By Zoey

The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to formally announce on Wednesday that it will not agree to an early extension of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), a decision that would begin a lengthy review process for North America’s landmark trade deal while negotiations over major revisions continue.

The expected declaration does not immediately end the trade agreement. Instead, it activates a review mechanism built into the pact that could keep negotiations ongoing for years as the three countries attempt to reach consensus on a new framework for regional trade.

The review process stems from a “sunset clause” that was included when the agreement was negotiated during President Trump’s first term. Under that provision, the United States, Mexico, and Canada must periodically decide whether they wish to extend the agreement for another 16 years. If all three governments fail to support an extension, annual review meetings will continue over the following decade.

If no agreement is ultimately reached during that period, the USMCA would expire on July 1, 2036, bringing an end to more than four decades of integrated North American free trade that began with the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 before it was replaced by the USMCA in 2020.

Trade officials from the three countries are expected to meet virtually on Wednesday to discuss the future of the agreement. Although the United States is not expected to endorse an immediate extension, discussions over possible revisions are expected to continue.

The U.S. Trade Representative’s Office has already scheduled another round of negotiations with Mexico during the week of July 20, signaling that Washington intends to keep pursuing substantial changes to the agreement rather than allowing it to continue under its current terms.

One of the central issues in the negotiations is the Trump administration’s effort to strengthen North American manufacturing, particularly within the automotive industry.

U.S. negotiators are seeking significantly tougher rules governing where vehicle components are produced. According to officials familiar with the discussions, Washington wants automobiles manufactured in North America to contain at least 50% U.S.-made content, a proposal that would substantially increase the overall regional content requirements vehicles must meet to qualify for tariff-free treatment under the trade agreement.

The administration also wants stronger safeguards designed to prevent Chinese products from entering North American supply chains and benefiting indirectly from the trade preferences provided under the USMCA.

President Trump has repeatedly argued that the existing agreement has failed to achieve its intended goals, particularly as the United States continues to run a sizable trade deficit with Mexico.

Although Trump praised the USMCA when it took effect in 2020, describing it at the time as one of the most balanced and beneficial trade agreements ever signed by the United States, his administration has since expressed dissatisfaction with the agreement’s results.

The president has argued that many manufacturers shifted production from China to Mexico following the tariffs imposed on Chinese imports, contributing to a widening U.S. trade deficit with Mexico rather than creating additional manufacturing jobs in the United States.

As a result, Trump has increasingly favored the use of tariffs as a trade policy tool, including duties on automobiles, steel, and aluminum imported from both Mexico and Canada.

The current review process is separate from another provision in the agreement that would allow any of the three member countries to withdraw entirely. Under that clause, a country could begin the process of leaving the pact by providing formal notice, with withdrawal taking effect six months later.

Instead, the ongoing review mechanism is intended to encourage negotiations and periodic reassessment rather than immediate termination.

Negotiations have also highlighted differences in how the United States is engaging with its two North American trading partners.

Formal negotiating sessions are currently taking place only between U.S. and Mexican officials, while discussions with Canada have remained less structured.

Trade tensions between Washington and Ottawa continue over several longstanding issues, including Canada’s protected dairy market and actions taken by some Canadian provinces affecting the sale of American alcoholic beverages.

Although U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer remains in contact with Canadian Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, no formal negotiating timetable comparable to the U.S.-Mexico talks has yet been announced.

Mexico has emerged as Washington’s primary negotiating partner during the current phase of discussions.

Officials from both countries have acknowledged that they broadly share concerns about declining U.S. manufacturing employment, the growing use of Asian-made automotive components in North American vehicle production, and the need to prevent goods from outside the region from bypassing trade rules through transshipment.

While both governments agree on the overall objectives, negotiations continue over how those goals should be achieved without significantly disrupting regional supply chains that have developed over decades.

Among the ideas discussed is the possibility of establishing a 15% global tariff on imported automobiles, while allowing vehicles produced in Mexico and Canada to receive lower tariff rates if they comply with stricter regional content requirements under a revised trade agreement.

Mexican officials have indicated that discussions remain constructive, emphasizing that both countries recognize many of the same challenges facing North American manufacturing.

The principal debate now centers on designing new trade rules that strengthen domestic production while preserving the competitiveness of the highly integrated North American automotive industry.

With the expected U.S. decision not to support an immediate extension, negotiations over the future of the USMCA are set to enter a new phase that could shape trade relations between the United States, Mexico, and Canada for years to come. While the agreement will remain in force for now, the coming rounds of negotiations are expected to determine whether the three nations can reach a revised framework before the pact’s long-term future comes into question.

Original article