By Anietie anii-bassey
A bulk carrier transiting near the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz came under attack from multiple small craft on Sunday, according to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center, underscoring the continued volatility in one of the world’s most critical shipping corridors.
The incident marks at least two dozen reported attacks in and around the strait since the outbreak of the Iran war, raising fresh concerns over maritime security and global energy supply routes.
The vessel, which has not been identified, was traveling northbound when it was targeted off the coast of Sirik, Iran, just east of the narrow waterway that connects the Persian Gulf to the open ocean.
Authorities confirmed that all crew members aboard the ship were safe following the encounter. No group immediately claimed responsibility for the assault, which is the first such incident reported in the area since April 22, when another cargo vessel came under fire.
The Strait of Hormuz remains a flashpoint in the ongoing conflict, with Iranian officials maintaining that they exercise control over the passage. Tehran has asserted that ships unaffiliated with the United States or Israel may pass safely if they comply with certain conditions, including the payment of tolls. These claims, combined with repeated threats and attacks on commercial vessels, have effectively curtailed free navigation through the strait, significantly disrupting international shipping.
Despite a fragile three-week ceasefire currently in place, uncertainty continues to loom over the region. On Saturday, Donald Trump indicated that further military action remains a possibility, signaling that the truce could unravel at any moment.
Amid these tensions, Iran has put forward a new proposal to the United States aimed at bringing a definitive end to the conflict within 30 days. According to reports from Iranian state-linked media, the proposal outlines a framework to resolve outstanding disputes quickly, moving beyond the current ceasefire arrangement.
However, Trump expressed skepticism over the initiative, stating he was reviewing the proposal but doubted it would lead to a meaningful agreement. In a social media post, he criticized Iran sharply, arguing that the country had yet to face sufficient consequences for its actions over the past four decades since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
The Iranian proposal reportedly includes 14 points, calling for the lifting of U.S. sanctions, an end to the American naval blockade of Iranian ports, and the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the region.
It also demands a cessation of hostilities across the Middle East, including Israeli military operations in Lebanon. Notably absent from the proposal is any detailed reference to Iran’s nuclear program or its stockpile of enriched uranium, long considered a central issue in tensions between Tehran and Washington.
Diplomatic efforts continue behind the scenes. Iran delivered its response through Pakistan, which has emerged as a key intermediary after hosting direct talks between Iranian and U.S. officials last month. Senior Pakistani leaders, including the prime minister, foreign minister, and army chief, are reportedly urging both sides to engage in direct dialogue to de-escalate the conflict.
Further diplomatic outreach took place Sunday when Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held discussions with Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi, whose country previously facilitated negotiations before the outbreak of hostilities.
Meanwhile, Iran has signaled it will not retreat from its position on the Strait of Hormuz. Speaking during a visit to port facilities on Larak Island, deputy parliament speaker Ali Nikzad declared that Tehran would not return the strait to its prewar status. Though Nikzad does not hold direct decision-making authority, his remarks reflect the broader stance within Iran’s leadership.
The United States has warned shipping companies that any payments made to Iran—whether in cash or digital assets—to secure passage through the strait could result in sanctions. At the same time, the U.S. naval blockade, in place since mid-April, has sharply reduced Iran’s oil exports, placing additional strain on its already struggling economy.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Iran’s revenue from tolls has been minimal compared to its prewar oil income. He noted that oil storage facilities within Iran are nearing capacity, raising the possibility that the country may soon be forced to halt production at some wells.
Economic pressures are increasingly visible داخل Iran. The national currency, the rial, continued its downward slide on Sunday, trading at approximately 1.84 million to the U.S. dollar in Tehran’s main currency exchange district. This marks a sharp decline from its already weakened position late last year and reflects deepening economic instability.
The currency’s collapse has contributed to rising prices and growing hardship for ordinary Iranians. Reports indicate that several factories have opted not to renew worker contracts following the Persian New Year in March, leading to significant job losses. Analysts warn that the situation could deteriorate further if the conflict persists and sanctions remain in place.
Adding to the complex domestic landscape, Yousef Pezeshkian, adviser to President Masoud Pezeshkian, suggested that both Iran and the United States perceive themselves as having the upper hand in the conflict, reducing the likelihood of either side making concessions.
In a separate development, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has called on Iran to urgently provide medical treatment to imprisoned Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi.
The committee said her condition has worsened significantly, placing her life at risk. Mohammadi reportedly collapsed twice in prison and was hospitalized, with her legal team indicating she may have suffered a heart attack earlier this year.
As tensions persist across military, economic, and diplomatic fronts, the situation in and around the Strait of Hormuz remains a critical focal point, with implications not only for regional stability but also for global trade and energy markets.
Original article


Comments