The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) United Front strategy in the 1920s is widely described by historians as a calculated effort to penetrate and influence a rival political organization. Figures including Mao Zedong, Li Dazhao, and Zhou Enlai operated within the Chinese Nationalist Party, or Kuomintang, while remaining under Communist Party direction.
Records of the period indicate that Sun Yat-sen, the founding leader of the Nationalist movement, had set clear conditions for cooperation with Soviet Russia and for the limited participation of Communist Party members. Those conditions, according to multiple historical accounts, were already being tested, and in some cases undermined, from the opening session of the Kuomintang’s first national congress in January 1924.
Scholars and researchers have also noted that the full text of the 1923 Sun-Joffe Joint Declaration, in which Sun expressed reservations about introducing communism into China, has rarely been reproduced in official narratives for decades.
Sun Yat-sen’s conditions for cooperation and the early fractures
The first Kuomintang national congress, held in Guangzhou in January 1924, formalized cooperation with Soviet Russia and allowed Communist Party members to join the party as individuals. In official Communist Party narratives, this arrangement has often been framed as an “alliance with Russia and the Communists.”
Some scholars, including historian Xin Haonian, have argued that this phrasing obscures Sun Yat-sen’s original formulation. According to their research, Sun’s actual position was closer to “alliance with Russia, tolerance of Communists,” with explicit constraints attached.
For the best of our weekly content！
You are now signed up for our newsletter
Check your email to complete sign up
In the Sun-Joffe Joint Declaration, signed with Soviet envoy Adolf Joffe in January 1923, Sun stated that the Soviet system and communism were not suitable for China’s conditions. He also called on the Soviet Union to refrain from supporting Mongolian independence and from maintaining military forces in Outer Mongolia.
For Communist Party members joining the Kuomintang, Sun required adherence to the Three Principles of the People and obedience to party discipline. He warned that any attempt to transform the Kuomintang into a vehicle for Communist goals would be resisted.
Subsequent developments suggest that these conditions proved difficult to enforce in practice.
Mao Zedong’s entry into the Kuomintang
Mao Zedong joined the Kuomintang in 1923, formally as an individual member. Contemporary accounts and later historical analyses indicate that he remained under the direction of the Chinese Communist Party while working within Nationalist structures.
Alongside other Communist leaders, including Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao, Mao participated in efforts to reshape the Kuomintang’s organizational framework. A joint proposal submitted to Sun Yat-sen called for the creation of centralized executive bodies in Shanghai and Guangzhou, designed to mobilize workers, students, and other social groups.
Afterward, Mao returned to Hunan province, where he worked to expand Kuomintang branch networks. In practice, this work appears to have overlapped with the expansion of Communist Party influence at the local level.
Interventions at the 1924 congress
At the Kuomintang’s first national congress in 1924, Mao served as a delegate from Hunan and participated in procedural debates that carried broader political implications.
One proposal, introduced by delegate Fang Ruilin, sought to prohibit party members from belonging to other political organizations. The measure would have directly affected individuals holding dual membership in both the Kuomintang and the Communist Party.
According to records of the proceedings, the proposal encountered immediate resistance. Mao intervened during the debate and called for a vote before further discussion could take place. The motion was defeated.
A second proposal, involving proportional representation in selecting central committee members, was also rejected after opposition from Mao and others. Critics at the time argued that such changes would have limited the influence of Soviet-aligned and Communist-affiliated delegates.
Mao was subsequently elected as an alternate member of the Kuomintang’s Central Executive Committee.
Control of organizational and propaganda structures
In early 1924, Mao moved to Shanghai and joined the Kuomintang’s Shanghai Executive Bureau, where he worked in the organizational department. Because senior leaders were frequently absent, day-to-day operations reportedly fell largely to him.
Later, in 1925, Mao relocated to Guangzhou and took on a more prominent role within the party’s propaganda apparatus. Wang Jingwei, then a leading figure in the National Government, recommended Mao as acting head of the Kuomintang’s propaganda department. The appointment was approved by the party’s central leadership.
From that position, Mao expanded the department’s authority. Directives required that ideological materials be reviewed centrally before distribution, and the department’s influence extended across multiple provinces.
He also oversaw the launch of Political Weekly, a publication that promoted revolutionary messaging under Kuomintang auspices.
Not all party figures supported these developments. Veteran Nationalist leader Ye Chucang publicly criticized Mao’s activities, reflecting broader internal divisions over the direction of the United Front.
Rising tensions within the Kuomintang
By late 1925, opposition within the Kuomintang had begun to coalesce. A group of senior figures convened in Beijing and issued resolutions calling for the removal of Communist Party members from key positions and for the termination of Soviet advisory influence.
These actions were quickly challenged by the Kuomintang’s left wing. A joint statement signed by leading figures, including Wang Jingwei and Mao, declared the meeting illegitimate. A subsequent party resolution condemned the dissenting group and reaffirmed cooperation with the Soviet Union.
The episode highlighted the growing polarization within the party, as competing factions struggled over its future direction.
The question of transparency
At the second Kuomintang national congress in January 1926, concerns about dual party membership resurfaced. Delegates raised complaints that Communist Party members within the Kuomintang were not disclosing their affiliations or activities.
Mao responded by arguing that party members should retain the freedom to join or leave political organizations without restriction. He also suggested that secrecy was necessary because the Communist Party lacked legal status at the time.
The debate underscored unresolved tensions over loyalty, transparency, and organizational control within the United Front framework.
Expansion of communist influence by 1927
By the time of the Northern Expedition, launched in 1926 to unify China, Communist influence within the Kuomintang had grown significantly. Contemporary estimates suggest that Communist Party members and their allies occupied a substantial share of positions within central party organs and administrative departments.
At the same time, Communist organizers were mobilizing rural populations through land reform campaigns, while Kuomintang military forces advanced northward against regional warlords.
In March 1927, Communist-led labor uprisings in Shanghai further intensified the situation. Observers at the time described the scale of worker mobilization as unprecedented, contributing to a sense of political instability in key urban centers.
The 1927 break
In April 1927, Chiang Kai-shek, a senior Kuomintang military leader, moved decisively against Communist forces in Shanghai. Backed by allied commanders including Bai Chongxi, Nationalist troops disarmed labor militias and arrested or executed large numbers of Communist activists.
The crackdown effectively dismantled the Communist Party’s urban organizational network and marked the collapse of the First United Front.
In response, Soviet authorities organized large-scale demonstrations condemning the actions as “white terror,” reflecting the international dimension of the conflict.
The legacy of the Sun-Joffe declaration
The Sun-Joffe Joint Declaration remains a key document for understanding the original terms of cooperation between Sun Yat-sen and Soviet representatives.
Some researchers have argued that its full text has not been widely circulated in official historical narratives, particularly sections expressing reservations about the applicability of communism in China.
Original article
Comments