A United Nations committee says countries bound by the 1965 Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination must pursue reparations for people of African descent, including financial compensation and broader measures addressing what it describes as the continuing effects of slavery and racial discrimination.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
A United Nations committee is calling on countries around the world to adopt comprehensive reparations for people of African descent, arguing that governments have present-day legal obligations to address the continuing consequences of the transatlantic slave trade even if the underlying acts occurred before modern international human-rights law existed.
The Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination said Monday that reparations should include financial compensation but should extend considerably further, encompassing measures such as truth commissions, greater access to historical archives and changes involving public memorials.
According to a Reuters report, the committee is grounding its position in the legally binding 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination rather than arguing that today’s legal standards should be applied retroactively to the centuries in which the transatlantic slave trade operated.
That distinction is central to what the committee described as a “paradigm shift” in the international reparations debate.
Instead of determining whether slavery violated international legal rules in force at the time, the committee argues that governments covered by the convention have current responsibilities to confront racial inequalities and other consequences it attributes to slavery and colonial-era practices.
The document states:
“States Parties must implement comprehensive reparatory measures for people of African descent, covering all aspects of remedies.”
The committee’s interpretation could provide additional support for reparations claims brought through national and international legal systems, with the document reportedly capable of being cited in court proceedings.
Approximately 12.5 million Africans were forcibly taken and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries, according to U.N. estimates.
The committee described the transatlantic slave trade as the largest forced displacement in history.
Millions of African men, women and children were transported to the Americas between the 16th and 19th centuries, with European powers and their colonies deeply involved in the slave trade and the economic systems surrounding it.
A total of 182 countries are covered by the committee’s reparations push, including the United States, United Kingdom, France, Portugal and other countries historically connected to the transatlantic slave trade.
International demands for reparations have grown in recent years and have included proposals ranging from official government apologies to direct financial compensation.
Opponents have challenged those demands on several grounds, including the argument that people living today should not bear personal or financial responsibility for actions committed by people generations or centuries earlier.
Governments have also raised questions about whether modern states can face legal liability for actions that were not prohibited by international law when they occurred.
That argument relies in part on the principle of intertemporality, under which historical conduct is generally evaluated according to the legal rules applicable at the time.
Britain and the European Union abstained from a U.N. resolution concerning slavery in March, reflecting broader reluctance among some governments to accept legal frameworks that could create reparations obligations.
The committee’s new position seeks to move around that historical-law dispute.
“Irrespective of the legal characterization of the original historical acts, States Parties remain bound by their present obligations under the Convention to address structural inequalities,” the U.N. document states.
Under that reasoning, the committee does not need to establish that the transatlantic slave trade violated the same international conventions that govern states today.
Instead, it argues that governments currently bound by the racial-discrimination convention must remedy conditions that the committee concludes remain connected to those historical practices.
That approach substantially broadens the reparations question.
Rather than concentrating exclusively on determining responsibility for specific acts committed centuries ago, the committee is directing governments to examine current laws, institutions and social conditions affecting people of African descent.
Financial payments are only one component of the remedies envisioned.
The committee said monetary compensation by itself would not sufficiently address the issue and called for “transformative” reparations.
Those measures could include opening government and institutional archives, reconsidering or revising public monuments and memorials and creating independent truth commissions to investigate historical abuses and their continuing effects.
The recommendations indicate that reparations, as envisioned by the committee, would encompass historical documentation, public commemoration, government policy and institutional reform in addition to direct financial settlements.
Pela Boker-Wilson, a Liberian lawyer who helped draft the document, said governments should move beyond symbolic statements of regret and undertake concrete reviews of their policies and legal systems.
“We are calling on state parties to take concrete and meaningful action,” Boker-Wilson told Reuters. “We want to affirm the dignity of those whose suffering was denied, whose suffering was minimised or forgotten.”
The committee’s position is likely to intensify an already contentious international debate over slavery reparations.
Supporters argue that the economic and social consequences of slavery and racial discrimination continue to affect communities descended from enslaved Africans and that governments should address those effects through formal remedies.
Opponents dispute both the legal basis for present-day liability and the fairness of imposing financial obligations on current taxpayers for historical conduct they did not personally commit.
The committee is attempting to answer the legal objection by shifting the focus from whether slavery violated international law centuries ago to whether governments are fulfilling obligations they accepted under the 1965 racial-discrimination convention.
Its document contends that current legal duties require states to address what it considers structural inequalities regardless of the original legal status of the historical conduct.
If governments adopt the committee’s recommendations, reparations efforts could therefore extend far beyond direct payments.
The framework could involve changes to national laws and policies, investigations through truth commissions, access to previously restricted historical records and reconsideration of how governments publicly commemorate individuals, institutions and events connected to slavery.
With 182 countries implicated under the convention-based framework, the committee is seeking to move the issue from a debate over whether reparations should be considered to a question of what forms those reparations should take and how quickly governments should begin implementing them.
Original article
Comments