(國語)無人機正在改變空中優勢概念,烏克蘭的機會來了|【 #時事軍事】

時事軍事-夏洛山
3109粉絲
Hello, I am Xia Lushan
One of the most prominent lessons of the Russian-Ukrainian war is that we must gain air superiority
Then we can talk about further gaining decisive battlefield advantage
The Russian air force failed to establish air superiority from the beginning
The Putin's army lost the battle and fell into an endless war of consumption
As for Ukraine, due to resources and capabilities restrictions, it is also difficult to establish air superiority
This forced Ukraine to undergo a devastating attack on its territory and cities by the Russian army
With the development of the war, the excellent performance of small drones on the battlefield
forced people to rethink what is air superiority
Not only the Ukrainian battlefield, but also the hot spots all over the world
are threatened by drones, rockets and missiles from the air
They can penetrate advanced missile defense systems and cause fatal damage to opponents
In January this year, in Jordan, a drone attack even killed three American soldiers
In the Middle East, some extremist forces supported by Iran
The weapons they have in their hands include drones, rockets and missiles
Its cost may range from hundreds to hundreds of thousands of dollars
It's not about high-tech equipment
But it can form the so-called air superiority in the air of the U.S. military bases, which are heavily defended
and actually cause U.S. casualties
This is almost impossible for advanced weapons systems worth tens of millions of dollars or even more
But they did it
Although the success rate of drones is small and pitiful
But the occurrence of such incidents forced the U.S. military to reconsider the concept of air superiority
On July 29, Deputy Secretary of the Air Force Cliff said
Due to the large-scale use of small low-cost drones
The U.S. Air Force needs to reconsider the definition of air superiority
He said
We used to claim that since 1953, no American has died of air suffering
We can't say that anymore
Cliff's words make people wonder
What should the air superiority actually look like?
Is it the same as the 30,000-inch altitude of the Yalu River in the Cold War in 1953?
Or is it the same as what happened today at the altitude of the four-axis drone hanging a grenade at an altitude of 3,000 feet?
The answer is all included
Today, the scope of air superiority is almost connected to the ground
It's hard to find a drone
Low altitude, small radar interface
Trained operators can control a group of drones
Bring the real problem to the opponent
Especially in the Middle East
They forced the United States and its allies to use F-22s, F-15s and F-16s
And expensive anti-aircraft missiles
Against Iran and its agents
Cheap drones, rockets and ballistic missiles
Causing a cost exchange of no proportion
In April of this year
The United States and the allied forces defeated Iran's missile attack on Israel
Destroyed 99% of Iran's ballistic missiles and drones
Even in the vast majority of cases
The U.S. military interception was successful
But this does not reflect a long-term balance in the strategic level
The reason is that this balance is likely to be easily broken due to the huge number of advantages of the opponent's offensive weapons
And the opponent's attack
As long as there are very few or even accidental breakthroughs
Will cause unacceptable losses
In fact, this has already happened
Since October 2023
More than 170 drones, rockets and missiles have been attacked in the Middle East
Dozens of U.S. soldiers have been injured and three people have died
In addition to the extremist organizations of Syria, Iraq, Gaza and Lebanon supported by Iran
Iran also supports the Yemeni Hussein army
The organization is using similar long-range guided missiles to attack the Red Sea
And in early July
Using ballistic missiles to attack Israel and Tel Aviv, which are more than 1,000 kilometers away, causing civilian casualties
The U.S. has a strong enough air force to intercept Iran's drones and missiles
In the Middle East, the U.S. seems to be firmly controlling the traditional air superiority
But there is also a historical embarrassment
U.S. air superiority does not absolutely mean to stop the air threat from the opponent
This is the actual situation of air superiority
And how to define air superiority for further discussion
The U.S. has learned a lot of experience and lessons from the conflict after World War II
Of course, the U.S. will not learn new things from its opponents in the Middle East
And make changes to the existing system
Slif believes that the U.S. can learn to use small drones as an extension of its conventional air force
He said, before the second world war broke out
You can see that the outline of World War II has begun to form
This is not the hope of the third world war
But if it happens
People want to know how much of today's Israeli-Ukrainian lesson has started to influence and change the way the U.S. military fights
People are more interested in being able to get something valuable from it
The U.S. Air Force first used high-end drones
Including MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Death God drones
And various other drone systems
More high-end autonomous combat aircraft are currently being developed
The aircraft will carry out missions with a manned combat aircraft
U.S. Deputy Secretary of the Air Force Dalton said
The idea of paying attention to cost-effectiveness is becoming more and more accepted by the Department of Defense and the Air Force
He believes that the U.S. needs to consider how to use cost-effectiveness to strengthen expensive platforms
He said, for the Air Force
Historically, it has been focused on building an independent and exquisite platform
Emphasize quality, not quantity
But when you think about how to infiltrate and destroy the war environment we may face
Quantity can also have a qualitative impact
In addition to the large-scale use of low-cost combat platforms
In the way of the man
In addition to the way of the man
The U.S. also hopes to use artificial intelligence and machine learning
Open up new possibilities for drones and future weapons systems
The development of network technology and automation
And changed the way of thinking of the Air Force
The future combat system is no longer a plane
How a pilot and a data chain complete a mission
But a multi-automation platform
Complete a mission on your own in a complex multi-system
People are just the decision makers in the way of returning
On the battlefield
When both sides have a deadly air defense system and can prevent the other side from penetrating the air,
that is, when both sides cannot obtain complete air superiority,
the war becomes a painful consumption.
This is not good for Ukraine, which is not as powerful as Russia.
However, Ukraine may use the time and location of its choice to plan an air-to-ground unified war
to gain air superiority and turn the game around.
In other words, Ukraine needs to combine long-range ground-to-ground weapons,
fighter jets, drones, electronic warfare, battlefield information systems, and special combat capabilities
to gain air superiority,
and then seek active battlefield and change the course of the war.
With the help of the United States and NATO, Ukraine has this potential.
In this respect, Ukraine may have a better advantage than Russia.
Historically, the drone system has never been widely used in combat like today.
Last year, Ukraine sent about 100,000 small drones to the front line
and used attack drones to hit Russian air bases, fuel tanks, and other targets nearly 200 times.
Russia has launched thousands of ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and attack drones to Ukraine.
In short, the increased long-range drone system on the Ukrainian battlefield
represents the real potential of these low-cost precision strike systems.
The deployment of drones and guided missiles shows that even the troops with backward equipment,
including some local forces and terrorists,
are obviously easier to obtain long-range precision strike capabilities than before.
These weapons are not only effective,
but can also be mass-produced at low cost by non-national activists.
However, the defense system used to deal with these attacks is very expensive and scarce.
Ukraine and Russia now use small drones to launch tens of thousands of attacks on the battlefield every month.
Ukraine has built an independent drone force
and accelerated the development and innovation of ground, sea, and air drone systems.
The first-person view of the drone carrying the bomb can directly destroy Russian tanks, armored vehicles,
rockets, and warplanes.
The drone can even provide its own intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance for the front line and its troops.
Ukraine plans to produce 1 million drones in about 200 factories across the country this year.
In the Ukrainian battlefield,
low-cost, large-capacity drones have dominated the airspace from 3,000 feet up and down to the ground.
Here, drones have unquestionable air superiority.
No matter how low the air superiority of the airspace is, it is an advantage.
It can bring undisputed initiative to the battlefield, which is heavily dependent on air force.
If we can learn something from the Russian-Ukrainian war,
it is that air superiority is a necessary condition to achieve decisive initiative in the battlefield.
Otherwise, both sides will consume everything in the battlefield,
and drones have become an important means of breaking the battlefield.
That's all for today.
Thank you for your attention.
See you next time.
