By Elsie Kamsiyochi

After more than three months of devastating conflict, Iran and the United States appear closer than ever to reaching a breakthrough agreement that could bring an end to one of the most dangerous confrontations in the Middle East in recent years. Officials from both countries signaled that a framework for peace has largely been agreed upon, although uncertainty remains over exactly when the first formal document will be signed.

Iranian officials said on Saturday that a memorandum of understanding with Washington could be finalized within the coming days, but they rejected suggestions that the agreement would be signed immediately. The comments came after Pakistan, which has played a key mediating role during the negotiations, announced that preparations were underway for an electronic signing ceremony and predicted a deal could be completed within 24 hours.

Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif expressed optimism about the diplomatic process, saying the two sides had already agreed on the broad framework of a peace arrangement. According to Sharif, technical discussions would continue next week after the initial signing. However, Iran’s Foreign Ministry quickly moved to temper expectations.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei stated that while progress had been made, there was no certainty regarding the exact date of the signing. He emphasized that the process remained delicate and that Iran would proceed cautiously until all outstanding issues were resolved. While dismissing the possibility of a signing on Sunday, Baghaei acknowledged that an agreement could still be finalized within the next several days.

The latest developments follow signals from both Tehran and Washington on Friday that negotiations had entered their final stages. A senior U.S. administration official said negotiators had agreed on a draft text and that Washington expected an initial accord to be signed soon.

The conflict began on February 28 when joint U.S.-Israeli military strikes targeted Iranian facilities. Iran responded with attacks against American military assets in the Gulf region, while Hezbollah forces in Lebanon launched attacks against Israel. The escalation rapidly expanded into a regional conflict that has claimed thousands of lives, primarily in Iran and Lebanon, while disrupting global energy markets.

One of the most significant consequences of the war has been the disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important maritime trade routes. The narrow waterway handles a substantial portion of global oil exports, and tensions in the area have repeatedly raised fears of a wider economic crisis. Iran effectively blocked traffic through the strait during the conflict, while the United States imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports.

Under the proposed peace framework, both sides would take steps to reverse those actions. Sources familiar with the negotiations said the memorandum would require Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping while the United States would lift its naval restrictions on Iranian ports. Such measures could help stabilize global energy markets and reduce the risk of further military confrontations in the Gulf.

Despite the progress, security concerns remain. Only hours after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi described the tentative agreement as evidence that Iran had emerged stronger from the conflict, U.S. forces intercepted and destroyed several Iranian attack drones reportedly heading toward the Strait of Hormuz. American military officials later confirmed the operation and stated that commercial shipping lanes remained open and secure.

Araqchi portrayed the ongoing negotiations as a victory for Tehran, arguing that Iran had successfully resisted military pressure while preserving its national interests. He indicated that some aspects of the draft agreement remained open to revision but said the overall direction of the talks was positive.

According to sources familiar with the negotiations, the proposed deal would include the release of billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets and the easing of sanctions on Iranian oil exports. In return, Iran would guarantee freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz and participate in further diplomatic talks aimed at resolving the dispute over its nuclear program.

The future of Iran’s nuclear activities remains one of the most contentious issues in the negotiations. American officials say the final objective is the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program, including the removal and destruction of its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Tehran, however, has resisted those demands. Iranian officials reportedly favor retaining uranium in a diluted form and preserving elements of the country’s nuclear infrastructure for peaceful purposes.

Additional reports suggest negotiators have discussed the possibility of war reparations for Iran and a reduction in U.S. demands concerning Iran’s missile program. American officials have disputed some of those claims, highlighting the complex and unresolved nature of the talks.

The conflict also brought dramatic political changes inside Iran. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was killed during an airstrike in the opening hours of the war and was succeeded by his son, Mojtaba Khamenei. Iranian state media announced that funeral ceremonies for the late leader will begin in Tehran on July 4 before concluding with his burial in the holy city of Mashhad on July 9.

Meanwhile, Israel has made clear that it is not a participant in the emerging memorandum. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly disagreed with Washington’s approach toward ending the conflict, particularly regarding military operations in Lebanon. Iranian officials have suggested that a peace agreement would ultimately lead to an end to hostilities in Lebanon and an Israeli withdrawal from occupied territories, but Israeli leaders have firmly rejected those suggestions.

Israel’s defense establishment insists it will maintain the freedom to respond to perceived security threats regardless of any agreement reached between Tehran and Washington. As a result, even if the memorandum is signed in the coming days, significant challenges could remain before a lasting regional peace is secured.

For now, however, diplomats and observers view the negotiations as the most promising opportunity yet to end a war that has shaken the Middle East, disrupted global energy markets, and heightened fears of a broader international conflict. Whether the agreement can survive the remaining political and security obstacles will become clearer in the days ahead.

Source Reuters

Original article