Tucker Carlson accused President Donald Trump and his advisers of abandoning the voters who returned him to the White House, calling the administration’s direction “the greatest betrayal” he has witnessed in American politics.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom.
Journalist Tucker Carlson delivered one of his sharpest public rebukes of President Donald Trump to date, accusing the president and his administration of systematically abandoning the commitments that helped secure Trump’s 2024 election victory and describing the break with those voters as historically significant.
Carlson made the remarks during a recent appearance on the Dubai-based “Going Underground” podcast with host Afshin Rattansi. Asked about officials connected to Vice President JD Vance who have departed the administration, Carlson offered a sweeping assessment of what he believes has gone wrong inside Trump’s second term.
“People are probably leaving in larger numbers now because it’s a disaster,” Carlson said.
“And it’s a disaster in a pretty unusual way. It’s not simply that they’ve taken a wrong turn, but they’ve almost systematically… the president and his advisors have almost systematically betrayed the people who voted for him in 2024,” Carlson told Rattansi.
Carlson expanded on those accusations during the interview discussion, arguing that the direction of the administration represented more than an ordinary political disagreement. He also theorized that Trump underwent a significant change following the 2024 assassination attempt against him in Butler, Pennsylvania, although Carlson said he could not fully explain what caused that shift.
Rattansi noted that the Butler shooting occurred before Trump returned to office and therefore before Carlson’s allegation that the president had betrayed the voters who elected him.
Carlson responded by pointing to personnel decisions made after Trump’s election, naming Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz, John Radcliffe and Howard Lutnick as examples of officials whose views Carlson believed conflicted with positions Trump had promoted to voters during the campaign.
“So in appointing those people to those key positions, he betrayed his voters,” Carlson said. “And I was aware of that at the time, I was shocked by it. I didn’t understand it. It was not what I expected at all.”
Carlson said he remains unable to fully explain why Trump made those decisions.
“I didn’t understand it. And I still don’t fully understand it, but it turned out to be, once again, the greatest betrayal that I’m aware of in the history of American politics.”
His description of the administration as having “almost systematically betrayed the people who voted for him in 2024” was also highlighted in reporting on the interview, which covered Carlson’s wider criticism of U.S. foreign policy and the Trump administration.
The remarks represent another escalation in the increasingly public split between Carlson and Trump, particularly over the administration’s foreign policy and the war involving Iran. Carlson has emerged as one of the most prominent figures arguing that current U.S. policy has departed from the “America First” approach he believed Trump would pursue.
That dispute has also fueled speculation about Carlson’s political plans beyond the Republican Party. Carlson publicly discussed helping build a third party earlier this summer and in August unveiled a 10-point political manifesto describing principles he believes should guide a future political movement. He stopped short of formally launching a party at that time, instead describing the principles as a possible foundation for “whatever comes next.”
The developing movement has centered heavily on opposition to foreign military intervention, dissatisfaction with both major parties and Carlson’s contention that an “America First” political agenda has been abandoned by the current Republican establishment. Carlson has said he wants any future political organization to reflect a broader set of priorities centered on national sovereignty, government accountability and limiting American involvement in foreign conflicts.
His clashes with Republicans have extended to defense legislation as well. Carlson previously called for Nuremberg-style treason trials for politicians supporting a provision in the fiscal 2027 National Defense Authorization Act that critics, including Carlson, characterized as improperly integrating U.S. and Israeli military and defense structures.
The provision, Section 219, establishes a U.S.-Israel defense technology cooperation initiative involving bilateral research, development, testing, integration and industrial cooperation. Carlson has characterized that arrangement much more broadly as a formal merger and argued that lawmakers supporting it should face treason proceedings, while critics of Carlson’s interpretation have disputed that characterization of the legislation.
Carlson’s latest comments, however, went beyond any single foreign-policy disagreement or legislative fight. By describing Trump’s personnel choices and policy direction as a systematic betrayal of his own electorate, Carlson framed his dispute with the president as a fundamental break over what Trump’s 2024 victory was supposed to represent.
The disagreement now places Carlson, once one of the most influential media figures supportive of Trump’s broader political movement, openly at odds with the president over the direction of the administration and the future of the political coalition that returned Trump to office.
Original article
Comments