Secretary of State points to behind-the-scenes progress while Iranian officials publicly deny direct negotiations.

By yourNEWS Media Newsroom

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday that private communications with Iranian representatives suggest a different tone than the country’s public statements, indicating that negotiations tied to the ongoing conflict may be advancing despite outward tensions.

Speaking in an interview, Rubio said Iranian officials have conveyed more conciliatory positions in private discussions than in their public messaging, according to remarks reported by The Hill.

“You have people over there that are saying some of the right things privately,” Rubio said, adding that public statements issued by Iranian leadership do not necessarily reflect the substance of ongoing conversations.

The conflict began in late February following coordinated U.S. and Israeli strikes targeting Iran’s leadership, including the death of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Leadership subsequently shifted to his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, whose public role has remained limited amid reports of uncertain health status.

Among Iranian officials publicly associated with the government’s response is Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the country’s parliament speaker, who has issued statements warning of expanded regional targeting in the event of further escalation. He has also been identified in reports as a potential figure connected to indirect negotiations.

Despite Rubio’s comments, Iranian officials have denied engaging in direct talks with the United States. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said Monday that Tehran has not participated in direct negotiations, describing ongoing meetings hosted in Pakistan as a separate regional initiative not involving Iran.

“We have had no direct negotiations with the United States so far,” Baghaei said, according to coverage from CNN.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly said negotiations with Iran are progressing, while also warning that failure to reach an agreement could result in further military action, including potential strikes on critical infrastructure.

The differing public and private messaging underscores the complexity of ongoing diplomatic efforts as military operations continue across the region. Officials have indicated that negotiations remain fluid, with both sides balancing strategic positioning and potential pathways toward de-escalation.

Original article