By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
WASHINGTON — House Republicans defeated an effort to advance impeachment proceedings against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday, Nov. 10, voting 211-204 to refer eight articles of impeachment introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to the House Judiciary Committee rather than allow an immediate vote on the charges. The procedural maneuver effectively ended the effort for the remainder of the current Congress, with Massie emerging as the only Republican to oppose the motion.
The House vote, reported by Fox News, demonstrated Republican unity behind Hegseth despite the party’s sweeping losses in the Nov. 3 midterm elections and growing disagreements over the administration’s military campaign against Iran. Massie’s resolution accused the defense secretary of violating congressional war powers, conducting unauthorized military operations and disregarding legal protections for civilians and service members. Republican leaders maintained that the accusations did not warrant impeachment and supported referring the resolution to committee.
According to Reuters’ account of the vote, Massie was the only Republican who voted against the referral, joining Democrats who opposed the procedural motion. The outcome prevented lawmakers from debating or voting separately on the eight impeachment articles, which Massie had introduced Monday as a privileged resolution intended to force congressional consideration.
The Kentucky Republican had argued that the House had a constitutional responsibility to examine Hegseth’s actions before Democrats assume control of Congress in January. His resolution alleged violations involving the war with Iran, military strikes against suspected drug-trafficking vessels, operations in Yemen and Venezuela, and the Pentagon’s treatment of Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz. Massie maintained that those actions raised legal questions extending beyond disagreements over the administration’s military strategy.
The charges included allegations that Hegseth violated the War Powers Resolution by continuing military operations against Iran without obtaining congressional authorization. Other articles challenged the legality of strikes against suspected drug-trafficking vessels in international waters and military operations connected to the capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The resolution also accused Hegseth of retaliating against Kelly after the senator participated in a video reminding service members that they are obligated to refuse unlawful orders.
Before the vote, Massie indicated that he intended to request individual roll calls on the eight articles if lawmakers rejected the motion to refer the resolution to committee. The congressman argued that some members might support certain allegations while opposing others, making separate votes necessary to establish their positions. Republican leaders’ successful procedural motion prevented that process from moving forward.
Hegseth strongly rejected the impeachment effort during a Pentagon news conference earlier Tuesday, accusing Massie of using congressional proceedings to advance personal and political grievances. The defense secretary defended the administration’s military operations and maintained that disagreements over presidential decisions did not constitute impeachable offenses.
“What one disgruntled and defeated congressman is attempting is not oversight, and it’s not accountability,” Hegseth said during the briefing. “It’s a political spectacle, a personal manifesto driven by ego and resentment.”
The defense secretary also criticized the timing of the effort, which came one day before Veterans Day, arguing that the allegations undermined the service members who carried out the administration’s military orders. Hegseth maintained that those operations were lawful and necessary to protect American national security interests, including efforts to counter Iranian military capabilities and other international threats.
President Trump publicly defended Hegseth following the news conference, praising his performance while attacking Massie, who lost his Republican primary earlier this year but remains in Congress until January. Trump wrote on Truth Social that Hegseth deserved an “‘A’ PLUS, PLUS, PLUS” for his response to the impeachment effort and characterized Massie as a defeated political opponent.
Vice President JD Vance also condemned the resolution, questioning why Congress was pursuing impeachment rather than addressing policy disagreements through legislation. In a statement posted Tuesday on X, Vance wrote, “Has Pete Hegseth committed impeachable crimes? The question is absurd and the answer is: obviously not.”
“Like so much of Congress, impeachment has become a ridiculous show that stands in for actual policymaking,” Vance continued, arguing that lawmakers possessed other constitutional mechanisms for challenging executive branch decisions. He suggested that opposition to Hegseth was partly driven by the secretary’s efforts to reorganize military leadership and redirect American forces away from certain overseas commitments.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., likewise opposed the impeachment push, emphasizing the importance of supporting military leadership during ongoing operations. Republican leaders argued that allowing the resolution to advance would create an unnecessary confrontation over national security decisions while Congress faced pressing legislative deadlines.
Massie disputed that interpretation, maintaining that congressional authority over military operations is a constitutional responsibility rather than an optional political consideration. The Kentucky Republican has repeatedly opposed military engagements undertaken without explicit congressional authorization, including actions ordered by Republican administrations. He argued that lawmakers should apply constitutional restrictions consistently regardless of which party controls the White House.
The procedural vote also reflected the political consequences of the recent midterm elections. Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress on Nov. 3 and are scheduled to assume their majorities when the 120th Congress convenes Jan. 3, 2027. Although Republicans remain in charge during the final weeks of the current session, the incoming Democratic majority will gain control of House committees and the legislative calendar.
According to Axios’ reporting on Tuesday’s outcome, the vote effectively prevents further consideration of Massie’s impeachment effort during the current Congress. Democrats could introduce new articles after assuming control in January, however, potentially renewing scrutiny of Hegseth’s management of the Pentagon and the administration’s conduct of military operations.
The House’s decision to refer the resolution to committee was not a vote determining whether Hegseth committed the alleged offenses. It instead halted immediate consideration of the charges, leaving the underlying constitutional and legal disputes unresolved. Under the Constitution, the House may impeach federal civil officers by a simple majority, while removal from office requires conviction by a two-thirds majority of senators present.
The outcome provides Hegseth with a reprieve at a politically sensitive moment for the administration. Republican lawmakers have faced increasing criticism over the Iran war, rising energy costs and economic conditions following their electoral defeats, while Democrats have indicated that Pentagon oversight will be a priority when they assume control of Congress.
For Massie, the vote represents the failure of his effort to secure an immediate congressional judgment on the defense secretary’s conduct before the end of his House tenure. For Republican leaders, the result demonstrated that the conference remained united in opposing Hegseth’s impeachment despite broader divisions over the party’s political direction.
With the resolution referred to the Judiciary Committee, Hegseth remains in office and the impeachment articles will not advance to a full House vote during the current Congress. The possibility of renewed proceedings will depend on whether Democrats choose to revisit the allegations after taking control in January.
Original article
Comments