficacy. And they're even some Chinese
compounds are actually OTC like OTC drugs almost.
Shen Qi Wan for middle-aged men with urinary dysfunction or
Ge Gen Tang which has Ma Huang for acute colds.
That's often in markets in Japan with the Ma Huang via Phedra.
And so you see in other countries you know where the clinical efficacy
really is at the forefront and the cost saving for patients is at the forefront.
And it's not America where physicians have high salaries
and they're also really just primarily learning about drugs
as their intervention. That's kind of you know no matter how well-intentioned your
physician is unless they recommend something that they're not giving you
you found a gem. They exist I know but many times you know it's not clinical
efficacy that determines what your physician tells you.
That's been great marketing on the part of the AMA and the
you know the Flexner report going back 100 years. You know these same formulas
used for the same conditions are used in Japan by gynecologists a huge percentage
and they're even covered by insurance. So it's tricky in America because our
health care system is some of the least effective and some of
the most expensive. We have some of the worst patient outcomes
anywhere in the developed world and have one of the most expensive health care
systems. So I don't know about you but if I bought
the most expensive broccoli that tasted the worst I would
call that a racket. And in Europe where physicians don't make
a lot of money necessarily and Europe is very advanced in terms of
like outlawing pesticides and maybe pulling drugs off the market sometimes
when there are problems. Why America is 10 or 20 years behind I
don't know. But the third reason is that really
there are multiple bodies together that want to make sure that
pharmaceuticals are the main form of intervention
and surgery and that the hospitals are getting reimbursed properly.
And so it really works back and forth. There are multiple
you know businesses, let's just call them that, that work together
that have decided that this is the way they want the medical interventions to
be. Not that it's going to be you know the
most evidence-based cost-affordable medicine for the patient.
So that was not accidental that was deliberate and that was
really the third reason I would say why alternative medicine if it's so
effective why is it not more popular. It's kind of an
question that people ask without directly asking and I think it's a great
question. So that's all I got for you today guys.
Catch you in the next video. If you like these vlog styles let me
know. I'm happy to do more of them. It's very easy for me to just go take a
few cents on. So if you like it let me know and
otherwise I'll catch you in the other videos soon.
