BY MIRABEL ODETA

Sam Altman said on Tuesday that the rapid rise of artificial intelligence has not caused the widespread employment crisis many experts once predicted, admitting that his earlier fears about AI eliminating large numbers of white-collar jobs had so far not materialized.

Speaking virtually during a conference hosted by Commonwealth Bank of Australia in Sydney, Altman reflected on how expectations surrounding artificial intelligence have changed since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022. He explained that while OpenAI accurately predicted the extraordinary speed of AI’s technological progress, the company was less accurate in forecasting how quickly society and the economy would be disrupted.

Altman acknowledged that he once believed entry-level white-collar jobs would already be facing severe cuts due to automation powered by AI systems. However, he said the reality has turned out differently, with human workers continuing to play a far more important role in businesses than many in the tech industry expected.

“I’m delighted to be wrong about this,” Altman said during the interview with Commonwealth Bank CEO Matt Comyn. “I thought there would have been more impact on entry-level white-collar jobs being eliminated by now than has actually happened.”

He explained that over time he has developed a better understanding of why the labor market has remained more resilient despite the rapid adoption of AI tools across industries. According to Altman, many forms of work still rely heavily on human interaction, judgment, trust, and communication in ways that AI systems cannot fully replicate.

The comments marked a notable shift in tone from earlier warnings made by Altman and other technology leaders, many of whom had cautioned that artificial intelligence could trigger major unemployment waves across office-based professions. In recent years, concerns over AI replacing workers have become a major topic of debate among economists, governments, and businesses worldwide.

Altman admitted that OpenAI had previously contributed to fears surrounding automation because company executives believed the threat was serious enough to discuss publicly. While he defended those earlier warnings as responsible at the time, he acknowledged that some critics now feel the industry exaggerated the danger.

“People are like, ‘you could have saved the world a lot of fear mongering and a lot of doom and gloom,’” Altman said. “But at the time I thought it was a real risk we should talk about.”

Even so, Altman stressed that the long-term effects of AI on employment are still uncertain and that future disruptions remain possible as systems continue improving at a rapid pace.

Although AI has not produced the dramatic “jobs apocalypse” some predicted, companies across several industries have already begun integrating automation into daily operations. Large multinational firms including HSBC, Amazon, Standard Chartered, and Commonwealth Bank of Australia have announced restructuring efforts in which certain tasks previously handled by employees are now being assisted or replaced by AI systems.

Altman’s remarks come at a significant moment for OpenAI, which is reportedly preparing for a confidential filing tied to a future public stock market debut in the United States. Reports suggest the company could pursue a valuation approaching $1 trillion while raising tens of billions of dollars from investors, reflecting the enormous financial interest surrounding the AI industry.

During the conference, Altman shared a personal example that helped reshape his understanding of AI’s limitations in the workplace. He revealed that he once experimented with allowing AI systems to draft and send responses to Slack messages and emails on his behalf. The messages reportedly included labels informing recipients that they were communicating with “Sam’s AI.”

Despite the efficiency benefits, Altman said the experience convinced him that people still strongly value authentic human interaction, especially in professional communication. He eventually returned to personally responding to at least some messages himself because the automated exchanges lacked the personal connection people expect from real conversations.

“It was an amazing example to me that we really do care about people,” he said. “We really do care about our interactions with people.”

That realization, Altman explained, fundamentally changed how he views the future relationship between AI and human employment. Rather than completely replacing workers, he now believes artificial intelligence will likely reshape jobs, alter workflows, and automate repetitive tasks while still leaving many essential human responsibilities intact.

He said the employment landscape created by AI may end up looking very different from the more extreme predictions that have dominated public discussions over the past few years. According to Altman, the growing evidence suggests that many careers will evolve alongside AI instead of disappearing entirely.

“I don’t think we’re going to have the kind of jobs apocalypse that some of the companies in our space advocate or talk about,” he said.

The debate over AI’s impact on employment continues to intensify as businesses race to adopt advanced automation tools while workers increasingly worry about long-term job security. Economists remain divided over whether artificial intelligence will primarily create new forms of work or eventually replace millions of existing positions.

For now, Altman’s latest comments reflect a more cautious and optimistic outlook from one of the most influential figures in the artificial intelligence industry, suggesting that the future of work may involve cooperation between humans and machines rather than outright replacement.

Original article