BY EMMANUEL OGBONNA

Representatives from more than 60 countries gathered in Brussels on Monday for high-level talks aimed at addressing stability, security and the long-term future of Israel, the West Bank and Gaza, as international focus remains heavily fixed on broader tensions across the Middle East, including conflicts involving Iran and Lebanon.

The meeting, hosted by Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot and the European Union’s chief diplomat Kaja Kallas, brought together a wide array of European, Arab and international representatives alongside Palestinian Prime Minister Mohamed Mustafa. The discussions are intended to revive diplomatic momentum around a lasting settlement, even as conditions on the ground continue to deteriorate.

Officials opened the conference against the backdrop of intensifying violence in the West Bank and the extensive destruction in Gaza following months of war. These developments, participants acknowledged, are increasingly undermining the already fragile prospects for a negotiated two-state solution, long regarded by much of the international community as the most viable framework for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Prévot cautioned ahead of the meeting that achieving such an outcome is becoming more difficult with each passing day. He emphasized that while conditions are worsening, many governments across Europe and the Arab world remain committed to the principle that two sovereign states living side by side is the only realistic path to durable peace and regional stability. He framed the gathering as an effort to maintain diplomatic engagement at a time when shifting geopolitical priorities risk sidelining the issue.

The European Union, a bloc of 27 nations, continues to play a central financial and political role in Palestinian affairs. It remains the largest single donor to the Palestinian Authority, led by Mahmoud Abbas, who has governed from Ramallah for two decades. Despite its significant involvement, the EU has sought to distinguish its approach from that of Donald Trump, particularly by avoiding direct participation in U.S.-led diplomatic initiatives and instead emphasizing multilateral frameworks rooted in the United Nations and international law.

European officials are increasingly concerned about being marginalized in diplomatic efforts in a region that lies in close proximity to the continent. The Brussels meeting is widely viewed as an attempt to reassert influence and coordinate a unified international response amid rapidly evolving conditions on the ground.

Public sentiment across Europe has also shifted sharply in response to the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Images of widespread destruction and civilian suffering have fueled political pressure on European governments to adopt a more critical stance toward Israel’s military operations. Some leaders have openly questioned the conduct of the war by the government of Benjamin Netanyahu, while discussions have intensified around potential policy responses, including targeted sanctions against Israeli settlers or a reassessment of certain aspects of EU-Israel relations.

Recent political changes within the bloc may further influence its approach. The departure of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who had been a key ally of Netanyahu, is seen by some diplomats as potentially easing internal divisions and opening the door to a more unified European position.

Meanwhile, conditions in the West Bank have continued to worsen. Palestinian residents report an increase in settler violence and tighter restrictions imposed by Israeli forces, developments they say have been exacerbated by the broader regional conflict involving Iran. Israeli authorities have defended the measures as necessary for security, citing heightened risks amid ongoing hostilities.

In Brussels, Mustafa outlined a vision for post-war governance in Gaza, emphasizing the need for unified authority and coordinated security arrangements. He argued that the territory should be governed under a single political and legal framework, with security responsibilities consolidated under the Palestinian Authority in coordination with international partners. Mustafa stressed that fragmented control would undermine any effort to achieve stability.

He also called for the gradual disarmament of armed groups operating in Gaza and reiterated demands for a full Israeli military withdrawal from the territory. His remarks underscored the complex challenges facing any future settlement, particularly the need to balance security concerns with political legitimacy and reconstruction efforts.

As the conference proceeds, participants face the difficult task of translating broad diplomatic consensus into actionable steps. With violence ongoing and political divisions deepening, the path toward a comprehensive peace agreement appears increasingly uncertain. Nonetheless, the scale of international participation in Brussels reflects a continued, if strained, commitment to preventing further escalation and laying the groundwork for a more stable future in the region.

Original article