A Texas appellate court reduced a $50 million judgment against Infowars founder Alex Jones to $1.5 million, ruling that the Sandy Hook parents who sued him had not presented sufficient evidence to exceed the state’s $750,000 damages cap for each plaintiff.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
A Texas appeals court on Friday sharply reduced a $50 million judgment against Infowars founder Alex Jones, cutting the award to $1.5 million in a lawsuit brought by the parents of a child killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.
The unanimous decision by the Texas Third Court of Appeals found that Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis had not presented evidence showing that harassment associated with Jones’ false claims about the massacre met the legal threshold necessary to exceed Texas’ $750,000 damages cap for each plaintiff.
The decision represents a major reduction in Jones’ financial liability in the Texas case but does not affect a separate $1.4 billion judgment entered against him in Connecticut.
Heslin and Lewis are the parents of Jesse Lewis, their 6-year-old son who was among the 20 children and six educators killed when a gunman attacked Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, in December 2012.
Jones and his company, Free Speech Systems, were found liable for damages after Jones repeatedly claimed that the shooting had been staged or fabricated, including assertions that the massacre was part of a government effort to impose stricter gun-control laws.
The Texas lawsuit culminated in a 2022 verdict and marked the first time Jones was ordered to pay damages to Sandy Hook family members over those claims.
During the trial, Jones acknowledged that the massacre did occur and admitted that his previous assertions were wrong.
He testified that the attack was “100% real.”
Jones had maintained that the lawsuit raised First Amendment concerns, portraying the case as an attack on his free-speech rights.
Heslin and Lewis, however, told jurors that Jones’ acknowledgment and apology were insufficient after years in which they said his statements contributed to harassment and suffering experienced by Sandy Hook families.
They asked the jury to impose substantial financial damages.
Jones’ trial attorney, Andino Reynal, immediately indicated after the original verdict that the award would be challenged on appeal.
Reynal also predicted at the time that the judgment would ultimately be reduced to $1.5 million — the precise amount now ordered by the appellate court.
The Texas Third Court of Appeals concluded that the evidence presented by Heslin and Lewis did not justify damages beyond the statutory limit of $750,000 for each parent.
That leaves Jones responsible for $1.5 million under the Texas judgment rather than the original $50 million award.
The ruling does not disturb the much larger Connecticut judgment.
Jones was separately ordered to pay approximately $1.4 billion in litigation brought by other Sandy Hook families, leaving him exposed to substantial financial liabilities despite Friday’s favorable Texas decision.
The legal battles have also become intertwined with bankruptcy proceedings involving Jones and Free Speech Systems.
Both Jones and his company have filed for bankruptcy, and litigation over their assets and obligations remains ongoing.
Infowars itself has also undergone significant changes amid those proceedings.
The satirical publication The Onion previously sought to take control of Jones’ Infowars platforms with plans to transform the operation into parody content based around the conspiracy theories and style associated with the site.
Jones relinquished the Infowars brand in April and moved his broadcasting operations to a different location.
He has since shifted his programs to new websites while also distributing them through his personal X account.
The Onion, meanwhile, established its own Infowars-branded page on its website and began publishing videos parodying Jones’ programming.
Friday’s decision substantially reduces one of the judgments against Jones but leaves intact the $1.4 billion Connecticut award and does not end the continuing bankruptcy and asset disputes stemming from the Sandy Hook litigation.
Original article
Comments