癱瘓憲法法庭？！藍白「擴權」的第一步？

I took a break and have returned to meet everyone aga The first thing I did when I came back was check the Legislative Yuan because I was very worried because the Blue and White parties are agents of the CCP The results of my research these past few days I saw it and my face turned green The blue and white constitutional litigation law amendment passed three readings They managed to shut down Taiwan's constitutional court What is the Constitutional Court The Constitutional Court is also known as the Grand Justices Session If a bill is found to have constitutional issues it must be submitted to the Constitutional Court for review If the court deems this bill unconstitutional then the bill is invalid The KMT passed an expanded authority bill the Legislative Yuan's criminal law on powers allowing legislators to interpret the law indefinitely summoning people and companies and accessing confidential information from companies and individuals Who blocked this terrifying bill It was the Constitutional Court The Constitutional Court ruled that this power expansion bill was unconstitutional Therefore the power expansion law passed by the Blue and White parties became invalid The problem has arisen Knowing the function of the constitutional court And its great power Now turning the focus to this constitutional court Why are they doing this It's simple The world knows Sima Zhao's intentions They want to let them do as they please Enact an expansion of power bill At this point we just received another 10 000 yuan in general distribution money everyone was happy I also got mine and I was also happy should I thank the Kuomintang or XXX Can it be like this Can you forget the trap behind the one thousand dollars Do you understand the methods of blue and white First give you one thousand dollars so you can't see the trap behind then trap you later Let the entire Taiwan s Now looking at the Kuomintang how did it paralyze the constitutional court Before the amendment it was only those actually serving not including retired resigned or vacant judges with two-thirds attendance More than half agree it is unconstitutional can declare it unconstitutional after the amendment regardless of how many are actually serving it will be calculated based on the statutory total of 15 people The decision threshold now requires two-thirds of 15 people to be present at least 10 people and a majority to agree what does this mean it means that even if there are retirements or vacancies I still count you as 15 people In other words if the actual number of people is less than 10 the court will be paralyzed and unable to vote The chief justice is nominated by the president and approved by the Legislative Yuan If the Legislative Yuan refuses to approve the entire constitutional court will be paralyzed The constitutional court is currently paralyzed Nine out of ten people' s constitutional relief cases are all left there completely immovable Legal experts and civil society groups have mentioned that "the law established by the court" is lower in hierarchy than the constitution although there is the "Constitutional Court Act" The discussion is about the organization and procedures of the constitutional court However it is still a common law This does not mean that the judges of the constitutional court cannot review it Many legal experts have called on the justices to resolve this constitutional deadlock If a law renders constitutional review ineffective then that law itself is unconstitutional