By Gloria Ogbonna
During a Tuesday appearance on CNN News Central, Rep. Rich McCormick (R-GA) made clear that he would not consider U.S. operations involving Iran successful if the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz remains closed.
Speaking with co-host John Berman, McCormick was asked directly whether he would be satisfied with an end to American military efforts if the key waterway were still blocked. His response was firm: “No, of course not.”
McCormick argued that if the United States chooses to engage militarily, it must do so decisively rather than with limited or incremental measures. Drawing on military doctrine, he referenced lessons taught in command and staff schools, warfighting programs, and war colleges — emphasizing that prolonged conflicts often lose public support when objectives are pursued halfway.
According to McCormick, historical examples such as U.S. involvement in Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq demonstrate the dangers of half-measures. In his view, when operations are not carried out with clear and comprehensive goals, conflicts tend to drag on, eroding domestic backing and strategic effectiveness.
The congressman stressed the importance of reopening and securing the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints for global oil shipments. He stated that the U.S. has the capability to control the strait and other strategic assets, including Kharg Island, a major Iranian oil export terminal.
McCormick further claimed that decisive action could significantly weaken Iran’s ability to support allied militant groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis, as well as limit Tehran’s broader regional influence.
“We have the ability,” McCormick said, arguing that ensuring freedom of navigation and curbing Iran’s regional activities would serve both U.S. interests and global stability. He concluded that if the U.S. is engaged, it should “finish this” rather than leave objectives incomplete.
Earlier in the interview, McCormick also suggested that unpredictability can be a strategic advantage. From a military perspective, he said, it is often beneficial for adversaries to remain uncertain about future actions. He indicated that former President Donald Trump has at times announced multiple potential plans, which could serve as a way to keep opponents guessing.
McCormick added that he believes Trump’s broader strategy may involve applying pressure not only to Iran but also to U.S. allies, rather than signaling any intention to relinquish control of the Strait to Iranian forces.
The discussion reflects the continuing debate among U.S. lawmakers over how forcefully America should respond to tensions involving Iran and the broader Middle East, particularly when it comes to safeguarding global trade routes and maintaining regional deterrence.
Source Breitbart
Original article
Comments