Canada’s airport security authority is studying biometric identification for passenger screening while the federal government retains authority over whether travelers could ultimately be required to participate.

By yourNEWS Media Newsroom

Canada’s federal airport security agency is examining the use of biometric identification at passenger checkpoints as part of a broader modernization effort involving artificial intelligence and other technologies, but officials say any decision to make biometric screening compulsory would rest with the federal government.

The Canadian Air Transport Security Authority, known as CATSA, is working with Transport Canada and other organizations to determine whether biometric technology could be incorporated into pre-board security screening.

The initiative represents a potential expansion of biometric identification beyond systems already used to control employee access to restricted areas of Canadian airports.

“CATSA will not be the authority to determine whether biometrics should be mandatory,” CATSA spokesperson Anna Maddison said, according to Blacklock’s Reporter.

“Any decisions related to use of biometric technology are matters of government policy and would be made by Transport Canada.”

Maddison said the airport security authority and its government and industry partners are still evaluating how the technology could be used.

“The Authority in collaboration with Transport Canada and key partners is exploring the feasibility of biometric technology at the security screening checkpoint,” Maddison said.

No federal decision has been announced requiring airline passengers to undergo biometric identification during routine security screening, and CATSA has indicated that determining whether participation would be mandatory falls outside the agency’s authority.

The distinction is significant because CATSA administers airport screening programs but operates within federal transportation policy established by the Canadian government.

CATSA is a federal Crown corporation responsible for security screening at designated Canadian airports. Among its duties are pre-board screening of passengers and their carry-on belongings, checked-baggage screening and security procedures involving airport workers and other non-passengers entering restricted areas.

Biometric technology is therefore not entirely new to Canada’s airport-security infrastructure.

CATSA already manages the Restricted Area Identity Card, or RAIC, system for authorized people who require access to secured airport areas. That program uses biometric identifiers, including fingerprints and iris scans, to verify the identities of airport workers and other authorized non-passengers before permitting access to restricted locations.

The system was developed in cooperation with Transport Canada and airport authorities and operates separately from the passenger screening process now under consideration.

Workers who require restricted-area access must obtain the appropriate security clearance before receiving a card. Biometric readers at airport facilities can then compare the cardholder’s fingerprint or iris information with stored identifiers to confirm identity.

CATSA has also upgraded components of that system in recent years, including replacing older equipment with dual biometric readers capable of using either fingerprints or iris information.

The existence of that infrastructure means biometric identification already has an established role in Canadian aviation security, although its current use for restricted-area access does not mean the same requirements will automatically be applied to airline passengers.

The passenger initiative under consideration instead concerns the security checkpoint travelers encounter before entering an airport’s secure departure area.

CATSA has identified biometrics as one technology that could potentially be used to improve the efficiency of that process as the agency develops longer-term modernization plans.

Artificial intelligence is also part of CATSA’s technology research, though its existing AI work is not identical to the proposed passenger biometric program.

The agency has previously explored AI as a way of supplementing oversight at non-passenger vehicle screening checkpoints, including testing a prototype at Calgary International Airport designed to identify possible screening anomalies. CATSA has said further research could determine whether similar technology might assist oversight across additional security programs.

The broader modernization effort includes evaluating artificial intelligence, advanced analytics and biometric systems for possible applications within airport security operations.

The prospect of passenger biometrics raises a separate policy question over whether travelers would have a choice in providing biometric information.

CATSA has made clear that it would not make that decision itself.

Transport Canada, which establishes national transportation security policy and regulatory requirements, would be responsible for any government decision governing whether biometric identification at passenger checkpoints is voluntary or compulsory.

It also remains unclear what alternatives would be available to a passenger who declined biometric processing if the technology is introduced.

No announced policy has established that refusing a biometric scan would prevent a traveler from boarding a domestic flight.

The type of biometric information that might eventually be collected from passengers, how long any data would be retained, where it would be stored, which government or private entities could access it and whether traditional identification procedures would remain available have also not been detailed in the information released about the exploratory work.

Those questions would become increasingly important if the federal government moves from studying the technology to implementing it across Canadian airports.

Biometric systems generally authenticate identity by examining physical characteristics that can be digitally measured and compared. Depending on the system, those identifiers can include facial characteristics, fingerprints or iris patterns.

Airport and border agencies internationally have increasingly examined such technology as a way to automate identity verification and move passengers through checkpoints more efficiently, while the collection and storage of biometric information has also generated debate over privacy, data security and government access.

Canada’s existing RAIC program demonstrates that CATSA already has experience maintaining airport systems involving sensitive biometric identifiers, but that program applies to authorized non-passengers whose employment or duties require access to secure airport areas.

Extending biometric verification to the traveling public would represent a substantially different use because it could affect millions of ordinary airline passengers rather than a limited group of airport personnel.

For now, CATSA characterizes passenger biometrics as an area under examination rather than an established requirement.

The agency and Transport Canada are assessing whether the technology is feasible at security checkpoints, while the central question of whether passengers could someday be required to submit to biometric identification remains a matter for the Canadian government to decide.

Original article